Loading…
Do grazing intensity and herbivore type affect soil health? Insights from a semi-arid productivity gradient
1. Grazing is one of the most widespread forms of intensive management on Earth and is linked to reductions in soil health. However, little is known about the relative influence of herbivore type, herbivore intensity and site productivity on soil health. This lack of knowledge reduces our capacity t...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of applied ecology 2017-06, Vol.54 (3), p.976-985 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-839a9222b3282e090c4118cd2173bfbd3858f58126ede6ba3ddc915863026a523 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-839a9222b3282e090c4118cd2173bfbd3858f58126ede6ba3ddc915863026a523 |
container_end_page | 985 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 976 |
container_title | The Journal of applied ecology |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Eldridge, David J. Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel Travers, Samantha K. Val, James Oliver, Ian |
description | 1. Grazing is one of the most widespread forms of intensive management on Earth and is linked to reductions in soil health. However, little is known about the relative influence of herbivore type, herbivore intensity and site productivity on soil health. This lack of knowledge reduces our capacity to manage landscapes where grazing is a major land use. 2. We used structural equation modelling to assess the effects of recent (cattle, sheep, goats, kangaroos and rabbit dung) and historic (cattle, sheep/goat livestock tracks) herbivore activity on soil health at 451 sites across 0.5 M km² of eastern Australia. We assessed the direct and indirect effects of increasing herbivore intensity, using dung and livestock tracks, on 15 morphological, physical and chemical attributes that are indicative of soil health, and we used these attributes to derive three indices representing the capacity of the soil to maintain its structural integrity (stability), cycle nutrients (nutrients) and maintain water flow (infiltration). 3. Grazing had negative effects on the three soil health indices, but these effects varied with productivity. Grazing intensity was associated with strong reductions in the stability and nutrient indices under low productivity, but these effects diminished with increasing productivity. Herbivore effects on individual attributes varied in relation to productivity level and were strongly herbivore specific, with most due to cattle grazing, and to a lesser extent, sheep, goats and rabbits. Few effects due to kangaroos or historic grazing by livestock were observed. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our study shows that livestock and rabbits degrade soil health through grazing, and its effects are strongest under low or moderate productivity; however, kangaroo effects are benign. Our findings support calls for resource management agencies to consider site productivity, as well as herbivore type and intensity, when developing strategies to manage grazing by livestock, and feral and native herbivores. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2664.12834 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1897653553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44337959</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44337959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-839a9222b3282e090c4118cd2173bfbd3858f58126ede6ba3ddc915863026a523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxS0EEqUwMyFZYk7rjzi1J4RKgaJKMMBsObHTuqRxsd2i8NeTEOjKLSed3--d7wFwidEItzXGNGMJybJ0hAmn6REYHCbHYIAQwQkXCJ-CsxDWCCHBKB2A9zsHl1592XoJbR1NHWxsoKo1XBmf273zBsZma6AqS1NEGJyt2idVxdUNnLfq5SoGWHq3gQoGs7GJ8lbDrXd6V0S779xaf21NHc_BSamqYC5--xC83c9ep4_J4vlhPr1dJAWd8DThVChBCMkp4cQggYoUY15ogic0L3NNOeMl45hkRpssV1TrQmDGM4pIphihQ3Dd-7a_-NiZEOXa7XzdrpSYi0nGKGtvH4Jxryq8C8GbUm693SjfSIxkl6js8pNdfvIn0ZZgPfFpK9P8J5dPL7M_7qrn1iE6f-DSlNKJYIJ-AwJLgZs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1897653553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do grazing intensity and herbivore type affect soil health? Insights from a semi-arid productivity gradient</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Eldridge, David J. ; Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel ; Travers, Samantha K. ; Val, James ; Oliver, Ian</creator><contributor>Kardol, Paul</contributor><creatorcontrib>Eldridge, David J. ; Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel ; Travers, Samantha K. ; Val, James ; Oliver, Ian ; Kardol, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>1. Grazing is one of the most widespread forms of intensive management on Earth and is linked to reductions in soil health. However, little is known about the relative influence of herbivore type, herbivore intensity and site productivity on soil health. This lack of knowledge reduces our capacity to manage landscapes where grazing is a major land use. 2. We used structural equation modelling to assess the effects of recent (cattle, sheep, goats, kangaroos and rabbit dung) and historic (cattle, sheep/goat livestock tracks) herbivore activity on soil health at 451 sites across 0.5 M km² of eastern Australia. We assessed the direct and indirect effects of increasing herbivore intensity, using dung and livestock tracks, on 15 morphological, physical and chemical attributes that are indicative of soil health, and we used these attributes to derive three indices representing the capacity of the soil to maintain its structural integrity (stability), cycle nutrients (nutrients) and maintain water flow (infiltration). 3. Grazing had negative effects on the three soil health indices, but these effects varied with productivity. Grazing intensity was associated with strong reductions in the stability and nutrient indices under low productivity, but these effects diminished with increasing productivity. Herbivore effects on individual attributes varied in relation to productivity level and were strongly herbivore specific, with most due to cattle grazing, and to a lesser extent, sheep, goats and rabbits. Few effects due to kangaroos or historic grazing by livestock were observed. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our study shows that livestock and rabbits degrade soil health through grazing, and its effects are strongest under low or moderate productivity; however, kangaroo effects are benign. Our findings support calls for resource management agencies to consider site productivity, as well as herbivore type and intensity, when developing strategies to manage grazing by livestock, and feral and native herbivores.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12834</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley & Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>Aridity ; Benign ; Cattle ; drylands ; Dung ; Flow stability ; Goats ; Grassland management ; Grazing ; Grazing intensity ; Harvest ; Health ; healthy soils ; herbivore activity ; Herbivores ; Infiltration ; kangaroo ; Land use ; Land use management ; Landscape ; Livestock ; Nutrients ; Productivity ; Rabbits ; Resource management ; Sheep ; soil condition ; soil nutrients ; Soil stability ; Soils ; Structural integrity ; Structural stability ; Water flow</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2017-06, Vol.54 (3), p.976-985</ispartof><rights>2017 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2016 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>Journal of Applied Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-839a9222b3282e090c4118cd2173bfbd3858f58126ede6ba3ddc915863026a523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-839a9222b3282e090c4118cd2173bfbd3858f58126ede6ba3ddc915863026a523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44337959$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44337959$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Kardol, Paul</contributor><creatorcontrib>Eldridge, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Travers, Samantha K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Val, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Ian</creatorcontrib><title>Do grazing intensity and herbivore type affect soil health? Insights from a semi-arid productivity gradient</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>1. Grazing is one of the most widespread forms of intensive management on Earth and is linked to reductions in soil health. However, little is known about the relative influence of herbivore type, herbivore intensity and site productivity on soil health. This lack of knowledge reduces our capacity to manage landscapes where grazing is a major land use. 2. We used structural equation modelling to assess the effects of recent (cattle, sheep, goats, kangaroos and rabbit dung) and historic (cattle, sheep/goat livestock tracks) herbivore activity on soil health at 451 sites across 0.5 M km² of eastern Australia. We assessed the direct and indirect effects of increasing herbivore intensity, using dung and livestock tracks, on 15 morphological, physical and chemical attributes that are indicative of soil health, and we used these attributes to derive three indices representing the capacity of the soil to maintain its structural integrity (stability), cycle nutrients (nutrients) and maintain water flow (infiltration). 3. Grazing had negative effects on the three soil health indices, but these effects varied with productivity. Grazing intensity was associated with strong reductions in the stability and nutrient indices under low productivity, but these effects diminished with increasing productivity. Herbivore effects on individual attributes varied in relation to productivity level and were strongly herbivore specific, with most due to cattle grazing, and to a lesser extent, sheep, goats and rabbits. Few effects due to kangaroos or historic grazing by livestock were observed. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our study shows that livestock and rabbits degrade soil health through grazing, and its effects are strongest under low or moderate productivity; however, kangaroo effects are benign. Our findings support calls for resource management agencies to consider site productivity, as well as herbivore type and intensity, when developing strategies to manage grazing by livestock, and feral and native herbivores.</description><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>Benign</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>drylands</subject><subject>Dung</subject><subject>Flow stability</subject><subject>Goats</subject><subject>Grassland management</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Grazing intensity</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>healthy soils</subject><subject>herbivore activity</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Infiltration</subject><subject>kangaroo</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use management</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>soil condition</subject><subject>soil nutrients</subject><subject>Soil stability</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Structural integrity</subject><subject>Structural stability</subject><subject>Water flow</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxS0EEqUwMyFZYk7rjzi1J4RKgaJKMMBsObHTuqRxsd2i8NeTEOjKLSed3--d7wFwidEItzXGNGMJybJ0hAmn6REYHCbHYIAQwQkXCJ-CsxDWCCHBKB2A9zsHl1592XoJbR1NHWxsoKo1XBmf273zBsZma6AqS1NEGJyt2idVxdUNnLfq5SoGWHq3gQoGs7GJ8lbDrXd6V0S779xaf21NHc_BSamqYC5--xC83c9ep4_J4vlhPr1dJAWd8DThVChBCMkp4cQggYoUY15ogic0L3NNOeMl45hkRpssV1TrQmDGM4pIphihQ3Dd-7a_-NiZEOXa7XzdrpSYi0nGKGtvH4Jxryq8C8GbUm693SjfSIxkl6js8pNdfvIn0ZZgPfFpK9P8J5dPL7M_7qrn1iE6f-DSlNKJYIJ-AwJLgZs</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Eldridge, David J.</creator><creator>Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel</creator><creator>Travers, Samantha K.</creator><creator>Val, James</creator><creator>Oliver, Ian</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Do grazing intensity and herbivore type affect soil health? Insights from a semi-arid productivity gradient</title><author>Eldridge, David J. ; Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel ; Travers, Samantha K. ; Val, James ; Oliver, Ian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-839a9222b3282e090c4118cd2173bfbd3858f58126ede6ba3ddc915863026a523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>Benign</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>drylands</topic><topic>Dung</topic><topic>Flow stability</topic><topic>Goats</topic><topic>Grassland management</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Grazing intensity</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>healthy soils</topic><topic>herbivore activity</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Infiltration</topic><topic>kangaroo</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use management</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>soil condition</topic><topic>soil nutrients</topic><topic>Soil stability</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Structural integrity</topic><topic>Structural stability</topic><topic>Water flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eldridge, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Travers, Samantha K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Val, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Ian</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley_OA刊</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eldridge, David J.</au><au>Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel</au><au>Travers, Samantha K.</au><au>Val, James</au><au>Oliver, Ian</au><au>Kardol, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do grazing intensity and herbivore type affect soil health? Insights from a semi-arid productivity gradient</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>976</spage><epage>985</epage><pages>976-985</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><abstract>1. Grazing is one of the most widespread forms of intensive management on Earth and is linked to reductions in soil health. However, little is known about the relative influence of herbivore type, herbivore intensity and site productivity on soil health. This lack of knowledge reduces our capacity to manage landscapes where grazing is a major land use. 2. We used structural equation modelling to assess the effects of recent (cattle, sheep, goats, kangaroos and rabbit dung) and historic (cattle, sheep/goat livestock tracks) herbivore activity on soil health at 451 sites across 0.5 M km² of eastern Australia. We assessed the direct and indirect effects of increasing herbivore intensity, using dung and livestock tracks, on 15 morphological, physical and chemical attributes that are indicative of soil health, and we used these attributes to derive three indices representing the capacity of the soil to maintain its structural integrity (stability), cycle nutrients (nutrients) and maintain water flow (infiltration). 3. Grazing had negative effects on the three soil health indices, but these effects varied with productivity. Grazing intensity was associated with strong reductions in the stability and nutrient indices under low productivity, but these effects diminished with increasing productivity. Herbivore effects on individual attributes varied in relation to productivity level and were strongly herbivore specific, with most due to cattle grazing, and to a lesser extent, sheep, goats and rabbits. Few effects due to kangaroos or historic grazing by livestock were observed. 4. Synthesis and applications. Our study shows that livestock and rabbits degrade soil health through grazing, and its effects are strongest under low or moderate productivity; however, kangaroo effects are benign. Our findings support calls for resource management agencies to consider site productivity, as well as herbivore type and intensity, when developing strategies to manage grazing by livestock, and feral and native herbivores.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2664.12834</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8901 |
ispartof | The Journal of applied ecology, 2017-06, Vol.54 (3), p.976-985 |
issn | 0021-8901 1365-2664 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1897653553 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Aridity Benign Cattle drylands Dung Flow stability Goats Grassland management Grazing Grazing intensity Harvest Health healthy soils herbivore activity Herbivores Infiltration kangaroo Land use Land use management Landscape Livestock Nutrients Productivity Rabbits Resource management Sheep soil condition soil nutrients Soil stability Soils Structural integrity Structural stability Water flow |
title | Do grazing intensity and herbivore type affect soil health? Insights from a semi-arid productivity gradient |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A11%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20grazing%20intensity%20and%20herbivore%20type%20affect%20soil%20health?%20Insights%20from%20a%20semi-arid%20productivity%20gradient&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Eldridge,%20David%20J.&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=976&rft.epage=985&rft.pages=976-985&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2664.12834&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44337959%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3784-839a9222b3282e090c4118cd2173bfbd3858f58126ede6ba3ddc915863026a523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1897653553&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44337959&rfr_iscdi=true |