Loading…
The 10 April 2014 Nicaraguan Crustal Earthquake: Evidence of Complex Deformation of the Central American Volcanic Arc
On 10 April 2014, an M w 6.1 earthquake struck central Nicaragua. The main event and the aftershocks were clearly recorded by the Nicaraguan national seismic network and other regional seismic stations. These crustal earthquakes were strongly felt in central Nicaragua but caused relatively little da...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pure and applied geophysics 2016-10, Vol.173 (10-11), p.3305-3315 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-4a7767645ca6565d75060cf579b7ca866c90d3a617ae72d65888e32b7a7154663 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-4a7767645ca6565d75060cf579b7ca866c90d3a617ae72d65888e32b7a7154663 |
container_end_page | 3315 |
container_issue | 10-11 |
container_start_page | 3305 |
container_title | Pure and applied geophysics |
container_volume | 173 |
creator | Suárez, Gerardo Muñoz, Angélica Farraz, Isaac A. Talavera, Emilio Tenorio, Virginia Novelo-Casanova, David A. Sánchez, Antonio |
description | On 10 April 2014, an
M
w
6.1 earthquake struck central Nicaragua. The main event and the aftershocks were clearly recorded by the Nicaraguan national seismic network and other regional seismic stations. These crustal earthquakes were strongly felt in central Nicaragua but caused relatively little damage. This is in sharp contrast to the destructive effects of the 1972 earthquake in the capital city of Managua. The differences in damage stem from the fact that the 1972 earthquake occurred on a fault beneath the city; in contrast, the 2014 event lies offshore, under Lake Managua. The distribution of aftershocks of the 2014 event shows two clusters of seismic activity. In the northwestern part of Lake Managua, an alignment of aftershocks suggests a northwest to southeast striking fault, parallel to the volcanic arc. The source mechanism agrees with this right-lateral, strike-slip motion on a plane with the same orientation as the aftershock sequence. For an earthquake of this magnitude, seismic scaling relations between fault length and magnitude predict a sub-surface fault length of approximately 16 km. This length is in good agreement with the extent of the fault defined by the aftershock sequence. A second cluster of aftershocks beneath Apoyeque volcano occurred simultaneously, but spatially separated from the first. There is no clear alignment of the epicenters in this cluster. Nevertheless, the decay of the number of earthquakes beneath Apoyeque as a function of time shows the typical behavior of an aftershock sequence and not of a volcanic swarm. The northeast–southwest striking Tiscapa/Ciudad Jardín and Estadio faults that broke during the 1972 and 1931 Managua earthquakes are orthogonal to the fault where the 10 April earthquake occurred. These orthogonal faults in close geographic proximity show that Central Nicaragua is being deformed in a complex tectonic setting. The Nicaraguan forearc sliver, between the trench and the volcanic arc, moves to the northwest relative to the Caribbean plate at a rate of 14 mm/year. Part of the deformation is apparently accommodated by strain partitioning in the form of bookshelf faulting, on a system of orthogonal faults. The sinistral faults striking northeast–southwest rotate blocks of the Caribbean plate in a clockwise manner. The recent crustal earthquakes in central Nicaragua in 1931, 1972 and 2005 earthquakes took place on these left-lateral faults. The motion of the forearc sliver is also accommodated by a sec |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00024-015-1201-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1904775442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1904775442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-4a7767645ca6565d75060cf579b7ca866c90d3a617ae72d65888e32b7a7154663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwA9gsMQeu41fCFoXykCpYCqvlOk6bksTFThD01-OqDCxMR7o637nSh9AlgWsCIG8CAKQsAcITkgJJdkdoQlgKSU6oOEYTAEoTxjk9RWchbACIlDyfoHGxtpgALra-aXEkGX5ujPZ6Neoel34Mg27xTPth_THqd3uLZ59NZXtjsatx6bpta7_wna2d7_TQuH5_HuJmafvBR7TorI-DPX5zbYzG4MKbc3RS6zbYi9-cotf72aJ8TOYvD09lMU80pfmQMC2lkIJxowUXvJIcBJiay3wpjc6EMDlUVAsitZVpJXiWZZamS6kl4UwIOkVXh92tdx-jDYPauNH38aUiObCogLE0tsihZbwLwdtaRRmd9t-KgNrbVQe7KtpVe7tqF5n0wITY7VfW_1n-F_oBaVd68A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1904775442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The 10 April 2014 Nicaraguan Crustal Earthquake: Evidence of Complex Deformation of the Central American Volcanic Arc</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Suárez, Gerardo ; Muñoz, Angélica ; Farraz, Isaac A. ; Talavera, Emilio ; Tenorio, Virginia ; Novelo-Casanova, David A. ; Sánchez, Antonio</creator><creatorcontrib>Suárez, Gerardo ; Muñoz, Angélica ; Farraz, Isaac A. ; Talavera, Emilio ; Tenorio, Virginia ; Novelo-Casanova, David A. ; Sánchez, Antonio</creatorcontrib><description>On 10 April 2014, an
M
w
6.1 earthquake struck central Nicaragua. The main event and the aftershocks were clearly recorded by the Nicaraguan national seismic network and other regional seismic stations. These crustal earthquakes were strongly felt in central Nicaragua but caused relatively little damage. This is in sharp contrast to the destructive effects of the 1972 earthquake in the capital city of Managua. The differences in damage stem from the fact that the 1972 earthquake occurred on a fault beneath the city; in contrast, the 2014 event lies offshore, under Lake Managua. The distribution of aftershocks of the 2014 event shows two clusters of seismic activity. In the northwestern part of Lake Managua, an alignment of aftershocks suggests a northwest to southeast striking fault, parallel to the volcanic arc. The source mechanism agrees with this right-lateral, strike-slip motion on a plane with the same orientation as the aftershock sequence. For an earthquake of this magnitude, seismic scaling relations between fault length and magnitude predict a sub-surface fault length of approximately 16 km. This length is in good agreement with the extent of the fault defined by the aftershock sequence. A second cluster of aftershocks beneath Apoyeque volcano occurred simultaneously, but spatially separated from the first. There is no clear alignment of the epicenters in this cluster. Nevertheless, the decay of the number of earthquakes beneath Apoyeque as a function of time shows the typical behavior of an aftershock sequence and not of a volcanic swarm. The northeast–southwest striking Tiscapa/Ciudad Jardín and Estadio faults that broke during the 1972 and 1931 Managua earthquakes are orthogonal to the fault where the 10 April earthquake occurred. These orthogonal faults in close geographic proximity show that Central Nicaragua is being deformed in a complex tectonic setting. The Nicaraguan forearc sliver, between the trench and the volcanic arc, moves to the northwest relative to the Caribbean plate at a rate of 14 mm/year. Part of the deformation is apparently accommodated by strain partitioning in the form of bookshelf faulting, on a system of orthogonal faults. The sinistral faults striking northeast–southwest rotate blocks of the Caribbean plate in a clockwise manner. The recent crustal earthquakes in central Nicaragua in 1931, 1972 and 2005 earthquakes took place on these left-lateral faults. The motion of the forearc sliver is also accommodated by a second set of right-lateral, strike-slip faults oriented parallel to the volcanic arc. Faults with this orientation and direction of motion are responsible for the 2014 and possibly the 1955 earthquakes. The presence of this geometry of orthogonal crustal faults highlights the seismic hazard posed by this complex faulting system, not only in the capital city of Managua, but also to the major Nicaraguan cities, which lie close to the volcanic arc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-4553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9136</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00024-015-1201-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Aftershocks ; Alignment ; Basins ; Clusters ; Decay ; Deformation ; Deformation mechanisms ; Direction ; Distribution ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquakes ; Fault lines ; Faults ; Geological faults ; Geological hazards ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Lakes ; Length ; Movement ; Offshore ; Orientation ; Partitioning ; Proximity ; Scaling ; Seismic activity ; Seismic hazard ; Sequencing ; Slip ; Strain ; Strike-slip faults ; Volcanic activity ; Volcanoes</subject><ispartof>Pure and applied geophysics, 2016-10, Vol.173 (10-11), p.3305-3315</ispartof><rights>Springer Basel 2015</rights><rights>Pure and Applied Geophysics is a copyright of Springer, 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-4a7767645ca6565d75060cf579b7ca866c90d3a617ae72d65888e32b7a7154663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-4a7767645ca6565d75060cf579b7ca866c90d3a617ae72d65888e32b7a7154663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suárez, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Angélica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farraz, Isaac A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talavera, Emilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tenorio, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novelo-Casanova, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Antonio</creatorcontrib><title>The 10 April 2014 Nicaraguan Crustal Earthquake: Evidence of Complex Deformation of the Central American Volcanic Arc</title><title>Pure and applied geophysics</title><addtitle>Pure Appl. Geophys</addtitle><description>On 10 April 2014, an
M
w
6.1 earthquake struck central Nicaragua. The main event and the aftershocks were clearly recorded by the Nicaraguan national seismic network and other regional seismic stations. These crustal earthquakes were strongly felt in central Nicaragua but caused relatively little damage. This is in sharp contrast to the destructive effects of the 1972 earthquake in the capital city of Managua. The differences in damage stem from the fact that the 1972 earthquake occurred on a fault beneath the city; in contrast, the 2014 event lies offshore, under Lake Managua. The distribution of aftershocks of the 2014 event shows two clusters of seismic activity. In the northwestern part of Lake Managua, an alignment of aftershocks suggests a northwest to southeast striking fault, parallel to the volcanic arc. The source mechanism agrees with this right-lateral, strike-slip motion on a plane with the same orientation as the aftershock sequence. For an earthquake of this magnitude, seismic scaling relations between fault length and magnitude predict a sub-surface fault length of approximately 16 km. This length is in good agreement with the extent of the fault defined by the aftershock sequence. A second cluster of aftershocks beneath Apoyeque volcano occurred simultaneously, but spatially separated from the first. There is no clear alignment of the epicenters in this cluster. Nevertheless, the decay of the number of earthquakes beneath Apoyeque as a function of time shows the typical behavior of an aftershock sequence and not of a volcanic swarm. The northeast–southwest striking Tiscapa/Ciudad Jardín and Estadio faults that broke during the 1972 and 1931 Managua earthquakes are orthogonal to the fault where the 10 April earthquake occurred. These orthogonal faults in close geographic proximity show that Central Nicaragua is being deformed in a complex tectonic setting. The Nicaraguan forearc sliver, between the trench and the volcanic arc, moves to the northwest relative to the Caribbean plate at a rate of 14 mm/year. Part of the deformation is apparently accommodated by strain partitioning in the form of bookshelf faulting, on a system of orthogonal faults. The sinistral faults striking northeast–southwest rotate blocks of the Caribbean plate in a clockwise manner. The recent crustal earthquakes in central Nicaragua in 1931, 1972 and 2005 earthquakes took place on these left-lateral faults. The motion of the forearc sliver is also accommodated by a second set of right-lateral, strike-slip faults oriented parallel to the volcanic arc. Faults with this orientation and direction of motion are responsible for the 2014 and possibly the 1955 earthquakes. The presence of this geometry of orthogonal crustal faults highlights the seismic hazard posed by this complex faulting system, not only in the capital city of Managua, but also to the major Nicaraguan cities, which lie close to the volcanic arc.</description><subject>Aftershocks</subject><subject>Alignment</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Clusters</subject><subject>Decay</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Deformation mechanisms</subject><subject>Direction</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Fault lines</subject><subject>Faults</subject><subject>Geological faults</subject><subject>Geological hazards</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Length</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Orientation</subject><subject>Partitioning</subject><subject>Proximity</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Sequencing</subject><subject>Slip</subject><subject>Strain</subject><subject>Strike-slip faults</subject><subject>Volcanic activity</subject><subject>Volcanoes</subject><issn>0033-4553</issn><issn>1420-9136</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwA9gsMQeu41fCFoXykCpYCqvlOk6bksTFThD01-OqDCxMR7o637nSh9AlgWsCIG8CAKQsAcITkgJJdkdoQlgKSU6oOEYTAEoTxjk9RWchbACIlDyfoHGxtpgALra-aXEkGX5ujPZ6Neoel34Mg27xTPth_THqd3uLZ59NZXtjsatx6bpta7_wna2d7_TQuH5_HuJmafvBR7TorI-DPX5zbYzG4MKbc3RS6zbYi9-cotf72aJ8TOYvD09lMU80pfmQMC2lkIJxowUXvJIcBJiay3wpjc6EMDlUVAsitZVpJXiWZZamS6kl4UwIOkVXh92tdx-jDYPauNH38aUiObCogLE0tsihZbwLwdtaRRmd9t-KgNrbVQe7KtpVe7tqF5n0wITY7VfW_1n-F_oBaVd68A</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Suárez, Gerardo</creator><creator>Muñoz, Angélica</creator><creator>Farraz, Isaac A.</creator><creator>Talavera, Emilio</creator><creator>Tenorio, Virginia</creator><creator>Novelo-Casanova, David A.</creator><creator>Sánchez, Antonio</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>The 10 April 2014 Nicaraguan Crustal Earthquake: Evidence of Complex Deformation of the Central American Volcanic Arc</title><author>Suárez, Gerardo ; Muñoz, Angélica ; Farraz, Isaac A. ; Talavera, Emilio ; Tenorio, Virginia ; Novelo-Casanova, David A. ; Sánchez, Antonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-4a7767645ca6565d75060cf579b7ca866c90d3a617ae72d65888e32b7a7154663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aftershocks</topic><topic>Alignment</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Clusters</topic><topic>Decay</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Deformation mechanisms</topic><topic>Direction</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Fault lines</topic><topic>Faults</topic><topic>Geological faults</topic><topic>Geological hazards</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Length</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Orientation</topic><topic>Partitioning</topic><topic>Proximity</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Sequencing</topic><topic>Slip</topic><topic>Strain</topic><topic>Strike-slip faults</topic><topic>Volcanic activity</topic><topic>Volcanoes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suárez, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Angélica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farraz, Isaac A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talavera, Emilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tenorio, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novelo-Casanova, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Antonio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Pure and applied geophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suárez, Gerardo</au><au>Muñoz, Angélica</au><au>Farraz, Isaac A.</au><au>Talavera, Emilio</au><au>Tenorio, Virginia</au><au>Novelo-Casanova, David A.</au><au>Sánchez, Antonio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The 10 April 2014 Nicaraguan Crustal Earthquake: Evidence of Complex Deformation of the Central American Volcanic Arc</atitle><jtitle>Pure and applied geophysics</jtitle><stitle>Pure Appl. Geophys</stitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>173</volume><issue>10-11</issue><spage>3305</spage><epage>3315</epage><pages>3305-3315</pages><issn>0033-4553</issn><eissn>1420-9136</eissn><abstract>On 10 April 2014, an
M
w
6.1 earthquake struck central Nicaragua. The main event and the aftershocks were clearly recorded by the Nicaraguan national seismic network and other regional seismic stations. These crustal earthquakes were strongly felt in central Nicaragua but caused relatively little damage. This is in sharp contrast to the destructive effects of the 1972 earthquake in the capital city of Managua. The differences in damage stem from the fact that the 1972 earthquake occurred on a fault beneath the city; in contrast, the 2014 event lies offshore, under Lake Managua. The distribution of aftershocks of the 2014 event shows two clusters of seismic activity. In the northwestern part of Lake Managua, an alignment of aftershocks suggests a northwest to southeast striking fault, parallel to the volcanic arc. The source mechanism agrees with this right-lateral, strike-slip motion on a plane with the same orientation as the aftershock sequence. For an earthquake of this magnitude, seismic scaling relations between fault length and magnitude predict a sub-surface fault length of approximately 16 km. This length is in good agreement with the extent of the fault defined by the aftershock sequence. A second cluster of aftershocks beneath Apoyeque volcano occurred simultaneously, but spatially separated from the first. There is no clear alignment of the epicenters in this cluster. Nevertheless, the decay of the number of earthquakes beneath Apoyeque as a function of time shows the typical behavior of an aftershock sequence and not of a volcanic swarm. The northeast–southwest striking Tiscapa/Ciudad Jardín and Estadio faults that broke during the 1972 and 1931 Managua earthquakes are orthogonal to the fault where the 10 April earthquake occurred. These orthogonal faults in close geographic proximity show that Central Nicaragua is being deformed in a complex tectonic setting. The Nicaraguan forearc sliver, between the trench and the volcanic arc, moves to the northwest relative to the Caribbean plate at a rate of 14 mm/year. Part of the deformation is apparently accommodated by strain partitioning in the form of bookshelf faulting, on a system of orthogonal faults. The sinistral faults striking northeast–southwest rotate blocks of the Caribbean plate in a clockwise manner. The recent crustal earthquakes in central Nicaragua in 1931, 1972 and 2005 earthquakes took place on these left-lateral faults. The motion of the forearc sliver is also accommodated by a second set of right-lateral, strike-slip faults oriented parallel to the volcanic arc. Faults with this orientation and direction of motion are responsible for the 2014 and possibly the 1955 earthquakes. The presence of this geometry of orthogonal crustal faults highlights the seismic hazard posed by this complex faulting system, not only in the capital city of Managua, but also to the major Nicaraguan cities, which lie close to the volcanic arc.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s00024-015-1201-z</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-4553 |
ispartof | Pure and applied geophysics, 2016-10, Vol.173 (10-11), p.3305-3315 |
issn | 0033-4553 1420-9136 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1904775442 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Aftershocks Alignment Basins Clusters Decay Deformation Deformation mechanisms Direction Distribution Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earthquake damage Earthquakes Fault lines Faults Geological faults Geological hazards Geophysics/Geodesy Lakes Length Movement Offshore Orientation Partitioning Proximity Scaling Seismic activity Seismic hazard Sequencing Slip Strain Strike-slip faults Volcanic activity Volcanoes |
title | The 10 April 2014 Nicaraguan Crustal Earthquake: Evidence of Complex Deformation of the Central American Volcanic Arc |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A18%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%2010%20April%202014%20Nicaraguan%20Crustal%20Earthquake:%20Evidence%20of%20Complex%20Deformation%20of%20the%20Central%20American%20Volcanic%20Arc&rft.jtitle=Pure%20and%20applied%20geophysics&rft.au=Su%C3%A1rez,%20Gerardo&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=173&rft.issue=10-11&rft.spage=3305&rft.epage=3315&rft.pages=3305-3315&rft.issn=0033-4553&rft.eissn=1420-9136&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00024-015-1201-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1904775442%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a339t-4a7767645ca6565d75060cf579b7ca866c90d3a617ae72d65888e32b7a7154663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1904775442&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |