Can alternative indicators overcome language biases in citation counts? A comparison of Spanish and UK research

This study compares Spanish and UK research in eight subject fields using a range of bibliometric and social media indicators. For each field, lists of Spanish and UK journal articles published in the year 2012 and their citation counts were extracted from Scopus. The software Webometric Analyst was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientometrics 2016-12, Vol.109 (3), p.2007-2030
Main Authors: Mas-Bleda, Amalia, Thelwall, Mike
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bibliometrics
CAI
Citation analysis
Citation indexes
Computer assisted instruction
Computer Science
Digital media
Distance learning
Indicators
Information Storage and Retrieval
Informetrics
Internet
Library Science
Lists
Readers
Social networks
Webometrics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study compares Spanish and UK research in eight subject fields using a range of bibliometric and social media indicators. For each field, lists of Spanish and UK journal articles published in the year 2012 and their citation counts were extracted from Scopus. The software Webometric Analyst was then used to extract a range of altmetrics for these articles, including patent citations, online presentation mentions, online course syllabus mentions, Wikipedia mentions and Mendeley reader counts and Altmetric.com was used to extract Twitter mentions. Results show that Mendeley is the altmetric source with the highest coverage, with 80 % of sampled articles having one or more Mendeley readers, followed by Twitter (34 %). The coverage of the remaining sources was lower than 3 %. All of the indicators checked either have too little data or increase the overall difference between Spain and the UK and so none can be suggested as alternatives to reduce the bias against Spain in traditional citation indexes.
ISSN:0138-9130
1588-2861
DOI:10.1007/s11192-016-2118-8