Loading…
Retrieving Soybean Leaf Area Index from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Analysis of RF, ANN, and SVM Regression Models
Leaf area index (LAI) is an important indicator of plant growth and yield that can be monitored by remote sensing. Several models were constructed using datasets derived from SRS and STR sampling methods to determine the optimal model for soybean (multiple strains) LAI inversion for the whole crop g...
Saved in:
Published in: | Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2017-04, Vol.9 (4), p.309 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-649f8cfb99847f62b861ce909579862f2f888f00fcba5fba08aabaa2a5a7c1e63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-649f8cfb99847f62b861ce909579862f2f888f00fcba5fba08aabaa2a5a7c1e63 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 309 |
container_title | Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Yuan, Huanhuan Yang, Guijun Li, Changchun Wang, Yanjie Liu, Jiangang Yu, Haiyang Feng, Haikuan Xu, Bo Zhao, Xiaoqing Yang, Xiaodong |
description | Leaf area index (LAI) is an important indicator of plant growth and yield that can be monitored by remote sensing. Several models were constructed using datasets derived from SRS and STR sampling methods to determine the optimal model for soybean (multiple strains) LAI inversion for the whole crop growth period and a single growth period. Random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM) regression models were compared with a partial least-squares regression (PLS) model. The RF model yielded the highest precision, accuracy, and stability with V-R2, SDR2, V-RMSE, and SDRMSE values of 0.741, 0.031, 0.106, and 0.005, respectively, over the whole growth period based on STR sampling. The ANN model had the highest precision, accuracy, and stability (0.452, 0.132, 0.086, and 0.009, respectively) over a single growth phase based on STR sampling. The precision, accuracy, and stability of the RF, ANN, and SVM models were improved by inclusion of STR sampling. The RF model is suitable for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively large (i.e., the whole growth period or more than one growth period). The ANN model is more appropriate for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively low (i.e., a single growth period). |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/rs9040309 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1905786052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1905786052</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-649f8cfb99847f62b861ce909579862f2f888f00fcba5fba08aabaa2a5a7c1e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkN1Kw0AQRoMoWLQXvsGAV0Krm83frnehWFtoK7S2t2GSzNaUdLfupmLewYc2UhHnZoaPw8dwPO_GZ_dBINmDdZKFLGDyzOtxlvBhyCU__3dfen3ndqybIPA7tud9LamxFX1Uegsr0-aEGmaEClJLCFNd0icoa_aw1nvUmkpIyVZYw4beqqImmLQHsu5ARWO7dEl70xCsSLuu8RFSjXXrKgdGwXI8gHSxGADqElabeQdvLTlXGQ1zU1Ltrr0LhbWj_u--8tbjp9fRZDh7eZ6O0tmwCCLRDONQKlGoXEoRJirmuYj9giSTUSJFzBVXQgjFmCpyjFSOTCDmiBwjTAqf4uDKuz31Hqx5P5Jrsp052u5Vl3VWokTELOIddXeiCmucs6Syg632aNvMZ9mP7-zPd_ANz3Nyow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1905786052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retrieving Soybean Leaf Area Index from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Analysis of RF, ANN, and SVM Regression Models</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><creator>Yuan, Huanhuan ; Yang, Guijun ; Li, Changchun ; Wang, Yanjie ; Liu, Jiangang ; Yu, Haiyang ; Feng, Haikuan ; Xu, Bo ; Zhao, Xiaoqing ; Yang, Xiaodong</creator><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Huanhuan ; Yang, Guijun ; Li, Changchun ; Wang, Yanjie ; Liu, Jiangang ; Yu, Haiyang ; Feng, Haikuan ; Xu, Bo ; Zhao, Xiaoqing ; Yang, Xiaodong</creatorcontrib><description>Leaf area index (LAI) is an important indicator of plant growth and yield that can be monitored by remote sensing. Several models were constructed using datasets derived from SRS and STR sampling methods to determine the optimal model for soybean (multiple strains) LAI inversion for the whole crop growth period and a single growth period. Random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM) regression models were compared with a partial least-squares regression (PLS) model. The RF model yielded the highest precision, accuracy, and stability with V-R2, SDR2, V-RMSE, and SDRMSE values of 0.741, 0.031, 0.106, and 0.005, respectively, over the whole growth period based on STR sampling. The ANN model had the highest precision, accuracy, and stability (0.452, 0.132, 0.086, and 0.009, respectively) over a single growth phase based on STR sampling. The precision, accuracy, and stability of the RF, ANN, and SVM models were improved by inclusion of STR sampling. The RF model is suitable for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively large (i.e., the whole growth period or more than one growth period). The ANN model is more appropriate for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively low (i.e., a single growth period).</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/rs9040309</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Artificial neural networks ; Chlorophyll ; Crop growth ; Crop yield ; Crops ; Datasets ; Detection ; Estimation ; Leaf area ; Leaf area index ; Learning theory ; Least squares method ; Leaves ; Neural networks ; Optimization ; Plant growth ; Regression analysis ; Remote monitoring ; Remote sensing ; Sampling ; Sampling methods ; Soybeans ; Stability ; Support vector machines ; Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2017-04, Vol.9 (4), p.309</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-649f8cfb99847f62b861ce909579862f2f888f00fcba5fba08aabaa2a5a7c1e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-649f8cfb99847f62b861ce909579862f2f888f00fcba5fba08aabaa2a5a7c1e63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6425-8321</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1905786052/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1905786052?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Huanhuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Guijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Changchun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yanjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jiangang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Haiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Haikuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaoqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xiaodong</creatorcontrib><title>Retrieving Soybean Leaf Area Index from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Analysis of RF, ANN, and SVM Regression Models</title><title>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</title><description>Leaf area index (LAI) is an important indicator of plant growth and yield that can be monitored by remote sensing. Several models were constructed using datasets derived from SRS and STR sampling methods to determine the optimal model for soybean (multiple strains) LAI inversion for the whole crop growth period and a single growth period. Random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM) regression models were compared with a partial least-squares regression (PLS) model. The RF model yielded the highest precision, accuracy, and stability with V-R2, SDR2, V-RMSE, and SDRMSE values of 0.741, 0.031, 0.106, and 0.005, respectively, over the whole growth period based on STR sampling. The ANN model had the highest precision, accuracy, and stability (0.452, 0.132, 0.086, and 0.009, respectively) over a single growth phase based on STR sampling. The precision, accuracy, and stability of the RF, ANN, and SVM models were improved by inclusion of STR sampling. The RF model is suitable for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively large (i.e., the whole growth period or more than one growth period). The ANN model is more appropriate for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively low (i.e., a single growth period).</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Crop growth</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Leaf area</subject><subject>Leaf area index</subject><subject>Learning theory</subject><subject>Least squares method</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Remote monitoring</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><issn>2072-4292</issn><issn>2072-4292</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkN1Kw0AQRoMoWLQXvsGAV0Krm83frnehWFtoK7S2t2GSzNaUdLfupmLewYc2UhHnZoaPw8dwPO_GZ_dBINmDdZKFLGDyzOtxlvBhyCU__3dfen3ndqybIPA7tud9LamxFX1Uegsr0-aEGmaEClJLCFNd0icoa_aw1nvUmkpIyVZYw4beqqImmLQHsu5ARWO7dEl70xCsSLuu8RFSjXXrKgdGwXI8gHSxGADqElabeQdvLTlXGQ1zU1Ltrr0LhbWj_u--8tbjp9fRZDh7eZ6O0tmwCCLRDONQKlGoXEoRJirmuYj9giSTUSJFzBVXQgjFmCpyjFSOTCDmiBwjTAqf4uDKuz31Hqx5P5Jrsp052u5Vl3VWokTELOIddXeiCmucs6Syg632aNvMZ9mP7-zPd_ANz3Nyow</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Yuan, Huanhuan</creator><creator>Yang, Guijun</creator><creator>Li, Changchun</creator><creator>Wang, Yanjie</creator><creator>Liu, Jiangang</creator><creator>Yu, Haiyang</creator><creator>Feng, Haikuan</creator><creator>Xu, Bo</creator><creator>Zhao, Xiaoqing</creator><creator>Yang, Xiaodong</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6425-8321</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Retrieving Soybean Leaf Area Index from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Analysis of RF, ANN, and SVM Regression Models</title><author>Yuan, Huanhuan ; Yang, Guijun ; Li, Changchun ; Wang, Yanjie ; Liu, Jiangang ; Yu, Haiyang ; Feng, Haikuan ; Xu, Bo ; Zhao, Xiaoqing ; Yang, Xiaodong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-649f8cfb99847f62b861ce909579862f2f888f00fcba5fba08aabaa2a5a7c1e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Crop growth</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Leaf area</topic><topic>Leaf area index</topic><topic>Learning theory</topic><topic>Least squares method</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Remote monitoring</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Huanhuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Guijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Changchun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yanjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jiangang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Haiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Haikuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaoqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xiaodong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yuan, Huanhuan</au><au>Yang, Guijun</au><au>Li, Changchun</au><au>Wang, Yanjie</au><au>Liu, Jiangang</au><au>Yu, Haiyang</au><au>Feng, Haikuan</au><au>Xu, Bo</au><au>Zhao, Xiaoqing</au><au>Yang, Xiaodong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retrieving Soybean Leaf Area Index from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Analysis of RF, ANN, and SVM Regression Models</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>309</spage><pages>309-</pages><issn>2072-4292</issn><eissn>2072-4292</eissn><abstract>Leaf area index (LAI) is an important indicator of plant growth and yield that can be monitored by remote sensing. Several models were constructed using datasets derived from SRS and STR sampling methods to determine the optimal model for soybean (multiple strains) LAI inversion for the whole crop growth period and a single growth period. Random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM) regression models were compared with a partial least-squares regression (PLS) model. The RF model yielded the highest precision, accuracy, and stability with V-R2, SDR2, V-RMSE, and SDRMSE values of 0.741, 0.031, 0.106, and 0.005, respectively, over the whole growth period based on STR sampling. The ANN model had the highest precision, accuracy, and stability (0.452, 0.132, 0.086, and 0.009, respectively) over a single growth phase based on STR sampling. The precision, accuracy, and stability of the RF, ANN, and SVM models were improved by inclusion of STR sampling. The RF model is suitable for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively large (i.e., the whole growth period or more than one growth period). The ANN model is more appropriate for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively low (i.e., a single growth period).</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/rs9040309</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6425-8321</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2072-4292 |
ispartof | Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2017-04, Vol.9 (4), p.309 |
issn | 2072-4292 2072-4292 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1905786052 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); IngentaConnect Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Artificial neural networks Chlorophyll Crop growth Crop yield Crops Datasets Detection Estimation Leaf area Leaf area index Learning theory Least squares method Leaves Neural networks Optimization Plant growth Regression analysis Remote monitoring Remote sensing Sampling Sampling methods Soybeans Stability Support vector machines Unmanned aerial vehicles |
title | Retrieving Soybean Leaf Area Index from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Analysis of RF, ANN, and SVM Regression Models |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T11%3A14%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retrieving%20Soybean%20Leaf%20Area%20Index%20from%20Unmanned%20Aerial%20Vehicle%20Hyperspectral%20Remote%20Sensing:%20Analysis%20of%20RF,%20ANN,%20and%20SVM%20Regression%20Models&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Yuan,%20Huanhuan&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=309&rft.pages=309-&rft.issn=2072-4292&rft.eissn=2072-4292&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/rs9040309&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1905786052%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-649f8cfb99847f62b861ce909579862f2f888f00fcba5fba08aabaa2a5a7c1e63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1905786052&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |