Loading…

Pssst, Can You Keep a Secret?: Unperfected "Secret" Liens as a Preference Defense

Facts and Procedural Background The dispute in E.D.C. Liquidating centered on whether a debtor's pre-petition payments to the holder of an unperfected statutory lien could be avoided as preferential transfers under § 547 of the Bankruptcy Code. The issue arose in the context of a post-confirmat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American Bankruptcy Institute journal 2017-06, Vol.36 (6), p.32
Main Authors: Lee, Bernice C, Hitchings, Jarret P, Helman, Andrew C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 32
container_title American Bankruptcy Institute journal
container_volume 36
creator Lee, Bernice C
Hitchings, Jarret P
Helman, Andrew C
description Facts and Procedural Background The dispute in E.D.C. Liquidating centered on whether a debtor's pre-petition payments to the holder of an unperfected statutory lien could be avoided as preferential transfers under § 547 of the Bankruptcy Code. The issue arose in the context of a post-confirmation adversary proceeding initiated by a plan liquidating trustee seeking to avoid and recover five pre-petition transfers totaling at least $231,000.2 Prior to its bankruptcy filing, the debtor provided tool-and-die manufacturing, storage and related services.3 In the course of this business, the debtor ordered two custom molds from Mo-Tech Corp. (the defendant/transferee).4 Due to financial difficulties, the debtor was unable to pay for the molds, so the parties negotiated new payment terms before Mo-Tech would deliver the molds. Mo-Tech argued that even in light of the unperfected nature of its lien, each of the transfers was on account of a fully secured claim because at the time of each transfer, it had a right to file a financing statement under Ohio's moldbuilder's lien laws. [...]the transfers were shielded from avoidance. [...]the pre-petition transfers allowed Mo-Tech to receive more than it would have had the transfers not been made and its claim been treated as an unsecured claim in a chapter 7 liquidation.9 The E.D.C. Liquidation Court's Decision The bankruptcy court agreed with Mo-Tech, concluding that the transfers made to it after delivering both molds could not be avoided as preferential transfers. [...]the court denied the trustee's motion and granted Mo-Tech's motion. The trustee argued that...
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1906060085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1906060085</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_19060600853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNis8KgkAYxPdQkP15hw-7FuiKml06WBHUwagOnWSxEZJYbb_1_VuoB4gZmB8zMxBemEXhMo2lHIkxcxMEMk5k6olzwcx2QbnSdG97OgIdKbqgMrCbNd10B1OjsniQ_219Oj2hmZQzFQY1DHQF2jrSjKkY1urFmP1yIub73TU_LDvTvnuwLZu2N9pNZZgFiVOwiqP_Xh_y4Txt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1906060085</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pssst, Can You Keep a Secret?: Unperfected "Secret" Liens as a Preference Defense</title><source>Nexis UK</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Lee, Bernice C ; Hitchings, Jarret P ; Helman, Andrew C</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Bernice C ; Hitchings, Jarret P ; Helman, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><description>Facts and Procedural Background The dispute in E.D.C. Liquidating centered on whether a debtor's pre-petition payments to the holder of an unperfected statutory lien could be avoided as preferential transfers under § 547 of the Bankruptcy Code. The issue arose in the context of a post-confirmation adversary proceeding initiated by a plan liquidating trustee seeking to avoid and recover five pre-petition transfers totaling at least $231,000.2 Prior to its bankruptcy filing, the debtor provided tool-and-die manufacturing, storage and related services.3 In the course of this business, the debtor ordered two custom molds from Mo-Tech Corp. (the defendant/transferee).4 Due to financial difficulties, the debtor was unable to pay for the molds, so the parties negotiated new payment terms before Mo-Tech would deliver the molds. Mo-Tech argued that even in light of the unperfected nature of its lien, each of the transfers was on account of a fully secured claim because at the time of each transfer, it had a right to file a financing statement under Ohio's moldbuilder's lien laws. [...]the transfers were shielded from avoidance. [...]the pre-petition transfers allowed Mo-Tech to receive more than it would have had the transfers not been made and its claim been treated as an unsecured claim in a chapter 7 liquidation.9 The E.D.C. Liquidation Court's Decision The bankruptcy court agreed with Mo-Tech, concluding that the transfers made to it after delivering both molds could not be avoided as preferential transfers. [...]the court denied the trustee's motion and granted Mo-Tech's motion. The trustee argued that...</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-7522</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria: American Bankruptcy Institute</publisher><subject>Bankruptcy ; Bankruptcy laws ; Bankruptcy reorganization ; Commercial law ; Debtors ; Federal court decisions ; Federal courts ; Liens ; Petitions ; Preferences ; State court decisions ; State laws ; Subcontractors</subject><ispartof>American Bankruptcy Institute journal, 2017-06, Vol.36 (6), p.32</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Bankruptcy Institute Jun 2017</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1906060085/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1906060085?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11687,36059,44362,74666</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Bernice C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hitchings, Jarret P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helman, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><title>Pssst, Can You Keep a Secret?: Unperfected "Secret" Liens as a Preference Defense</title><title>American Bankruptcy Institute journal</title><description>Facts and Procedural Background The dispute in E.D.C. Liquidating centered on whether a debtor's pre-petition payments to the holder of an unperfected statutory lien could be avoided as preferential transfers under § 547 of the Bankruptcy Code. The issue arose in the context of a post-confirmation adversary proceeding initiated by a plan liquidating trustee seeking to avoid and recover five pre-petition transfers totaling at least $231,000.2 Prior to its bankruptcy filing, the debtor provided tool-and-die manufacturing, storage and related services.3 In the course of this business, the debtor ordered two custom molds from Mo-Tech Corp. (the defendant/transferee).4 Due to financial difficulties, the debtor was unable to pay for the molds, so the parties negotiated new payment terms before Mo-Tech would deliver the molds. Mo-Tech argued that even in light of the unperfected nature of its lien, each of the transfers was on account of a fully secured claim because at the time of each transfer, it had a right to file a financing statement under Ohio's moldbuilder's lien laws. [...]the transfers were shielded from avoidance. [...]the pre-petition transfers allowed Mo-Tech to receive more than it would have had the transfers not been made and its claim been treated as an unsecured claim in a chapter 7 liquidation.9 The E.D.C. Liquidation Court's Decision The bankruptcy court agreed with Mo-Tech, concluding that the transfers made to it after delivering both molds could not be avoided as preferential transfers. [...]the court denied the trustee's motion and granted Mo-Tech's motion. The trustee argued that...</description><subject>Bankruptcy</subject><subject>Bankruptcy laws</subject><subject>Bankruptcy reorganization</subject><subject>Commercial law</subject><subject>Debtors</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Federal courts</subject><subject>Liens</subject><subject>Petitions</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>State laws</subject><subject>Subcontractors</subject><issn>1931-7522</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqNis8KgkAYxPdQkP15hw-7FuiKml06WBHUwagOnWSxEZJYbb_1_VuoB4gZmB8zMxBemEXhMo2lHIkxcxMEMk5k6olzwcx2QbnSdG97OgIdKbqgMrCbNd10B1OjsniQ_219Oj2hmZQzFQY1DHQF2jrSjKkY1urFmP1yIub73TU_LDvTvnuwLZu2N9pNZZgFiVOwiqP_Xh_y4Txt</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Lee, Bernice C</creator><creator>Hitchings, Jarret P</creator><creator>Helman, Andrew C</creator><general>American Bankruptcy Institute</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Pssst, Can You Keep a Secret?: Unperfected "Secret" Liens as a Preference Defense</title><author>Lee, Bernice C ; Hitchings, Jarret P ; Helman, Andrew C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_19060600853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Bankruptcy</topic><topic>Bankruptcy laws</topic><topic>Bankruptcy reorganization</topic><topic>Commercial law</topic><topic>Debtors</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Federal courts</topic><topic>Liens</topic><topic>Petitions</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>State laws</topic><topic>Subcontractors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Bernice C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hitchings, Jarret P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helman, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>American Bankruptcy Institute journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Bernice C</au><au>Hitchings, Jarret P</au><au>Helman, Andrew C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pssst, Can You Keep a Secret?: Unperfected "Secret" Liens as a Preference Defense</atitle><jtitle>American Bankruptcy Institute journal</jtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>32</spage><pages>32-</pages><issn>1931-7522</issn><abstract>Facts and Procedural Background The dispute in E.D.C. Liquidating centered on whether a debtor's pre-petition payments to the holder of an unperfected statutory lien could be avoided as preferential transfers under § 547 of the Bankruptcy Code. The issue arose in the context of a post-confirmation adversary proceeding initiated by a plan liquidating trustee seeking to avoid and recover five pre-petition transfers totaling at least $231,000.2 Prior to its bankruptcy filing, the debtor provided tool-and-die manufacturing, storage and related services.3 In the course of this business, the debtor ordered two custom molds from Mo-Tech Corp. (the defendant/transferee).4 Due to financial difficulties, the debtor was unable to pay for the molds, so the parties negotiated new payment terms before Mo-Tech would deliver the molds. Mo-Tech argued that even in light of the unperfected nature of its lien, each of the transfers was on account of a fully secured claim because at the time of each transfer, it had a right to file a financing statement under Ohio's moldbuilder's lien laws. [...]the transfers were shielded from avoidance. [...]the pre-petition transfers allowed Mo-Tech to receive more than it would have had the transfers not been made and its claim been treated as an unsecured claim in a chapter 7 liquidation.9 The E.D.C. Liquidation Court's Decision The bankruptcy court agreed with Mo-Tech, concluding that the transfers made to it after delivering both molds could not be avoided as preferential transfers. [...]the court denied the trustee's motion and granted Mo-Tech's motion. The trustee argued that...</abstract><cop>Alexandria</cop><pub>American Bankruptcy Institute</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1931-7522
ispartof American Bankruptcy Institute journal, 2017-06, Vol.36 (6), p.32
issn 1931-7522
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1906060085
source Nexis UK; Business Source Ultimate; ABI/INFORM Global
subjects Bankruptcy
Bankruptcy laws
Bankruptcy reorganization
Commercial law
Debtors
Federal court decisions
Federal courts
Liens
Petitions
Preferences
State court decisions
State laws
Subcontractors
title Pssst, Can You Keep a Secret?: Unperfected "Secret" Liens as a Preference Defense
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A57%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pssst,%20Can%20You%20Keep%20a%20Secret?:%20Unperfected%20%22Secret%22%20Liens%20as%20a%20Preference%20Defense&rft.jtitle=American%20Bankruptcy%20Institute%20journal&rft.au=Lee,%20Bernice%20C&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=32&rft.pages=32-&rft.issn=1931-7522&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1906060085%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_19060600853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1906060085&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true