Loading…
Major Parts of Speech
According to the contemporary consensus, when reaching in the lexicon grammar looks for items like nouns, verbs, and prepositions while logic sees items like predicates, connectives, and quantifiers. In fact, there doesn't seem to be a single lexical category contemporary grammar and logic both...
Saved in:
Published in: | Erkenntnis 2015-03, Vol.80 (Suppl 1), p.3-29 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ef212d683da863d61f74af40dd1a45f143d5122ef14e7846c16563b16b64eb183 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ef212d683da863d61f74af40dd1a45f143d5122ef14e7846c16563b16b64eb183 |
container_end_page | 29 |
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | Erkenntnis |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | Szabó, Zoltán Gendler |
description | According to the contemporary consensus, when reaching in the lexicon grammar looks for items like nouns, verbs, and prepositions while logic sees items like predicates, connectives, and quantifiers. In fact, there doesn't seem to be a single lexical category contemporary grammar and logic both make use of. I hope to show that while a perfect match between the lexical categories of grammar and logic is impossible there can be a substantial overlap. I propose semantic definitions for all the major parts of speech (noun, verb, adjective, and adverb). I argue that the differences among these categories can be captured in terms of distinctions recognized in logic (referring expression vs. predicate, constant vs. variable). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10670-014-9658-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1865246994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24735019</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24735019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ef212d683da863d61f74af40dd1a45f143d5122ef14e7846c16563b16b64eb183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j81LAzEQxYMoWKtHDx6EgufoTD4m2aMUq0JFQT2HdDdRF-2uyfbgf2_KinjyNAPzfu_NY-wE4RwBzEVGIAMcUPGKtOW4wyaojeBWCdhlE0DS5Qq0zw5ybqEwyuCEHd_5tkuzB5-GPOvi7LEPoX49ZHvRv-dw9DOn7Hlx9TS_4cv769v55ZLXUtqBhyhQNGRl4y3JhjAa5aOCpkGvdEQlG41ChLIFYxXV5QmSK6QVqbBCK6fsbPTtU_e5CXlwbbdJ6xLp0JIWiqpKFRWOqjp1OacQXZ_ePnz6cghu296N7V1p77btHRZGjEwu2vVLSH-c_4FOR6jNQ5d-U4QyUgNW8htWd2LU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865246994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Major Parts of Speech</title><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Szabó, Zoltán Gendler</creator><creatorcontrib>Szabó, Zoltán Gendler</creatorcontrib><description>According to the contemporary consensus, when reaching in the lexicon grammar looks for items like nouns, verbs, and prepositions while logic sees items like predicates, connectives, and quantifiers. In fact, there doesn't seem to be a single lexical category contemporary grammar and logic both make use of. I hope to show that while a perfect match between the lexical categories of grammar and logic is impossible there can be a substantial overlap. I propose semantic definitions for all the major parts of speech (noun, verb, adjective, and adverb). I argue that the differences among these categories can be captured in terms of distinctions recognized in logic (referring expression vs. predicate, constant vs. variable).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8420</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10670-014-9658-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Education ; Epistemology ; Ethics ; Grammar ; Logic ; Ontology ; Philosophy ; Speech</subject><ispartof>Erkenntnis, 2015-03, Vol.80 (Suppl 1), p.3-29</ispartof><rights>2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><rights>Erkenntnis is a copyright of Springer, 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ef212d683da863d61f74af40dd1a45f143d5122ef14e7846c16563b16b64eb183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ef212d683da863d61f74af40dd1a45f143d5122ef14e7846c16563b16b64eb183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1865246994/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1865246994?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12861,27924,27925,34775,44200,58238,58471,74728</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Szabó, Zoltán Gendler</creatorcontrib><title>Major Parts of Speech</title><title>Erkenntnis</title><addtitle>Erkenn</addtitle><description>According to the contemporary consensus, when reaching in the lexicon grammar looks for items like nouns, verbs, and prepositions while logic sees items like predicates, connectives, and quantifiers. In fact, there doesn't seem to be a single lexical category contemporary grammar and logic both make use of. I hope to show that while a perfect match between the lexical categories of grammar and logic is impossible there can be a substantial overlap. I propose semantic definitions for all the major parts of speech (noun, verb, adjective, and adverb). I argue that the differences among these categories can be captured in terms of distinctions recognized in logic (referring expression vs. predicate, constant vs. variable).</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Speech</subject><issn>0165-0106</issn><issn>1572-8420</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNp9j81LAzEQxYMoWKtHDx6EgufoTD4m2aMUq0JFQT2HdDdRF-2uyfbgf2_KinjyNAPzfu_NY-wE4RwBzEVGIAMcUPGKtOW4wyaojeBWCdhlE0DS5Qq0zw5ybqEwyuCEHd_5tkuzB5-GPOvi7LEPoX49ZHvRv-dw9DOn7Hlx9TS_4cv769v55ZLXUtqBhyhQNGRl4y3JhjAa5aOCpkGvdEQlG41ChLIFYxXV5QmSK6QVqbBCK6fsbPTtU_e5CXlwbbdJ6xLp0JIWiqpKFRWOqjp1OacQXZ_ePnz6cghu296N7V1p77btHRZGjEwu2vVLSH-c_4FOR6jNQ5d-U4QyUgNW8htWd2LU</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Szabó, Zoltán Gendler</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Major Parts of Speech</title><author>Szabó, Zoltán Gendler</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ef212d683da863d61f74af40dd1a45f143d5122ef14e7846c16563b16b64eb183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Speech</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Szabó, Zoltán Gendler</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Erkenntnis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Szabó, Zoltán Gendler</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Major Parts of Speech</atitle><jtitle>Erkenntnis</jtitle><stitle>Erkenn</stitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>3-29</pages><issn>0165-0106</issn><eissn>1572-8420</eissn><abstract>According to the contemporary consensus, when reaching in the lexicon grammar looks for items like nouns, verbs, and prepositions while logic sees items like predicates, connectives, and quantifiers. In fact, there doesn't seem to be a single lexical category contemporary grammar and logic both make use of. I hope to show that while a perfect match between the lexical categories of grammar and logic is impossible there can be a substantial overlap. I propose semantic definitions for all the major parts of speech (noun, verb, adjective, and adverb). I argue that the differences among these categories can be captured in terms of distinctions recognized in logic (referring expression vs. predicate, constant vs. variable).</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10670-014-9658-1</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0106 |
ispartof | Erkenntnis, 2015-03, Vol.80 (Suppl 1), p.3-29 |
issn | 0165-0106 1572-8420 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1865246994 |
source | Art, Design and Architecture Collection; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Nature |
subjects | Education Epistemology Ethics Grammar Logic Ontology Philosophy Speech |
title | Major Parts of Speech |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A26%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Major%20Parts%20of%20Speech&rft.jtitle=Erkenntnis&rft.au=Szab%C3%B3,%20Zolt%C3%A1n%20Gendler&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=3-29&rft.issn=0165-0106&rft.eissn=1572-8420&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10670-014-9658-1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24735019%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ef212d683da863d61f74af40dd1a45f143d5122ef14e7846c16563b16b64eb183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865246994&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24735019&rfr_iscdi=true |