Loading…
Structural Simplicity vs. Robustness in the Progressive Collapse Risk Assessment of a 13-Story RC Framed Structure
In the present study, the effect of the structural simplicity on the progressive collapse resistance of a 13-story RC framed building is assessed. The existing structure from Brăila (a zone with high seismic risk from Romania) designed in 1972 according to the former seismic code P13-70, was re-des...
Saved in:
Published in: | Advanced Engineering Forum 2017-03, Vol.21, p.78-85 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1958-3cb5a79ed59e45e057bc922b1041ce7bb6123ac4f3468c9e088955a542010d173 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 85 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 78 |
container_title | Advanced Engineering Forum |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Besoiu, Teodora S. Ioani, Adrian M. |
description | In the present study, the effect of the structural simplicity on the progressive collapse resistance of a 13-story RC framed building is assessed. The existing structure from Brăila (a zone with high seismic risk from Romania) designed in 1972 according to the former seismic code P13-70, was re-designed in accordance to the provisions of the current seismic code P100-1/2013. The original building consists of beams and columns with different cross-sections along the height of the structure. To achieve the objective of this study, a new model with constant cross-sections was designed according to the current seismic and structural concrete codes. Following the provisions of the GSA (2003) Guidelines, nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed using the Applied Element Method incorporated in the ELS® computer software. It was shown that, under the standard GSA loading (DL+0.25LL) the both two numerical models of the 13-story building are not expected to fail when a first-story corner column is suddenly removed. To estimate the ultimate load-bearing capacity of the structural models, a series of nineteen nonlinear dynamic analyses are carried out. The robustness analyses indicate that, the model with different cross-sections can sustain a maximum load 16% larger than the model with constant cross-sections along its height. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.21.78 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1873863618</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4318343831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1958-3cb5a79ed59e45e057bc922b1041ce7bb6123ac4f3468c9e088955a542010d173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMfoE7_Q0Bv2-WjaRMQYYxNBUHZFLwLaXaq0a6dSerYv7djil56dTgf7_seHoQuKEkzwuRwvV6nwTpooqucTRuIw9FkmjKaFnIPHTPGs0Qp-ryPTjjhoqBESXnws5BKHqGzEN4IIYxSyXNyjPw8-s7Gzpsaz91yVTvr4gZ_hhTP2rILsYEQsGtwfAX84NsX3_fuE_C4rWuzCoBnLrzjUQj9fNl_htsKG0x5Mo-t3-DZGE-9WcIC_wTBKTqsTB3g7LsO0NN08ji-Se7ur2_Ho7vEUiVkwm0pTKFgIRRkAogoSqsYKynJqIWiLHPKuLFZxbNcWgVESiWEERkjlCxowQfofOe78u1HByHqt7bzTR-pqSy4zHneQxigy92V9W0IHiq98m5p_EZTorfUdU9d_1LXPXXdU9eM6mIrv9rJozdNiGBf_6T8x-AL0i-Q6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1873863618</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structural Simplicity vs. Robustness in the Progressive Collapse Risk Assessment of a 13-Story RC Framed Structure</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Besoiu, Teodora S. ; Ioani, Adrian M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Besoiu, Teodora S. ; Ioani, Adrian M.</creatorcontrib><description>In the present study, the effect of the structural simplicity on the progressive collapse resistance of a 13-story RC framed building is assessed. The existing structure from Brăila (a zone with high seismic risk from Romania) designed in 1972 according to the former seismic code P13-70, was re-designed in accordance to the provisions of the current seismic code P100-1/2013. The original building consists of beams and columns with different cross-sections along the height of the structure. To achieve the objective of this study, a new model with constant cross-sections was designed according to the current seismic and structural concrete codes. Following the provisions of the GSA (2003) Guidelines, nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed using the Applied Element Method incorporated in the ELS® computer software. It was shown that, under the standard GSA loading (DL+0.25LL) the both two numerical models of the 13-story building are not expected to fail when a first-story corner column is suddenly removed. To estimate the ultimate load-bearing capacity of the structural models, a series of nineteen nonlinear dynamic analyses are carried out. The robustness analyses indicate that, the model with different cross-sections can sustain a maximum load 16% larger than the model with constant cross-sections along its height.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2234-9898</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2234-991X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 3035710988</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9783035710984</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2234-991X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.21.78</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Zurich: Trans Tech Publications Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Advanced Engineering Forum, 2017-03, Vol.21, p.78-85</ispartof><rights>2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Trans Tech Publications Ltd. Mar 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1958-3cb5a79ed59e45e057bc922b1041ce7bb6123ac4f3468c9e088955a542010d173</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.scientific.net/Image/TitleCover/4448?width=600</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Besoiu, Teodora S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ioani, Adrian M.</creatorcontrib><title>Structural Simplicity vs. Robustness in the Progressive Collapse Risk Assessment of a 13-Story RC Framed Structure</title><title>Advanced Engineering Forum</title><description>In the present study, the effect of the structural simplicity on the progressive collapse resistance of a 13-story RC framed building is assessed. The existing structure from Brăila (a zone with high seismic risk from Romania) designed in 1972 according to the former seismic code P13-70, was re-designed in accordance to the provisions of the current seismic code P100-1/2013. The original building consists of beams and columns with different cross-sections along the height of the structure. To achieve the objective of this study, a new model with constant cross-sections was designed according to the current seismic and structural concrete codes. Following the provisions of the GSA (2003) Guidelines, nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed using the Applied Element Method incorporated in the ELS® computer software. It was shown that, under the standard GSA loading (DL+0.25LL) the both two numerical models of the 13-story building are not expected to fail when a first-story corner column is suddenly removed. To estimate the ultimate load-bearing capacity of the structural models, a series of nineteen nonlinear dynamic analyses are carried out. The robustness analyses indicate that, the model with different cross-sections can sustain a maximum load 16% larger than the model with constant cross-sections along its height.</description><issn>2234-9898</issn><issn>2234-991X</issn><issn>2234-991X</issn><isbn>3035710988</isbn><isbn>9783035710984</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMfoE7_Q0Bv2-WjaRMQYYxNBUHZFLwLaXaq0a6dSerYv7djil56dTgf7_seHoQuKEkzwuRwvV6nwTpooqucTRuIw9FkmjKaFnIPHTPGs0Qp-ryPTjjhoqBESXnws5BKHqGzEN4IIYxSyXNyjPw8-s7Gzpsaz91yVTvr4gZ_hhTP2rILsYEQsGtwfAX84NsX3_fuE_C4rWuzCoBnLrzjUQj9fNl_htsKG0x5Mo-t3-DZGE-9WcIC_wTBKTqsTB3g7LsO0NN08ji-Se7ur2_Ho7vEUiVkwm0pTKFgIRRkAogoSqsYKynJqIWiLHPKuLFZxbNcWgVESiWEERkjlCxowQfofOe78u1HByHqt7bzTR-pqSy4zHneQxigy92V9W0IHiq98m5p_EZTorfUdU9d_1LXPXXdU9eM6mIrv9rJozdNiGBf_6T8x-AL0i-Q6Q</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Besoiu, Teodora S.</creator><creator>Ioani, Adrian M.</creator><general>Trans Tech Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Structural Simplicity vs. Robustness in the Progressive Collapse Risk Assessment of a 13-Story RC Framed Structure</title><author>Besoiu, Teodora S. ; Ioani, Adrian M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1958-3cb5a79ed59e45e057bc922b1041ce7bb6123ac4f3468c9e088955a542010d173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Besoiu, Teodora S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ioani, Adrian M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Advanced Engineering Forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Besoiu, Teodora S.</au><au>Ioani, Adrian M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structural Simplicity vs. Robustness in the Progressive Collapse Risk Assessment of a 13-Story RC Framed Structure</atitle><jtitle>Advanced Engineering Forum</jtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>21</volume><spage>78</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>78-85</pages><issn>2234-9898</issn><issn>2234-991X</issn><eissn>2234-991X</eissn><isbn>3035710988</isbn><isbn>9783035710984</isbn><abstract>In the present study, the effect of the structural simplicity on the progressive collapse resistance of a 13-story RC framed building is assessed. The existing structure from Brăila (a zone with high seismic risk from Romania) designed in 1972 according to the former seismic code P13-70, was re-designed in accordance to the provisions of the current seismic code P100-1/2013. The original building consists of beams and columns with different cross-sections along the height of the structure. To achieve the objective of this study, a new model with constant cross-sections was designed according to the current seismic and structural concrete codes. Following the provisions of the GSA (2003) Guidelines, nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed using the Applied Element Method incorporated in the ELS® computer software. It was shown that, under the standard GSA loading (DL+0.25LL) the both two numerical models of the 13-story building are not expected to fail when a first-story corner column is suddenly removed. To estimate the ultimate load-bearing capacity of the structural models, a series of nineteen nonlinear dynamic analyses are carried out. The robustness analyses indicate that, the model with different cross-sections can sustain a maximum load 16% larger than the model with constant cross-sections along its height.</abstract><cop>Zurich</cop><pub>Trans Tech Publications Ltd</pub><doi>10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.21.78</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2234-9898 |
ispartof | Advanced Engineering Forum, 2017-03, Vol.21, p.78-85 |
issn | 2234-9898 2234-991X 2234-991X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1873863618 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Structural Simplicity vs. Robustness in the Progressive Collapse Risk Assessment of a 13-Story RC Framed Structure |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A19%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structural%20Simplicity%20vs.%20Robustness%20in%20the%20Progressive%20Collapse%20Risk%20Assessment%20of%20a%2013-Story%20RC%20Framed%20Structure&rft.jtitle=Advanced%20Engineering%20Forum&rft.au=Besoiu,%20Teodora%20S.&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=21&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=78-85&rft.issn=2234-9898&rft.eissn=2234-991X&rft.isbn=3035710988&rft.isbn_list=9783035710984&rft_id=info:doi/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.21.78&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4318343831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1958-3cb5a79ed59e45e057bc922b1041ce7bb6123ac4f3468c9e088955a542010d173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1873863618&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |