Loading…

Social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession in the UK

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to consider how Big Four and mid-tier accountancy firms in the UK are responding to political concerns about social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession. Design/methodology/approach Interviews were undertaken with 18 public accountancy firms, ra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Accounting, auditing & accountability journal auditing & accountability journal, 2017-07, Vol.30 (5), p.1082-1110
Main Author: Duff, Angus
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1603-5824a00ecc1448cb477e0d0987f82741c8d9efee447e57647e535850aa1a506a3
cites
container_end_page 1110
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1082
container_title Accounting, auditing & accountability journal
container_volume 30
creator Duff, Angus
description Purpose The purpose of this paper is to consider how Big Four and mid-tier accountancy firms in the UK are responding to political concerns about social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession. Design/methodology/approach Interviews were undertaken with 18 public accountancy firms, ranked in the Top 30 by fee income, operating in the UK to identify how they are recruiting staff in the light of the Fair Access to the Professions’ agenda. Bourdieusian sociology is used to inform the findings. Findings The Big Four firms employ a discourse of hiring “the brightest and the best” to satisfy perceived client demand, where symbolic capital is instantiated by reputational capital, reflecting prestige and specialisation, supported by a workforce with elite credentials. For mid-tier firms, reputational capital is interpreted as the need for individuals to service a diverse client portfolio. In general, most interviewees demonstrated relatively limited awareness of the issues surrounding the Fair Access agenda. Research limitations/implications The interviews with accountancy firms are both exploratory and cross-sectional. Furthermore, the study was undertaken at an embryonic point (2010) in the emerging Fair Access discourse. Future work considering the accountancy profession could usefully examine if, and how, matters have progressed. Social implications The investigation finds that accountancy firms remain relatively socially exclusive, largely due to the requirement for high educational entry standards, and interviewees’ responses generally indicate only limited attempts at engagement with political agendas of promoting Fair Access to the profession. Originality/value This paper is the first to empirically evaluate how the accountancy profession is responding to the Fair Access agenda; documents changing patterns of recruitment in accountancy employment, including the hiring of non-graduates to undertake professional work; and augments the literature considering social class and accounting.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/AAAJ-10-2012-1133
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1913812824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1913812824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1603-5824a00ecc1448cb477e0d0987f82741c8d9efee447e57647e535850aa1a506a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUD1PwzAUtBBIhMIPYLPEbHgvtmtnjCraApUYoHP06jjCVRKXfAz996SUjeXdcHfvTsfYPcIjItinPM9fBYJIAVOBKOUFS9BoK1QK-pIlkGkUUht1zW76fg8Ak8smbPURXaCaN3EX6jAcObUlX1LoeO6c73s-RD58eU7OxbEdqHVHfuhiNVEhtjy0v-z27ZZdVVT3_u4PZ2y7fP5crMXmffWyyDfC4Ryk0DZVBOCdQ6Ws2yljPJSQWVPZ1Ch0tsx85b1SxmszP12prQYiJA1zkjP2cP47lfgefT8U-zh27RRZYIbSYjolTCo4q3zjO6rL4tCFhrpjgVCc5ir-zSV_AJeoWnI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1913812824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession in the UK</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Duff, Angus</creator><creatorcontrib>Duff, Angus</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to consider how Big Four and mid-tier accountancy firms in the UK are responding to political concerns about social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession. Design/methodology/approach Interviews were undertaken with 18 public accountancy firms, ranked in the Top 30 by fee income, operating in the UK to identify how they are recruiting staff in the light of the Fair Access to the Professions’ agenda. Bourdieusian sociology is used to inform the findings. Findings The Big Four firms employ a discourse of hiring “the brightest and the best” to satisfy perceived client demand, where symbolic capital is instantiated by reputational capital, reflecting prestige and specialisation, supported by a workforce with elite credentials. For mid-tier firms, reputational capital is interpreted as the need for individuals to service a diverse client portfolio. In general, most interviewees demonstrated relatively limited awareness of the issues surrounding the Fair Access agenda. Research limitations/implications The interviews with accountancy firms are both exploratory and cross-sectional. Furthermore, the study was undertaken at an embryonic point (2010) in the emerging Fair Access discourse. Future work considering the accountancy profession could usefully examine if, and how, matters have progressed. Social implications The investigation finds that accountancy firms remain relatively socially exclusive, largely due to the requirement for high educational entry standards, and interviewees’ responses generally indicate only limited attempts at engagement with political agendas of promoting Fair Access to the profession. Originality/value This paper is the first to empirically evaluate how the accountancy profession is responding to the Fair Access agenda; documents changing patterns of recruitment in accountancy employment, including the hiring of non-graduates to undertake professional work; and augments the literature considering social class and accounting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-3574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-10-2012-1133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Access ; Accountancy ; Accountants ; Accounting ; Accounting firms ; Agenda ; Bourdieu, Pierre (1930-2002) ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Companies ; Credentials ; Cultural capital ; Discourse ; Employment ; Habitus ; Higher education ; Hiring ; Income distribution ; Interviews ; Market positioning ; Prestige ; Professional recruitment ; Professions ; Public interest ; Recruitment ; Social classes ; Social mobility ; Students ; Success ; Upward mobility ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Accounting, auditing &amp; accountability journal, 2017-07, Vol.30 (5), p.1082-1110</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1603-5824a00ecc1448cb477e0d0987f82741c8d9efee447e57647e535850aa1a506a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12847,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duff, Angus</creatorcontrib><title>Social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession in the UK</title><title>Accounting, auditing &amp; accountability journal</title><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to consider how Big Four and mid-tier accountancy firms in the UK are responding to political concerns about social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession. Design/methodology/approach Interviews were undertaken with 18 public accountancy firms, ranked in the Top 30 by fee income, operating in the UK to identify how they are recruiting staff in the light of the Fair Access to the Professions’ agenda. Bourdieusian sociology is used to inform the findings. Findings The Big Four firms employ a discourse of hiring “the brightest and the best” to satisfy perceived client demand, where symbolic capital is instantiated by reputational capital, reflecting prestige and specialisation, supported by a workforce with elite credentials. For mid-tier firms, reputational capital is interpreted as the need for individuals to service a diverse client portfolio. In general, most interviewees demonstrated relatively limited awareness of the issues surrounding the Fair Access agenda. Research limitations/implications The interviews with accountancy firms are both exploratory and cross-sectional. Furthermore, the study was undertaken at an embryonic point (2010) in the emerging Fair Access discourse. Future work considering the accountancy profession could usefully examine if, and how, matters have progressed. Social implications The investigation finds that accountancy firms remain relatively socially exclusive, largely due to the requirement for high educational entry standards, and interviewees’ responses generally indicate only limited attempts at engagement with political agendas of promoting Fair Access to the profession. Originality/value This paper is the first to empirically evaluate how the accountancy profession is responding to the Fair Access agenda; documents changing patterns of recruitment in accountancy employment, including the hiring of non-graduates to undertake professional work; and augments the literature considering social class and accounting.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Access</subject><subject>Accountancy</subject><subject>Accountants</subject><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Accounting firms</subject><subject>Agenda</subject><subject>Bourdieu, Pierre (1930-2002)</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Credentials</subject><subject>Cultural capital</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Habitus</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Hiring</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Market positioning</subject><subject>Prestige</subject><subject>Professional recruitment</subject><subject>Professions</subject><subject>Public interest</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Social mobility</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Upward mobility</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0951-3574</issn><issn>1758-4205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNplUD1PwzAUtBBIhMIPYLPEbHgvtmtnjCraApUYoHP06jjCVRKXfAz996SUjeXdcHfvTsfYPcIjItinPM9fBYJIAVOBKOUFS9BoK1QK-pIlkGkUUht1zW76fg8Ak8smbPURXaCaN3EX6jAcObUlX1LoeO6c73s-RD58eU7OxbEdqHVHfuhiNVEhtjy0v-z27ZZdVVT3_u4PZ2y7fP5crMXmffWyyDfC4Ryk0DZVBOCdQ6Ws2yljPJSQWVPZ1Ch0tsx85b1SxmszP12prQYiJA1zkjP2cP47lfgefT8U-zh27RRZYIbSYjolTCo4q3zjO6rL4tCFhrpjgVCc5ir-zSV_AJeoWnI</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Duff, Angus</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession in the UK</title><author>Duff, Angus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1603-5824a00ecc1448cb477e0d0987f82741c8d9efee447e57647e535850aa1a506a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Access</topic><topic>Accountancy</topic><topic>Accountants</topic><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Accounting firms</topic><topic>Agenda</topic><topic>Bourdieu, Pierre (1930-2002)</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Credentials</topic><topic>Cultural capital</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Habitus</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Hiring</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Market positioning</topic><topic>Prestige</topic><topic>Professional recruitment</topic><topic>Professions</topic><topic>Public interest</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Social mobility</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Upward mobility</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duff, Angus</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Accounting, auditing &amp; accountability journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duff, Angus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession in the UK</atitle><jtitle>Accounting, auditing &amp; accountability journal</jtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1082</spage><epage>1110</epage><pages>1082-1110</pages><issn>0951-3574</issn><eissn>1758-4205</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to consider how Big Four and mid-tier accountancy firms in the UK are responding to political concerns about social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession. Design/methodology/approach Interviews were undertaken with 18 public accountancy firms, ranked in the Top 30 by fee income, operating in the UK to identify how they are recruiting staff in the light of the Fair Access to the Professions’ agenda. Bourdieusian sociology is used to inform the findings. Findings The Big Four firms employ a discourse of hiring “the brightest and the best” to satisfy perceived client demand, where symbolic capital is instantiated by reputational capital, reflecting prestige and specialisation, supported by a workforce with elite credentials. For mid-tier firms, reputational capital is interpreted as the need for individuals to service a diverse client portfolio. In general, most interviewees demonstrated relatively limited awareness of the issues surrounding the Fair Access agenda. Research limitations/implications The interviews with accountancy firms are both exploratory and cross-sectional. Furthermore, the study was undertaken at an embryonic point (2010) in the emerging Fair Access discourse. Future work considering the accountancy profession could usefully examine if, and how, matters have progressed. Social implications The investigation finds that accountancy firms remain relatively socially exclusive, largely due to the requirement for high educational entry standards, and interviewees’ responses generally indicate only limited attempts at engagement with political agendas of promoting Fair Access to the profession. Originality/value This paper is the first to empirically evaluate how the accountancy profession is responding to the Fair Access agenda; documents changing patterns of recruitment in accountancy employment, including the hiring of non-graduates to undertake professional work; and augments the literature considering social class and accounting.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/AAAJ-10-2012-1133</doi><tpages>29</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-3574
ispartof Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 2017-07, Vol.30 (5), p.1082-1110
issn 0951-3574
1758-4205
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1913812824
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)
subjects Academic achievement
Access
Accountancy
Accountants
Accounting
Accounting firms
Agenda
Bourdieu, Pierre (1930-2002)
Colleges & universities
Companies
Credentials
Cultural capital
Discourse
Employment
Habitus
Higher education
Hiring
Income distribution
Interviews
Market positioning
Prestige
Professional recruitment
Professions
Public interest
Recruitment
Social classes
Social mobility
Students
Success
Upward mobility
Workforce
title Social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession in the UK
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A56%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20mobility%20and%20Fair%20Access%20to%20the%20accountancy%20profession%20in%20the%20UK&rft.jtitle=Accounting,%20auditing%20&%20accountability%20journal&rft.au=Duff,%20Angus&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1082&rft.epage=1110&rft.pages=1082-1110&rft.issn=0951-3574&rft.eissn=1758-4205&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2012-1133&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E1913812824%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1603-5824a00ecc1448cb477e0d0987f82741c8d9efee447e57647e535850aa1a506a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1913812824&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true