Loading…

Influence of Annealing on Microstructural Evolution, Precipitation Sequence, and Fracture Toughness of Cryorolled Al–Cu–Si Alloy

Microstructural evolution, precipitation sequence, and fracture toughness of cryorolled Al 2014 alloy subjected to annealing treatment were investigated in the present work. Al 2014 alloy was solutionized (ST) and subjected to cryorolling (CR) up to effective true strain of 2.3. The CR Al 2014 alloy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Metallography, microstructure, and analysis microstructure, and analysis, 2016-12, Vol.5 (6), p.540-556
Main Authors: Joshi, Amit, Yogesha, K. K., Kumar, Nikhil, Jayaganthan, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b2618bf3118030048af29514b4bc3bd8c80209cf13ce73f2592ae5c2e464044d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b2618bf3118030048af29514b4bc3bd8c80209cf13ce73f2592ae5c2e464044d3
container_end_page 556
container_issue 6
container_start_page 540
container_title Metallography, microstructure, and analysis
container_volume 5
creator Joshi, Amit
Yogesha, K. K.
Kumar, Nikhil
Jayaganthan, R.
description Microstructural evolution, precipitation sequence, and fracture toughness of cryorolled Al 2014 alloy subjected to annealing treatment were investigated in the present work. Al 2014 alloy was solutionized (ST) and subjected to cryorolling (CR) up to effective true strain of 2.3. The CR Al 2014 alloy samples were annealed (AN) at temperatures ranging from 100 to 350 °C for the duration of 45 min. TEM and XRD studies of the CR and CR + AN were made to understand its precipitation kinetics. Fracture toughness tests were performed on CR and CR + AN alloy, and its deformation behavior was correlated with microstructural features. The improvement in fracture toughness K ee (23.06–37.8 MPa √m) of CR Al 2014 alloy was observed as compared to ST alloy. The fracture toughness was retained up to 200 °C for CR alloy, but it started decreasing beyond 200 °C. The improvement in fracture toughness of cryorolled Al 2014 alloy at low-temperature annealing from 100 to 200 °C is attributed to the formation of GP zones and metastable phase θ′ . However, beyond temperature 200 °C, fracture toughness has reduced due to combined effect of recovery, recrystallization, and formation of stable coarser phase such as θ and λ.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13632-016-0313-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1880832888</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1880832888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b2618bf3118030048af29514b4bc3bd8c80209cf13ce73f2592ae5c2e464044d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIVKUfwM0S1wb8auocq6iFSkUgtZwtx3FKkLGLnaD2xoE_4A_5EhyCEBcuuzvSzOzuAHCO0SVGaHoVME0pSRBOE0QxTfZHYEBwRpKMTNHx75ySUzAKoS4QyignjLABeF_ayrTaKg1dBWfWamlqu4XOwttaeRca36qm9dLA-aszbVM7O4b3Xqt6Vzeyg3CtX74dxlDaEi687AQably7fbQ6hM459wfnnTG6hDPz-faRt7Gs6wiMO5yBk0qaoEc_fQgeFvNNfpOs7q6X-WyVKIrTJilIinlRUYw5oggxLiuSTTArWKFoUXLFEUGZqjBVekorMsmI1BNFNEsZYqykQ3DR--68iyeHRjy51tu4UmDOEaeEcx5ZuGd17wevK7Hz9bP0B4GR6PIWfd4i5i26vMU-akivCZFrt9r_cf5X9AU6doY1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880832888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Annealing on Microstructural Evolution, Precipitation Sequence, and Fracture Toughness of Cryorolled Al–Cu–Si Alloy</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Joshi, Amit ; Yogesha, K. K. ; Kumar, Nikhil ; Jayaganthan, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Amit ; Yogesha, K. K. ; Kumar, Nikhil ; Jayaganthan, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Microstructural evolution, precipitation sequence, and fracture toughness of cryorolled Al 2014 alloy subjected to annealing treatment were investigated in the present work. Al 2014 alloy was solutionized (ST) and subjected to cryorolling (CR) up to effective true strain of 2.3. The CR Al 2014 alloy samples were annealed (AN) at temperatures ranging from 100 to 350 °C for the duration of 45 min. TEM and XRD studies of the CR and CR + AN were made to understand its precipitation kinetics. Fracture toughness tests were performed on CR and CR + AN alloy, and its deformation behavior was correlated with microstructural features. The improvement in fracture toughness K ee (23.06–37.8 MPa √m) of CR Al 2014 alloy was observed as compared to ST alloy. The fracture toughness was retained up to 200 °C for CR alloy, but it started decreasing beyond 200 °C. The improvement in fracture toughness of cryorolled Al 2014 alloy at low-temperature annealing from 100 to 200 °C is attributed to the formation of GP zones and metastable phase θ′ . However, beyond temperature 200 °C, fracture toughness has reduced due to combined effect of recovery, recrystallization, and formation of stable coarser phase such as θ and λ.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2192-9262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2192-9270</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13632-016-0313-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Fracture toughness ; Materials Science ; Metallic Materials ; Nanotechnology ; Structural Materials ; Surfaces and Interfaces ; Technical Article ; Thin Films</subject><ispartof>Metallography, microstructure, and analysis, 2016-12, Vol.5 (6), p.540-556</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York and ASM International 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media 2016</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b2618bf3118030048af29514b4bc3bd8c80209cf13ce73f2592ae5c2e464044d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b2618bf3118030048af29514b4bc3bd8c80209cf13ce73f2592ae5c2e464044d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yogesha, K. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayaganthan, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Annealing on Microstructural Evolution, Precipitation Sequence, and Fracture Toughness of Cryorolled Al–Cu–Si Alloy</title><title>Metallography, microstructure, and analysis</title><addtitle>Metallogr. Microstruct. Anal</addtitle><description>Microstructural evolution, precipitation sequence, and fracture toughness of cryorolled Al 2014 alloy subjected to annealing treatment were investigated in the present work. Al 2014 alloy was solutionized (ST) and subjected to cryorolling (CR) up to effective true strain of 2.3. The CR Al 2014 alloy samples were annealed (AN) at temperatures ranging from 100 to 350 °C for the duration of 45 min. TEM and XRD studies of the CR and CR + AN were made to understand its precipitation kinetics. Fracture toughness tests were performed on CR and CR + AN alloy, and its deformation behavior was correlated with microstructural features. The improvement in fracture toughness K ee (23.06–37.8 MPa √m) of CR Al 2014 alloy was observed as compared to ST alloy. The fracture toughness was retained up to 200 °C for CR alloy, but it started decreasing beyond 200 °C. The improvement in fracture toughness of cryorolled Al 2014 alloy at low-temperature annealing from 100 to 200 °C is attributed to the formation of GP zones and metastable phase θ′ . However, beyond temperature 200 °C, fracture toughness has reduced due to combined effect of recovery, recrystallization, and formation of stable coarser phase such as θ and λ.</description><subject>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Fracture toughness</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Metallic Materials</subject><subject>Nanotechnology</subject><subject>Structural Materials</subject><subject>Surfaces and Interfaces</subject><subject>Technical Article</subject><subject>Thin Films</subject><issn>2192-9262</issn><issn>2192-9270</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIVKUfwM0S1wb8auocq6iFSkUgtZwtx3FKkLGLnaD2xoE_4A_5EhyCEBcuuzvSzOzuAHCO0SVGaHoVME0pSRBOE0QxTfZHYEBwRpKMTNHx75ySUzAKoS4QyignjLABeF_ayrTaKg1dBWfWamlqu4XOwttaeRca36qm9dLA-aszbVM7O4b3Xqt6Vzeyg3CtX74dxlDaEi687AQably7fbQ6hM459wfnnTG6hDPz-faRt7Gs6wiMO5yBk0qaoEc_fQgeFvNNfpOs7q6X-WyVKIrTJilIinlRUYw5oggxLiuSTTArWKFoUXLFEUGZqjBVekorMsmI1BNFNEsZYqykQ3DR--68iyeHRjy51tu4UmDOEaeEcx5ZuGd17wevK7Hz9bP0B4GR6PIWfd4i5i26vMU-akivCZFrt9r_cf5X9AU6doY1</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Joshi, Amit</creator><creator>Yogesha, K. K.</creator><creator>Kumar, Nikhil</creator><creator>Jayaganthan, R.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Influence of Annealing on Microstructural Evolution, Precipitation Sequence, and Fracture Toughness of Cryorolled Al–Cu–Si Alloy</title><author>Joshi, Amit ; Yogesha, K. K. ; Kumar, Nikhil ; Jayaganthan, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b2618bf3118030048af29514b4bc3bd8c80209cf13ce73f2592ae5c2e464044d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Fracture toughness</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Metallic Materials</topic><topic>Nanotechnology</topic><topic>Structural Materials</topic><topic>Surfaces and Interfaces</topic><topic>Technical Article</topic><topic>Thin Films</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yogesha, K. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayaganthan, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Metallography, microstructure, and analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Joshi, Amit</au><au>Yogesha, K. K.</au><au>Kumar, Nikhil</au><au>Jayaganthan, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Annealing on Microstructural Evolution, Precipitation Sequence, and Fracture Toughness of Cryorolled Al–Cu–Si Alloy</atitle><jtitle>Metallography, microstructure, and analysis</jtitle><stitle>Metallogr. Microstruct. Anal</stitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>540</spage><epage>556</epage><pages>540-556</pages><issn>2192-9262</issn><eissn>2192-9270</eissn><abstract>Microstructural evolution, precipitation sequence, and fracture toughness of cryorolled Al 2014 alloy subjected to annealing treatment were investigated in the present work. Al 2014 alloy was solutionized (ST) and subjected to cryorolling (CR) up to effective true strain of 2.3. The CR Al 2014 alloy samples were annealed (AN) at temperatures ranging from 100 to 350 °C for the duration of 45 min. TEM and XRD studies of the CR and CR + AN were made to understand its precipitation kinetics. Fracture toughness tests were performed on CR and CR + AN alloy, and its deformation behavior was correlated with microstructural features. The improvement in fracture toughness K ee (23.06–37.8 MPa √m) of CR Al 2014 alloy was observed as compared to ST alloy. The fracture toughness was retained up to 200 °C for CR alloy, but it started decreasing beyond 200 °C. The improvement in fracture toughness of cryorolled Al 2014 alloy at low-temperature annealing from 100 to 200 °C is attributed to the formation of GP zones and metastable phase θ′ . However, beyond temperature 200 °C, fracture toughness has reduced due to combined effect of recovery, recrystallization, and formation of stable coarser phase such as θ and λ.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s13632-016-0313-x</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2192-9262
ispartof Metallography, microstructure, and analysis, 2016-12, Vol.5 (6), p.540-556
issn 2192-9262
2192-9270
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1880832888
source Springer Nature
subjects Characterization and Evaluation of Materials
Chemistry and Materials Science
Fracture toughness
Materials Science
Metallic Materials
Nanotechnology
Structural Materials
Surfaces and Interfaces
Technical Article
Thin Films
title Influence of Annealing on Microstructural Evolution, Precipitation Sequence, and Fracture Toughness of Cryorolled Al–Cu–Si Alloy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A54%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Annealing%20on%20Microstructural%20Evolution,%20Precipitation%20Sequence,%20and%20Fracture%20Toughness%20of%20Cryorolled%20Al%E2%80%93Cu%E2%80%93Si%20Alloy&rft.jtitle=Metallography,%20microstructure,%20and%20analysis&rft.au=Joshi,%20Amit&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=540&rft.epage=556&rft.pages=540-556&rft.issn=2192-9262&rft.eissn=2192-9270&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13632-016-0313-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1880832888%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-b2618bf3118030048af29514b4bc3bd8c80209cf13ce73f2592ae5c2e464044d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880832888&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true