Loading…

Retrieving Soybean Leaf Area Index from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Analysis of RF, ANN, and SVM Regression Models

Leaf area index (LAI) is an important indicator of plant growth and yield that can be monitored by remote sensing. Several models were constructed using datasets derived from SRS and STR sampling methods to determine the optimal model for soybean (multiple strains) LAI inversion for the whole crop g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2017-04, Vol.9 (4), p.309
Main Authors: Yuan, Huanhuan, Yang, Guijun, Li, Changchun, Wang, Yanjie, Liu, Jiangang, Yu, Haiyang, Feng, Haikuan, Xu, Bo, Zhao, Xiaoqing, Yang, Xiaodong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-649f8cfb99847f62b861ce909579862f2f888f00fcba5fba08aabaa2a5a7c1e63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-649f8cfb99847f62b861ce909579862f2f888f00fcba5fba08aabaa2a5a7c1e63
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 309
container_title Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)
container_volume 9
creator Yuan, Huanhuan
Yang, Guijun
Li, Changchun
Wang, Yanjie
Liu, Jiangang
Yu, Haiyang
Feng, Haikuan
Xu, Bo
Zhao, Xiaoqing
Yang, Xiaodong
description Leaf area index (LAI) is an important indicator of plant growth and yield that can be monitored by remote sensing. Several models were constructed using datasets derived from SRS and STR sampling methods to determine the optimal model for soybean (multiple strains) LAI inversion for the whole crop growth period and a single growth period. Random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM) regression models were compared with a partial least-squares regression (PLS) model. The RF model yielded the highest precision, accuracy, and stability with V-R2, SDR2, V-RMSE, and SDRMSE values of 0.741, 0.031, 0.106, and 0.005, respectively, over the whole growth period based on STR sampling. The ANN model had the highest precision, accuracy, and stability (0.452, 0.132, 0.086, and 0.009, respectively) over a single growth phase based on STR sampling. The precision, accuracy, and stability of the RF, ANN, and SVM models were improved by inclusion of STR sampling. The RF model is suitable for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively large (i.e., the whole growth period or more than one growth period). The ANN model is more appropriate for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively low (i.e., a single growth period).
doi_str_mv 10.3390/rs9040309
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1905786052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1905786052</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-649f8cfb99847f62b861ce909579862f2f888f00fcba5fba08aabaa2a5a7c1e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkN1Kw0AQRoMoWLQXvsGAV0Krm83frnehWFtoK7S2t2GSzNaUdLfupmLewYc2UhHnZoaPw8dwPO_GZ_dBINmDdZKFLGDyzOtxlvBhyCU__3dfen3ndqybIPA7tud9LamxFX1Uegsr0-aEGmaEClJLCFNd0icoa_aw1nvUmkpIyVZYw4beqqImmLQHsu5ARWO7dEl70xCsSLuu8RFSjXXrKgdGwXI8gHSxGADqElabeQdvLTlXGQ1zU1Ltrr0LhbWj_u--8tbjp9fRZDh7eZ6O0tmwCCLRDONQKlGoXEoRJirmuYj9giSTUSJFzBVXQgjFmCpyjFSOTCDmiBwjTAqf4uDKuz31Hqx5P5Jrsp052u5Vl3VWokTELOIddXeiCmucs6Syg632aNvMZ9mP7-zPd_ANz3Nyow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1905786052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retrieving Soybean Leaf Area Index from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Analysis of RF, ANN, and SVM Regression Models</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><creator>Yuan, Huanhuan ; Yang, Guijun ; Li, Changchun ; Wang, Yanjie ; Liu, Jiangang ; Yu, Haiyang ; Feng, Haikuan ; Xu, Bo ; Zhao, Xiaoqing ; Yang, Xiaodong</creator><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Huanhuan ; Yang, Guijun ; Li, Changchun ; Wang, Yanjie ; Liu, Jiangang ; Yu, Haiyang ; Feng, Haikuan ; Xu, Bo ; Zhao, Xiaoqing ; Yang, Xiaodong</creatorcontrib><description>Leaf area index (LAI) is an important indicator of plant growth and yield that can be monitored by remote sensing. Several models were constructed using datasets derived from SRS and STR sampling methods to determine the optimal model for soybean (multiple strains) LAI inversion for the whole crop growth period and a single growth period. Random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM) regression models were compared with a partial least-squares regression (PLS) model. The RF model yielded the highest precision, accuracy, and stability with V-R2, SDR2, V-RMSE, and SDRMSE values of 0.741, 0.031, 0.106, and 0.005, respectively, over the whole growth period based on STR sampling. The ANN model had the highest precision, accuracy, and stability (0.452, 0.132, 0.086, and 0.009, respectively) over a single growth phase based on STR sampling. The precision, accuracy, and stability of the RF, ANN, and SVM models were improved by inclusion of STR sampling. The RF model is suitable for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively large (i.e., the whole growth period or more than one growth period). The ANN model is more appropriate for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively low (i.e., a single growth period).</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/rs9040309</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Artificial neural networks ; Chlorophyll ; Crop growth ; Crop yield ; Crops ; Datasets ; Detection ; Estimation ; Leaf area ; Leaf area index ; Learning theory ; Least squares method ; Leaves ; Neural networks ; Optimization ; Plant growth ; Regression analysis ; Remote monitoring ; Remote sensing ; Sampling ; Sampling methods ; Soybeans ; Stability ; Support vector machines ; Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2017-04, Vol.9 (4), p.309</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-649f8cfb99847f62b861ce909579862f2f888f00fcba5fba08aabaa2a5a7c1e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-649f8cfb99847f62b861ce909579862f2f888f00fcba5fba08aabaa2a5a7c1e63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6425-8321</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1905786052/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1905786052?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Huanhuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Guijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Changchun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yanjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jiangang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Haiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Haikuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaoqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xiaodong</creatorcontrib><title>Retrieving Soybean Leaf Area Index from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Analysis of RF, ANN, and SVM Regression Models</title><title>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</title><description>Leaf area index (LAI) is an important indicator of plant growth and yield that can be monitored by remote sensing. Several models were constructed using datasets derived from SRS and STR sampling methods to determine the optimal model for soybean (multiple strains) LAI inversion for the whole crop growth period and a single growth period. Random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM) regression models were compared with a partial least-squares regression (PLS) model. The RF model yielded the highest precision, accuracy, and stability with V-R2, SDR2, V-RMSE, and SDRMSE values of 0.741, 0.031, 0.106, and 0.005, respectively, over the whole growth period based on STR sampling. The ANN model had the highest precision, accuracy, and stability (0.452, 0.132, 0.086, and 0.009, respectively) over a single growth phase based on STR sampling. The precision, accuracy, and stability of the RF, ANN, and SVM models were improved by inclusion of STR sampling. The RF model is suitable for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively large (i.e., the whole growth period or more than one growth period). The ANN model is more appropriate for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively low (i.e., a single growth period).</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Crop growth</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Leaf area</subject><subject>Leaf area index</subject><subject>Learning theory</subject><subject>Least squares method</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Remote monitoring</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><issn>2072-4292</issn><issn>2072-4292</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkN1Kw0AQRoMoWLQXvsGAV0Krm83frnehWFtoK7S2t2GSzNaUdLfupmLewYc2UhHnZoaPw8dwPO_GZ_dBINmDdZKFLGDyzOtxlvBhyCU__3dfen3ndqybIPA7tud9LamxFX1Uegsr0-aEGmaEClJLCFNd0icoa_aw1nvUmkpIyVZYw4beqqImmLQHsu5ARWO7dEl70xCsSLuu8RFSjXXrKgdGwXI8gHSxGADqElabeQdvLTlXGQ1zU1Ltrr0LhbWj_u--8tbjp9fRZDh7eZ6O0tmwCCLRDONQKlGoXEoRJirmuYj9giSTUSJFzBVXQgjFmCpyjFSOTCDmiBwjTAqf4uDKuz31Hqx5P5Jrsp052u5Vl3VWokTELOIddXeiCmucs6Syg632aNvMZ9mP7-zPd_ANz3Nyow</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Yuan, Huanhuan</creator><creator>Yang, Guijun</creator><creator>Li, Changchun</creator><creator>Wang, Yanjie</creator><creator>Liu, Jiangang</creator><creator>Yu, Haiyang</creator><creator>Feng, Haikuan</creator><creator>Xu, Bo</creator><creator>Zhao, Xiaoqing</creator><creator>Yang, Xiaodong</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6425-8321</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Retrieving Soybean Leaf Area Index from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Analysis of RF, ANN, and SVM Regression Models</title><author>Yuan, Huanhuan ; Yang, Guijun ; Li, Changchun ; Wang, Yanjie ; Liu, Jiangang ; Yu, Haiyang ; Feng, Haikuan ; Xu, Bo ; Zhao, Xiaoqing ; Yang, Xiaodong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-649f8cfb99847f62b861ce909579862f2f888f00fcba5fba08aabaa2a5a7c1e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Crop growth</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Leaf area</topic><topic>Leaf area index</topic><topic>Learning theory</topic><topic>Least squares method</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Remote monitoring</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Huanhuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Guijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Changchun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yanjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jiangang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Haiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Haikuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xiaoqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xiaodong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yuan, Huanhuan</au><au>Yang, Guijun</au><au>Li, Changchun</au><au>Wang, Yanjie</au><au>Liu, Jiangang</au><au>Yu, Haiyang</au><au>Feng, Haikuan</au><au>Xu, Bo</au><au>Zhao, Xiaoqing</au><au>Yang, Xiaodong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retrieving Soybean Leaf Area Index from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Analysis of RF, ANN, and SVM Regression Models</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>309</spage><pages>309-</pages><issn>2072-4292</issn><eissn>2072-4292</eissn><abstract>Leaf area index (LAI) is an important indicator of plant growth and yield that can be monitored by remote sensing. Several models were constructed using datasets derived from SRS and STR sampling methods to determine the optimal model for soybean (multiple strains) LAI inversion for the whole crop growth period and a single growth period. Random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM) regression models were compared with a partial least-squares regression (PLS) model. The RF model yielded the highest precision, accuracy, and stability with V-R2, SDR2, V-RMSE, and SDRMSE values of 0.741, 0.031, 0.106, and 0.005, respectively, over the whole growth period based on STR sampling. The ANN model had the highest precision, accuracy, and stability (0.452, 0.132, 0.086, and 0.009, respectively) over a single growth phase based on STR sampling. The precision, accuracy, and stability of the RF, ANN, and SVM models were improved by inclusion of STR sampling. The RF model is suitable for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively large (i.e., the whole growth period or more than one growth period). The ANN model is more appropriate for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively low (i.e., a single growth period).</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/rs9040309</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6425-8321</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-4292
ispartof Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2017-04, Vol.9 (4), p.309
issn 2072-4292
2072-4292
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1905786052
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); IngentaConnect Journals
subjects Accuracy
Artificial neural networks
Chlorophyll
Crop growth
Crop yield
Crops
Datasets
Detection
Estimation
Leaf area
Leaf area index
Learning theory
Least squares method
Leaves
Neural networks
Optimization
Plant growth
Regression analysis
Remote monitoring
Remote sensing
Sampling
Sampling methods
Soybeans
Stability
Support vector machines
Unmanned aerial vehicles
title Retrieving Soybean Leaf Area Index from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Analysis of RF, ANN, and SVM Regression Models
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T11%3A14%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retrieving%20Soybean%20Leaf%20Area%20Index%20from%20Unmanned%20Aerial%20Vehicle%20Hyperspectral%20Remote%20Sensing:%20Analysis%20of%20RF,%20ANN,%20and%20SVM%20Regression%20Models&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Yuan,%20Huanhuan&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=309&rft.pages=309-&rft.issn=2072-4292&rft.eissn=2072-4292&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/rs9040309&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1905786052%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-649f8cfb99847f62b861ce909579862f2f888f00fcba5fba08aabaa2a5a7c1e63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1905786052&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true