Leadership and Leaders in Networked Social Movements

The followers/leaders, participation/leadership division is less obvious in Networked Social Movements than in traditional movements. Participants in these movements, adhering to egalitarian principles, seek to emphasize the absence of leaders, which has led some to characterize the movements as &qu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Demokratizatsiya (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2017-01, Vol.25 (1), p.7-22
Main Author: Nikiporets-Takigawa, Galina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Activists
Collective action
Hierarchy
Interest groups
Internet
Leadership
Myths
Participation
Political activism
Political leadership
Politics
Social activism
Social aspects
Social movements
Social networks
Society
Technology application
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The followers/leaders, participation/leadership division is less obvious in Networked Social Movements than in traditional movements. Participants in these movements, adhering to egalitarian principles, seek to emphasize the absence of leaders, which has led some to characterize the movements as "leaderless." This article interrogates that perspective through a critical review of these interpretations and myths, as well as the autonomous leadership theory proposed by Simon Western. After demonstrating the existence of hierarchy in Networked Social Movements, the article then focuses on the leaders of the Networked Social Movements, considering their specific characteristics in comparison to traditional leaders, and discussing the influence of new technologies on these specific characteristics.
ISSN:1074-6846
1940-4603