Loading…

Rapid Last Glacial Maximum deglaciation in the Indian Himalaya coeval with midlatitude glaciers: New insights from 10Be‐dating of ice‐polished bedrock surfaces in the Chandra Valley, NW Himalaya

Despite a large number of dated glacial landforms in the Himalaya, the ice extent during the global Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) from 19 to 23 ka is only known to first order. New cosmogenic 10Be exposure ages from well‐preserved glacially polished surfaces, combined with published data, and an improv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical research letters 2016-02, Vol.43 (4), p.1589-1597
Main Authors: Eugster, Patricia, Scherler, Dirk, Thiede, Rasmus C., Codilean, Alexandru T., Strecker, Manfred R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 1597
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1589
container_title Geophysical research letters
container_volume 43
creator Eugster, Patricia
Scherler, Dirk
Thiede, Rasmus C.
Codilean, Alexandru T.
Strecker, Manfred R.
description Despite a large number of dated glacial landforms in the Himalaya, the ice extent during the global Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) from 19 to 23 ka is only known to first order. New cosmogenic 10Be exposure ages from well‐preserved glacially polished surfaces, combined with published data, and an improved production rate scaling model allow reconstruction of the LGM ice extent and subsequent deglaciation in the Chandra Valley of NW India. We show that a >1000 m thick valley glacier retreated >150 km within a few thousand years after the onset of LGM deglaciation. By comparing the recession of the Chandra Valley Glacier and other Himalayan glaciers with those of Northern and Southern Hemisphere glaciers, we demonstrate that post‐LGM deglaciation was similar and nearly finished prior to the Bølling/Allerød interstadial. Our study supports the view that many Himalayan glaciers advanced during the LGM, likely in response to global variations in temperature. Key Points Exposure ages of ice‐polished surfaces similar to moraine boulders Extensive MIS‐2 (LGM) glaciation at the southern front of the Indian Himalaya Himalayan LGM deglaciation coeval with midlatitude LGM deglaciation
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2015GL066077
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1907583487</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3990922831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1376-9dc84c3c206af44b5e7ceebb2dd1e958e83f93df3307029cc4942dec1f8d7e5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtu1EAQhlsIJIbAjgOUxJaB6ofdbnYwCpNIJkgRj6XV010ed_CLbpthdhyBU3EQToKTAGLFqh76_vqrVIw95viMI4rnAnm2LTHPUes7bMWNUusCUd9lK0Sz5ELn99mDlK4QUaLkK_bj0o7BQ2nTBNvWumBbeGO_hm7uwNP-pjOFoYfQw9QQnPc-2B7OQmdbe7TgBvqySA5haqALvl3gafYEN0qK6QVc0GERp7BvpgR1HDrg-Ip-fvvuF7bfw1BDcNf1OLQhNeRhRz4O7hOkOdbWUfrjvWls76OFD7Zt6fgULj7-3eMhu1fbNtGj3_GEvX99-m5zti7fbs83L8v1yKXO18a7QjnpBOa2VmqXkXZEu53wnpPJCipkbaSvpUSNwjinjBKeHK8LrykjecKe3M4d4_B5pjRVV8Mc-8Wy4gZ1VkhV6P9SWitpRGbyhRK31CEs51RjXG6Jx4pjdf3M6t9nVtvLMpOmyOUvAaaXng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1774392596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid Last Glacial Maximum deglaciation in the Indian Himalaya coeval with midlatitude glaciers: New insights from 10Be‐dating of ice‐polished bedrock surfaces in the Chandra Valley, NW Himalaya</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive</source><creator>Eugster, Patricia ; Scherler, Dirk ; Thiede, Rasmus C. ; Codilean, Alexandru T. ; Strecker, Manfred R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eugster, Patricia ; Scherler, Dirk ; Thiede, Rasmus C. ; Codilean, Alexandru T. ; Strecker, Manfred R.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite a large number of dated glacial landforms in the Himalaya, the ice extent during the global Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) from 19 to 23 ka is only known to first order. New cosmogenic 10Be exposure ages from well‐preserved glacially polished surfaces, combined with published data, and an improved production rate scaling model allow reconstruction of the LGM ice extent and subsequent deglaciation in the Chandra Valley of NW India. We show that a &gt;1000 m thick valley glacier retreated &gt;150 km within a few thousand years after the onset of LGM deglaciation. By comparing the recession of the Chandra Valley Glacier and other Himalayan glaciers with those of Northern and Southern Hemisphere glaciers, we demonstrate that post‐LGM deglaciation was similar and nearly finished prior to the Bølling/Allerød interstadial. Our study supports the view that many Himalayan glaciers advanced during the LGM, likely in response to global variations in temperature. Key Points Exposure ages of ice‐polished surfaces similar to moraine boulders Extensive MIS‐2 (LGM) glaciation at the southern front of the Indian Himalaya Himalayan LGM deglaciation coeval with midlatitude LGM deglaciation</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2015GL066077</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bedrock ; Beryllium 10 ; Chronology ; Climate change ; cosmogenic nuclides ; Data ; Deglaciation ; Exposure ; exposure dating ; Geological time ; glaciation ; Glaciers ; Himalaya ; Ice ; Ice ages ; Ice dating ; Landforms ; Last Glacial Maximum ; LGM ; Meltwater ; Recession ; Reconstruction ; Scaling ; Southern Hemisphere ; Temperature ; Temperature effects ; Valley glaciers ; Valleys</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2016-02, Vol.43 (4), p.1589-1597</ispartof><rights>2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Feb 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2015GL066077$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2015GL066077$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11514,27924,27925,46468,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eugster, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherler, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiede, Rasmus C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Codilean, Alexandru T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strecker, Manfred R.</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid Last Glacial Maximum deglaciation in the Indian Himalaya coeval with midlatitude glaciers: New insights from 10Be‐dating of ice‐polished bedrock surfaces in the Chandra Valley, NW Himalaya</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>Despite a large number of dated glacial landforms in the Himalaya, the ice extent during the global Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) from 19 to 23 ka is only known to first order. New cosmogenic 10Be exposure ages from well‐preserved glacially polished surfaces, combined with published data, and an improved production rate scaling model allow reconstruction of the LGM ice extent and subsequent deglaciation in the Chandra Valley of NW India. We show that a &gt;1000 m thick valley glacier retreated &gt;150 km within a few thousand years after the onset of LGM deglaciation. By comparing the recession of the Chandra Valley Glacier and other Himalayan glaciers with those of Northern and Southern Hemisphere glaciers, we demonstrate that post‐LGM deglaciation was similar and nearly finished prior to the Bølling/Allerød interstadial. Our study supports the view that many Himalayan glaciers advanced during the LGM, likely in response to global variations in temperature. Key Points Exposure ages of ice‐polished surfaces similar to moraine boulders Extensive MIS‐2 (LGM) glaciation at the southern front of the Indian Himalaya Himalayan LGM deglaciation coeval with midlatitude LGM deglaciation</description><subject>Bedrock</subject><subject>Beryllium 10</subject><subject>Chronology</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>cosmogenic nuclides</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Deglaciation</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>exposure dating</subject><subject>Geological time</subject><subject>glaciation</subject><subject>Glaciers</subject><subject>Himalaya</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>Ice ages</subject><subject>Ice dating</subject><subject>Landforms</subject><subject>Last Glacial Maximum</subject><subject>LGM</subject><subject>Meltwater</subject><subject>Recession</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Southern Hemisphere</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Valley glaciers</subject><subject>Valleys</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtu1EAQhlsIJIbAjgOUxJaB6ofdbnYwCpNIJkgRj6XV010ed_CLbpthdhyBU3EQToKTAGLFqh76_vqrVIw95viMI4rnAnm2LTHPUes7bMWNUusCUd9lK0Sz5ELn99mDlK4QUaLkK_bj0o7BQ2nTBNvWumBbeGO_hm7uwNP-pjOFoYfQw9QQnPc-2B7OQmdbe7TgBvqySA5haqALvl3gafYEN0qK6QVc0GERp7BvpgR1HDrg-Ip-fvvuF7bfw1BDcNf1OLQhNeRhRz4O7hOkOdbWUfrjvWls76OFD7Zt6fgULj7-3eMhu1fbNtGj3_GEvX99-m5zti7fbs83L8v1yKXO18a7QjnpBOa2VmqXkXZEu53wnpPJCipkbaSvpUSNwjinjBKeHK8LrykjecKe3M4d4_B5pjRVV8Mc-8Wy4gZ1VkhV6P9SWitpRGbyhRK31CEs51RjXG6Jx4pjdf3M6t9nVtvLMpOmyOUvAaaXng</recordid><startdate>20160228</startdate><enddate>20160228</enddate><creator>Eugster, Patricia</creator><creator>Scherler, Dirk</creator><creator>Thiede, Rasmus C.</creator><creator>Codilean, Alexandru T.</creator><creator>Strecker, Manfred R.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160228</creationdate><title>Rapid Last Glacial Maximum deglaciation in the Indian Himalaya coeval with midlatitude glaciers: New insights from 10Be‐dating of ice‐polished bedrock surfaces in the Chandra Valley, NW Himalaya</title><author>Eugster, Patricia ; Scherler, Dirk ; Thiede, Rasmus C. ; Codilean, Alexandru T. ; Strecker, Manfred R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1376-9dc84c3c206af44b5e7ceebb2dd1e958e83f93df3307029cc4942dec1f8d7e5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bedrock</topic><topic>Beryllium 10</topic><topic>Chronology</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>cosmogenic nuclides</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Deglaciation</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>exposure dating</topic><topic>Geological time</topic><topic>glaciation</topic><topic>Glaciers</topic><topic>Himalaya</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>Ice ages</topic><topic>Ice dating</topic><topic>Landforms</topic><topic>Last Glacial Maximum</topic><topic>LGM</topic><topic>Meltwater</topic><topic>Recession</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Southern Hemisphere</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Valley glaciers</topic><topic>Valleys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eugster, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherler, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiede, Rasmus C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Codilean, Alexandru T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strecker, Manfred R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eugster, Patricia</au><au>Scherler, Dirk</au><au>Thiede, Rasmus C.</au><au>Codilean, Alexandru T.</au><au>Strecker, Manfred R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid Last Glacial Maximum deglaciation in the Indian Himalaya coeval with midlatitude glaciers: New insights from 10Be‐dating of ice‐polished bedrock surfaces in the Chandra Valley, NW Himalaya</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2016-02-28</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1589</spage><epage>1597</epage><pages>1589-1597</pages><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>Despite a large number of dated glacial landforms in the Himalaya, the ice extent during the global Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) from 19 to 23 ka is only known to first order. New cosmogenic 10Be exposure ages from well‐preserved glacially polished surfaces, combined with published data, and an improved production rate scaling model allow reconstruction of the LGM ice extent and subsequent deglaciation in the Chandra Valley of NW India. We show that a &gt;1000 m thick valley glacier retreated &gt;150 km within a few thousand years after the onset of LGM deglaciation. By comparing the recession of the Chandra Valley Glacier and other Himalayan glaciers with those of Northern and Southern Hemisphere glaciers, we demonstrate that post‐LGM deglaciation was similar and nearly finished prior to the Bølling/Allerød interstadial. Our study supports the view that many Himalayan glaciers advanced during the LGM, likely in response to global variations in temperature. Key Points Exposure ages of ice‐polished surfaces similar to moraine boulders Extensive MIS‐2 (LGM) glaciation at the southern front of the Indian Himalaya Himalayan LGM deglaciation coeval with midlatitude LGM deglaciation</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/2015GL066077</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8276
ispartof Geophysical research letters, 2016-02, Vol.43 (4), p.1589-1597
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1907583487
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive
subjects Bedrock
Beryllium 10
Chronology
Climate change
cosmogenic nuclides
Data
Deglaciation
Exposure
exposure dating
Geological time
glaciation
Glaciers
Himalaya
Ice
Ice ages
Ice dating
Landforms
Last Glacial Maximum
LGM
Meltwater
Recession
Reconstruction
Scaling
Southern Hemisphere
Temperature
Temperature effects
Valley glaciers
Valleys
title Rapid Last Glacial Maximum deglaciation in the Indian Himalaya coeval with midlatitude glaciers: New insights from 10Be‐dating of ice‐polished bedrock surfaces in the Chandra Valley, NW Himalaya
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T01%3A19%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20Last%20Glacial%20Maximum%20deglaciation%20in%20the%20Indian%20Himalaya%20coeval%20with%20midlatitude%20glaciers:%20New%20insights%20from%2010Be%E2%80%90dating%20of%20ice%E2%80%90polished%20bedrock%20surfaces%20in%20the%20Chandra%20Valley,%20NW%20Himalaya&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Eugster,%20Patricia&rft.date=2016-02-28&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1589&rft.epage=1597&rft.pages=1589-1597&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2015GL066077&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E3990922831%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1376-9dc84c3c206af44b5e7ceebb2dd1e958e83f93df3307029cc4942dec1f8d7e5e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1774392596&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true