BEYOND NONMARKET STRATEGY: MARKET ACTIONS AS CORPORATE POLITICAL ACTIVITY

Many firms attempt to manage their legal and regulatory environments by influencing policy makers. Typically, researchers have focused on how firms use nonmarket actions, including lobbying, campaign contributions, and related activities, to gain policy influence. We argue that firms may also attemp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Academy of Management review 2017-01, Vol.42 (1), p.32-52
Main Authors: FUNK, RUSSELL J., HIRSCHMAN, DANIEL
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Action
Campaign contributions
Campaigns
Changes
Codification
Companies
Innovations
Lobbying
Market strategy
Meaning
Mobilization
Policy making
Political participation
Public policy
Regulation
Sequences
Strategic management
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Many firms attempt to manage their legal and regulatory environments by influencing policy makers. Typically, researchers have focused on how firms use nonmarket actions, including lobbying, campaign contributions, and related activities, to gain policy influence. We argue that firms may also attempt to change the effects of policies through market actions. Market actions may lead to both formal policy change (i.e., transformations of codified rules) and interpretive policy change (i.e., transformations of the effects of rules without changes in their codified form). We identify two pathways by which firms' market actions may produce interpretive policy change: implementation and innovation. Implementation-driven change occurs when firms' interpretations of incomplete laws alter and clarify the meaning of those laws. Innovation-driven change occurs when firms engage in novel activities that are difficult to interpret within existing regulatory frameworks and, thus, alter the effects of those regulations. We then theorize how firms' market actions may complement traditional, nonmarket political mobilization in an analysis of sequences of formal and interpretive policy change.
ISSN:0363-7425
1930-3807
DOI:10.5465/amr.2013.0178