Loading…

Do grazing intensity and herbivore type affect soil health? Insights from a semi-arid productivity gradient

1. Grazing is one of the most widespread forms of intensive management on Earth and is linked to reductions in soil health. However, little is known about the relative influence of herbivore type, herbivore intensity and site productivity on soil health. This lack of knowledge reduces our capacity t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of applied ecology 2017-06, Vol.54 (3), p.976-985
Main Authors: Eldridge, David J., Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel, Travers, Samantha K., Val, James, Oliver, Ian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-839a9222b3282e090c4118cd2173bfbd3858f58126ede6ba3ddc915863026a523
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-839a9222b3282e090c4118cd2173bfbd3858f58126ede6ba3ddc915863026a523
container_end_page 985
container_issue 3
container_start_page 976
container_title The Journal of applied ecology
container_volume 54
creator Eldridge, David J.
Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel
Travers, Samantha K.
Val, James
Oliver, Ian
description 1. Grazing is one of the most widespread forms of intensive management on Earth and is linked to reductions in soil health. However, little is known about the relative influence of herbivore type, herbivore intensity and site productivity on soil health. This lack of knowledge reduces our capacity to manage landscapes where grazing is a major land use. 2. We used structural equation modelling to assess the effects of recent (cattle, sheep, goats, kangaroos and rabbit dung) and historic (cattle, sheep/goat livestock tracks) herbivore activity on soil health at 451 sites across 0.5 M km² of eastern Australia. We assessed the direct and indirect effects of increasing herbivore intensity, using dung and livestock tracks, on 15 morphological, physical and chemical attributes that are indicative of soil health, and we used these attributes to derive three indices representing the capacity of the soil to maintain its structural integrity (stability), cycle nutrients (nutrients) and maintain water flow (infiltration). 3. Grazing had negative effects on the three soil health indices, but these effects varied with productivity. Grazing intensity was associated with strong reductions in the stability and nutrient indices under low productivity, but these effects diminished with increasing productivity. Herbivore effects on individual attributes varied in relation to productivity level and were strongly herbivore specific, with most due to cattle grazing, and to a lesser extent, sheep, goats and rabbits. Few effects due to kangaroos or historic grazing by livestock were observed. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our study shows that livestock and rabbits degrade soil health through grazing, and its effects are strongest under low or moderate productivity; however, kangaroo effects are benign. Our findings support calls for resource management agencies to consider site productivity, as well as herbivore type and intensity, when developing strategies to manage grazing by livestock, and feral and native herbivores.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2664.12834
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1897653553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44337959</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44337959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-839a9222b3282e090c4118cd2173bfbd3858f58126ede6ba3ddc915863026a523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxS0EEqUwMyFZYk7rjzi1J4RKgaJKMMBsObHTuqRxsd2i8NeTEOjKLSed3--d7wFwidEItzXGNGMJybJ0hAmn6REYHCbHYIAQwQkXCJ-CsxDWCCHBKB2A9zsHl1592XoJbR1NHWxsoKo1XBmf273zBsZma6AqS1NEGJyt2idVxdUNnLfq5SoGWHq3gQoGs7GJ8lbDrXd6V0S779xaf21NHc_BSamqYC5--xC83c9ep4_J4vlhPr1dJAWd8DThVChBCMkp4cQggYoUY15ogic0L3NNOeMl45hkRpssV1TrQmDGM4pIphihQ3Dd-7a_-NiZEOXa7XzdrpSYi0nGKGtvH4Jxryq8C8GbUm693SjfSIxkl6js8pNdfvIn0ZZgPfFpK9P8J5dPL7M_7qrn1iE6f-DSlNKJYIJ-AwJLgZs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1897653553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do grazing intensity and herbivore type affect soil health? Insights from a semi-arid productivity gradient</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Eldridge, David J. ; Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel ; Travers, Samantha K. ; Val, James ; Oliver, Ian</creator><contributor>Kardol, Paul</contributor><creatorcontrib>Eldridge, David J. ; Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel ; Travers, Samantha K. ; Val, James ; Oliver, Ian ; Kardol, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>1. Grazing is one of the most widespread forms of intensive management on Earth and is linked to reductions in soil health. However, little is known about the relative influence of herbivore type, herbivore intensity and site productivity on soil health. This lack of knowledge reduces our capacity to manage landscapes where grazing is a major land use. 2. We used structural equation modelling to assess the effects of recent (cattle, sheep, goats, kangaroos and rabbit dung) and historic (cattle, sheep/goat livestock tracks) herbivore activity on soil health at 451 sites across 0.5 M km² of eastern Australia. We assessed the direct and indirect effects of increasing herbivore intensity, using dung and livestock tracks, on 15 morphological, physical and chemical attributes that are indicative of soil health, and we used these attributes to derive three indices representing the capacity of the soil to maintain its structural integrity (stability), cycle nutrients (nutrients) and maintain water flow (infiltration). 3. Grazing had negative effects on the three soil health indices, but these effects varied with productivity. Grazing intensity was associated with strong reductions in the stability and nutrient indices under low productivity, but these effects diminished with increasing productivity. Herbivore effects on individual attributes varied in relation to productivity level and were strongly herbivore specific, with most due to cattle grazing, and to a lesser extent, sheep, goats and rabbits. Few effects due to kangaroos or historic grazing by livestock were observed. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our study shows that livestock and rabbits degrade soil health through grazing, and its effects are strongest under low or moderate productivity; however, kangaroo effects are benign. Our findings support calls for resource management agencies to consider site productivity, as well as herbivore type and intensity, when developing strategies to manage grazing by livestock, and feral and native herbivores.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12834</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>Aridity ; Benign ; Cattle ; drylands ; Dung ; Flow stability ; Goats ; Grassland management ; Grazing ; Grazing intensity ; Harvest ; Health ; healthy soils ; herbivore activity ; Herbivores ; Infiltration ; kangaroo ; Land use ; Land use management ; Landscape ; Livestock ; Nutrients ; Productivity ; Rabbits ; Resource management ; Sheep ; soil condition ; soil nutrients ; Soil stability ; Soils ; Structural integrity ; Structural stability ; Water flow</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2017-06, Vol.54 (3), p.976-985</ispartof><rights>2017 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2016 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>Journal of Applied Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-839a9222b3282e090c4118cd2173bfbd3858f58126ede6ba3ddc915863026a523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-839a9222b3282e090c4118cd2173bfbd3858f58126ede6ba3ddc915863026a523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44337959$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44337959$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Kardol, Paul</contributor><creatorcontrib>Eldridge, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Travers, Samantha K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Val, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Ian</creatorcontrib><title>Do grazing intensity and herbivore type affect soil health? Insights from a semi-arid productivity gradient</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>1. Grazing is one of the most widespread forms of intensive management on Earth and is linked to reductions in soil health. However, little is known about the relative influence of herbivore type, herbivore intensity and site productivity on soil health. This lack of knowledge reduces our capacity to manage landscapes where grazing is a major land use. 2. We used structural equation modelling to assess the effects of recent (cattle, sheep, goats, kangaroos and rabbit dung) and historic (cattle, sheep/goat livestock tracks) herbivore activity on soil health at 451 sites across 0.5 M km² of eastern Australia. We assessed the direct and indirect effects of increasing herbivore intensity, using dung and livestock tracks, on 15 morphological, physical and chemical attributes that are indicative of soil health, and we used these attributes to derive three indices representing the capacity of the soil to maintain its structural integrity (stability), cycle nutrients (nutrients) and maintain water flow (infiltration). 3. Grazing had negative effects on the three soil health indices, but these effects varied with productivity. Grazing intensity was associated with strong reductions in the stability and nutrient indices under low productivity, but these effects diminished with increasing productivity. Herbivore effects on individual attributes varied in relation to productivity level and were strongly herbivore specific, with most due to cattle grazing, and to a lesser extent, sheep, goats and rabbits. Few effects due to kangaroos or historic grazing by livestock were observed. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our study shows that livestock and rabbits degrade soil health through grazing, and its effects are strongest under low or moderate productivity; however, kangaroo effects are benign. Our findings support calls for resource management agencies to consider site productivity, as well as herbivore type and intensity, when developing strategies to manage grazing by livestock, and feral and native herbivores.</description><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>Benign</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>drylands</subject><subject>Dung</subject><subject>Flow stability</subject><subject>Goats</subject><subject>Grassland management</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Grazing intensity</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>healthy soils</subject><subject>herbivore activity</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Infiltration</subject><subject>kangaroo</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use management</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>soil condition</subject><subject>soil nutrients</subject><subject>Soil stability</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Structural integrity</subject><subject>Structural stability</subject><subject>Water flow</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxS0EEqUwMyFZYk7rjzi1J4RKgaJKMMBsObHTuqRxsd2i8NeTEOjKLSed3--d7wFwidEItzXGNGMJybJ0hAmn6REYHCbHYIAQwQkXCJ-CsxDWCCHBKB2A9zsHl1592XoJbR1NHWxsoKo1XBmf273zBsZma6AqS1NEGJyt2idVxdUNnLfq5SoGWHq3gQoGs7GJ8lbDrXd6V0S779xaf21NHc_BSamqYC5--xC83c9ep4_J4vlhPr1dJAWd8DThVChBCMkp4cQggYoUY15ogic0L3NNOeMl45hkRpssV1TrQmDGM4pIphihQ3Dd-7a_-NiZEOXa7XzdrpSYi0nGKGtvH4Jxryq8C8GbUm693SjfSIxkl6js8pNdfvIn0ZZgPfFpK9P8J5dPL7M_7qrn1iE6f-DSlNKJYIJ-AwJLgZs</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Eldridge, David J.</creator><creator>Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel</creator><creator>Travers, Samantha K.</creator><creator>Val, James</creator><creator>Oliver, Ian</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Do grazing intensity and herbivore type affect soil health? Insights from a semi-arid productivity gradient</title><author>Eldridge, David J. ; Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel ; Travers, Samantha K. ; Val, James ; Oliver, Ian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-839a9222b3282e090c4118cd2173bfbd3858f58126ede6ba3ddc915863026a523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>Benign</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>drylands</topic><topic>Dung</topic><topic>Flow stability</topic><topic>Goats</topic><topic>Grassland management</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Grazing intensity</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>healthy soils</topic><topic>herbivore activity</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Infiltration</topic><topic>kangaroo</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use management</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>soil condition</topic><topic>soil nutrients</topic><topic>Soil stability</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Structural integrity</topic><topic>Structural stability</topic><topic>Water flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eldridge, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Travers, Samantha K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Val, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Ian</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley_OA刊</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eldridge, David J.</au><au>Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel</au><au>Travers, Samantha K.</au><au>Val, James</au><au>Oliver, Ian</au><au>Kardol, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do grazing intensity and herbivore type affect soil health? Insights from a semi-arid productivity gradient</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>976</spage><epage>985</epage><pages>976-985</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><abstract>1. Grazing is one of the most widespread forms of intensive management on Earth and is linked to reductions in soil health. However, little is known about the relative influence of herbivore type, herbivore intensity and site productivity on soil health. This lack of knowledge reduces our capacity to manage landscapes where grazing is a major land use. 2. We used structural equation modelling to assess the effects of recent (cattle, sheep, goats, kangaroos and rabbit dung) and historic (cattle, sheep/goat livestock tracks) herbivore activity on soil health at 451 sites across 0.5 M km² of eastern Australia. We assessed the direct and indirect effects of increasing herbivore intensity, using dung and livestock tracks, on 15 morphological, physical and chemical attributes that are indicative of soil health, and we used these attributes to derive three indices representing the capacity of the soil to maintain its structural integrity (stability), cycle nutrients (nutrients) and maintain water flow (infiltration). 3. Grazing had negative effects on the three soil health indices, but these effects varied with productivity. Grazing intensity was associated with strong reductions in the stability and nutrient indices under low productivity, but these effects diminished with increasing productivity. Herbivore effects on individual attributes varied in relation to productivity level and were strongly herbivore specific, with most due to cattle grazing, and to a lesser extent, sheep, goats and rabbits. Few effects due to kangaroos or historic grazing by livestock were observed. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our study shows that livestock and rabbits degrade soil health through grazing, and its effects are strongest under low or moderate productivity; however, kangaroo effects are benign. Our findings support calls for resource management agencies to consider site productivity, as well as herbivore type and intensity, when developing strategies to manage grazing by livestock, and feral and native herbivores.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2664.12834</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8901
ispartof The Journal of applied ecology, 2017-06, Vol.54 (3), p.976-985
issn 0021-8901
1365-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1897653553
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Aridity
Benign
Cattle
drylands
Dung
Flow stability
Goats
Grassland management
Grazing
Grazing intensity
Harvest
Health
healthy soils
herbivore activity
Herbivores
Infiltration
kangaroo
Land use
Land use management
Landscape
Livestock
Nutrients
Productivity
Rabbits
Resource management
Sheep
soil condition
soil nutrients
Soil stability
Soils
Structural integrity
Structural stability
Water flow
title Do grazing intensity and herbivore type affect soil health? Insights from a semi-arid productivity gradient
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A11%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20grazing%20intensity%20and%20herbivore%20type%20affect%20soil%20health?%20Insights%20from%20a%20semi-arid%20productivity%20gradient&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Eldridge,%20David%20J.&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=976&rft.epage=985&rft.pages=976-985&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2664.12834&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44337959%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-839a9222b3282e090c4118cd2173bfbd3858f58126ede6ba3ddc915863026a523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1897653553&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44337959&rfr_iscdi=true