Loading…

Formic Acid Oxidation at Ru@Pt Core-Shell Nanoparticles

Formic acid oxidation has been investigated at Ru@Pt core-shell nanoparticles for Pt coverages ranging from 0.4 to 1.9 monolayers (ML), in order to determine how the bi-functional and electronic effect of the Ru core and compression of the Pt lattice influence activity. By comparing voltammetric res...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Electrocatalysis 2016-11, Vol.7 (6), p.477-485
Main Authors: El Sawy, Ehab N., Pickup, Peter G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b8ec247c2ca6f7feb49a8da563b91ed2a55e21ab374cc7761ab360f6d9a5869c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b8ec247c2ca6f7feb49a8da563b91ed2a55e21ab374cc7761ab360f6d9a5869c3
container_end_page 485
container_issue 6
container_start_page 477
container_title Electrocatalysis
container_volume 7
creator El Sawy, Ehab N.
Pickup, Peter G.
description Formic acid oxidation has been investigated at Ru@Pt core-shell nanoparticles for Pt coverages ranging from 0.4 to 1.9 monolayers (ML), in order to determine how the bi-functional and electronic effect of the Ru core and compression of the Pt lattice influence activity. By comparing voltammetric results with those for CO stripping and bulk oxidation, it has been shown that the electronic effect of the Ru core on CO oxidation is the dominant factor influencing formic acid oxidation. Thus, the indirect pathway through adsorbed CO begins at the lowest potential for sub-monolayer Pt coverages, and the formic acid oxidation rate increases as the Pt coverage is increased towards one monolayer. However, the electronic effect of the Ru becomes muted as a second Pt layer is added, CO oxidation is shifted to higher potentials and formic acid oxidation activity drops. The optimum coverage of Pt depends on a balance between the electronic effects of the Ru core on the promotion of CO oxidation and inhibition of formic acid oxidation through the direct pathway that does not produce adsorbed CO. Thus, a coverage of 0.85 ML Pt provided the best activity for 0.5 M formic acid, while 1.3 ML gave a particularly high activity for 2 M formic acid at low potentials. Graphical Abstract One monolayer of Pt on a Ru core provides high activity for formic acid oxidation due to a strong electronic effect, while this becomes muted when a second layer of Pt is added
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12678-016-0328-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1880853890</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1880853890</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b8ec247c2ca6f7feb49a8da563b91ed2a55e21ab374cc7761ab360f6d9a5869c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EElXpD-AWibPBj9he36gqCkgVRTzOluM4kCqNi51K8O9xlR64sJedw8ys9kPokpJrSoi6SZRJBZhQiQlngOEETShIwELr8vSomWD6HM1S2pA8XHMCYoLUMsRt64q5a-ti_d3WdmhDX9iheNnfPg_FIkSPXz991xVPtg87G4fWdT5doLPGdsnPjnuK3pd3b4sHvFrfPy7mK-y44AOuwDtWKseclY1qfFVqC7UVklea-ppZITyjtuKqdE4peZCSNLLWVoDUjk_R1di7i-Fr79NgNmEf-3zSUID8AgdNsouOLhdDStE3ZhfbrY0_hhJzQGRGRCYjMgdEBnKGjZmUvf2Hj3-a_w39Auh3Z74</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1880853890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Formic Acid Oxidation at Ru@Pt Core-Shell Nanoparticles</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>El Sawy, Ehab N. ; Pickup, Peter G.</creator><creatorcontrib>El Sawy, Ehab N. ; Pickup, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><description>Formic acid oxidation has been investigated at Ru@Pt core-shell nanoparticles for Pt coverages ranging from 0.4 to 1.9 monolayers (ML), in order to determine how the bi-functional and electronic effect of the Ru core and compression of the Pt lattice influence activity. By comparing voltammetric results with those for CO stripping and bulk oxidation, it has been shown that the electronic effect of the Ru core on CO oxidation is the dominant factor influencing formic acid oxidation. Thus, the indirect pathway through adsorbed CO begins at the lowest potential for sub-monolayer Pt coverages, and the formic acid oxidation rate increases as the Pt coverage is increased towards one monolayer. However, the electronic effect of the Ru becomes muted as a second Pt layer is added, CO oxidation is shifted to higher potentials and formic acid oxidation activity drops. The optimum coverage of Pt depends on a balance between the electronic effects of the Ru core on the promotion of CO oxidation and inhibition of formic acid oxidation through the direct pathway that does not produce adsorbed CO. Thus, a coverage of 0.85 ML Pt provided the best activity for 0.5 M formic acid, while 1.3 ML gave a particularly high activity for 2 M formic acid at low potentials. Graphical Abstract One monolayer of Pt on a Ru core provides high activity for formic acid oxidation due to a strong electronic effect, while this becomes muted when a second layer of Pt is added</description><identifier>ISSN: 1868-2529</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1868-5994</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12678-016-0328-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Acids ; Carbon monoxide ; Catalysis ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Core-shell particles ; Electrochemistry ; Energy Systems ; Formic acid ; Monolayers ; Nanoparticles ; Original Research ; Oxidation ; Oxidation rate ; Physical Chemistry ; Platinum ; Ruthenium</subject><ispartof>Electrocatalysis, 2016-11, Vol.7 (6), p.477-485</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b8ec247c2ca6f7feb49a8da563b91ed2a55e21ab374cc7761ab360f6d9a5869c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b8ec247c2ca6f7feb49a8da563b91ed2a55e21ab374cc7761ab360f6d9a5869c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>El Sawy, Ehab N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickup, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><title>Formic Acid Oxidation at Ru@Pt Core-Shell Nanoparticles</title><title>Electrocatalysis</title><addtitle>Electrocatalysis</addtitle><description>Formic acid oxidation has been investigated at Ru@Pt core-shell nanoparticles for Pt coverages ranging from 0.4 to 1.9 monolayers (ML), in order to determine how the bi-functional and electronic effect of the Ru core and compression of the Pt lattice influence activity. By comparing voltammetric results with those for CO stripping and bulk oxidation, it has been shown that the electronic effect of the Ru core on CO oxidation is the dominant factor influencing formic acid oxidation. Thus, the indirect pathway through adsorbed CO begins at the lowest potential for sub-monolayer Pt coverages, and the formic acid oxidation rate increases as the Pt coverage is increased towards one monolayer. However, the electronic effect of the Ru becomes muted as a second Pt layer is added, CO oxidation is shifted to higher potentials and formic acid oxidation activity drops. The optimum coverage of Pt depends on a balance between the electronic effects of the Ru core on the promotion of CO oxidation and inhibition of formic acid oxidation through the direct pathway that does not produce adsorbed CO. Thus, a coverage of 0.85 ML Pt provided the best activity for 0.5 M formic acid, while 1.3 ML gave a particularly high activity for 2 M formic acid at low potentials. Graphical Abstract One monolayer of Pt on a Ru core provides high activity for formic acid oxidation due to a strong electronic effect, while this becomes muted when a second layer of Pt is added</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Carbon monoxide</subject><subject>Catalysis</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Core-shell particles</subject><subject>Electrochemistry</subject><subject>Energy Systems</subject><subject>Formic acid</subject><subject>Monolayers</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Oxidation rate</subject><subject>Physical Chemistry</subject><subject>Platinum</subject><subject>Ruthenium</subject><issn>1868-2529</issn><issn>1868-5994</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EElXpD-AWibPBj9he36gqCkgVRTzOluM4kCqNi51K8O9xlR64sJedw8ys9kPokpJrSoi6SZRJBZhQiQlngOEETShIwELr8vSomWD6HM1S2pA8XHMCYoLUMsRt64q5a-ti_d3WdmhDX9iheNnfPg_FIkSPXz991xVPtg87G4fWdT5doLPGdsnPjnuK3pd3b4sHvFrfPy7mK-y44AOuwDtWKseclY1qfFVqC7UVklea-ppZITyjtuKqdE4peZCSNLLWVoDUjk_R1di7i-Fr79NgNmEf-3zSUID8AgdNsouOLhdDStE3ZhfbrY0_hhJzQGRGRCYjMgdEBnKGjZmUvf2Hj3-a_w39Auh3Z74</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>El Sawy, Ehab N.</creator><creator>Pickup, Peter G.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Formic Acid Oxidation at Ru@Pt Core-Shell Nanoparticles</title><author>El Sawy, Ehab N. ; Pickup, Peter G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b8ec247c2ca6f7feb49a8da563b91ed2a55e21ab374cc7761ab360f6d9a5869c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Carbon monoxide</topic><topic>Catalysis</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Core-shell particles</topic><topic>Electrochemistry</topic><topic>Energy Systems</topic><topic>Formic acid</topic><topic>Monolayers</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Oxidation rate</topic><topic>Physical Chemistry</topic><topic>Platinum</topic><topic>Ruthenium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>El Sawy, Ehab N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickup, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Electrocatalysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>El Sawy, Ehab N.</au><au>Pickup, Peter G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Formic Acid Oxidation at Ru@Pt Core-Shell Nanoparticles</atitle><jtitle>Electrocatalysis</jtitle><stitle>Electrocatalysis</stitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>477</spage><epage>485</epage><pages>477-485</pages><issn>1868-2529</issn><eissn>1868-5994</eissn><abstract>Formic acid oxidation has been investigated at Ru@Pt core-shell nanoparticles for Pt coverages ranging from 0.4 to 1.9 monolayers (ML), in order to determine how the bi-functional and electronic effect of the Ru core and compression of the Pt lattice influence activity. By comparing voltammetric results with those for CO stripping and bulk oxidation, it has been shown that the electronic effect of the Ru core on CO oxidation is the dominant factor influencing formic acid oxidation. Thus, the indirect pathway through adsorbed CO begins at the lowest potential for sub-monolayer Pt coverages, and the formic acid oxidation rate increases as the Pt coverage is increased towards one monolayer. However, the electronic effect of the Ru becomes muted as a second Pt layer is added, CO oxidation is shifted to higher potentials and formic acid oxidation activity drops. The optimum coverage of Pt depends on a balance between the electronic effects of the Ru core on the promotion of CO oxidation and inhibition of formic acid oxidation through the direct pathway that does not produce adsorbed CO. Thus, a coverage of 0.85 ML Pt provided the best activity for 0.5 M formic acid, while 1.3 ML gave a particularly high activity for 2 M formic acid at low potentials. Graphical Abstract One monolayer of Pt on a Ru core provides high activity for formic acid oxidation due to a strong electronic effect, while this becomes muted when a second layer of Pt is added</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12678-016-0328-8</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1868-2529
ispartof Electrocatalysis, 2016-11, Vol.7 (6), p.477-485
issn 1868-2529
1868-5994
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1880853890
source Springer Nature
subjects Acids
Carbon monoxide
Catalysis
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Core-shell particles
Electrochemistry
Energy Systems
Formic acid
Monolayers
Nanoparticles
Original Research
Oxidation
Oxidation rate
Physical Chemistry
Platinum
Ruthenium
title Formic Acid Oxidation at Ru@Pt Core-Shell Nanoparticles
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A21%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Formic%20Acid%20Oxidation%20at%20Ru@Pt%20Core-Shell%20Nanoparticles&rft.jtitle=Electrocatalysis&rft.au=El%20Sawy,%20Ehab%20N.&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=477&rft.epage=485&rft.pages=477-485&rft.issn=1868-2529&rft.eissn=1868-5994&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12678-016-0328-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1880853890%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-b8ec247c2ca6f7feb49a8da563b91ed2a55e21ab374cc7761ab360f6d9a5869c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1880853890&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true