Loading…

Major Parts of Speech

According to the contemporary consensus, when reaching in the lexicon grammar looks for items like nouns, verbs, and prepositions while logic sees items like predicates, connectives, and quantifiers. In fact, there doesn't seem to be a single lexical category contemporary grammar and logic both...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Erkenntnis 2015-03, Vol.80 (Suppl 1), p.3-29
Main Author: Szabó, Zoltán Gendler
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ef212d683da863d61f74af40dd1a45f143d5122ef14e7846c16563b16b64eb183
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ef212d683da863d61f74af40dd1a45f143d5122ef14e7846c16563b16b64eb183
container_end_page 29
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Erkenntnis
container_volume 80
creator Szabó, Zoltán Gendler
description According to the contemporary consensus, when reaching in the lexicon grammar looks for items like nouns, verbs, and prepositions while logic sees items like predicates, connectives, and quantifiers. In fact, there doesn't seem to be a single lexical category contemporary grammar and logic both make use of. I hope to show that while a perfect match between the lexical categories of grammar and logic is impossible there can be a substantial overlap. I propose semantic definitions for all the major parts of speech (noun, verb, adjective, and adverb). I argue that the differences among these categories can be captured in terms of distinctions recognized in logic (referring expression vs. predicate, constant vs. variable).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10670-014-9658-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1865246994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24735019</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24735019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ef212d683da863d61f74af40dd1a45f143d5122ef14e7846c16563b16b64eb183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j81LAzEQxYMoWKtHDx6EgufoTD4m2aMUq0JFQT2HdDdRF-2uyfbgf2_KinjyNAPzfu_NY-wE4RwBzEVGIAMcUPGKtOW4wyaojeBWCdhlE0DS5Qq0zw5ybqEwyuCEHd_5tkuzB5-GPOvi7LEPoX49ZHvRv-dw9DOn7Hlx9TS_4cv769v55ZLXUtqBhyhQNGRl4y3JhjAa5aOCpkGvdEQlG41ChLIFYxXV5QmSK6QVqbBCK6fsbPTtU_e5CXlwbbdJ6xLp0JIWiqpKFRWOqjp1OacQXZ_ePnz6cghu296N7V1p77btHRZGjEwu2vVLSH-c_4FOR6jNQ5d-U4QyUgNW8htWd2LU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865246994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Major Parts of Speech</title><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Szabó, Zoltán Gendler</creator><creatorcontrib>Szabó, Zoltán Gendler</creatorcontrib><description>According to the contemporary consensus, when reaching in the lexicon grammar looks for items like nouns, verbs, and prepositions while logic sees items like predicates, connectives, and quantifiers. In fact, there doesn't seem to be a single lexical category contemporary grammar and logic both make use of. I hope to show that while a perfect match between the lexical categories of grammar and logic is impossible there can be a substantial overlap. I propose semantic definitions for all the major parts of speech (noun, verb, adjective, and adverb). I argue that the differences among these categories can be captured in terms of distinctions recognized in logic (referring expression vs. predicate, constant vs. variable).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8420</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10670-014-9658-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Education ; Epistemology ; Ethics ; Grammar ; Logic ; Ontology ; Philosophy ; Speech</subject><ispartof>Erkenntnis, 2015-03, Vol.80 (Suppl 1), p.3-29</ispartof><rights>2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><rights>Erkenntnis is a copyright of Springer, 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ef212d683da863d61f74af40dd1a45f143d5122ef14e7846c16563b16b64eb183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ef212d683da863d61f74af40dd1a45f143d5122ef14e7846c16563b16b64eb183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1865246994/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1865246994?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12861,27924,27925,34775,44200,58238,58471,74728</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Szabó, Zoltán Gendler</creatorcontrib><title>Major Parts of Speech</title><title>Erkenntnis</title><addtitle>Erkenn</addtitle><description>According to the contemporary consensus, when reaching in the lexicon grammar looks for items like nouns, verbs, and prepositions while logic sees items like predicates, connectives, and quantifiers. In fact, there doesn't seem to be a single lexical category contemporary grammar and logic both make use of. I hope to show that while a perfect match between the lexical categories of grammar and logic is impossible there can be a substantial overlap. I propose semantic definitions for all the major parts of speech (noun, verb, adjective, and adverb). I argue that the differences among these categories can be captured in terms of distinctions recognized in logic (referring expression vs. predicate, constant vs. variable).</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Speech</subject><issn>0165-0106</issn><issn>1572-8420</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNp9j81LAzEQxYMoWKtHDx6EgufoTD4m2aMUq0JFQT2HdDdRF-2uyfbgf2_KinjyNAPzfu_NY-wE4RwBzEVGIAMcUPGKtOW4wyaojeBWCdhlE0DS5Qq0zw5ybqEwyuCEHd_5tkuzB5-GPOvi7LEPoX49ZHvRv-dw9DOn7Hlx9TS_4cv769v55ZLXUtqBhyhQNGRl4y3JhjAa5aOCpkGvdEQlG41ChLIFYxXV5QmSK6QVqbBCK6fsbPTtU_e5CXlwbbdJ6xLp0JIWiqpKFRWOqjp1OacQXZ_ePnz6cghu296N7V1p77btHRZGjEwu2vVLSH-c_4FOR6jNQ5d-U4QyUgNW8htWd2LU</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Szabó, Zoltán Gendler</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Major Parts of Speech</title><author>Szabó, Zoltán Gendler</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ef212d683da863d61f74af40dd1a45f143d5122ef14e7846c16563b16b64eb183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Speech</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Szabó, Zoltán Gendler</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Erkenntnis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Szabó, Zoltán Gendler</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Major Parts of Speech</atitle><jtitle>Erkenntnis</jtitle><stitle>Erkenn</stitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>3-29</pages><issn>0165-0106</issn><eissn>1572-8420</eissn><abstract>According to the contemporary consensus, when reaching in the lexicon grammar looks for items like nouns, verbs, and prepositions while logic sees items like predicates, connectives, and quantifiers. In fact, there doesn't seem to be a single lexical category contemporary grammar and logic both make use of. I hope to show that while a perfect match between the lexical categories of grammar and logic is impossible there can be a substantial overlap. I propose semantic definitions for all the major parts of speech (noun, verb, adjective, and adverb). I argue that the differences among these categories can be captured in terms of distinctions recognized in logic (referring expression vs. predicate, constant vs. variable).</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10670-014-9658-1</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0106
ispartof Erkenntnis, 2015-03, Vol.80 (Suppl 1), p.3-29
issn 0165-0106
1572-8420
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1865246994
source Art, Design and Architecture Collection; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Nature
subjects Education
Epistemology
Ethics
Grammar
Logic
Ontology
Philosophy
Speech
title Major Parts of Speech
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A26%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Major%20Parts%20of%20Speech&rft.jtitle=Erkenntnis&rft.au=Szab%C3%B3,%20Zolt%C3%A1n%20Gendler&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=3-29&rft.issn=0165-0106&rft.eissn=1572-8420&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10670-014-9658-1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24735019%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ef212d683da863d61f74af40dd1a45f143d5122ef14e7846c16563b16b64eb183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865246994&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24735019&rfr_iscdi=true