Psychometric properties of the functional screening test: A review of current literature

[...]those tests which can be compared to a ‘gold standard’ test typically use radiographical measures. [...]clinical screening tests in general are based on the assumption that a biomechanical system which appears ‘normal’ leads to a low risk of injury: symmetry of function and absence of symptoms...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of science and medicine in sport 2013-12, Vol.16, p.e21-e21
Main Authors: Baxter, M, McBride, D, Milosavljevic, S, Hendrick, P
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Injuries
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Quantitative psychology
Sports Medicine
Validity
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page e21
container_issue
container_start_page e21
container_title Journal of science and medicine in sport
container_volume 16
creator Baxter, M
McBride, D
Milosavljevic, S
Hendrick, P
description [...]those tests which can be compared to a ‘gold standard’ test typically use radiographical measures. [...]clinical screening tests in general are based on the assumption that a biomechanical system which appears ‘normal’ leads to a low risk of injury: symmetry of function and absence of symptoms go hand in hand.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.10.052
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1912684822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1440244013002831</els_id><sourcerecordid>1912684822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1812-6054be76a9b39cc2494ca1be3b4efc10d9bbe00409cfbea61d8586a61f405a983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUcFq3DAQNaWBbjf9gl4EOXurkWSvHEhgWdIkEGghKfQm5NlxV47X3khywv595G4g0EsvM8Pw3vDmvSz7CnwBHMpv7aINdhcWgoNMmwUvxIdsBnqpc9AlfEyzUjwXqXzKPofQci6KpVzOst8_wwG3w46id8j2ftiTj44CGxoWt8Sascfoht52LKAn6l3_h0UK8ZytmKdnRy8TFEfvqY-sc5G8jaOn0-yksV2gL299nv36fvWwvsnvflzfrld3OYIGkZe8UDUtS1vVskIUqlJooSZZK2oQ-Kaqa-Jc8QqbmmwJG13oMvVG8cJWWs6zs-PdpP1pTMJMO4w-6Q0GKhClVlqIhJJHFPohBE-N2Xu3s_5ggJvJQtOavxaaycJpmSxMrIsji9ID6VVvAjrqkTbOE0azGdx_-Jf_8LFzvUPbPdKBwrtQE4Th5n4KacoIZMpHS5CvTEyQ6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1912684822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric properties of the functional screening test: A review of current literature</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Baxter, M ; McBride, D ; Milosavljevic, S ; Hendrick, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Baxter, M ; McBride, D ; Milosavljevic, S ; Hendrick, P</creatorcontrib><description>[...]those tests which can be compared to a ‘gold standard’ test typically use radiographical measures. [...]clinical screening tests in general are based on the assumption that a biomechanical system which appears ‘normal’ leads to a low risk of injury: symmetry of function and absence of symptoms go hand in hand.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1440-2440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.10.052</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Belconnen: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Injuries ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Quantitative psychology ; Sports Medicine ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of science and medicine in sport, 2013-12, Vol.16, p.e21-e21</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><rights>Copyright Copyright Agency Limited (Distributor) Dec 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baxter, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBride, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milosavljevic, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrick, P</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric properties of the functional screening test: A review of current literature</title><title>Journal of science and medicine in sport</title><description>[...]those tests which can be compared to a ‘gold standard’ test typically use radiographical measures. [...]clinical screening tests in general are based on the assumption that a biomechanical system which appears ‘normal’ leads to a low risk of injury: symmetry of function and absence of symptoms go hand in hand.</description><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Sports Medicine</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1440-2440</issn><issn>1878-1861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUcFq3DAQNaWBbjf9gl4EOXurkWSvHEhgWdIkEGghKfQm5NlxV47X3khywv595G4g0EsvM8Pw3vDmvSz7CnwBHMpv7aINdhcWgoNMmwUvxIdsBnqpc9AlfEyzUjwXqXzKPofQci6KpVzOst8_wwG3w46id8j2ftiTj44CGxoWt8Sascfoht52LKAn6l3_h0UK8ZytmKdnRy8TFEfvqY-sc5G8jaOn0-yksV2gL299nv36fvWwvsnvflzfrld3OYIGkZe8UDUtS1vVskIUqlJooSZZK2oQ-Kaqa-Jc8QqbmmwJG13oMvVG8cJWWs6zs-PdpP1pTMJMO4w-6Q0GKhClVlqIhJJHFPohBE-N2Xu3s_5ggJvJQtOavxaaycJpmSxMrIsji9ID6VVvAjrqkTbOE0azGdx_-Jf_8LFzvUPbPdKBwrtQE4Th5n4KacoIZMpHS5CvTEyQ6w</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Baxter, M</creator><creator>McBride, D</creator><creator>Milosavljevic, S</creator><creator>Hendrick, P</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Psychometric properties of the functional screening test: A review of current literature</title><author>Baxter, M ; McBride, D ; Milosavljevic, S ; Hendrick, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1812-6054be76a9b39cc2494ca1be3b4efc10d9bbe00409cfbea61d8586a61f405a983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Sports Medicine</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baxter, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBride, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milosavljevic, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrick, P</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Australia &amp; New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of science and medicine in sport</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baxter, M</au><au>McBride, D</au><au>Milosavljevic, S</au><au>Hendrick, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric properties of the functional screening test: A review of current literature</atitle><jtitle>Journal of science and medicine in sport</jtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>16</volume><spage>e21</spage><epage>e21</epage><pages>e21-e21</pages><issn>1440-2440</issn><eissn>1878-1861</eissn><abstract>[...]those tests which can be compared to a ‘gold standard’ test typically use radiographical measures. [...]clinical screening tests in general are based on the assumption that a biomechanical system which appears ‘normal’ leads to a low risk of injury: symmetry of function and absence of symptoms go hand in hand.</abstract><cop>Belconnen</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jsams.2013.10.052</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1440-2440
ispartof Journal of science and medicine in sport, 2013-12, Vol.16, p.e21-e21
issn 1440-2440
1878-1861
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1912684822
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Injuries
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Quantitative psychology
Sports Medicine
Validity
title Psychometric properties of the functional screening test: A review of current literature
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A44%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20properties%20of%20the%20functional%20screening%20test:%20A%20review%20of%20current%20literature&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20science%20and%20medicine%20in%20sport&rft.au=Baxter,%20M&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=16&rft.spage=e21&rft.epage=e21&rft.pages=e21-e21&rft.issn=1440-2440&rft.eissn=1878-1861&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsams.2013.10.052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1912684822%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1812-6054be76a9b39cc2494ca1be3b4efc10d9bbe00409cfbea61d8586a61f405a983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1912684822&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true