Loading…

Degradation and regeneration in mc‐Si after different gettering steps

Light and elevated temperature induced degradation (LeTID) affects significantly the performance of multicrystalline (mc) Si passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) solar cells, and underlying mechanisms of LeTID are still unknown. In this work LeTID and following regeneration of an industrial mc‐Si...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Progress in photovoltaics 2017-07, Vol.25 (7), p.545-552
Main Authors: Zuschlag, Annika, Skorka, Daniel, Hahn, Giso
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3272-a686e768f4897db42d74650966445497ea527ca70c256147619086e790008d203
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3272-a686e768f4897db42d74650966445497ea527ca70c256147619086e790008d203
container_end_page 552
container_issue 7
container_start_page 545
container_title Progress in photovoltaics
container_volume 25
creator Zuschlag, Annika
Skorka, Daniel
Hahn, Giso
description Light and elevated temperature induced degradation (LeTID) affects significantly the performance of multicrystalline (mc) Si passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) solar cells, and underlying mechanisms of LeTID are still unknown. In this work LeTID and following regeneration of an industrial mc‐Si PERC solar cell is compared to differently processed minority charge carrier lifetime samples under illumination (1 sun) and elevated temperature (75 °C). LeTID on cell level reveals the same kinetics compared to lifetime samples. Varying the processing sequence has a significant effect on LeTID of lifetime samples. Ungettered samples with fired SiNx:H surface passivation show a very strong LeTID and regeneration effect, with degradation kinetics being similar for all wafer areas irrespective of initial material quality. In contrast, regeneration sets in earlier in good quality areas. Differently gettered samples with lower contamination level than ungettered samples are less sensitive to LeTID, while overall degradation and regeneration behavior is strongly influenced by applied gettering sequences. Al‐gettered samples show a more pronounced degradation effect than P‐gettered samples, leading to the assumption that P‐gettering is more effective in the reduction of LeTID sensitive defects. If the gettering step is less effective, in lifetime samples after degradation a beginning regeneration effect could be observed. A model is presented, describing LeTID in boron as well as gallium doped mc‐Si being based on impurities that can be gettered and redistributed during high temperature steps. Using this experimental approach helps to clarify the underlying mechanisms of LeTID and leads to a better understanding of degradation and regeneration mechanisms in mc Si. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Light and elevated temperature induced degradation affects significantly the performance of multicrystalline silicon PERC solar cells, and the underlying mechanisms are still unknown. We show that all areas are affected, but effective gettering steps influence significantly the degree of degradation, with P‐gettering being more effective than Al‐gettering. A model is presented describing the degradation based on getterable and redistributable impurities.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pip.2832
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1911517444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1911517444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3272-a686e768f4897db42d74650966445497ea527ca70c256147619086e790008d203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQhxdRsFbBR1jw4iV1drt_skepthYKFlTwtqzJJGxpk7ibIr35CD6jT2JivHqa4cf3m4GPkEsGEwbAbxrfTHg65UdkxMCYhEnzetzviifaGHlKzmLcADCdGjUiizssg8td6-uKuiqnAUusMAyBr-gu-_78evLUFS0GmvuiwIBVS0tsu8BXJY0tNvGcnBRuG_Hib47Jy_z-efaQrB4Xy9ntKsmmXPPEqVShVmkhUqPzN8FzLZQEo5QQUhiNTnKdOQ0Zl4oJrZiBvmEAIM05TMfkarjbhPp9j7G1m3ofqu6lZYYxybQQoqOuByoLdYwBC9sEv3PhYBnYXpPtNNleU4cmA_rht3j4l7Pr5fqX_wGALGeV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1911517444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Degradation and regeneration in mc‐Si after different gettering steps</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Zuschlag, Annika ; Skorka, Daniel ; Hahn, Giso</creator><creatorcontrib>Zuschlag, Annika ; Skorka, Daniel ; Hahn, Giso</creatorcontrib><description>Light and elevated temperature induced degradation (LeTID) affects significantly the performance of multicrystalline (mc) Si passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) solar cells, and underlying mechanisms of LeTID are still unknown. In this work LeTID and following regeneration of an industrial mc‐Si PERC solar cell is compared to differently processed minority charge carrier lifetime samples under illumination (1 sun) and elevated temperature (75 °C). LeTID on cell level reveals the same kinetics compared to lifetime samples. Varying the processing sequence has a significant effect on LeTID of lifetime samples. Ungettered samples with fired SiNx:H surface passivation show a very strong LeTID and regeneration effect, with degradation kinetics being similar for all wafer areas irrespective of initial material quality. In contrast, regeneration sets in earlier in good quality areas. Differently gettered samples with lower contamination level than ungettered samples are less sensitive to LeTID, while overall degradation and regeneration behavior is strongly influenced by applied gettering sequences. Al‐gettered samples show a more pronounced degradation effect than P‐gettered samples, leading to the assumption that P‐gettering is more effective in the reduction of LeTID sensitive defects. If the gettering step is less effective, in lifetime samples after degradation a beginning regeneration effect could be observed. A model is presented, describing LeTID in boron as well as gallium doped mc‐Si being based on impurities that can be gettered and redistributed during high temperature steps. Using this experimental approach helps to clarify the underlying mechanisms of LeTID and leads to a better understanding of degradation and regeneration mechanisms in mc Si. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd Light and elevated temperature induced degradation affects significantly the performance of multicrystalline silicon PERC solar cells, and the underlying mechanisms are still unknown. We show that all areas are affected, but effective gettering steps influence significantly the degree of degradation, with P‐gettering being more effective than Al‐gettering. A model is presented describing the degradation based on getterable and redistributable impurities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-7995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-159X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pip.2832</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Boron ; Carrier lifetime ; Contamination ; Current carriers ; Defects ; Degradation ; Gallium ; Gettering ; High temperature ; Illumination ; Impurities ; LeTID ; multicrystalline ; Passivity ; Photovoltaic cells ; Regeneration ; silicon ; Solar cells ; Stellar mass ; Sun</subject><ispartof>Progress in photovoltaics, 2017-07, Vol.25 (7), p.545-552</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3272-a686e768f4897db42d74650966445497ea527ca70c256147619086e790008d203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3272-a686e768f4897db42d74650966445497ea527ca70c256147619086e790008d203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zuschlag, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skorka, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Giso</creatorcontrib><title>Degradation and regeneration in mc‐Si after different gettering steps</title><title>Progress in photovoltaics</title><description>Light and elevated temperature induced degradation (LeTID) affects significantly the performance of multicrystalline (mc) Si passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) solar cells, and underlying mechanisms of LeTID are still unknown. In this work LeTID and following regeneration of an industrial mc‐Si PERC solar cell is compared to differently processed minority charge carrier lifetime samples under illumination (1 sun) and elevated temperature (75 °C). LeTID on cell level reveals the same kinetics compared to lifetime samples. Varying the processing sequence has a significant effect on LeTID of lifetime samples. Ungettered samples with fired SiNx:H surface passivation show a very strong LeTID and regeneration effect, with degradation kinetics being similar for all wafer areas irrespective of initial material quality. In contrast, regeneration sets in earlier in good quality areas. Differently gettered samples with lower contamination level than ungettered samples are less sensitive to LeTID, while overall degradation and regeneration behavior is strongly influenced by applied gettering sequences. Al‐gettered samples show a more pronounced degradation effect than P‐gettered samples, leading to the assumption that P‐gettering is more effective in the reduction of LeTID sensitive defects. If the gettering step is less effective, in lifetime samples after degradation a beginning regeneration effect could be observed. A model is presented, describing LeTID in boron as well as gallium doped mc‐Si being based on impurities that can be gettered and redistributed during high temperature steps. Using this experimental approach helps to clarify the underlying mechanisms of LeTID and leads to a better understanding of degradation and regeneration mechanisms in mc Si. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd Light and elevated temperature induced degradation affects significantly the performance of multicrystalline silicon PERC solar cells, and the underlying mechanisms are still unknown. We show that all areas are affected, but effective gettering steps influence significantly the degree of degradation, with P‐gettering being more effective than Al‐gettering. A model is presented describing the degradation based on getterable and redistributable impurities.</description><subject>Boron</subject><subject>Carrier lifetime</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Current carriers</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Gallium</subject><subject>Gettering</subject><subject>High temperature</subject><subject>Illumination</subject><subject>Impurities</subject><subject>LeTID</subject><subject>multicrystalline</subject><subject>Passivity</subject><subject>Photovoltaic cells</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>silicon</subject><subject>Solar cells</subject><subject>Stellar mass</subject><subject>Sun</subject><issn>1062-7995</issn><issn>1099-159X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQhxdRsFbBR1jw4iV1drt_skepthYKFlTwtqzJJGxpk7ibIr35CD6jT2JivHqa4cf3m4GPkEsGEwbAbxrfTHg65UdkxMCYhEnzetzviifaGHlKzmLcADCdGjUiizssg8td6-uKuiqnAUusMAyBr-gu-_78evLUFS0GmvuiwIBVS0tsu8BXJY0tNvGcnBRuG_Hib47Jy_z-efaQrB4Xy9ntKsmmXPPEqVShVmkhUqPzN8FzLZQEo5QQUhiNTnKdOQ0Zl4oJrZiBvmEAIM05TMfkarjbhPp9j7G1m3ofqu6lZYYxybQQoqOuByoLdYwBC9sEv3PhYBnYXpPtNNleU4cmA_rht3j4l7Pr5fqX_wGALGeV</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Zuschlag, Annika</creator><creator>Skorka, Daniel</creator><creator>Hahn, Giso</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Degradation and regeneration in mc‐Si after different gettering steps</title><author>Zuschlag, Annika ; Skorka, Daniel ; Hahn, Giso</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3272-a686e768f4897db42d74650966445497ea527ca70c256147619086e790008d203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Boron</topic><topic>Carrier lifetime</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Current carriers</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Gallium</topic><topic>Gettering</topic><topic>High temperature</topic><topic>Illumination</topic><topic>Impurities</topic><topic>LeTID</topic><topic>multicrystalline</topic><topic>Passivity</topic><topic>Photovoltaic cells</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>silicon</topic><topic>Solar cells</topic><topic>Stellar mass</topic><topic>Sun</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zuschlag, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skorka, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Giso</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Progress in photovoltaics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zuschlag, Annika</au><au>Skorka, Daniel</au><au>Hahn, Giso</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Degradation and regeneration in mc‐Si after different gettering steps</atitle><jtitle>Progress in photovoltaics</jtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>545</spage><epage>552</epage><pages>545-552</pages><issn>1062-7995</issn><eissn>1099-159X</eissn><abstract>Light and elevated temperature induced degradation (LeTID) affects significantly the performance of multicrystalline (mc) Si passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) solar cells, and underlying mechanisms of LeTID are still unknown. In this work LeTID and following regeneration of an industrial mc‐Si PERC solar cell is compared to differently processed minority charge carrier lifetime samples under illumination (1 sun) and elevated temperature (75 °C). LeTID on cell level reveals the same kinetics compared to lifetime samples. Varying the processing sequence has a significant effect on LeTID of lifetime samples. Ungettered samples with fired SiNx:H surface passivation show a very strong LeTID and regeneration effect, with degradation kinetics being similar for all wafer areas irrespective of initial material quality. In contrast, regeneration sets in earlier in good quality areas. Differently gettered samples with lower contamination level than ungettered samples are less sensitive to LeTID, while overall degradation and regeneration behavior is strongly influenced by applied gettering sequences. Al‐gettered samples show a more pronounced degradation effect than P‐gettered samples, leading to the assumption that P‐gettering is more effective in the reduction of LeTID sensitive defects. If the gettering step is less effective, in lifetime samples after degradation a beginning regeneration effect could be observed. A model is presented, describing LeTID in boron as well as gallium doped mc‐Si being based on impurities that can be gettered and redistributed during high temperature steps. Using this experimental approach helps to clarify the underlying mechanisms of LeTID and leads to a better understanding of degradation and regeneration mechanisms in mc Si. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd Light and elevated temperature induced degradation affects significantly the performance of multicrystalline silicon PERC solar cells, and the underlying mechanisms are still unknown. We show that all areas are affected, but effective gettering steps influence significantly the degree of degradation, with P‐gettering being more effective than Al‐gettering. A model is presented describing the degradation based on getterable and redistributable impurities.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/pip.2832</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1062-7995
ispartof Progress in photovoltaics, 2017-07, Vol.25 (7), p.545-552
issn 1062-7995
1099-159X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1911517444
source Wiley
subjects Boron
Carrier lifetime
Contamination
Current carriers
Defects
Degradation
Gallium
Gettering
High temperature
Illumination
Impurities
LeTID
multicrystalline
Passivity
Photovoltaic cells
Regeneration
silicon
Solar cells
Stellar mass
Sun
title Degradation and regeneration in mc‐Si after different gettering steps
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A23%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Degradation%20and%20regeneration%20in%20mc%E2%80%90Si%20after%20different%20gettering%20steps&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20photovoltaics&rft.au=Zuschlag,%20Annika&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=545&rft.epage=552&rft.pages=545-552&rft.issn=1062-7995&rft.eissn=1099-159X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pip.2832&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1911517444%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3272-a686e768f4897db42d74650966445497ea527ca70c256147619086e790008d203%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1911517444&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true