Loading…

The Attribution of Navigational- and Goal-Directed Agency in Dogs (Canis familiaris) and Human Toddlers (Homo sapiens)

Both human infants and nonhuman primates can recognize unfamiliar entities as instrumental agents ascribing to them goals and efficiency of goal-pursuit. This competence relies on movement cues indicating distal sensitivity to the environment and choice of efficient goal-approach. Although dogs'...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of comparative psychology (1983) 2017-02, Vol.131 (1), p.1-9
Main Authors: Tauzin, Tibor, Csík, Andor, Lovas, Kata, Gergely, György, Topál, József
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-b6d5aceafe662a1396cb90b2972b3dc0c8974dd394b48aed02ee30ccc136f0113
cites
container_end_page 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of comparative psychology (1983)
container_volume 131
creator Tauzin, Tibor
Csík, Andor
Lovas, Kata
Gergely, György
Topál, József
description Both human infants and nonhuman primates can recognize unfamiliar entities as instrumental agents ascribing to them goals and efficiency of goal-pursuit. This competence relies on movement cues indicating distal sensitivity to the environment and choice of efficient goal-approach. Although dogs' evolved sensitivity to social cues allow them to recognize humans as communicative agents, it remains unclear whether they have also evolved a basic concept of instrumental agency. We used a preferential object-choice procedure to test whether adult pet dogs and human toddlers can identify unfamiliar entities as agents based on different types of movement cues that specify different levels of agency. In the navigational agency condition, dogs preferentially chose an object that modified its pathway to avoid collision with obstacles over another object showing no evidence of distal sensitivity (regularly bumping into obstacles). However, in the goal-efficiency condition where neither object collided with obstacles as it navigated toward a distal target, but only 1 of them exhibited efficient goal-approach as well, toddlers, but not dogs, showed a preference toward the efficient goal-directed agent. These findings indicate that dogs possess a limited concept of environmentally sensitive navigational agency that they attribute to self-propelled entities capable of modifying their movement to avoid colliding with obstacles. Toddlers, in contrast, demonstrated clear sensitivity to cues of efficient variability of goal-approach as the basis for differentiating, attributing, and showing preference for goal-directed instrumental agency.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/com0000053
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1868943245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4314721211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-b6d5aceafe662a1396cb90b2972b3dc0c8974dd394b48aed02ee30ccc136f0113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQgIMoOKcv_oKALypUk6ZNm8ex6SYMfZnP4ZqkM6NtatIO9u9tnbBH7x7uDr47uA-hW0qeKGHZs3I1GSNlZ2hCBRNRTPLsHE1IxtIoI4xfoqsQdgPCaZJN0H7zZfCs67wt-s66BrsSv8PebmGcoIowNBov3dAtrDeqMxrPtqZRB2wbvHDbgO_n0NiAS6htZcHb8PC7s-praPDGaV0ZP1ArVzscoLWmCQ_X6KKEKpibvzpFn68vm_kqWn8s3-azdQQJTbqo4DoFZaA0nMdAmeCqEKSIRRYXTCuicpElWjORFEkORpPYGEaUUpTxklDKpujueLf17rs3oZM71_vhryBpznORsDhJ_6H4wJDB3xQ9HinlXQjelLL1tgZ_kJTI0b482T_B0IJsw0GB76yqTFC996bpRlZSRuWQ7AcSEIXJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1866324007</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Attribution of Navigational- and Goal-Directed Agency in Dogs (Canis familiaris) and Human Toddlers (Homo sapiens)</title><source>PsycARTICLES via EBSCO</source><creator>Tauzin, Tibor ; Csík, Andor ; Lovas, Kata ; Gergely, György ; Topál, József</creator><contributor>Call, Josep ; Fragaszy, Dorothy M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tauzin, Tibor ; Csík, Andor ; Lovas, Kata ; Gergely, György ; Topál, József ; Call, Josep ; Fragaszy, Dorothy M</creatorcontrib><description>Both human infants and nonhuman primates can recognize unfamiliar entities as instrumental agents ascribing to them goals and efficiency of goal-pursuit. This competence relies on movement cues indicating distal sensitivity to the environment and choice of efficient goal-approach. Although dogs' evolved sensitivity to social cues allow them to recognize humans as communicative agents, it remains unclear whether they have also evolved a basic concept of instrumental agency. We used a preferential object-choice procedure to test whether adult pet dogs and human toddlers can identify unfamiliar entities as agents based on different types of movement cues that specify different levels of agency. In the navigational agency condition, dogs preferentially chose an object that modified its pathway to avoid collision with obstacles over another object showing no evidence of distal sensitivity (regularly bumping into obstacles). However, in the goal-efficiency condition where neither object collided with obstacles as it navigated toward a distal target, but only 1 of them exhibited efficient goal-approach as well, toddlers, but not dogs, showed a preference toward the efficient goal-directed agent. These findings indicate that dogs possess a limited concept of environmentally sensitive navigational agency that they attribute to self-propelled entities capable of modifying their movement to avoid colliding with obstacles. Toddlers, in contrast, demonstrated clear sensitivity to cues of efficient variability of goal-approach as the basis for differentiating, attributing, and showing preference for goal-directed instrumental agency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2087</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/com0000053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Agency ; Animal ; Attribution ; Babies ; Child Characteristics ; Comparative analysis ; Dogs ; Female ; Goal Orientation ; Goals ; Human ; Male ; Primates ; Psychology</subject><ispartof>Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 2017-02, Vol.131 (1), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>2017 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2017, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-b6d5aceafe662a1396cb90b2972b3dc0c8974dd394b48aed02ee30ccc136f0113</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Call, Josep</contributor><contributor>Fragaszy, Dorothy M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tauzin, Tibor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csík, Andor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovas, Kata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gergely, György</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topál, József</creatorcontrib><title>The Attribution of Navigational- and Goal-Directed Agency in Dogs (Canis familiaris) and Human Toddlers (Homo sapiens)</title><title>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</title><description>Both human infants and nonhuman primates can recognize unfamiliar entities as instrumental agents ascribing to them goals and efficiency of goal-pursuit. This competence relies on movement cues indicating distal sensitivity to the environment and choice of efficient goal-approach. Although dogs' evolved sensitivity to social cues allow them to recognize humans as communicative agents, it remains unclear whether they have also evolved a basic concept of instrumental agency. We used a preferential object-choice procedure to test whether adult pet dogs and human toddlers can identify unfamiliar entities as agents based on different types of movement cues that specify different levels of agency. In the navigational agency condition, dogs preferentially chose an object that modified its pathway to avoid collision with obstacles over another object showing no evidence of distal sensitivity (regularly bumping into obstacles). However, in the goal-efficiency condition where neither object collided with obstacles as it navigated toward a distal target, but only 1 of them exhibited efficient goal-approach as well, toddlers, but not dogs, showed a preference toward the efficient goal-directed agent. These findings indicate that dogs possess a limited concept of environmentally sensitive navigational agency that they attribute to self-propelled entities capable of modifying their movement to avoid colliding with obstacles. Toddlers, in contrast, demonstrated clear sensitivity to cues of efficient variability of goal-approach as the basis for differentiating, attributing, and showing preference for goal-directed instrumental agency.</description><subject>Agency</subject><subject>Animal</subject><subject>Attribution</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Child Characteristics</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Goal Orientation</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><issn>0735-7036</issn><issn>1939-2087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQgIMoOKcv_oKALypUk6ZNm8ex6SYMfZnP4ZqkM6NtatIO9u9tnbBH7x7uDr47uA-hW0qeKGHZs3I1GSNlZ2hCBRNRTPLsHE1IxtIoI4xfoqsQdgPCaZJN0H7zZfCs67wt-s66BrsSv8PebmGcoIowNBov3dAtrDeqMxrPtqZRB2wbvHDbgO_n0NiAS6htZcHb8PC7s-praPDGaV0ZP1ArVzscoLWmCQ_X6KKEKpibvzpFn68vm_kqWn8s3-azdQQJTbqo4DoFZaA0nMdAmeCqEKSIRRYXTCuicpElWjORFEkORpPYGEaUUpTxklDKpujueLf17rs3oZM71_vhryBpznORsDhJ_6H4wJDB3xQ9HinlXQjelLL1tgZ_kJTI0b482T_B0IJsw0GB76yqTFC996bpRlZSRuWQ7AcSEIXJ</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Tauzin, Tibor</creator><creator>Csík, Andor</creator><creator>Lovas, Kata</creator><creator>Gergely, György</creator><creator>Topál, József</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>The Attribution of Navigational- and Goal-Directed Agency in Dogs (Canis familiaris) and Human Toddlers (Homo sapiens)</title><author>Tauzin, Tibor ; Csík, Andor ; Lovas, Kata ; Gergely, György ; Topál, József</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-b6d5aceafe662a1396cb90b2972b3dc0c8974dd394b48aed02ee30ccc136f0113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agency</topic><topic>Animal</topic><topic>Attribution</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Child Characteristics</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Goal Orientation</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tauzin, Tibor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csík, Andor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovas, Kata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gergely, György</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topál, József</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tauzin, Tibor</au><au>Csík, Andor</au><au>Lovas, Kata</au><au>Gergely, György</au><au>Topál, József</au><au>Call, Josep</au><au>Fragaszy, Dorothy M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Attribution of Navigational- and Goal-Directed Agency in Dogs (Canis familiaris) and Human Toddlers (Homo sapiens)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>0735-7036</issn><eissn>1939-2087</eissn><abstract>Both human infants and nonhuman primates can recognize unfamiliar entities as instrumental agents ascribing to them goals and efficiency of goal-pursuit. This competence relies on movement cues indicating distal sensitivity to the environment and choice of efficient goal-approach. Although dogs' evolved sensitivity to social cues allow them to recognize humans as communicative agents, it remains unclear whether they have also evolved a basic concept of instrumental agency. We used a preferential object-choice procedure to test whether adult pet dogs and human toddlers can identify unfamiliar entities as agents based on different types of movement cues that specify different levels of agency. In the navigational agency condition, dogs preferentially chose an object that modified its pathway to avoid collision with obstacles over another object showing no evidence of distal sensitivity (regularly bumping into obstacles). However, in the goal-efficiency condition where neither object collided with obstacles as it navigated toward a distal target, but only 1 of them exhibited efficient goal-approach as well, toddlers, but not dogs, showed a preference toward the efficient goal-directed agent. These findings indicate that dogs possess a limited concept of environmentally sensitive navigational agency that they attribute to self-propelled entities capable of modifying their movement to avoid colliding with obstacles. Toddlers, in contrast, demonstrated clear sensitivity to cues of efficient variability of goal-approach as the basis for differentiating, attributing, and showing preference for goal-directed instrumental agency.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/com0000053</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-7036
ispartof Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 2017-02, Vol.131 (1), p.1-9
issn 0735-7036
1939-2087
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1868943245
source PsycARTICLES via EBSCO
subjects Agency
Animal
Attribution
Babies
Child Characteristics
Comparative analysis
Dogs
Female
Goal Orientation
Goals
Human
Male
Primates
Psychology
title The Attribution of Navigational- and Goal-Directed Agency in Dogs (Canis familiaris) and Human Toddlers (Homo sapiens)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T21%3A43%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Attribution%20of%20Navigational-%20and%20Goal-Directed%20Agency%20in%20Dogs%20(Canis%20familiaris)%20and%20Human%20Toddlers%20(Homo%20sapiens)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20comparative%20psychology%20(1983)&rft.au=Tauzin,%20Tibor&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=0735-7036&rft.eissn=1939-2087&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/com0000053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4314721211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-b6d5aceafe662a1396cb90b2972b3dc0c8974dd394b48aed02ee30ccc136f0113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1866324007&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true