A Deeper Defense of the Deep Rationality Theory of Wisdom: A Reply to Fileva and Tresan

In their paper, BWisdom Beyond Rationality: A Reply to Ryan,^ Iskra Fileva and Jon Tresan (2013) pose serious challenges to my Deep Rationality Theory of Wisdom (Ryan 2012). They ask for a more illuminating characterization of the notion of rationality at work in my theory, and they argue that regar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta analytica : philosophy and psychology 2017-03, Vol.32 (1), p.115-123
Main Author: Ryan, Sharon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Education
Epistemology
Logic
Metaphysics
Philosophy
Philosophy of Mind
Rationality
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In their paper, BWisdom Beyond Rationality: A Reply to Ryan,^ Iskra Fileva and Jon Tresan (2013) pose serious challenges to my Deep Rationality Theory of Wisdom (Ryan 2012). They ask for a more illuminating characterization of the notion of rationality at work in my theory, and they argue that regardless of how I clarify what I mean by rationality, it is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for wisdom. Obviously, if they are correct, the Deep Rationality Theory of Wisdom is seriously flawed.
ISSN:0353-5150
1874-6349
DOI:10.1007/s12136-016-0291-2