Refusing to take part in euthanasia

THIS series gives readers the opportunity to consider and contribute to discussion of some of the ethical dilemmas that can arise in veterinary practice. Each month, a case scenario is presented, followed by discussion of some of the issues involved.In addition, a possible way forward is suggested;...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:In practice (London 1979) 2016-05, Vol.38 (5), p.253-254
Main Author: Magalhães-Sant'Ana, Manuel
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:THIS series gives readers the opportunity to consider and contribute to discussion of some of the ethical dilemmas that can arise in veterinary practice. Each month, a case scenario is presented, followed by discussion of some of the issues involved.In addition, a possible way forward is suggested; however, there is rarely a cut-and-dried answer in such cases, and readers may wish to suggest an alternative approach. This month's dilemma, ‘Refusing to take part in euthanasia’, was submitted and is discussed by Manuel Magalhães-Sant'Ana. Readers with comments to contribute are invited to send them as soon as possible, so that they can be considered for publication in the next issue. Discussion of the dilemma ‘Too feral to save?’, which was published in the April issue of In Practice, appears on page 254.The series is being coordinated by Steven McCulloch, a practising vet with a PhD in the ethics of veterinary policy. It is hoped it will provide a framework that will help practitioners find solutions when facing similar dilemmas.
ISSN:0263-841X
2042-7689
DOI:10.1136/inp.i1959