Loading…

Structural Simplicity vs. Robustness in the Progressive Collapse Risk Assessment of a 13-Story RC Framed Structure

In the present study, the effect of the structural simplicity on the progressive collapse resistance of a 13-story RC framed building is assessed. The existing structure from Brăila (a zone with high seismic risk from Romania) designed in 1972 according to the former seismic code P13-70, was re-des...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advanced Engineering Forum 2017-03, Vol.21, p.78-85
Main Authors: Besoiu, Teodora S., Ioani, Adrian M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1958-3cb5a79ed59e45e057bc922b1041ce7bb6123ac4f3468c9e088955a542010d173
cites
container_end_page 85
container_issue
container_start_page 78
container_title Advanced Engineering Forum
container_volume 21
creator Besoiu, Teodora S.
Ioani, Adrian M.
description In the present study, the effect of the structural simplicity on the progressive collapse resistance of a 13-story RC framed building is assessed. The existing structure from Brăila (a zone with high seismic risk from Romania) designed in 1972 according to the former seismic code P13-70, was re-designed in accordance to the provisions of the current seismic code P100-1/2013. The original building consists of beams and columns with different cross-sections along the height of the structure. To achieve the objective of this study, a new model with constant cross-sections was designed according to the current seismic and structural concrete codes. Following the provisions of the GSA (2003) Guidelines, nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed using the Applied Element Method incorporated in the ELS® computer software. It was shown that, under the standard GSA loading (DL+0.25LL) the both two numerical models of the 13-story building are not expected to fail when a first-story corner column is suddenly removed. To estimate the ultimate load-bearing capacity of the structural models, a series of nineteen nonlinear dynamic analyses are carried out. The robustness analyses indicate that, the model with different cross-sections can sustain a maximum load 16% larger than the model with constant cross-sections along its height.
doi_str_mv 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.21.78
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1873863618</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4318343831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1958-3cb5a79ed59e45e057bc922b1041ce7bb6123ac4f3468c9e088955a542010d173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMfoE7_Q0Bv2-WjaRMQYYxNBUHZFLwLaXaq0a6dSerYv7djil56dTgf7_seHoQuKEkzwuRwvV6nwTpooqucTRuIw9FkmjKaFnIPHTPGs0Qp-ryPTjjhoqBESXnws5BKHqGzEN4IIYxSyXNyjPw8-s7Gzpsaz91yVTvr4gZ_hhTP2rILsYEQsGtwfAX84NsX3_fuE_C4rWuzCoBnLrzjUQj9fNl_htsKG0x5Mo-t3-DZGE-9WcIC_wTBKTqsTB3g7LsO0NN08ji-Se7ur2_Ho7vEUiVkwm0pTKFgIRRkAogoSqsYKynJqIWiLHPKuLFZxbNcWgVESiWEERkjlCxowQfofOe78u1HByHqt7bzTR-pqSy4zHneQxigy92V9W0IHiq98m5p_EZTorfUdU9d_1LXPXXdU9eM6mIrv9rJozdNiGBf_6T8x-AL0i-Q6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1873863618</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structural Simplicity vs. Robustness in the Progressive Collapse Risk Assessment of a 13-Story RC Framed Structure</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Besoiu, Teodora S. ; Ioani, Adrian M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Besoiu, Teodora S. ; Ioani, Adrian M.</creatorcontrib><description>In the present study, the effect of the structural simplicity on the progressive collapse resistance of a 13-story RC framed building is assessed. The existing structure from Brăila (a zone with high seismic risk from Romania) designed in 1972 according to the former seismic code P13-70, was re-designed in accordance to the provisions of the current seismic code P100-1/2013. The original building consists of beams and columns with different cross-sections along the height of the structure. To achieve the objective of this study, a new model with constant cross-sections was designed according to the current seismic and structural concrete codes. Following the provisions of the GSA (2003) Guidelines, nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed using the Applied Element Method incorporated in the ELS® computer software. It was shown that, under the standard GSA loading (DL+0.25LL) the both two numerical models of the 13-story building are not expected to fail when a first-story corner column is suddenly removed. To estimate the ultimate load-bearing capacity of the structural models, a series of nineteen nonlinear dynamic analyses are carried out. The robustness analyses indicate that, the model with different cross-sections can sustain a maximum load 16% larger than the model with constant cross-sections along its height.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2234-9898</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2234-991X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 3035710988</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9783035710984</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2234-991X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.21.78</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Zurich: Trans Tech Publications Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Advanced Engineering Forum, 2017-03, Vol.21, p.78-85</ispartof><rights>2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Trans Tech Publications Ltd. Mar 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1958-3cb5a79ed59e45e057bc922b1041ce7bb6123ac4f3468c9e088955a542010d173</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.scientific.net/Image/TitleCover/4448?width=600</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Besoiu, Teodora S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ioani, Adrian M.</creatorcontrib><title>Structural Simplicity vs. Robustness in the Progressive Collapse Risk Assessment of a 13-Story RC Framed Structure</title><title>Advanced Engineering Forum</title><description>In the present study, the effect of the structural simplicity on the progressive collapse resistance of a 13-story RC framed building is assessed. The existing structure from Brăila (a zone with high seismic risk from Romania) designed in 1972 according to the former seismic code P13-70, was re-designed in accordance to the provisions of the current seismic code P100-1/2013. The original building consists of beams and columns with different cross-sections along the height of the structure. To achieve the objective of this study, a new model with constant cross-sections was designed according to the current seismic and structural concrete codes. Following the provisions of the GSA (2003) Guidelines, nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed using the Applied Element Method incorporated in the ELS® computer software. It was shown that, under the standard GSA loading (DL+0.25LL) the both two numerical models of the 13-story building are not expected to fail when a first-story corner column is suddenly removed. To estimate the ultimate load-bearing capacity of the structural models, a series of nineteen nonlinear dynamic analyses are carried out. The robustness analyses indicate that, the model with different cross-sections can sustain a maximum load 16% larger than the model with constant cross-sections along its height.</description><issn>2234-9898</issn><issn>2234-991X</issn><issn>2234-991X</issn><isbn>3035710988</isbn><isbn>9783035710984</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMfoE7_Q0Bv2-WjaRMQYYxNBUHZFLwLaXaq0a6dSerYv7djil56dTgf7_seHoQuKEkzwuRwvV6nwTpooqucTRuIw9FkmjKaFnIPHTPGs0Qp-ryPTjjhoqBESXnws5BKHqGzEN4IIYxSyXNyjPw8-s7Gzpsaz91yVTvr4gZ_hhTP2rILsYEQsGtwfAX84NsX3_fuE_C4rWuzCoBnLrzjUQj9fNl_htsKG0x5Mo-t3-DZGE-9WcIC_wTBKTqsTB3g7LsO0NN08ji-Se7ur2_Ho7vEUiVkwm0pTKFgIRRkAogoSqsYKynJqIWiLHPKuLFZxbNcWgVESiWEERkjlCxowQfofOe78u1HByHqt7bzTR-pqSy4zHneQxigy92V9W0IHiq98m5p_EZTorfUdU9d_1LXPXXdU9eM6mIrv9rJozdNiGBf_6T8x-AL0i-Q6Q</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Besoiu, Teodora S.</creator><creator>Ioani, Adrian M.</creator><general>Trans Tech Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Structural Simplicity vs. Robustness in the Progressive Collapse Risk Assessment of a 13-Story RC Framed Structure</title><author>Besoiu, Teodora S. ; Ioani, Adrian M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1958-3cb5a79ed59e45e057bc922b1041ce7bb6123ac4f3468c9e088955a542010d173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Besoiu, Teodora S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ioani, Adrian M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Advanced Engineering Forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Besoiu, Teodora S.</au><au>Ioani, Adrian M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structural Simplicity vs. Robustness in the Progressive Collapse Risk Assessment of a 13-Story RC Framed Structure</atitle><jtitle>Advanced Engineering Forum</jtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>21</volume><spage>78</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>78-85</pages><issn>2234-9898</issn><issn>2234-991X</issn><eissn>2234-991X</eissn><isbn>3035710988</isbn><isbn>9783035710984</isbn><abstract>In the present study, the effect of the structural simplicity on the progressive collapse resistance of a 13-story RC framed building is assessed. The existing structure from Brăila (a zone with high seismic risk from Romania) designed in 1972 according to the former seismic code P13-70, was re-designed in accordance to the provisions of the current seismic code P100-1/2013. The original building consists of beams and columns with different cross-sections along the height of the structure. To achieve the objective of this study, a new model with constant cross-sections was designed according to the current seismic and structural concrete codes. Following the provisions of the GSA (2003) Guidelines, nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed using the Applied Element Method incorporated in the ELS® computer software. It was shown that, under the standard GSA loading (DL+0.25LL) the both two numerical models of the 13-story building are not expected to fail when a first-story corner column is suddenly removed. To estimate the ultimate load-bearing capacity of the structural models, a series of nineteen nonlinear dynamic analyses are carried out. The robustness analyses indicate that, the model with different cross-sections can sustain a maximum load 16% larger than the model with constant cross-sections along its height.</abstract><cop>Zurich</cop><pub>Trans Tech Publications Ltd</pub><doi>10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.21.78</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2234-9898
ispartof Advanced Engineering Forum, 2017-03, Vol.21, p.78-85
issn 2234-9898
2234-991X
2234-991X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1873863618
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Structural Simplicity vs. Robustness in the Progressive Collapse Risk Assessment of a 13-Story RC Framed Structure
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A19%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structural%20Simplicity%20vs.%20Robustness%20in%20the%20Progressive%20Collapse%20Risk%20Assessment%20of%20a%2013-Story%20RC%20Framed%20Structure&rft.jtitle=Advanced%20Engineering%20Forum&rft.au=Besoiu,%20Teodora%20S.&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=21&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=78-85&rft.issn=2234-9898&rft.eissn=2234-991X&rft.isbn=3035710988&rft.isbn_list=9783035710984&rft_id=info:doi/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.21.78&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4318343831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1958-3cb5a79ed59e45e057bc922b1041ce7bb6123ac4f3468c9e088955a542010d173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1873863618&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true