Loading…

When and how should biotic interactions be considered in models of species niches and distributions?

Biotic interactions can influence the ranges and abundances of species, but no clear guidelines exist for integrating them into correlative models of niches and distributions. Niche/distributional models characterize environmental/habitat suitability or species presence using predictor variables una...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of biogeography 2017-01, Vol.44 (1), p.8-17
Main Author: Anderson, Robert P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3475-4f2fb750638ec7961da29ad8c9bb350a40744c13f65e6e55b9fd2733c23389593
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3475-4f2fb750638ec7961da29ad8c9bb350a40744c13f65e6e55b9fd2733c23389593
container_end_page 17
container_issue 1
container_start_page 8
container_title Journal of biogeography
container_volume 44
creator Anderson, Robert P.
description Biotic interactions can influence the ranges and abundances of species, but no clear guidelines exist for integrating them into correlative models of niches and distributions. Niche/distributional models characterize environmental/habitat suitability or species presence using predictor variables unaffected by (= unlinked to) the population of the focal species. Such variables (termed 'scenopoetic') typically have been considered to include only abiotic factors. In contrast, population—demographic approaches model the abundance of the focal species by including linked predictor variables, which frequently are biotic interactors. Nevertheless, a focal species might hold no, or negligible, population-level effects on its biotic interactors. Hence, contrary to current theory, such interactors would represent unlinked variables valid and potentially very useful for niche/distributional models. Consideration of population-level effects indicates that facilitators and affecting amensals (species that negatively affect another species but are not affected by it) constitute unlinked variables, but commensals and affected amensals do not. For competitors, mutualists, predators/prey, consumers/resources, and parasites/hosts, additional information is necessary. Specifically, available ecological/natural history information for the particular species involved (e.g. regarding specificity) and theory regarding ecological networks can allow identification of interactors that are likely to be unlinked or nearly so. Including an unlinked biotic interactor as a predictor variable in a niche/distributional model should improve predictions when the effects of the biotic interactor vary across the study region, or in another place or time period. Other relevant interactors must be taken into account by post-processing a niche/distributional model, or via population—demographic models that require abundance data over time. This framework should improve current correlative models and highlights areas requiring progress.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jbi.12825
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1906149497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44134442</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44134442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3475-4f2fb750638ec7961da29ad8c9bb350a40744c13f65e6e55b9fd2733c23389593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LwzAchoMoOKcH_wAh4MlDt3y2zUl0-DEZeFE8hjZJaUrXzKRl7L83W9Wb5vIe8rzvDx4ALjGa4fjmTWlnmOSEH4EJpilPSCrEMZgginiCSIZOwVkIDUJIcMomQH_UpoNFp2HttjDUbmg1LK3rrYK2640vVG9dF2BpoIpptfFGxy-4dtq0AboKho1R1gTYWVXH2I9pG3pvy-HQvT0HJ1XRBnPxnVPw_vjwtnhOVq9Py8XdKlGUZTxhFanKjKOU5kZlIsW6IKLQuRJlSTkqGMoYU5hWKTep4bwUlSYZpYpQmgsu6BRcj7sb7z4HE3rZuMF38aTEAqWYCSayf6k8SskQpvutm5FS3oXgTSU33q4Lv5MYyb1qGVXLg-rIzkd2a1uz-xuUL_fLn8bV2GhC7_xvgzFMGWOEfgHm5ohp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1853470139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When and how should biotic interactions be considered in models of species niches and distributions?</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Anderson, Robert P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><description>Biotic interactions can influence the ranges and abundances of species, but no clear guidelines exist for integrating them into correlative models of niches and distributions. Niche/distributional models characterize environmental/habitat suitability or species presence using predictor variables unaffected by (= unlinked to) the population of the focal species. Such variables (termed 'scenopoetic') typically have been considered to include only abiotic factors. In contrast, population—demographic approaches model the abundance of the focal species by including linked predictor variables, which frequently are biotic interactors. Nevertheless, a focal species might hold no, or negligible, population-level effects on its biotic interactors. Hence, contrary to current theory, such interactors would represent unlinked variables valid and potentially very useful for niche/distributional models. Consideration of population-level effects indicates that facilitators and affecting amensals (species that negatively affect another species but are not affected by it) constitute unlinked variables, but commensals and affected amensals do not. For competitors, mutualists, predators/prey, consumers/resources, and parasites/hosts, additional information is necessary. Specifically, available ecological/natural history information for the particular species involved (e.g. regarding specificity) and theory regarding ecological networks can allow identification of interactors that are likely to be unlinked or nearly so. Including an unlinked biotic interactor as a predictor variable in a niche/distributional model should improve predictions when the effects of the biotic interactor vary across the study region, or in another place or time period. Other relevant interactors must be taken into account by post-processing a niche/distributional model, or via population—demographic models that require abundance data over time. This framework should improve current correlative models and highlights areas requiring progress.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-0270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2699</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jbi.12825</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBIODN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>Abiotic factors ; Abundance ; biotic interactor ; Commensals ; Consumers ; Correlation ; Demographics ; distribution ; Ecology ; Environment models ; Guidelines ; Habitats ; Invasions and biotic interactions ; network ; Networks ; niche ; Niches ; Parasites ; Population ; Post-processing ; Predators ; presence ; Prey ; suitability ; Temporal variations ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Journal of biogeography, 2017-01, Vol.44 (1), p.8-17</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3475-4f2fb750638ec7961da29ad8c9bb350a40744c13f65e6e55b9fd2733c23389593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3475-4f2fb750638ec7961da29ad8c9bb350a40744c13f65e6e55b9fd2733c23389593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44134442$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44134442$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><title>When and how should biotic interactions be considered in models of species niches and distributions?</title><title>Journal of biogeography</title><description>Biotic interactions can influence the ranges and abundances of species, but no clear guidelines exist for integrating them into correlative models of niches and distributions. Niche/distributional models characterize environmental/habitat suitability or species presence using predictor variables unaffected by (= unlinked to) the population of the focal species. Such variables (termed 'scenopoetic') typically have been considered to include only abiotic factors. In contrast, population—demographic approaches model the abundance of the focal species by including linked predictor variables, which frequently are biotic interactors. Nevertheless, a focal species might hold no, or negligible, population-level effects on its biotic interactors. Hence, contrary to current theory, such interactors would represent unlinked variables valid and potentially very useful for niche/distributional models. Consideration of population-level effects indicates that facilitators and affecting amensals (species that negatively affect another species but are not affected by it) constitute unlinked variables, but commensals and affected amensals do not. For competitors, mutualists, predators/prey, consumers/resources, and parasites/hosts, additional information is necessary. Specifically, available ecological/natural history information for the particular species involved (e.g. regarding specificity) and theory regarding ecological networks can allow identification of interactors that are likely to be unlinked or nearly so. Including an unlinked biotic interactor as a predictor variable in a niche/distributional model should improve predictions when the effects of the biotic interactor vary across the study region, or in another place or time period. Other relevant interactors must be taken into account by post-processing a niche/distributional model, or via population—demographic models that require abundance data over time. This framework should improve current correlative models and highlights areas requiring progress.</description><subject>Abiotic factors</subject><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>biotic interactor</subject><subject>Commensals</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>distribution</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environment models</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Invasions and biotic interactions</subject><subject>network</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>niche</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Post-processing</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>presence</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>suitability</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0305-0270</issn><issn>1365-2699</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LwzAchoMoOKcH_wAh4MlDt3y2zUl0-DEZeFE8hjZJaUrXzKRl7L83W9Wb5vIe8rzvDx4ALjGa4fjmTWlnmOSEH4EJpilPSCrEMZgginiCSIZOwVkIDUJIcMomQH_UpoNFp2HttjDUbmg1LK3rrYK2640vVG9dF2BpoIpptfFGxy-4dtq0AboKho1R1gTYWVXH2I9pG3pvy-HQvT0HJ1XRBnPxnVPw_vjwtnhOVq9Py8XdKlGUZTxhFanKjKOU5kZlIsW6IKLQuRJlSTkqGMoYU5hWKTep4bwUlSYZpYpQmgsu6BRcj7sb7z4HE3rZuMF38aTEAqWYCSayf6k8SskQpvutm5FS3oXgTSU33q4Lv5MYyb1qGVXLg-rIzkd2a1uz-xuUL_fLn8bV2GhC7_xvgzFMGWOEfgHm5ohp</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Anderson, Robert P.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>When and how should biotic interactions be considered in models of species niches and distributions?</title><author>Anderson, Robert P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3475-4f2fb750638ec7961da29ad8c9bb350a40744c13f65e6e55b9fd2733c23389593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abiotic factors</topic><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>biotic interactor</topic><topic>Commensals</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>distribution</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environment models</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Invasions and biotic interactions</topic><topic>network</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>niche</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Post-processing</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>presence</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>suitability</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Robert P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of biogeography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anderson, Robert P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When and how should biotic interactions be considered in models of species niches and distributions?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biogeography</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>8-17</pages><issn>0305-0270</issn><eissn>1365-2699</eissn><coden>JBIODN</coden><abstract>Biotic interactions can influence the ranges and abundances of species, but no clear guidelines exist for integrating them into correlative models of niches and distributions. Niche/distributional models characterize environmental/habitat suitability or species presence using predictor variables unaffected by (= unlinked to) the population of the focal species. Such variables (termed 'scenopoetic') typically have been considered to include only abiotic factors. In contrast, population—demographic approaches model the abundance of the focal species by including linked predictor variables, which frequently are biotic interactors. Nevertheless, a focal species might hold no, or negligible, population-level effects on its biotic interactors. Hence, contrary to current theory, such interactors would represent unlinked variables valid and potentially very useful for niche/distributional models. Consideration of population-level effects indicates that facilitators and affecting amensals (species that negatively affect another species but are not affected by it) constitute unlinked variables, but commensals and affected amensals do not. For competitors, mutualists, predators/prey, consumers/resources, and parasites/hosts, additional information is necessary. Specifically, available ecological/natural history information for the particular species involved (e.g. regarding specificity) and theory regarding ecological networks can allow identification of interactors that are likely to be unlinked or nearly so. Including an unlinked biotic interactor as a predictor variable in a niche/distributional model should improve predictions when the effects of the biotic interactor vary across the study region, or in another place or time period. Other relevant interactors must be taken into account by post-processing a niche/distributional model, or via population—demographic models that require abundance data over time. This framework should improve current correlative models and highlights areas requiring progress.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jbi.12825</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-0270
ispartof Journal of biogeography, 2017-01, Vol.44 (1), p.8-17
issn 0305-0270
1365-2699
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1906149497
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Abiotic factors
Abundance
biotic interactor
Commensals
Consumers
Correlation
Demographics
distribution
Ecology
Environment models
Guidelines
Habitats
Invasions and biotic interactions
network
Networks
niche
Niches
Parasites
Population
Post-processing
Predators
presence
Prey
suitability
Temporal variations
Variables
title When and how should biotic interactions be considered in models of species niches and distributions?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T07%3A05%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20and%20how%20should%20biotic%20interactions%20be%20considered%20in%20models%20of%20species%20niches%20and%20distributions?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biogeography&rft.au=Anderson,%20Robert%20P.&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=8-17&rft.issn=0305-0270&rft.eissn=1365-2699&rft.coden=JBIODN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jbi.12825&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44134442%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3475-4f2fb750638ec7961da29ad8c9bb350a40744c13f65e6e55b9fd2733c23389593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1853470139&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44134442&rfr_iscdi=true