Crisis in the air: An investigation of AirAsia’s crisis-response effectiveness based on frame alignment

•After the crash of AirAsia’s flight QZ8501, the organisation predominately used an informational crisis-response strategy.•An absence of frame alignment was observed between AirAsia’s response strategy and the public’s response.•Compared to the organisation, the public’s response revealed more emot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public relations review 2016-12, Vol.42 (5), p.879-892
Main Authors: Gerken, Fynn, Van der Land, Sarah F., van der Meer, Toni G.L.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
AirAsia
Aircraft accidents & safety
Airline industry
Case studies
Content analysis
Crises
Crisis communication
Effectiveness
Frame alignment
Internet
Management of crises
Network analysis
Quantitative analysis
Response time
Semantic-network analysis
Semantics
Situational crisis communication theory
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•After the crash of AirAsia’s flight QZ8501, the organisation predominately used an informational crisis-response strategy.•An absence of frame alignment was observed between AirAsia’s response strategy and the public’s response.•Compared to the organisation, the public’s response revealed more emotional aspects in their framing. This study explores the effectiveness of organisational crisis-response strategies and public online response by applying a framing perspective. This has been done to study the crash of AirAsia’s flight QZ8501, in which a three-step methodological case study approach has been employed. First, a quantitative content analysis was conducted in order to identify AirAsia’s (the sender) crisis-response strategy. Second, a semantic-network analysis was applied to analyse the response from the public (the receiver). Third, an extension of this semantic-network analysis was used to analyse to which extent the framing of AirAsia’s online crisis communication had been aligned with the public framing of the crash. The results of the first step indicated that AirAsia predominately used an informational strategy (e.g., Adjusting Information). Moreover, the findings of the second and third steps revealed that there was an absence of frame alignment between AirAsia’s response strategy and the public’s response. Compared to the organisation, the public’s reactions revealed more emotional aspects in their framing.
ISSN:0363-8111
1873-4537
DOI:10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.09.002