Loading…

Psychological measurement: Theory, paradoxes, and prototypes

The article focuses on the ongoing debate regarding the measurement of psychological attributes. The aim is to clarify different uses of the term theory and key points of agreement and disagreement among participants. In addition, the article addresses misinterpretations of key points in recent arti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Theory & psychology 2017-06, Vol.27 (3), p.407-418
Main Author: Humphry, Stephen M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37145daae796882c22bc34c8c50672a02f1aef809de4ebac9e5e5f9fc142f3e03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37145daae796882c22bc34c8c50672a02f1aef809de4ebac9e5e5f9fc142f3e03
container_end_page 418
container_issue 3
container_start_page 407
container_title Theory & psychology
container_volume 27
creator Humphry, Stephen M.
description The article focuses on the ongoing debate regarding the measurement of psychological attributes. The aim is to clarify different uses of the term theory and key points of agreement and disagreement among participants. In addition, the article addresses misinterpretations of key points in recent articles and notes an apparent paradox arising in the representational theory of measurement. Substantive theory is contrasted with both item response theory and the representational theory of measurement. Emphasis is placed on the direct dependence of the measurement of physical attributes on substantive quantitative theory as opposed to any form of separate measurement theory. It is concluded that the primary challenge faced in quantitative psychology is to posit testable substantive theories or laws which form a foundation for measurement.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0959354317699099
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1910814834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0959354317699099</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1910814834</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37145daae796882c22bc34c8c50672a02f1aef809de4ebac9e5e5f9fc142f3e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AUxBdRsFbvHgNeG30vu8lmxYuU-gEFPdRzeN287QdtN-6mYP57U-pBBE9zmN_MwAhxjXCLqPUdmNzIXEnUhTFgzIkYoCow1UrpUzE42OnBPxcXMa4BoDBSD8TDe-zs0m_8YmVpk2yZ4j7wlnftfTJbsg_dKGkoUO2_OI4S2tVJE3zr267heCnOHG0iX_3oUHw8TWbjl3T69vw6fpymVgG0qdSo8pqItSnKMrNZNrdS2dLmUOiMIHNI7EowNSuekzWcc-6Ms6gyJxnkUNwce_vpzz3Htlr7fdj1kxUahBJVKVVPwZGywccY2FVNWG0pdBVCdfio-vtRH0mPkUgL_lX6H_8NgrRmQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1910814834</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychological measurement: Theory, paradoxes, and prototypes</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><creator>Humphry, Stephen M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Humphry, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><description>The article focuses on the ongoing debate regarding the measurement of psychological attributes. The aim is to clarify different uses of the term theory and key points of agreement and disagreement among participants. In addition, the article addresses misinterpretations of key points in recent articles and notes an apparent paradox arising in the representational theory of measurement. Substantive theory is contrasted with both item response theory and the representational theory of measurement. Emphasis is placed on the direct dependence of the measurement of physical attributes on substantive quantitative theory as opposed to any form of separate measurement theory. It is concluded that the primary challenge faced in quantitative psychology is to posit testable substantive theories or laws which form a foundation for measurement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-3543</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7447</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0959354317699099</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Attributes ; Item response theory ; Prototypes ; Psychology ; Quantitative psychology ; Substantive theory</subject><ispartof>Theory &amp; psychology, 2017-06, Vol.27 (3), p.407-418</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37145daae796882c22bc34c8c50672a02f1aef809de4ebac9e5e5f9fc142f3e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37145daae796882c22bc34c8c50672a02f1aef809de4ebac9e5e5f9fc142f3e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Humphry, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><title>Psychological measurement: Theory, paradoxes, and prototypes</title><title>Theory &amp; psychology</title><description>The article focuses on the ongoing debate regarding the measurement of psychological attributes. The aim is to clarify different uses of the term theory and key points of agreement and disagreement among participants. In addition, the article addresses misinterpretations of key points in recent articles and notes an apparent paradox arising in the representational theory of measurement. Substantive theory is contrasted with both item response theory and the representational theory of measurement. Emphasis is placed on the direct dependence of the measurement of physical attributes on substantive quantitative theory as opposed to any form of separate measurement theory. It is concluded that the primary challenge faced in quantitative psychology is to posit testable substantive theories or laws which form a foundation for measurement.</description><subject>Attributes</subject><subject>Item response theory</subject><subject>Prototypes</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Substantive theory</subject><issn>0959-3543</issn><issn>1461-7447</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AUxBdRsFbvHgNeG30vu8lmxYuU-gEFPdRzeN287QdtN-6mYP57U-pBBE9zmN_MwAhxjXCLqPUdmNzIXEnUhTFgzIkYoCow1UrpUzE42OnBPxcXMa4BoDBSD8TDe-zs0m_8YmVpk2yZ4j7wlnftfTJbsg_dKGkoUO2_OI4S2tVJE3zr267heCnOHG0iX_3oUHw8TWbjl3T69vw6fpymVgG0qdSo8pqItSnKMrNZNrdS2dLmUOiMIHNI7EowNSuekzWcc-6Ms6gyJxnkUNwce_vpzz3Htlr7fdj1kxUahBJVKVVPwZGywccY2FVNWG0pdBVCdfio-vtRH0mPkUgL_lX6H_8NgrRmQA</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Humphry, Stephen M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Psychological measurement: Theory, paradoxes, and prototypes</title><author>Humphry, Stephen M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37145daae796882c22bc34c8c50672a02f1aef809de4ebac9e5e5f9fc142f3e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Attributes</topic><topic>Item response theory</topic><topic>Prototypes</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Substantive theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Humphry, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Theory &amp; psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Humphry, Stephen M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychological measurement: Theory, paradoxes, and prototypes</atitle><jtitle>Theory &amp; psychology</jtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>407</spage><epage>418</epage><pages>407-418</pages><issn>0959-3543</issn><eissn>1461-7447</eissn><abstract>The article focuses on the ongoing debate regarding the measurement of psychological attributes. The aim is to clarify different uses of the term theory and key points of agreement and disagreement among participants. In addition, the article addresses misinterpretations of key points in recent articles and notes an apparent paradox arising in the representational theory of measurement. Substantive theory is contrasted with both item response theory and the representational theory of measurement. Emphasis is placed on the direct dependence of the measurement of physical attributes on substantive quantitative theory as opposed to any form of separate measurement theory. It is concluded that the primary challenge faced in quantitative psychology is to posit testable substantive theories or laws which form a foundation for measurement.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0959354317699099</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-3543
ispartof Theory & psychology, 2017-06, Vol.27 (3), p.407-418
issn 0959-3543
1461-7447
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1910814834
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)
subjects Attributes
Item response theory
Prototypes
Psychology
Quantitative psychology
Substantive theory
title Psychological measurement: Theory, paradoxes, and prototypes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-17T00%3A33%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychological%20measurement:%20Theory,%20paradoxes,%20and%20prototypes&rft.jtitle=Theory%20&%20psychology&rft.au=Humphry,%20Stephen%20M.&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=407&rft.epage=418&rft.pages=407-418&rft.issn=0959-3543&rft.eissn=1461-7447&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0959354317699099&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1910814834%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-37145daae796882c22bc34c8c50672a02f1aef809de4ebac9e5e5f9fc142f3e03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1910814834&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0959354317699099&rfr_iscdi=true