Loading…

Quantifying eroding head cut detachment through flume experiments and hydraulic thresholds analysis

Gully erosion is known as one of the most important environmental earth hazards in the world and especially in Iran where it is controlled by both environmental and human factors. This research has attempted to assess the effects of land use (LU) on gully hydraulic flow condition of head cut initiat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental earth sciences 2016-11, Vol.75 (21), p.1, Article 1424
Main Authors: Nazari Samani, Aliakbar, James Wasson, Robert, Rahdari, Mohammad Reza, Moeini, Abolfazl
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a409t-a1b608a5bfda8226e2bf423fe1e5761dcf5071705a15c2fda7edae60ccc784e03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a409t-a1b608a5bfda8226e2bf423fe1e5761dcf5071705a15c2fda7edae60ccc784e03
container_end_page
container_issue 21
container_start_page 1
container_title Environmental earth sciences
container_volume 75
creator Nazari Samani, Aliakbar
James Wasson, Robert
Rahdari, Mohammad Reza
Moeini, Abolfazl
description Gully erosion is known as one of the most important environmental earth hazards in the world and especially in Iran where it is controlled by both environmental and human factors. This research has attempted to assess the effects of land use (LU) on gully hydraulic flow condition of head cut initiation under similar soil conditions through an experimental field base plot (15 × 0.4 m). Results reveal that critical shear stresses ( τ cr ) for head cut initiation in abandoned, dry farming and rangeland, land are 174, 43 and 192 dyne/cm 2 , respectively, the remarkable differences being the consequence of soil surface condition (e.g., vegetation cover and micro-relief). Moreover, the flow turbulence and response of soil to an increase in flow condition (rate and depth) indicated a complicated behavior which can be addressed to the influences of surface micro-relief features and LU effects. Although a simple linear equation between τ cr and K c can be used to estimate the parameter, significant differences of regression coefficients decrease the general equation for whole data sets. The main explanation for dramatic (3–4 times) variations of τ cr is the vegetation cover and soil surface conditions. In fact, the significant decrease in τ cr under dry farming can be linked to the effect of tillage operation on aggregate strength and soil susceptibility. Findings showed that a boundary shear stress of 35 dyne/cm 2 used in some physically based models for predicting erosion is subjected to high uncertainty and not appropriate for estimation of gully development. In addition, the duration of land abandonment has a crucial influence on soil erodibility, a factor given little consideration in erosion models. For the prediction of gully erosion rate, it is recommended that a single erodibility parameter is created from the functional relationship between τ cr and K c . Due to the interaction of slope, flow regime, shear stress and type of ground cover, the relationship between head cut initiation and surface roughness varies. In addition, the Reynolds number is not a reliable parameter for estimation of surface roughness during head cut initiation. Therefore, for gully erosion modeling other hydraulic parameters should be used to produce a reliable model. For prediction of gully erosion rates a single erodibility parameter from the functional relationship between τ cr and K c could be used.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12665-016-6183-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1834759048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4235495491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a409t-a1b608a5bfda8226e2bf423fe1e5761dcf5071705a15c2fda7edae60ccc784e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouKz7A7wFPFcnaZu2R1n8ggUR9BzSZLLt0m3XpAH7702piBdzmYR53mHyEHLN4JYBFHeecSHyBJhIBCvTJD0jK1aK-OJVdf57L-GSbLw_QDwpSysQK6LfgurH1k5tv6foBjPXBpWhOozU4Kh0c8R-pGPjhrBvqO3CESl-ndC1c8NT1RvaTMap0LV65tA3Q2fmhuom3_orcmFV53HzU9fk4_Hhffuc7F6fXrb3u0RlUI2JYrWAUuW1NarkXCCvbcZTiwzzQjCjbQ4FKyBXLNc8QgUahQK01kWZIaRrcrPMPbnhM6Af5WEILi7hZbSSFXkFWRkptlDaDd47tPIUf6LcJBnIWadcdMqoU846ZRozfMn4yPZ7dH8m_xv6Bi_Aejw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1834759048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying eroding head cut detachment through flume experiments and hydraulic thresholds analysis</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Nazari Samani, Aliakbar ; James Wasson, Robert ; Rahdari, Mohammad Reza ; Moeini, Abolfazl</creator><creatorcontrib>Nazari Samani, Aliakbar ; James Wasson, Robert ; Rahdari, Mohammad Reza ; Moeini, Abolfazl</creatorcontrib><description>Gully erosion is known as one of the most important environmental earth hazards in the world and especially in Iran where it is controlled by both environmental and human factors. This research has attempted to assess the effects of land use (LU) on gully hydraulic flow condition of head cut initiation under similar soil conditions through an experimental field base plot (15 × 0.4 m). Results reveal that critical shear stresses ( τ cr ) for head cut initiation in abandoned, dry farming and rangeland, land are 174, 43 and 192 dyne/cm 2 , respectively, the remarkable differences being the consequence of soil surface condition (e.g., vegetation cover and micro-relief). Moreover, the flow turbulence and response of soil to an increase in flow condition (rate and depth) indicated a complicated behavior which can be addressed to the influences of surface micro-relief features and LU effects. Although a simple linear equation between τ cr and K c can be used to estimate the parameter, significant differences of regression coefficients decrease the general equation for whole data sets. The main explanation for dramatic (3–4 times) variations of τ cr is the vegetation cover and soil surface conditions. In fact, the significant decrease in τ cr under dry farming can be linked to the effect of tillage operation on aggregate strength and soil susceptibility. Findings showed that a boundary shear stress of 35 dyne/cm 2 used in some physically based models for predicting erosion is subjected to high uncertainty and not appropriate for estimation of gully development. In addition, the duration of land abandonment has a crucial influence on soil erodibility, a factor given little consideration in erosion models. For the prediction of gully erosion rate, it is recommended that a single erodibility parameter is created from the functional relationship between τ cr and K c . Due to the interaction of slope, flow regime, shear stress and type of ground cover, the relationship between head cut initiation and surface roughness varies. In addition, the Reynolds number is not a reliable parameter for estimation of surface roughness during head cut initiation. Therefore, for gully erosion modeling other hydraulic parameters should be used to produce a reliable model. For prediction of gully erosion rates a single erodibility parameter from the functional relationship between τ cr and K c could be used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-6280</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-6299</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12665-016-6183-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Abandoned land ; Biogeosciences ; Dryland farming ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental Science and Engineering ; Erosion rates ; Geochemistry ; Geology ; Ground cover ; Gullies ; Gully erosion ; Human factors ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Land use ; Original Article ; Rangelands ; Shear stress ; Soil erosion ; Soil surfaces ; Terrestrial Pollution ; Vegetation cover</subject><ispartof>Environmental earth sciences, 2016-11, Vol.75 (21), p.1, Article 1424</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a409t-a1b608a5bfda8226e2bf423fe1e5761dcf5071705a15c2fda7edae60ccc784e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a409t-a1b608a5bfda8226e2bf423fe1e5761dcf5071705a15c2fda7edae60ccc784e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nazari Samani, Aliakbar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James Wasson, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahdari, Mohammad Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeini, Abolfazl</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying eroding head cut detachment through flume experiments and hydraulic thresholds analysis</title><title>Environmental earth sciences</title><addtitle>Environ Earth Sci</addtitle><description>Gully erosion is known as one of the most important environmental earth hazards in the world and especially in Iran where it is controlled by both environmental and human factors. This research has attempted to assess the effects of land use (LU) on gully hydraulic flow condition of head cut initiation under similar soil conditions through an experimental field base plot (15 × 0.4 m). Results reveal that critical shear stresses ( τ cr ) for head cut initiation in abandoned, dry farming and rangeland, land are 174, 43 and 192 dyne/cm 2 , respectively, the remarkable differences being the consequence of soil surface condition (e.g., vegetation cover and micro-relief). Moreover, the flow turbulence and response of soil to an increase in flow condition (rate and depth) indicated a complicated behavior which can be addressed to the influences of surface micro-relief features and LU effects. Although a simple linear equation between τ cr and K c can be used to estimate the parameter, significant differences of regression coefficients decrease the general equation for whole data sets. The main explanation for dramatic (3–4 times) variations of τ cr is the vegetation cover and soil surface conditions. In fact, the significant decrease in τ cr under dry farming can be linked to the effect of tillage operation on aggregate strength and soil susceptibility. Findings showed that a boundary shear stress of 35 dyne/cm 2 used in some physically based models for predicting erosion is subjected to high uncertainty and not appropriate for estimation of gully development. In addition, the duration of land abandonment has a crucial influence on soil erodibility, a factor given little consideration in erosion models. For the prediction of gully erosion rate, it is recommended that a single erodibility parameter is created from the functional relationship between τ cr and K c . Due to the interaction of slope, flow regime, shear stress and type of ground cover, the relationship between head cut initiation and surface roughness varies. In addition, the Reynolds number is not a reliable parameter for estimation of surface roughness during head cut initiation. Therefore, for gully erosion modeling other hydraulic parameters should be used to produce a reliable model. For prediction of gully erosion rates a single erodibility parameter from the functional relationship between τ cr and K c could be used.</description><subject>Abandoned land</subject><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Dryland farming</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Science and Engineering</subject><subject>Erosion rates</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Ground cover</subject><subject>Gullies</subject><subject>Gully erosion</subject><subject>Human factors</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Rangelands</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soil surfaces</subject><subject>Terrestrial Pollution</subject><subject>Vegetation cover</subject><issn>1866-6280</issn><issn>1866-6299</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouKz7A7wFPFcnaZu2R1n8ggUR9BzSZLLt0m3XpAH7702piBdzmYR53mHyEHLN4JYBFHeecSHyBJhIBCvTJD0jK1aK-OJVdf57L-GSbLw_QDwpSysQK6LfgurH1k5tv6foBjPXBpWhOozU4Kh0c8R-pGPjhrBvqO3CESl-ndC1c8NT1RvaTMap0LV65tA3Q2fmhuom3_orcmFV53HzU9fk4_Hhffuc7F6fXrb3u0RlUI2JYrWAUuW1NarkXCCvbcZTiwzzQjCjbQ4FKyBXLNc8QgUahQK01kWZIaRrcrPMPbnhM6Af5WEILi7hZbSSFXkFWRkptlDaDd47tPIUf6LcJBnIWadcdMqoU846ZRozfMn4yPZ7dH8m_xv6Bi_Aejw</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Nazari Samani, Aliakbar</creator><creator>James Wasson, Robert</creator><creator>Rahdari, Mohammad Reza</creator><creator>Moeini, Abolfazl</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Quantifying eroding head cut detachment through flume experiments and hydraulic thresholds analysis</title><author>Nazari Samani, Aliakbar ; James Wasson, Robert ; Rahdari, Mohammad Reza ; Moeini, Abolfazl</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a409t-a1b608a5bfda8226e2bf423fe1e5761dcf5071705a15c2fda7edae60ccc784e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Abandoned land</topic><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Dryland farming</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Science and Engineering</topic><topic>Erosion rates</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Ground cover</topic><topic>Gullies</topic><topic>Gully erosion</topic><topic>Human factors</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Rangelands</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soil surfaces</topic><topic>Terrestrial Pollution</topic><topic>Vegetation cover</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nazari Samani, Aliakbar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James Wasson, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahdari, Mohammad Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeini, Abolfazl</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental earth sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nazari Samani, Aliakbar</au><au>James Wasson, Robert</au><au>Rahdari, Mohammad Reza</au><au>Moeini, Abolfazl</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying eroding head cut detachment through flume experiments and hydraulic thresholds analysis</atitle><jtitle>Environmental earth sciences</jtitle><stitle>Environ Earth Sci</stitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><artnum>1424</artnum><issn>1866-6280</issn><eissn>1866-6299</eissn><abstract>Gully erosion is known as one of the most important environmental earth hazards in the world and especially in Iran where it is controlled by both environmental and human factors. This research has attempted to assess the effects of land use (LU) on gully hydraulic flow condition of head cut initiation under similar soil conditions through an experimental field base plot (15 × 0.4 m). Results reveal that critical shear stresses ( τ cr ) for head cut initiation in abandoned, dry farming and rangeland, land are 174, 43 and 192 dyne/cm 2 , respectively, the remarkable differences being the consequence of soil surface condition (e.g., vegetation cover and micro-relief). Moreover, the flow turbulence and response of soil to an increase in flow condition (rate and depth) indicated a complicated behavior which can be addressed to the influences of surface micro-relief features and LU effects. Although a simple linear equation between τ cr and K c can be used to estimate the parameter, significant differences of regression coefficients decrease the general equation for whole data sets. The main explanation for dramatic (3–4 times) variations of τ cr is the vegetation cover and soil surface conditions. In fact, the significant decrease in τ cr under dry farming can be linked to the effect of tillage operation on aggregate strength and soil susceptibility. Findings showed that a boundary shear stress of 35 dyne/cm 2 used in some physically based models for predicting erosion is subjected to high uncertainty and not appropriate for estimation of gully development. In addition, the duration of land abandonment has a crucial influence on soil erodibility, a factor given little consideration in erosion models. For the prediction of gully erosion rate, it is recommended that a single erodibility parameter is created from the functional relationship between τ cr and K c . Due to the interaction of slope, flow regime, shear stress and type of ground cover, the relationship between head cut initiation and surface roughness varies. In addition, the Reynolds number is not a reliable parameter for estimation of surface roughness during head cut initiation. Therefore, for gully erosion modeling other hydraulic parameters should be used to produce a reliable model. For prediction of gully erosion rates a single erodibility parameter from the functional relationship between τ cr and K c could be used.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12665-016-6183-3</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1866-6280
ispartof Environmental earth sciences, 2016-11, Vol.75 (21), p.1, Article 1424
issn 1866-6280
1866-6299
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1834759048
source Springer Nature
subjects Abandoned land
Biogeosciences
Dryland farming
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Environmental Science and Engineering
Erosion rates
Geochemistry
Geology
Ground cover
Gullies
Gully erosion
Human factors
Hydrology/Water Resources
Land use
Original Article
Rangelands
Shear stress
Soil erosion
Soil surfaces
Terrestrial Pollution
Vegetation cover
title Quantifying eroding head cut detachment through flume experiments and hydraulic thresholds analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A30%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20eroding%20head%20cut%20detachment%20through%20flume%20experiments%20and%20hydraulic%20thresholds%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20earth%20sciences&rft.au=Nazari%20Samani,%20Aliakbar&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.artnum=1424&rft.issn=1866-6280&rft.eissn=1866-6299&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12665-016-6183-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4235495491%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a409t-a1b608a5bfda8226e2bf423fe1e5761dcf5071705a15c2fda7edae60ccc784e03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1834759048&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true