Enhanced activation in face regions during false categorisation of Mooney images as faces

Results Four stimulus-response constellations were considered for analysis: i.e. upright stimuli recognized as faces ('hits', 83% of the trials) and non-faces ('misses', 14%), inverted-scrambled stimuli recognized as non-faces ('correct rejections', 82%) and classified...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2009-07, Vol.47, p.S85-S85
Main Authors: Genc, E., Gruetzner, C., Singer, W., Uhlhaas, P., Kohler, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
False alarms
Perceptions
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Results Four stimulus-response constellations were considered for analysis: i.e. upright stimuli recognized as faces ('hits', 83% of the trials) and non-faces ('misses', 14%), inverted-scrambled stimuli recognized as non-faces ('correct rejections', 82%) and classified as faces ('false alarms', 14%). [...]we found higher responses in these areas for false alarms rather than hits.
ISSN:1053-8119
1095-9572
DOI:10.1016/S1053-8119(09)70636-6