Loading…
The Attribution of Navigational- and Goal-Directed Agency in Dogs (Canis familiaris) and Human Toddlers (Homo sapiens)
Both human infants and nonhuman primates can recognize unfamiliar entities as instrumental agents ascribing to them goals and efficiency of goal-pursuit. This competence relies on movement cues indicating distal sensitivity to the environment and choice of efficient goal-approach. Although dogs'...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of comparative psychology (1983) 2017-02, Vol.131 (1), p.1-9 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-b6d5aceafe662a1396cb90b2972b3dc0c8974dd394b48aed02ee30ccc136f0113 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 9 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of comparative psychology (1983) |
container_volume | 131 |
creator | Tauzin, Tibor Csík, Andor Lovas, Kata Gergely, György Topál, József |
description | Both human infants and nonhuman primates can recognize unfamiliar entities as instrumental agents ascribing to them goals and efficiency of goal-pursuit. This competence relies on movement cues indicating distal sensitivity to the environment and choice of efficient goal-approach. Although dogs' evolved sensitivity to social cues allow them to recognize humans as communicative agents, it remains unclear whether they have also evolved a basic concept of instrumental agency. We used a preferential object-choice procedure to test whether adult pet dogs and human toddlers can identify unfamiliar entities as agents based on different types of movement cues that specify different levels of agency. In the navigational agency condition, dogs preferentially chose an object that modified its pathway to avoid collision with obstacles over another object showing no evidence of distal sensitivity (regularly bumping into obstacles). However, in the goal-efficiency condition where neither object collided with obstacles as it navigated toward a distal target, but only 1 of them exhibited efficient goal-approach as well, toddlers, but not dogs, showed a preference toward the efficient goal-directed agent. These findings indicate that dogs possess a limited concept of environmentally sensitive navigational agency that they attribute to self-propelled entities capable of modifying their movement to avoid colliding with obstacles. Toddlers, in contrast, demonstrated clear sensitivity to cues of efficient variability of goal-approach as the basis for differentiating, attributing, and showing preference for goal-directed instrumental agency. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/com0000053 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1868943245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4314721211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-b6d5aceafe662a1396cb90b2972b3dc0c8974dd394b48aed02ee30ccc136f0113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQgIMoOKcv_oKALypUk6ZNm8ex6SYMfZnP4ZqkM6NtatIO9u9tnbBH7x7uDr47uA-hW0qeKGHZs3I1GSNlZ2hCBRNRTPLsHE1IxtIoI4xfoqsQdgPCaZJN0H7zZfCs67wt-s66BrsSv8PebmGcoIowNBov3dAtrDeqMxrPtqZRB2wbvHDbgO_n0NiAS6htZcHb8PC7s-praPDGaV0ZP1ArVzscoLWmCQ_X6KKEKpibvzpFn68vm_kqWn8s3-azdQQJTbqo4DoFZaA0nMdAmeCqEKSIRRYXTCuicpElWjORFEkORpPYGEaUUpTxklDKpujueLf17rs3oZM71_vhryBpznORsDhJ_6H4wJDB3xQ9HinlXQjelLL1tgZ_kJTI0b482T_B0IJsw0GB76yqTFC996bpRlZSRuWQ7AcSEIXJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1866324007</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Attribution of Navigational- and Goal-Directed Agency in Dogs (Canis familiaris) and Human Toddlers (Homo sapiens)</title><source>PsycARTICLES via EBSCO</source><creator>Tauzin, Tibor ; Csík, Andor ; Lovas, Kata ; Gergely, György ; Topál, József</creator><contributor>Call, Josep ; Fragaszy, Dorothy M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tauzin, Tibor ; Csík, Andor ; Lovas, Kata ; Gergely, György ; Topál, József ; Call, Josep ; Fragaszy, Dorothy M</creatorcontrib><description>Both human infants and nonhuman primates can recognize unfamiliar entities as instrumental agents ascribing to them goals and efficiency of goal-pursuit. This competence relies on movement cues indicating distal sensitivity to the environment and choice of efficient goal-approach. Although dogs' evolved sensitivity to social cues allow them to recognize humans as communicative agents, it remains unclear whether they have also evolved a basic concept of instrumental agency. We used a preferential object-choice procedure to test whether adult pet dogs and human toddlers can identify unfamiliar entities as agents based on different types of movement cues that specify different levels of agency. In the navigational agency condition, dogs preferentially chose an object that modified its pathway to avoid collision with obstacles over another object showing no evidence of distal sensitivity (regularly bumping into obstacles). However, in the goal-efficiency condition where neither object collided with obstacles as it navigated toward a distal target, but only 1 of them exhibited efficient goal-approach as well, toddlers, but not dogs, showed a preference toward the efficient goal-directed agent. These findings indicate that dogs possess a limited concept of environmentally sensitive navigational agency that they attribute to self-propelled entities capable of modifying their movement to avoid colliding with obstacles. Toddlers, in contrast, demonstrated clear sensitivity to cues of efficient variability of goal-approach as the basis for differentiating, attributing, and showing preference for goal-directed instrumental agency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2087</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/com0000053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Agency ; Animal ; Attribution ; Babies ; Child Characteristics ; Comparative analysis ; Dogs ; Female ; Goal Orientation ; Goals ; Human ; Male ; Primates ; Psychology</subject><ispartof>Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 2017-02, Vol.131 (1), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>2017 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2017, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-b6d5aceafe662a1396cb90b2972b3dc0c8974dd394b48aed02ee30ccc136f0113</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Call, Josep</contributor><contributor>Fragaszy, Dorothy M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tauzin, Tibor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csík, Andor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovas, Kata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gergely, György</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topál, József</creatorcontrib><title>The Attribution of Navigational- and Goal-Directed Agency in Dogs (Canis familiaris) and Human Toddlers (Homo sapiens)</title><title>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</title><description>Both human infants and nonhuman primates can recognize unfamiliar entities as instrumental agents ascribing to them goals and efficiency of goal-pursuit. This competence relies on movement cues indicating distal sensitivity to the environment and choice of efficient goal-approach. Although dogs' evolved sensitivity to social cues allow them to recognize humans as communicative agents, it remains unclear whether they have also evolved a basic concept of instrumental agency. We used a preferential object-choice procedure to test whether adult pet dogs and human toddlers can identify unfamiliar entities as agents based on different types of movement cues that specify different levels of agency. In the navigational agency condition, dogs preferentially chose an object that modified its pathway to avoid collision with obstacles over another object showing no evidence of distal sensitivity (regularly bumping into obstacles). However, in the goal-efficiency condition where neither object collided with obstacles as it navigated toward a distal target, but only 1 of them exhibited efficient goal-approach as well, toddlers, but not dogs, showed a preference toward the efficient goal-directed agent. These findings indicate that dogs possess a limited concept of environmentally sensitive navigational agency that they attribute to self-propelled entities capable of modifying their movement to avoid colliding with obstacles. Toddlers, in contrast, demonstrated clear sensitivity to cues of efficient variability of goal-approach as the basis for differentiating, attributing, and showing preference for goal-directed instrumental agency.</description><subject>Agency</subject><subject>Animal</subject><subject>Attribution</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Child Characteristics</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Goal Orientation</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><issn>0735-7036</issn><issn>1939-2087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQgIMoOKcv_oKALypUk6ZNm8ex6SYMfZnP4ZqkM6NtatIO9u9tnbBH7x7uDr47uA-hW0qeKGHZs3I1GSNlZ2hCBRNRTPLsHE1IxtIoI4xfoqsQdgPCaZJN0H7zZfCs67wt-s66BrsSv8PebmGcoIowNBov3dAtrDeqMxrPtqZRB2wbvHDbgO_n0NiAS6htZcHb8PC7s-praPDGaV0ZP1ArVzscoLWmCQ_X6KKEKpibvzpFn68vm_kqWn8s3-azdQQJTbqo4DoFZaA0nMdAmeCqEKSIRRYXTCuicpElWjORFEkORpPYGEaUUpTxklDKpujueLf17rs3oZM71_vhryBpznORsDhJ_6H4wJDB3xQ9HinlXQjelLL1tgZ_kJTI0b482T_B0IJsw0GB76yqTFC996bpRlZSRuWQ7AcSEIXJ</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Tauzin, Tibor</creator><creator>Csík, Andor</creator><creator>Lovas, Kata</creator><creator>Gergely, György</creator><creator>Topál, József</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>The Attribution of Navigational- and Goal-Directed Agency in Dogs (Canis familiaris) and Human Toddlers (Homo sapiens)</title><author>Tauzin, Tibor ; Csík, Andor ; Lovas, Kata ; Gergely, György ; Topál, József</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-b6d5aceafe662a1396cb90b2972b3dc0c8974dd394b48aed02ee30ccc136f0113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agency</topic><topic>Animal</topic><topic>Attribution</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Child Characteristics</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Goal Orientation</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tauzin, Tibor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csík, Andor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovas, Kata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gergely, György</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topál, József</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tauzin, Tibor</au><au>Csík, Andor</au><au>Lovas, Kata</au><au>Gergely, György</au><au>Topál, József</au><au>Call, Josep</au><au>Fragaszy, Dorothy M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Attribution of Navigational- and Goal-Directed Agency in Dogs (Canis familiaris) and Human Toddlers (Homo sapiens)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>0735-7036</issn><eissn>1939-2087</eissn><abstract>Both human infants and nonhuman primates can recognize unfamiliar entities as instrumental agents ascribing to them goals and efficiency of goal-pursuit. This competence relies on movement cues indicating distal sensitivity to the environment and choice of efficient goal-approach. Although dogs' evolved sensitivity to social cues allow them to recognize humans as communicative agents, it remains unclear whether they have also evolved a basic concept of instrumental agency. We used a preferential object-choice procedure to test whether adult pet dogs and human toddlers can identify unfamiliar entities as agents based on different types of movement cues that specify different levels of agency. In the navigational agency condition, dogs preferentially chose an object that modified its pathway to avoid collision with obstacles over another object showing no evidence of distal sensitivity (regularly bumping into obstacles). However, in the goal-efficiency condition where neither object collided with obstacles as it navigated toward a distal target, but only 1 of them exhibited efficient goal-approach as well, toddlers, but not dogs, showed a preference toward the efficient goal-directed agent. These findings indicate that dogs possess a limited concept of environmentally sensitive navigational agency that they attribute to self-propelled entities capable of modifying their movement to avoid colliding with obstacles. Toddlers, in contrast, demonstrated clear sensitivity to cues of efficient variability of goal-approach as the basis for differentiating, attributing, and showing preference for goal-directed instrumental agency.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/com0000053</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-7036 |
ispartof | Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 2017-02, Vol.131 (1), p.1-9 |
issn | 0735-7036 1939-2087 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1868943245 |
source | PsycARTICLES via EBSCO |
subjects | Agency Animal Attribution Babies Child Characteristics Comparative analysis Dogs Female Goal Orientation Goals Human Male Primates Psychology |
title | The Attribution of Navigational- and Goal-Directed Agency in Dogs (Canis familiaris) and Human Toddlers (Homo sapiens) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T21%3A43%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Attribution%20of%20Navigational-%20and%20Goal-Directed%20Agency%20in%20Dogs%20(Canis%20familiaris)%20and%20Human%20Toddlers%20(Homo%20sapiens)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20comparative%20psychology%20(1983)&rft.au=Tauzin,%20Tibor&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=0735-7036&rft.eissn=1939-2087&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/com0000053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4314721211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-b6d5aceafe662a1396cb90b2972b3dc0c8974dd394b48aed02ee30ccc136f0113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1866324007&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |