Collective victimhood and acknowledgement of outgroup suffering across history: Majority and minority perspectives

This paper examines how temporally differentiated representations of ingroup victimhood and acknowledgment of outgroup suffering relate to present intergroup attitudes. A mixed‐methods research was conducted in Bulgaria where both the ethnic majority and the Bulgarian Turkish minority can be viewed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of social psychology 2017-03, Vol.47 (2), p.228-240
Main Authors: Green, Eva G.T., Visintin, Emilio Paolo, Hristova, Antoaneta, Bozhanova, Ana, Pereira, Adrienne, Staerklé, Christian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acknowledgment
acknowledgment of outgroup suffering
Bulgaria
Collective guilt
collective victimhood
Ethnicity
Forgiveness
group‐based forgiveness
Guilt
historical memory
Intergroup relations
Meaning
Minority & ethnic groups
Minority groups
Perpetrators
Power
Prejudice
Social distance
Social psychology
Suffering
Victimization
Victims
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper examines how temporally differentiated representations of ingroup victimhood and acknowledgment of outgroup suffering relate to present intergroup attitudes. A mixed‐methods research was conducted in Bulgaria where both the ethnic majority and the Bulgarian Turkish minority can be viewed as victims and perpetrators in the past. Multigroup path models (Study 1) revealed that for the majority (N = 192) collective victimhood was positively related to social distance through reduced forgiveness and through reduced collective guilt for a different historical era. Acknowledgment of outgroup suffering, in turn, was associated with reduced social distance through heightened guilt and through forgiveness for another era. Among the Bulgarian Turks (N = 160), the result pattern differed. Collective victimhood was unrelated to forgiveness. Moreover, the relationship between guilt and social distance was positive. Semi‐directive interviews (Study 2) revealed different meanings attributed to the events by the two groups. The impact of intertwined historical representations on current‐day prejudice is discussed in light of power asymmetry between groups.
ISSN:0046-2772
1099-0992
DOI:10.1002/ejsp.2237