An Empirical Assessment of the Sensitivity of Mixture Models to Changes in Measurement

This study explored the extent to which variations in self-report measures across studies can produce differences in the results obtained from mixture models. Data (N = 854) come from a laboratory analogue study of methods for creating commensurate scores of alcohol- and substance-use-related constr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Structural equation modeling 2017-03, Vol.24 (2), p.159-179
Main Authors: Cole, Veronica T., Bauer, Daniel J., Hussong, Andrea M., Giordano, Michael L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Alcohol
factor mixture models
Latent class analysis
Measurement
mixture models
Self report
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study explored the extent to which variations in self-report measures across studies can produce differences in the results obtained from mixture models. Data (N = 854) come from a laboratory analogue study of methods for creating commensurate scores of alcohol- and substance-use-related constructs when items differ systematically across participants for any given measure. Items were manipulated according to 4 conditions, corresponding to increasing levels of alteration to item stems, response options, or both. In Study 1, results from latent class analyses (LCAs) of alcohol consequences were compared across the 4 conditions, revealing differences in class enumeration and configuration. In Study 2, results from factor mixture models (FMMs) of alcohol expectancies were compared across 2 of the conditions, revealing differences in patterns and magnitude of the factor loadings and thresholds. The results suggest that even subtle differences in measurement can have substantively meaningful effects on mixture model results.
ISSN:1070-5511
1532-8007
DOI:10.1080/10705511.2016.1257354