Retrospective Accounts of Sexual Peer Victimization in Adolescence: Do Social Status and Gender-Conformity Play a Role?

In popular media, the degree to which adolescents possess social power and conform to gender norms appears to dictate experiences and perpetrations of peer victimization that are sexual in nature. Therefore, the hypothesis that high-status gender conforming adolescents sexually victimize low-status...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sex roles 2017-04, Vol.76 (7-8), p.485-497
Main Authors: Buchanan, Carie M., McDougall, Patti
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescents
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Conformity
Early Adolescents
Gender Studies
Hierarchies
High Schools
Mass media effects
Medicine/Public Health
Original Article
Peer Acceptance
Peer Groups
Peer relationships
Peers
Psychology
Puberty
Resistance (Psychology)
Sexes
Sexual harassment
Sexuality
Social Behavior
Social Environment
Social power
Social status
Sociology
Studies
Teenagers
Victimization
Victims
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In popular media, the degree to which adolescents possess social power and conform to gender norms appears to dictate experiences and perpetrations of peer victimization that are sexual in nature. Therefore, the hypothesis that high-status gender conforming adolescents sexually victimize low-status gender nonconforming peers was examined using retrospective accounts of social status, gender-conformity, and sexual and nonsexual forms of peer victimization in high school as reported by 209 participants, ages 18–23 years old. Although these hypotheses were not fully supported, popularity and gender-conformity were found to be associated with different forms of peer victimization as they occur in adolescence. Self-reported popularity was implicated more commonly in experiencing nonsexual forms of peer victimization and perpetrating sexual peer victimization. However, gender-conformity was found to be a stronger predictor in explaining experiences of social and sexual peer victimization and perpetrating verbal and social peer victimization. The findings suggest that there is a level of complexity to sexual and nonsexual peer victimization that requires more refined examination of gender-conformity and social hierarchy alongside the identification of additional mechanisms. To effectively prevent different forms of peer victimization (sexual and nonsexual) during adolescence, it is important to continue examining the role of developmental mechanisms specific to adolescence.
ISSN:0360-0025
1573-2762
DOI:10.1007/s11199-016-0672-4