Loading…

Some Considerations on the Use of Actuarial and Related Forensic Measures With Diverse Correctional Populations

The appropriateness of the use of actuarial risk assessment instruments and related structured forensic measures with persons of diversity is a sensitive and contentious issue in clinical, legal, and correctional arenas. The Ewert v. Canada (2015) decision has brought close scrutiny to the use of th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of threat assessment and management 2016-06, Vol.3 (2), p.107-121
Main Author: Olver, Mark E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a1399-d830671f540851fc568ee816f6797c10fd0df2ad8f9dc28ccb313701d6b736073
cites
container_end_page 121
container_issue 2
container_start_page 107
container_title Journal of threat assessment and management
container_volume 3
creator Olver, Mark E.
description The appropriateness of the use of actuarial risk assessment instruments and related structured forensic measures with persons of diversity is a sensitive and contentious issue in clinical, legal, and correctional arenas. The Ewert v. Canada (2015) decision has brought close scrutiny to the use of these measures specifically with Indigenous persons in Canadian federal corrections. The November 2015 webinar Ewert v. Canada: Implications for Forensic Practice provided an important opportunity to discuss central issues and to examine the evidence. In this commentary, I review the evidence regarding the predictive properties of 4 structured forensic assessment measures among Indigenous offenders-the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised, Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender Version, Level of Service scales, and Statistical Information on Recidivism scales-drawing largely from Correctional Service of Canada data sources. I close with a set of conclusions and future directions regarding the practice of forensic assessment and use of structured assessment tools with persons of diversity. Although further work remains to be done, I advance the argument that available and forthcoming data support the careful and responsible application of actuarial and related structured tools in forensic assessment contexts with Canadian Indigenous offenders.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/tam0000065
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1833121409</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1833121409</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a1399-d830671f540851fc568ee816f6797c10fd0df2ad8f9dc28ccb313701d6b736073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE9LAzEQxYN_wFp78RMEvAmryWZ3kxxLtSpUFLV4DGkyoVu2zZpkhX57d6noXGZg3u8x8xC6pOSGEsZvk96SoaryCI1yWsmsECU5Rue0YExIkhNx8rco8jM0iXEzAJxLyskI-Xe_BTzzu1hbCDrV_YT9Dqc14GUE7B2emtTpUOsG653Fb9DoBBbPfYAeMvgZdOwCRPxZpzW-q78hxMExBDCDXc-9-rZrDt4X6NTpJsLkt4_Rcn7_MXvMFi8PT7PpItOUSZlZwUjFqSsLIkrqTFkJAEErV3HJDSXOEutybYWT1uTCmBWjjBNqqxVnFeFsjK4Ovm3wXx3EpDa-C_0xUVHBGM1pQWSvuj6oTPAxBnCqDfVWh72iRA0Bq_-A_8W61aqNe6NDqk0D0XT9r7s0aBVTeQ9y9gPl33rv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1833121409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some Considerations on the Use of Actuarial and Related Forensic Measures With Diverse Correctional Populations</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Olver, Mark E.</creator><contributor>Hart, Stephen D ; Haag, Andrew</contributor><creatorcontrib>Olver, Mark E. ; Hart, Stephen D ; Haag, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>The appropriateness of the use of actuarial risk assessment instruments and related structured forensic measures with persons of diversity is a sensitive and contentious issue in clinical, legal, and correctional arenas. The Ewert v. Canada (2015) decision has brought close scrutiny to the use of these measures specifically with Indigenous persons in Canadian federal corrections. The November 2015 webinar Ewert v. Canada: Implications for Forensic Practice provided an important opportunity to discuss central issues and to examine the evidence. In this commentary, I review the evidence regarding the predictive properties of 4 structured forensic assessment measures among Indigenous offenders-the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised, Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender Version, Level of Service scales, and Statistical Information on Recidivism scales-drawing largely from Correctional Service of Canada data sources. I close with a set of conclusions and future directions regarding the practice of forensic assessment and use of structured assessment tools with persons of diversity. Although further work remains to be done, I advance the argument that available and forthcoming data support the careful and responsible application of actuarial and related structured tools in forensic assessment contexts with Canadian Indigenous offenders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-4842</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1433890208</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781433890208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-4850</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/tam0000065</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Correctional Institutions ; Criminal Offenders ; Forensic Evaluation ; Human ; Indigenous Populations ; Risk Assessment</subject><ispartof>Journal of threat assessment and management, 2016-06, Vol.3 (2), p.107-121</ispartof><rights>2016 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2016, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a1399-d830671f540851fc568ee816f6797c10fd0df2ad8f9dc28ccb313701d6b736073</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Hart, Stephen D</contributor><contributor>Haag, Andrew</contributor><creatorcontrib>Olver, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><title>Some Considerations on the Use of Actuarial and Related Forensic Measures With Diverse Correctional Populations</title><title>Journal of threat assessment and management</title><description>The appropriateness of the use of actuarial risk assessment instruments and related structured forensic measures with persons of diversity is a sensitive and contentious issue in clinical, legal, and correctional arenas. The Ewert v. Canada (2015) decision has brought close scrutiny to the use of these measures specifically with Indigenous persons in Canadian federal corrections. The November 2015 webinar Ewert v. Canada: Implications for Forensic Practice provided an important opportunity to discuss central issues and to examine the evidence. In this commentary, I review the evidence regarding the predictive properties of 4 structured forensic assessment measures among Indigenous offenders-the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised, Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender Version, Level of Service scales, and Statistical Information on Recidivism scales-drawing largely from Correctional Service of Canada data sources. I close with a set of conclusions and future directions regarding the practice of forensic assessment and use of structured assessment tools with persons of diversity. Although further work remains to be done, I advance the argument that available and forthcoming data support the careful and responsible application of actuarial and related structured tools in forensic assessment contexts with Canadian Indigenous offenders.</description><subject>Correctional Institutions</subject><subject>Criminal Offenders</subject><subject>Forensic Evaluation</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Indigenous Populations</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><issn>2169-4842</issn><issn>2169-4850</issn><isbn>1433890208</isbn><isbn>9781433890208</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE9LAzEQxYN_wFp78RMEvAmryWZ3kxxLtSpUFLV4DGkyoVu2zZpkhX57d6noXGZg3u8x8xC6pOSGEsZvk96SoaryCI1yWsmsECU5Rue0YExIkhNx8rco8jM0iXEzAJxLyskI-Xe_BTzzu1hbCDrV_YT9Dqc14GUE7B2emtTpUOsG653Fb9DoBBbPfYAeMvgZdOwCRPxZpzW-q78hxMExBDCDXc-9-rZrDt4X6NTpJsLkt4_Rcn7_MXvMFi8PT7PpItOUSZlZwUjFqSsLIkrqTFkJAEErV3HJDSXOEutybYWT1uTCmBWjjBNqqxVnFeFsjK4Ovm3wXx3EpDa-C_0xUVHBGM1pQWSvuj6oTPAxBnCqDfVWh72iRA0Bq_-A_8W61aqNe6NDqk0D0XT9r7s0aBVTeQ9y9gPl33rv</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Olver, Mark E.</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Some Considerations on the Use of Actuarial and Related Forensic Measures With Diverse Correctional Populations</title><author>Olver, Mark E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a1399-d830671f540851fc568ee816f6797c10fd0df2ad8f9dc28ccb313701d6b736073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Correctional Institutions</topic><topic>Criminal Offenders</topic><topic>Forensic Evaluation</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Indigenous Populations</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olver, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of threat assessment and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olver, Mark E.</au><au>Hart, Stephen D</au><au>Haag, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some Considerations on the Use of Actuarial and Related Forensic Measures With Diverse Correctional Populations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of threat assessment and management</jtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>107-121</pages><issn>2169-4842</issn><eissn>2169-4850</eissn><isbn>1433890208</isbn><isbn>9781433890208</isbn><abstract>The appropriateness of the use of actuarial risk assessment instruments and related structured forensic measures with persons of diversity is a sensitive and contentious issue in clinical, legal, and correctional arenas. The Ewert v. Canada (2015) decision has brought close scrutiny to the use of these measures specifically with Indigenous persons in Canadian federal corrections. The November 2015 webinar Ewert v. Canada: Implications for Forensic Practice provided an important opportunity to discuss central issues and to examine the evidence. In this commentary, I review the evidence regarding the predictive properties of 4 structured forensic assessment measures among Indigenous offenders-the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised, Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender Version, Level of Service scales, and Statistical Information on Recidivism scales-drawing largely from Correctional Service of Canada data sources. I close with a set of conclusions and future directions regarding the practice of forensic assessment and use of structured assessment tools with persons of diversity. Although further work remains to be done, I advance the argument that available and forthcoming data support the careful and responsible application of actuarial and related structured tools in forensic assessment contexts with Canadian Indigenous offenders.</abstract><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/tam0000065</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-4842
ispartof Journal of threat assessment and management, 2016-06, Vol.3 (2), p.107-121
issn 2169-4842
2169-4850
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1833121409
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Correctional Institutions
Criminal Offenders
Forensic Evaluation
Human
Indigenous Populations
Risk Assessment
title Some Considerations on the Use of Actuarial and Related Forensic Measures With Diverse Correctional Populations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A47%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20Considerations%20on%20the%20Use%20of%20Actuarial%20and%20Related%20Forensic%20Measures%20With%20Diverse%20Correctional%20Populations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20threat%20assessment%20and%20management&rft.au=Olver,%20Mark%20E.&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=107-121&rft.issn=2169-4842&rft.eissn=2169-4850&rft.isbn=1433890208&rft.isbn_list=9781433890208&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/tam0000065&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1833121409%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a1399-d830671f540851fc568ee816f6797c10fd0df2ad8f9dc28ccb313701d6b736073%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1833121409&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true