The role of dual categorization and relative ingroup prototypicality in reparations to a minority group: An examination of empathy and collective guilt as mediators

• Published in: Asian journal of social psychology 2017-01, Vol.20 (1), p.33-44
• Main Authors: Mashuri, Ali, Zaduqisti, Esti, Alroy‐Thiberge, Daphne
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Attitudes; Christians; Classification; collective guilt; dual categorization; Empathy; Group identity; Guilt; Muslims; Payments; relative ingroup prototypicality; reparation attitude; reparation intention; Social psychology; Strategies
• ISSN: 1367-2223; 1467-839X
• DOI: 10.1111/ajsp.12163

In the current study, we investigate factors that facilitate or otherwise obstruct reparations of a perpetrating group (i.e. Muslims) to a victim group (i.e. Christians). The study (N = 200) reveals that among Muslim participants, the role of dual Abrahamic categorization in positively predicting reparation attitude towards Christians was mediated by the first group's prosocial emotions of empathy and collective guilt towards the latter group. In addition, relative Muslim prototypicality negatively predicted dual Abrahamic categorization and each of the two prosocial emotions. Empathy and collective guilt in turn mediated the role of relative ingroup prototypicality in negatively predicting reparation attitude. Moreover, as hypothesized, we found that the roles of empathy and collective guilt in predicting reparation intention, as manifested in participants' willingness to engage in collective action on behalf of the victim group, were not significant on their own, but were mediated by reparation attitude. These findings shed light on the importance of the relationship between the perpetrating group's shared identity with the victim group, reduced ingroup focus and its support for making reparations to the victim group. Theoretical implications, study limitations and practical strategies highlighting how to decrease relative Muslim prototypicality are discussed.