Loading…
Formic Acid Oxidation at Ru@Pt Core-Shell Nanoparticles
Formic acid oxidation has been investigated at Ru@Pt core-shell nanoparticles for Pt coverages ranging from 0.4 to 1.9 monolayers (ML), in order to determine how the bi-functional and electronic effect of the Ru core and compression of the Pt lattice influence activity. By comparing voltammetric res...
Saved in:
Published in: | Electrocatalysis 2016-11, Vol.7 (6), p.477-485 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b8ec247c2ca6f7feb49a8da563b91ed2a55e21ab374cc7761ab360f6d9a5869c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b8ec247c2ca6f7feb49a8da563b91ed2a55e21ab374cc7761ab360f6d9a5869c3 |
container_end_page | 485 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 477 |
container_title | Electrocatalysis |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | El Sawy, Ehab N. Pickup, Peter G. |
description | Formic acid oxidation has been investigated at Ru@Pt core-shell nanoparticles for Pt coverages ranging from 0.4 to 1.9 monolayers (ML), in order to determine how the bi-functional and electronic effect of the Ru core and compression of the Pt lattice influence activity. By comparing voltammetric results with those for CO stripping and bulk oxidation, it has been shown that the electronic effect of the Ru core on CO oxidation is the dominant factor influencing formic acid oxidation. Thus, the indirect pathway through adsorbed CO begins at the lowest potential for sub-monolayer Pt coverages, and the formic acid oxidation rate increases as the Pt coverage is increased towards one monolayer. However, the electronic effect of the Ru becomes muted as a second Pt layer is added, CO oxidation is shifted to higher potentials and formic acid oxidation activity drops. The optimum coverage of Pt depends on a balance between the electronic effects of the Ru core on the promotion of CO oxidation and inhibition of formic acid oxidation through the direct pathway that does not produce adsorbed CO. Thus, a coverage of 0.85 ML Pt provided the best activity for 0.5 M formic acid, while 1.3 ML gave a particularly high activity for 2 M formic acid at low potentials.
Graphical Abstract
One monolayer of Pt on a Ru core provides high activity for formic acid oxidation due to a strong electronic effect, while this becomes muted when a second layer of Pt is added |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12678-016-0328-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1880853890</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1880853890</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b8ec247c2ca6f7feb49a8da563b91ed2a55e21ab374cc7761ab360f6d9a5869c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EElXpD-AWibPBj9he36gqCkgVRTzOluM4kCqNi51K8O9xlR64sJedw8ys9kPokpJrSoi6SZRJBZhQiQlngOEETShIwELr8vSomWD6HM1S2pA8XHMCYoLUMsRt64q5a-ti_d3WdmhDX9iheNnfPg_FIkSPXz991xVPtg87G4fWdT5doLPGdsnPjnuK3pd3b4sHvFrfPy7mK-y44AOuwDtWKseclY1qfFVqC7UVklea-ppZITyjtuKqdE4peZCSNLLWVoDUjk_R1di7i-Fr79NgNmEf-3zSUID8AgdNsouOLhdDStE3ZhfbrY0_hhJzQGRGRCYjMgdEBnKGjZmUvf2Hj3-a_w39Auh3Z74</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880853890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Formic Acid Oxidation at Ru@Pt Core-Shell Nanoparticles</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>El Sawy, Ehab N. ; Pickup, Peter G.</creator><creatorcontrib>El Sawy, Ehab N. ; Pickup, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><description>Formic acid oxidation has been investigated at Ru@Pt core-shell nanoparticles for Pt coverages ranging from 0.4 to 1.9 monolayers (ML), in order to determine how the bi-functional and electronic effect of the Ru core and compression of the Pt lattice influence activity. By comparing voltammetric results with those for CO stripping and bulk oxidation, it has been shown that the electronic effect of the Ru core on CO oxidation is the dominant factor influencing formic acid oxidation. Thus, the indirect pathway through adsorbed CO begins at the lowest potential for sub-monolayer Pt coverages, and the formic acid oxidation rate increases as the Pt coverage is increased towards one monolayer. However, the electronic effect of the Ru becomes muted as a second Pt layer is added, CO oxidation is shifted to higher potentials and formic acid oxidation activity drops. The optimum coverage of Pt depends on a balance between the electronic effects of the Ru core on the promotion of CO oxidation and inhibition of formic acid oxidation through the direct pathway that does not produce adsorbed CO. Thus, a coverage of 0.85 ML Pt provided the best activity for 0.5 M formic acid, while 1.3 ML gave a particularly high activity for 2 M formic acid at low potentials.
Graphical Abstract
One monolayer of Pt on a Ru core provides high activity for formic acid oxidation due to a strong electronic effect, while this becomes muted when a second layer of Pt is added</description><identifier>ISSN: 1868-2529</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1868-5994</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12678-016-0328-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Acids ; Carbon monoxide ; Catalysis ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Core-shell particles ; Electrochemistry ; Energy Systems ; Formic acid ; Monolayers ; Nanoparticles ; Original Research ; Oxidation ; Oxidation rate ; Physical Chemistry ; Platinum ; Ruthenium</subject><ispartof>Electrocatalysis, 2016-11, Vol.7 (6), p.477-485</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b8ec247c2ca6f7feb49a8da563b91ed2a55e21ab374cc7761ab360f6d9a5869c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b8ec247c2ca6f7feb49a8da563b91ed2a55e21ab374cc7761ab360f6d9a5869c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>El Sawy, Ehab N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickup, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><title>Formic Acid Oxidation at Ru@Pt Core-Shell Nanoparticles</title><title>Electrocatalysis</title><addtitle>Electrocatalysis</addtitle><description>Formic acid oxidation has been investigated at Ru@Pt core-shell nanoparticles for Pt coverages ranging from 0.4 to 1.9 monolayers (ML), in order to determine how the bi-functional and electronic effect of the Ru core and compression of the Pt lattice influence activity. By comparing voltammetric results with those for CO stripping and bulk oxidation, it has been shown that the electronic effect of the Ru core on CO oxidation is the dominant factor influencing formic acid oxidation. Thus, the indirect pathway through adsorbed CO begins at the lowest potential for sub-monolayer Pt coverages, and the formic acid oxidation rate increases as the Pt coverage is increased towards one monolayer. However, the electronic effect of the Ru becomes muted as a second Pt layer is added, CO oxidation is shifted to higher potentials and formic acid oxidation activity drops. The optimum coverage of Pt depends on a balance between the electronic effects of the Ru core on the promotion of CO oxidation and inhibition of formic acid oxidation through the direct pathway that does not produce adsorbed CO. Thus, a coverage of 0.85 ML Pt provided the best activity for 0.5 M formic acid, while 1.3 ML gave a particularly high activity for 2 M formic acid at low potentials.
Graphical Abstract
One monolayer of Pt on a Ru core provides high activity for formic acid oxidation due to a strong electronic effect, while this becomes muted when a second layer of Pt is added</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Carbon monoxide</subject><subject>Catalysis</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Core-shell particles</subject><subject>Electrochemistry</subject><subject>Energy Systems</subject><subject>Formic acid</subject><subject>Monolayers</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Oxidation rate</subject><subject>Physical Chemistry</subject><subject>Platinum</subject><subject>Ruthenium</subject><issn>1868-2529</issn><issn>1868-5994</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EElXpD-AWibPBj9he36gqCkgVRTzOluM4kCqNi51K8O9xlR64sJedw8ys9kPokpJrSoi6SZRJBZhQiQlngOEETShIwELr8vSomWD6HM1S2pA8XHMCYoLUMsRt64q5a-ti_d3WdmhDX9iheNnfPg_FIkSPXz991xVPtg87G4fWdT5doLPGdsnPjnuK3pd3b4sHvFrfPy7mK-y44AOuwDtWKseclY1qfFVqC7UVklea-ppZITyjtuKqdE4peZCSNLLWVoDUjk_R1di7i-Fr79NgNmEf-3zSUID8AgdNsouOLhdDStE3ZhfbrY0_hhJzQGRGRCYjMgdEBnKGjZmUvf2Hj3-a_w39Auh3Z74</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>El Sawy, Ehab N.</creator><creator>Pickup, Peter G.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Formic Acid Oxidation at Ru@Pt Core-Shell Nanoparticles</title><author>El Sawy, Ehab N. ; Pickup, Peter G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b8ec247c2ca6f7feb49a8da563b91ed2a55e21ab374cc7761ab360f6d9a5869c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Carbon monoxide</topic><topic>Catalysis</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Core-shell particles</topic><topic>Electrochemistry</topic><topic>Energy Systems</topic><topic>Formic acid</topic><topic>Monolayers</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Oxidation rate</topic><topic>Physical Chemistry</topic><topic>Platinum</topic><topic>Ruthenium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>El Sawy, Ehab N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickup, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Electrocatalysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>El Sawy, Ehab N.</au><au>Pickup, Peter G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Formic Acid Oxidation at Ru@Pt Core-Shell Nanoparticles</atitle><jtitle>Electrocatalysis</jtitle><stitle>Electrocatalysis</stitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>477</spage><epage>485</epage><pages>477-485</pages><issn>1868-2529</issn><eissn>1868-5994</eissn><abstract>Formic acid oxidation has been investigated at Ru@Pt core-shell nanoparticles for Pt coverages ranging from 0.4 to 1.9 monolayers (ML), in order to determine how the bi-functional and electronic effect of the Ru core and compression of the Pt lattice influence activity. By comparing voltammetric results with those for CO stripping and bulk oxidation, it has been shown that the electronic effect of the Ru core on CO oxidation is the dominant factor influencing formic acid oxidation. Thus, the indirect pathway through adsorbed CO begins at the lowest potential for sub-monolayer Pt coverages, and the formic acid oxidation rate increases as the Pt coverage is increased towards one monolayer. However, the electronic effect of the Ru becomes muted as a second Pt layer is added, CO oxidation is shifted to higher potentials and formic acid oxidation activity drops. The optimum coverage of Pt depends on a balance between the electronic effects of the Ru core on the promotion of CO oxidation and inhibition of formic acid oxidation through the direct pathway that does not produce adsorbed CO. Thus, a coverage of 0.85 ML Pt provided the best activity for 0.5 M formic acid, while 1.3 ML gave a particularly high activity for 2 M formic acid at low potentials.
Graphical Abstract
One monolayer of Pt on a Ru core provides high activity for formic acid oxidation due to a strong electronic effect, while this becomes muted when a second layer of Pt is added</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12678-016-0328-8</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1868-2529 |
ispartof | Electrocatalysis, 2016-11, Vol.7 (6), p.477-485 |
issn | 1868-2529 1868-5994 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1880853890 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Acids Carbon monoxide Catalysis Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Core-shell particles Electrochemistry Energy Systems Formic acid Monolayers Nanoparticles Original Research Oxidation Oxidation rate Physical Chemistry Platinum Ruthenium |
title | Formic Acid Oxidation at Ru@Pt Core-Shell Nanoparticles |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A21%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Formic%20Acid%20Oxidation%20at%20Ru@Pt%20Core-Shell%20Nanoparticles&rft.jtitle=Electrocatalysis&rft.au=El%20Sawy,%20Ehab%20N.&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=477&rft.epage=485&rft.pages=477-485&rft.issn=1868-2529&rft.eissn=1868-5994&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12678-016-0328-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1880853890%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b8ec247c2ca6f7feb49a8da563b91ed2a55e21ab374cc7761ab360f6d9a5869c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880853890&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |