Trust and Decision‐making in Times of Crisis: The EU's Response to the Events in Ukraine

It is a common assumption that through decades of co‐operation there has been an emergence of trust between the Member States of the European Union. Yet, we have little evidence about the nature of trust and its implications for decision‐making, in particular in times of crisis. Hence, our article&#...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of common market studies 2017-01, Vol.55 (1), p.54-70
Main Authors: Natorski, Michal, Pomorska, Karolina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Annexation
Crises
Decision making
Economic theory
European foreign policy
Institution building
International relations
Politics
power
Russia
Sanctions
Studies
Trust
Ukraine
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:It is a common assumption that through decades of co‐operation there has been an emergence of trust between the Member States of the European Union. Yet, we have little evidence about the nature of trust and its implications for decision‐making, in particular in times of crisis. Hence, our article's central question: how does trust matter in the process of decision‐making during crisis? Our argument is that uncertainty during the crisis enabled trust‐building between the actors: Member States and European institutions. In the case of the Ukrainian crisis, this happened in parallel to the decreasing levels of trust in EU–Russia relations. Consequently, the EU was able to agree and implement the instruments of coercive power. To illustrate our argument, we look at the adoption of EU sanctions in reaction to the annexation of Crimea, the downing of the Malaysian Airlines MH17 plane and the war in Donbass.
ISSN:0021-9886
1468-5965
DOI:10.1111/jcms.12445