Comparison of trace mineral repletion strategies to overcome a high antagonist diet

An abstract of a study by Hartman et al comparing trace mineral (TM) repletion strategies to overcome a high antagonist diet is presented. Seventy-two Red Angus steers were blocked by BW and assigned equally to corn silage-based depletion period diets either supplemented with Cu, Mn, Se, and Zn at N...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of animal science 2017-03, Vol.95, p.173
Main Authors: Hartman, S J, Genther-Schroeder, O N, Hansen, S L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cattle
Copper
Corn
Corn silage
Diet
Feeds
Manganese
Nutrition
Selenium
Silage
Trace elements
Zinc
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 173
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 95
creator Hartman, S J
Genther-Schroeder, O N
Hansen, S L
description An abstract of a study by Hartman et al comparing trace mineral (TM) repletion strategies to overcome a high antagonist diet is presented. Seventy-two Red Angus steers were blocked by BW and assigned equally to corn silage-based depletion period diets either supplemented with Cu, Mn, Se, and Zn at NRC recommendations (CON) or supplemented with 0.3% S (CaSO^sub 4^), 5 mg of Mo/kg DM, and no added TM (DEP). Results suggest that regardless of dietary antagonists, ITM rapidly repleted Cu and Se, whereas similar repletion took 28 and 42 d for the BLEND and ING treatments.
doi_str_mv 10.2527/asasmw.2017.355
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1899435389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1899435389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_18994353893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyj1vwjAQgGGrKhIp7cx6UucEf-CSzIiqe9nRiR6Jo8SX-gz8_WboD2B6h-dVam10Zb3dbVBQxntltdlVzvsnVRhvfenMh3tWhdbWlHVt7FK9iPRaG-sbX6jvPY8TpiAcgS-QE54JxhAp4QCJpoFymElmyNQGEsgMfKN05pEAoQttBxgzthyDZPgJlF_V4oKD0Nt_V-r983Dcf5VT4t8rST71fE1xppOpm2brvKsb99j1B8_VR-4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1899435389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of trace mineral repletion strategies to overcome a high antagonist diet</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Hartman, S J ; Genther-Schroeder, O N ; Hansen, S L</creator><creatorcontrib>Hartman, S J ; Genther-Schroeder, O N ; Hansen, S L</creatorcontrib><description>An abstract of a study by Hartman et al comparing trace mineral (TM) repletion strategies to overcome a high antagonist diet is presented. Seventy-two Red Angus steers were blocked by BW and assigned equally to corn silage-based depletion period diets either supplemented with Cu, Mn, Se, and Zn at NRC recommendations (CON) or supplemented with 0.3% S (CaSO^sub 4^), 5 mg of Mo/kg DM, and no added TM (DEP). Results suggest that regardless of dietary antagonists, ITM rapidly repleted Cu and Se, whereas similar repletion took 28 and 42 d for the BLEND and ING treatments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/asasmw.2017.355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Cattle ; Copper ; Corn ; Corn silage ; Diet ; Feeds ; Manganese ; Nutrition ; Selenium ; Silage ; Trace elements ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2017-03, Vol.95, p.173</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Mar 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hartman, S J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genther-Schroeder, O N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, S L</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of trace mineral repletion strategies to overcome a high antagonist diet</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>An abstract of a study by Hartman et al comparing trace mineral (TM) repletion strategies to overcome a high antagonist diet is presented. Seventy-two Red Angus steers were blocked by BW and assigned equally to corn silage-based depletion period diets either supplemented with Cu, Mn, Se, and Zn at NRC recommendations (CON) or supplemented with 0.3% S (CaSO^sub 4^), 5 mg of Mo/kg DM, and no added TM (DEP). Results suggest that regardless of dietary antagonists, ITM rapidly repleted Cu and Se, whereas similar repletion took 28 and 42 d for the BLEND and ING treatments.</description><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Corn silage</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Selenium</subject><subject>Silage</subject><subject>Trace elements</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNyj1vwjAQgGGrKhIp7cx6UucEf-CSzIiqe9nRiR6Jo8SX-gz8_WboD2B6h-dVam10Zb3dbVBQxntltdlVzvsnVRhvfenMh3tWhdbWlHVt7FK9iPRaG-sbX6jvPY8TpiAcgS-QE54JxhAp4QCJpoFymElmyNQGEsgMfKN05pEAoQttBxgzthyDZPgJlF_V4oKD0Nt_V-r983Dcf5VT4t8rST71fE1xppOpm2brvKsb99j1B8_VR-4</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Hartman, S J</creator><creator>Genther-Schroeder, O N</creator><creator>Hansen, S L</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Comparison of trace mineral repletion strategies to overcome a high antagonist diet</title><author>Hartman, S J ; Genther-Schroeder, O N ; Hansen, S L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_18994353893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Corn silage</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Selenium</topic><topic>Silage</topic><topic>Trace elements</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hartman, S J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genther-Schroeder, O N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, S L</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Career and Technical Education</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hartman, S J</au><au>Genther-Schroeder, O N</au><au>Hansen, S L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of trace mineral repletion strategies to overcome a high antagonist diet</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>95</volume><spage>173</spage><pages>173-</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>An abstract of a study by Hartman et al comparing trace mineral (TM) repletion strategies to overcome a high antagonist diet is presented. Seventy-two Red Angus steers were blocked by BW and assigned equally to corn silage-based depletion period diets either supplemented with Cu, Mn, Se, and Zn at NRC recommendations (CON) or supplemented with 0.3% S (CaSO^sub 4^), 5 mg of Mo/kg DM, and no added TM (DEP). Results suggest that regardless of dietary antagonists, ITM rapidly repleted Cu and Se, whereas similar repletion took 28 and 42 d for the BLEND and ING treatments.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/asasmw.2017.355</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2017-03, Vol.95, p.173
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1899435389
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Cattle
Copper
Corn
Corn silage
Diet
Feeds
Manganese
Nutrition
Selenium
Silage
Trace elements
Zinc
title Comparison of trace mineral repletion strategies to overcome a high antagonist diet
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A33%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20trace%20mineral%20repletion%20strategies%20to%20overcome%20a%20high%20antagonist%20diet&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Hartman,%20S%20J&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=95&rft.spage=173&rft.pages=173-&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/asasmw.2017.355&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1899435389%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_18994353893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1899435389&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true