Loading…
Rapid Last Glacial Maximum deglaciation in the Indian Himalaya coeval with midlatitude glaciers: New insights from 10Be‐dating of ice‐polished bedrock surfaces in the Chandra Valley, NW Himalaya
Despite a large number of dated glacial landforms in the Himalaya, the ice extent during the global Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) from 19 to 23 ka is only known to first order. New cosmogenic 10Be exposure ages from well‐preserved glacially polished surfaces, combined with published data, and an improv...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geophysical research letters 2016-02, Vol.43 (4), p.1589-1597 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1597 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1589 |
container_title | Geophysical research letters |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Eugster, Patricia Scherler, Dirk Thiede, Rasmus C. Codilean, Alexandru T. Strecker, Manfred R. |
description | Despite a large number of dated glacial landforms in the Himalaya, the ice extent during the global Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) from 19 to 23 ka is only known to first order. New cosmogenic 10Be exposure ages from well‐preserved glacially polished surfaces, combined with published data, and an improved production rate scaling model allow reconstruction of the LGM ice extent and subsequent deglaciation in the Chandra Valley of NW India. We show that a >1000 m thick valley glacier retreated >150 km within a few thousand years after the onset of LGM deglaciation. By comparing the recession of the Chandra Valley Glacier and other Himalayan glaciers with those of Northern and Southern Hemisphere glaciers, we demonstrate that post‐LGM deglaciation was similar and nearly finished prior to the Bølling/Allerød interstadial. Our study supports the view that many Himalayan glaciers advanced during the LGM, likely in response to global variations in temperature.
Key Points
Exposure ages of ice‐polished surfaces similar to moraine boulders
Extensive MIS‐2 (LGM) glaciation at the southern front of the Indian Himalaya
Himalayan LGM deglaciation coeval with midlatitude LGM deglaciation |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2015GL066077 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1907583487</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3990922831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1376-9dc84c3c206af44b5e7ceebb2dd1e958e83f93df3307029cc4942dec1f8d7e5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtu1EAQhlsIJIbAjgOUxJaB6ofdbnYwCpNIJkgRj6XV010ed_CLbpthdhyBU3EQToKTAGLFqh76_vqrVIw95viMI4rnAnm2LTHPUes7bMWNUusCUd9lK0Sz5ELn99mDlK4QUaLkK_bj0o7BQ2nTBNvWumBbeGO_hm7uwNP-pjOFoYfQw9QQnPc-2B7OQmdbe7TgBvqySA5haqALvl3gafYEN0qK6QVc0GERp7BvpgR1HDrg-Ip-fvvuF7bfw1BDcNf1OLQhNeRhRz4O7hOkOdbWUfrjvWls76OFD7Zt6fgULj7-3eMhu1fbNtGj3_GEvX99-m5zti7fbs83L8v1yKXO18a7QjnpBOa2VmqXkXZEu53wnpPJCipkbaSvpUSNwjinjBKeHK8LrykjecKe3M4d4_B5pjRVV8Mc-8Wy4gZ1VkhV6P9SWitpRGbyhRK31CEs51RjXG6Jx4pjdf3M6t9nVtvLMpOmyOUvAaaXng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1774392596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid Last Glacial Maximum deglaciation in the Indian Himalaya coeval with midlatitude glaciers: New insights from 10Be‐dating of ice‐polished bedrock surfaces in the Chandra Valley, NW Himalaya</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive</source><creator>Eugster, Patricia ; Scherler, Dirk ; Thiede, Rasmus C. ; Codilean, Alexandru T. ; Strecker, Manfred R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eugster, Patricia ; Scherler, Dirk ; Thiede, Rasmus C. ; Codilean, Alexandru T. ; Strecker, Manfred R.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite a large number of dated glacial landforms in the Himalaya, the ice extent during the global Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) from 19 to 23 ka is only known to first order. New cosmogenic 10Be exposure ages from well‐preserved glacially polished surfaces, combined with published data, and an improved production rate scaling model allow reconstruction of the LGM ice extent and subsequent deglaciation in the Chandra Valley of NW India. We show that a >1000 m thick valley glacier retreated >150 km within a few thousand years after the onset of LGM deglaciation. By comparing the recession of the Chandra Valley Glacier and other Himalayan glaciers with those of Northern and Southern Hemisphere glaciers, we demonstrate that post‐LGM deglaciation was similar and nearly finished prior to the Bølling/Allerød interstadial. Our study supports the view that many Himalayan glaciers advanced during the LGM, likely in response to global variations in temperature.
Key Points
Exposure ages of ice‐polished surfaces similar to moraine boulders
Extensive MIS‐2 (LGM) glaciation at the southern front of the Indian Himalaya
Himalayan LGM deglaciation coeval with midlatitude LGM deglaciation</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2015GL066077</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bedrock ; Beryllium 10 ; Chronology ; Climate change ; cosmogenic nuclides ; Data ; Deglaciation ; Exposure ; exposure dating ; Geological time ; glaciation ; Glaciers ; Himalaya ; Ice ; Ice ages ; Ice dating ; Landforms ; Last Glacial Maximum ; LGM ; Meltwater ; Recession ; Reconstruction ; Scaling ; Southern Hemisphere ; Temperature ; Temperature effects ; Valley glaciers ; Valleys</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2016-02, Vol.43 (4), p.1589-1597</ispartof><rights>2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Feb 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2015GL066077$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2015GL066077$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11514,27924,27925,46468,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eugster, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherler, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiede, Rasmus C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Codilean, Alexandru T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strecker, Manfred R.</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid Last Glacial Maximum deglaciation in the Indian Himalaya coeval with midlatitude glaciers: New insights from 10Be‐dating of ice‐polished bedrock surfaces in the Chandra Valley, NW Himalaya</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>Despite a large number of dated glacial landforms in the Himalaya, the ice extent during the global Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) from 19 to 23 ka is only known to first order. New cosmogenic 10Be exposure ages from well‐preserved glacially polished surfaces, combined with published data, and an improved production rate scaling model allow reconstruction of the LGM ice extent and subsequent deglaciation in the Chandra Valley of NW India. We show that a >1000 m thick valley glacier retreated >150 km within a few thousand years after the onset of LGM deglaciation. By comparing the recession of the Chandra Valley Glacier and other Himalayan glaciers with those of Northern and Southern Hemisphere glaciers, we demonstrate that post‐LGM deglaciation was similar and nearly finished prior to the Bølling/Allerød interstadial. Our study supports the view that many Himalayan glaciers advanced during the LGM, likely in response to global variations in temperature.
Key Points
Exposure ages of ice‐polished surfaces similar to moraine boulders
Extensive MIS‐2 (LGM) glaciation at the southern front of the Indian Himalaya
Himalayan LGM deglaciation coeval with midlatitude LGM deglaciation</description><subject>Bedrock</subject><subject>Beryllium 10</subject><subject>Chronology</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>cosmogenic nuclides</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Deglaciation</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>exposure dating</subject><subject>Geological time</subject><subject>glaciation</subject><subject>Glaciers</subject><subject>Himalaya</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>Ice ages</subject><subject>Ice dating</subject><subject>Landforms</subject><subject>Last Glacial Maximum</subject><subject>LGM</subject><subject>Meltwater</subject><subject>Recession</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Southern Hemisphere</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Valley glaciers</subject><subject>Valleys</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtu1EAQhlsIJIbAjgOUxJaB6ofdbnYwCpNIJkgRj6XV010ed_CLbpthdhyBU3EQToKTAGLFqh76_vqrVIw95viMI4rnAnm2LTHPUes7bMWNUusCUd9lK0Sz5ELn99mDlK4QUaLkK_bj0o7BQ2nTBNvWumBbeGO_hm7uwNP-pjOFoYfQw9QQnPc-2B7OQmdbe7TgBvqySA5haqALvl3gafYEN0qK6QVc0GERp7BvpgR1HDrg-Ip-fvvuF7bfw1BDcNf1OLQhNeRhRz4O7hOkOdbWUfrjvWls76OFD7Zt6fgULj7-3eMhu1fbNtGj3_GEvX99-m5zti7fbs83L8v1yKXO18a7QjnpBOa2VmqXkXZEu53wnpPJCipkbaSvpUSNwjinjBKeHK8LrykjecKe3M4d4_B5pjRVV8Mc-8Wy4gZ1VkhV6P9SWitpRGbyhRK31CEs51RjXG6Jx4pjdf3M6t9nVtvLMpOmyOUvAaaXng</recordid><startdate>20160228</startdate><enddate>20160228</enddate><creator>Eugster, Patricia</creator><creator>Scherler, Dirk</creator><creator>Thiede, Rasmus C.</creator><creator>Codilean, Alexandru T.</creator><creator>Strecker, Manfred R.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160228</creationdate><title>Rapid Last Glacial Maximum deglaciation in the Indian Himalaya coeval with midlatitude glaciers: New insights from 10Be‐dating of ice‐polished bedrock surfaces in the Chandra Valley, NW Himalaya</title><author>Eugster, Patricia ; Scherler, Dirk ; Thiede, Rasmus C. ; Codilean, Alexandru T. ; Strecker, Manfred R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1376-9dc84c3c206af44b5e7ceebb2dd1e958e83f93df3307029cc4942dec1f8d7e5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bedrock</topic><topic>Beryllium 10</topic><topic>Chronology</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>cosmogenic nuclides</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Deglaciation</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>exposure dating</topic><topic>Geological time</topic><topic>glaciation</topic><topic>Glaciers</topic><topic>Himalaya</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>Ice ages</topic><topic>Ice dating</topic><topic>Landforms</topic><topic>Last Glacial Maximum</topic><topic>LGM</topic><topic>Meltwater</topic><topic>Recession</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Southern Hemisphere</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Valley glaciers</topic><topic>Valleys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eugster, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherler, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiede, Rasmus C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Codilean, Alexandru T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strecker, Manfred R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eugster, Patricia</au><au>Scherler, Dirk</au><au>Thiede, Rasmus C.</au><au>Codilean, Alexandru T.</au><au>Strecker, Manfred R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid Last Glacial Maximum deglaciation in the Indian Himalaya coeval with midlatitude glaciers: New insights from 10Be‐dating of ice‐polished bedrock surfaces in the Chandra Valley, NW Himalaya</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2016-02-28</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1589</spage><epage>1597</epage><pages>1589-1597</pages><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>Despite a large number of dated glacial landforms in the Himalaya, the ice extent during the global Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) from 19 to 23 ka is only known to first order. New cosmogenic 10Be exposure ages from well‐preserved glacially polished surfaces, combined with published data, and an improved production rate scaling model allow reconstruction of the LGM ice extent and subsequent deglaciation in the Chandra Valley of NW India. We show that a >1000 m thick valley glacier retreated >150 km within a few thousand years after the onset of LGM deglaciation. By comparing the recession of the Chandra Valley Glacier and other Himalayan glaciers with those of Northern and Southern Hemisphere glaciers, we demonstrate that post‐LGM deglaciation was similar and nearly finished prior to the Bølling/Allerød interstadial. Our study supports the view that many Himalayan glaciers advanced during the LGM, likely in response to global variations in temperature.
Key Points
Exposure ages of ice‐polished surfaces similar to moraine boulders
Extensive MIS‐2 (LGM) glaciation at the southern front of the Indian Himalaya
Himalayan LGM deglaciation coeval with midlatitude LGM deglaciation</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/2015GL066077</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-8276 |
ispartof | Geophysical research letters, 2016-02, Vol.43 (4), p.1589-1597 |
issn | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1907583487 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive |
subjects | Bedrock Beryllium 10 Chronology Climate change cosmogenic nuclides Data Deglaciation Exposure exposure dating Geological time glaciation Glaciers Himalaya Ice Ice ages Ice dating Landforms Last Glacial Maximum LGM Meltwater Recession Reconstruction Scaling Southern Hemisphere Temperature Temperature effects Valley glaciers Valleys |
title | Rapid Last Glacial Maximum deglaciation in the Indian Himalaya coeval with midlatitude glaciers: New insights from 10Be‐dating of ice‐polished bedrock surfaces in the Chandra Valley, NW Himalaya |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T01%3A19%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20Last%20Glacial%20Maximum%20deglaciation%20in%20the%20Indian%20Himalaya%20coeval%20with%20midlatitude%20glaciers:%20New%20insights%20from%2010Be%E2%80%90dating%20of%20ice%E2%80%90polished%20bedrock%20surfaces%20in%20the%20Chandra%20Valley,%20NW%20Himalaya&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Eugster,%20Patricia&rft.date=2016-02-28&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1589&rft.epage=1597&rft.pages=1589-1597&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2015GL066077&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E3990922831%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1376-9dc84c3c206af44b5e7ceebb2dd1e958e83f93df3307029cc4942dec1f8d7e5e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1774392596&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |