Loading…

Examination of Heterogeneous Societies: Identifying Subpopulations by Contrasting Cultures

The recent development of data analytic tools rooted around the Multi-Group Latent Class Analysis (MGLCA) has enabled the examination of heterogeneous datasets in a cross-cultural context. Although the MGLCA is considered as an established and popular cross-cultural data analysis approach, the infin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cross-cultural psychology 2017-01, Vol.48 (1), p.39-57
Main Authors: Glückstad, Fumiko Kano, Schmidt, Mikkel N., Mørup, Morten
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-d5090db0f35b2aa3165c741e3aec2655810b79f434d51fbc25b5b2100f1f00223
container_end_page 57
container_issue 1
container_start_page 39
container_title Journal of cross-cultural psychology
container_volume 48
creator Glückstad, Fumiko Kano
Schmidt, Mikkel N.
Mørup, Morten
description The recent development of data analytic tools rooted around the Multi-Group Latent Class Analysis (MGLCA) has enabled the examination of heterogeneous datasets in a cross-cultural context. Although the MGLCA is considered as an established and popular cross-cultural data analysis approach, the infinite relational model (IRM) is a new and disruptive type of unsupervised clustering approach that has been developed recently by cognitive psychologists and computer scientists. In this article, an extended version of the IRM coined the multinominal IRM—or mIRM in short—is applied to a cross-cultural analysis of survey data available from the World Value Survey organization. Specifically, the present work analyzes response patterns of the Portrait Value Questionnaire (PVQ) representing Schwartz’s 10 basic values of Japanese and Swedes. The applied model exposes heterogeneous structures of the two societies consisting of fine-grained response patterns expressed by the respective subpopulations and extracts latent typological structures contrasting and highlighting similarities and differences between these two societies. In the final section, we discuss similarities and differences identified between the MGLCA and the mIRM approaches, which indicate potential applications and contributions of the mIRM and the general IRM framework for future cross-cultural data analyses.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0022022116672346
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1906180526</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0022022116672346</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1906180526</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-d5090db0f35b2aa3165c741e3aec2655810b79f434d51fbc25b5b2100f1f00223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLxDAQhYMouK7ePRYEb9GZpEm2R1nWXWHBg3oOaTtZurjNmrSg_96WehBBGJjD-96b4TF2jXCHaMw9gBDDIGpthMz1CZuhUoKrXIhTNhtlPurn7CKlPQCgMsWM3a4-3aFpXdeENgs-21BHMeyopdCn7CVUDXUNpUt25t17oqufPWdvj6vX5YZvn9dPy4ctr4QWHa8VFFCX4KUqhXMStapMjiQdDYBSC4TSFD6Xea3Ql5VQ5QAigEc_fijn7GbKPcbw0VPq7D70sR1OWixA4wKU0AMFE1XFkFIkb4-xObj4ZRHs2Ib928Zg4ZMluR39Cv2P_wban1wQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1906180526</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examination of Heterogeneous Societies: Identifying Subpopulations by Contrasting Cultures</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Glückstad, Fumiko Kano ; Schmidt, Mikkel N. ; Mørup, Morten</creator><creatorcontrib>Glückstad, Fumiko Kano ; Schmidt, Mikkel N. ; Mørup, Morten</creatorcontrib><description>The recent development of data analytic tools rooted around the Multi-Group Latent Class Analysis (MGLCA) has enabled the examination of heterogeneous datasets in a cross-cultural context. Although the MGLCA is considered as an established and popular cross-cultural data analysis approach, the infinite relational model (IRM) is a new and disruptive type of unsupervised clustering approach that has been developed recently by cognitive psychologists and computer scientists. In this article, an extended version of the IRM coined the multinominal IRM—or mIRM in short—is applied to a cross-cultural analysis of survey data available from the World Value Survey organization. Specifically, the present work analyzes response patterns of the Portrait Value Questionnaire (PVQ) representing Schwartz’s 10 basic values of Japanese and Swedes. The applied model exposes heterogeneous structures of the two societies consisting of fine-grained response patterns expressed by the respective subpopulations and extracts latent typological structures contrasting and highlighting similarities and differences between these two societies. In the final section, we discuss similarities and differences identified between the MGLCA and the mIRM approaches, which indicate potential applications and contributions of the mIRM and the general IRM framework for future cross-cultural data analyses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0221</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0022022116672346</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Clustering ; Cross cultural studies ; Cultural Context ; Cultural differences ; Data Analysis ; Heterogeneity ; Information Management ; Latent class analysis ; Nonparametric statistics ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Psychologists ; Questionnaires ; Sociocultural factors ; Values ; Work organization</subject><ispartof>Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 2017-01, Vol.48 (1), p.39-57</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-d5090db0f35b2aa3165c741e3aec2655810b79f434d51fbc25b5b2100f1f00223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223,33774,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glückstad, Fumiko Kano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Mikkel N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mørup, Morten</creatorcontrib><title>Examination of Heterogeneous Societies: Identifying Subpopulations by Contrasting Cultures</title><title>Journal of cross-cultural psychology</title><description>The recent development of data analytic tools rooted around the Multi-Group Latent Class Analysis (MGLCA) has enabled the examination of heterogeneous datasets in a cross-cultural context. Although the MGLCA is considered as an established and popular cross-cultural data analysis approach, the infinite relational model (IRM) is a new and disruptive type of unsupervised clustering approach that has been developed recently by cognitive psychologists and computer scientists. In this article, an extended version of the IRM coined the multinominal IRM—or mIRM in short—is applied to a cross-cultural analysis of survey data available from the World Value Survey organization. Specifically, the present work analyzes response patterns of the Portrait Value Questionnaire (PVQ) representing Schwartz’s 10 basic values of Japanese and Swedes. The applied model exposes heterogeneous structures of the two societies consisting of fine-grained response patterns expressed by the respective subpopulations and extracts latent typological structures contrasting and highlighting similarities and differences between these two societies. In the final section, we discuss similarities and differences identified between the MGLCA and the mIRM approaches, which indicate potential applications and contributions of the mIRM and the general IRM framework for future cross-cultural data analyses.</description><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Cross cultural studies</subject><subject>Cultural Context</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Information Management</subject><subject>Latent class analysis</subject><subject>Nonparametric statistics</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Sociocultural factors</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Work organization</subject><issn>0022-0221</issn><issn>1552-5422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLxDAQhYMouK7ePRYEb9GZpEm2R1nWXWHBg3oOaTtZurjNmrSg_96WehBBGJjD-96b4TF2jXCHaMw9gBDDIGpthMz1CZuhUoKrXIhTNhtlPurn7CKlPQCgMsWM3a4-3aFpXdeENgs-21BHMeyopdCn7CVUDXUNpUt25t17oqufPWdvj6vX5YZvn9dPy4ctr4QWHa8VFFCX4KUqhXMStapMjiQdDYBSC4TSFD6Xea3Ql5VQ5QAigEc_fijn7GbKPcbw0VPq7D70sR1OWixA4wKU0AMFE1XFkFIkb4-xObj4ZRHs2Ib928Zg4ZMluR39Cv2P_wban1wQ</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Glückstad, Fumiko Kano</creator><creator>Schmidt, Mikkel N.</creator><creator>Mørup, Morten</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Examination of Heterogeneous Societies</title><author>Glückstad, Fumiko Kano ; Schmidt, Mikkel N. ; Mørup, Morten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-d5090db0f35b2aa3165c741e3aec2655810b79f434d51fbc25b5b2100f1f00223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Cross cultural studies</topic><topic>Cultural Context</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Information Management</topic><topic>Latent class analysis</topic><topic>Nonparametric statistics</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Sociocultural factors</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Work organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glückstad, Fumiko Kano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Mikkel N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mørup, Morten</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of cross-cultural psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glückstad, Fumiko Kano</au><au>Schmidt, Mikkel N.</au><au>Mørup, Morten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Examination of Heterogeneous Societies: Identifying Subpopulations by Contrasting Cultures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cross-cultural psychology</jtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>39-57</pages><issn>0022-0221</issn><eissn>1552-5422</eissn><abstract>The recent development of data analytic tools rooted around the Multi-Group Latent Class Analysis (MGLCA) has enabled the examination of heterogeneous datasets in a cross-cultural context. Although the MGLCA is considered as an established and popular cross-cultural data analysis approach, the infinite relational model (IRM) is a new and disruptive type of unsupervised clustering approach that has been developed recently by cognitive psychologists and computer scientists. In this article, an extended version of the IRM coined the multinominal IRM—or mIRM in short—is applied to a cross-cultural analysis of survey data available from the World Value Survey organization. Specifically, the present work analyzes response patterns of the Portrait Value Questionnaire (PVQ) representing Schwartz’s 10 basic values of Japanese and Swedes. The applied model exposes heterogeneous structures of the two societies consisting of fine-grained response patterns expressed by the respective subpopulations and extracts latent typological structures contrasting and highlighting similarities and differences between these two societies. In the final section, we discuss similarities and differences identified between the MGLCA and the mIRM approaches, which indicate potential applications and contributions of the mIRM and the general IRM framework for future cross-cultural data analyses.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0022022116672346</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0221
ispartof Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 2017-01, Vol.48 (1), p.39-57
issn 0022-0221
1552-5422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1906180526
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Sociological Abstracts; SAGE
subjects Clustering
Cross cultural studies
Cultural Context
Cultural differences
Data Analysis
Heterogeneity
Information Management
Latent class analysis
Nonparametric statistics
Polls & surveys
Psychologists
Questionnaires
Sociocultural factors
Values
Work organization
title Examination of Heterogeneous Societies: Identifying Subpopulations by Contrasting Cultures
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A21%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examination%20of%20Heterogeneous%20Societies:%20Identifying%20Subpopulations%20by%20Contrasting%20Cultures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cross-cultural%20psychology&rft.au=Gl%C3%BCckstad,%20Fumiko%20Kano&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=39-57&rft.issn=0022-0221&rft.eissn=1552-5422&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0022022116672346&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1906180526%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-d5090db0f35b2aa3165c741e3aec2655810b79f434d51fbc25b5b2100f1f00223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1906180526&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0022022116672346&rfr_iscdi=true