Loading…
Social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession in the UK
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to consider how Big Four and mid-tier accountancy firms in the UK are responding to political concerns about social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession. Design/methodology/approach Interviews were undertaken with 18 public accountancy firms, ra...
Saved in:
Published in: | Accounting, auditing & accountability journal auditing & accountability journal, 2017-07, Vol.30 (5), p.1082-1110 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1603-5824a00ecc1448cb477e0d0987f82741c8d9efee447e57647e535850aa1a506a3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1110 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1082 |
container_title | Accounting, auditing & accountability journal |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Duff, Angus |
description | Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to consider how Big Four and mid-tier accountancy firms in the UK are responding to political concerns about social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession.
Design/methodology/approach
Interviews were undertaken with 18 public accountancy firms, ranked in the Top 30 by fee income, operating in the UK to identify how they are recruiting staff in the light of the Fair Access to the Professions’ agenda. Bourdieusian sociology is used to inform the findings.
Findings
The Big Four firms employ a discourse of hiring “the brightest and the best” to satisfy perceived client demand, where symbolic capital is instantiated by reputational capital, reflecting prestige and specialisation, supported by a workforce with elite credentials. For mid-tier firms, reputational capital is interpreted as the need for individuals to service a diverse client portfolio. In general, most interviewees demonstrated relatively limited awareness of the issues surrounding the Fair Access agenda.
Research limitations/implications
The interviews with accountancy firms are both exploratory and cross-sectional. Furthermore, the study was undertaken at an embryonic point (2010) in the emerging Fair Access discourse. Future work considering the accountancy profession could usefully examine if, and how, matters have progressed.
Social implications
The investigation finds that accountancy firms remain relatively socially exclusive, largely due to the requirement for high educational entry standards, and interviewees’ responses generally indicate only limited attempts at engagement with political agendas of promoting Fair Access to the profession.
Originality/value
This paper is the first to empirically evaluate how the accountancy profession is responding to the Fair Access agenda; documents changing patterns of recruitment in accountancy employment, including the hiring of non-graduates to undertake professional work; and augments the literature considering social class and accounting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/AAAJ-10-2012-1133 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1913812824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1913812824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1603-5824a00ecc1448cb477e0d0987f82741c8d9efee447e57647e535850aa1a506a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUD1PwzAUtBBIhMIPYLPEbHgvtmtnjCraApUYoHP06jjCVRKXfAz996SUjeXdcHfvTsfYPcIjItinPM9fBYJIAVOBKOUFS9BoK1QK-pIlkGkUUht1zW76fg8Ak8smbPURXaCaN3EX6jAcObUlX1LoeO6c73s-RD58eU7OxbEdqHVHfuhiNVEhtjy0v-z27ZZdVVT3_u4PZ2y7fP5crMXmffWyyDfC4Ryk0DZVBOCdQ6Ws2yljPJSQWVPZ1Ch0tsx85b1SxmszP12prQYiJA1zkjP2cP47lfgefT8U-zh27RRZYIbSYjolTCo4q3zjO6rL4tCFhrpjgVCc5ir-zSV_AJeoWnI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1913812824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession in the UK</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Duff, Angus</creator><creatorcontrib>Duff, Angus</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to consider how Big Four and mid-tier accountancy firms in the UK are responding to political concerns about social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession.
Design/methodology/approach
Interviews were undertaken with 18 public accountancy firms, ranked in the Top 30 by fee income, operating in the UK to identify how they are recruiting staff in the light of the Fair Access to the Professions’ agenda. Bourdieusian sociology is used to inform the findings.
Findings
The Big Four firms employ a discourse of hiring “the brightest and the best” to satisfy perceived client demand, where symbolic capital is instantiated by reputational capital, reflecting prestige and specialisation, supported by a workforce with elite credentials. For mid-tier firms, reputational capital is interpreted as the need for individuals to service a diverse client portfolio. In general, most interviewees demonstrated relatively limited awareness of the issues surrounding the Fair Access agenda.
Research limitations/implications
The interviews with accountancy firms are both exploratory and cross-sectional. Furthermore, the study was undertaken at an embryonic point (2010) in the emerging Fair Access discourse. Future work considering the accountancy profession could usefully examine if, and how, matters have progressed.
Social implications
The investigation finds that accountancy firms remain relatively socially exclusive, largely due to the requirement for high educational entry standards, and interviewees’ responses generally indicate only limited attempts at engagement with political agendas of promoting Fair Access to the profession.
Originality/value
This paper is the first to empirically evaluate how the accountancy profession is responding to the Fair Access agenda; documents changing patterns of recruitment in accountancy employment, including the hiring of non-graduates to undertake professional work; and augments the literature considering social class and accounting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-3574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-10-2012-1133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Access ; Accountancy ; Accountants ; Accounting ; Accounting firms ; Agenda ; Bourdieu, Pierre (1930-2002) ; Colleges & universities ; Companies ; Credentials ; Cultural capital ; Discourse ; Employment ; Habitus ; Higher education ; Hiring ; Income distribution ; Interviews ; Market positioning ; Prestige ; Professional recruitment ; Professions ; Public interest ; Recruitment ; Social classes ; Social mobility ; Students ; Success ; Upward mobility ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 2017-07, Vol.30 (5), p.1082-1110</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1603-5824a00ecc1448cb477e0d0987f82741c8d9efee447e57647e535850aa1a506a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12847,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duff, Angus</creatorcontrib><title>Social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession in the UK</title><title>Accounting, auditing & accountability journal</title><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to consider how Big Four and mid-tier accountancy firms in the UK are responding to political concerns about social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession.
Design/methodology/approach
Interviews were undertaken with 18 public accountancy firms, ranked in the Top 30 by fee income, operating in the UK to identify how they are recruiting staff in the light of the Fair Access to the Professions’ agenda. Bourdieusian sociology is used to inform the findings.
Findings
The Big Four firms employ a discourse of hiring “the brightest and the best” to satisfy perceived client demand, where symbolic capital is instantiated by reputational capital, reflecting prestige and specialisation, supported by a workforce with elite credentials. For mid-tier firms, reputational capital is interpreted as the need for individuals to service a diverse client portfolio. In general, most interviewees demonstrated relatively limited awareness of the issues surrounding the Fair Access agenda.
Research limitations/implications
The interviews with accountancy firms are both exploratory and cross-sectional. Furthermore, the study was undertaken at an embryonic point (2010) in the emerging Fair Access discourse. Future work considering the accountancy profession could usefully examine if, and how, matters have progressed.
Social implications
The investigation finds that accountancy firms remain relatively socially exclusive, largely due to the requirement for high educational entry standards, and interviewees’ responses generally indicate only limited attempts at engagement with political agendas of promoting Fair Access to the profession.
Originality/value
This paper is the first to empirically evaluate how the accountancy profession is responding to the Fair Access agenda; documents changing patterns of recruitment in accountancy employment, including the hiring of non-graduates to undertake professional work; and augments the literature considering social class and accounting.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Access</subject><subject>Accountancy</subject><subject>Accountants</subject><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Accounting firms</subject><subject>Agenda</subject><subject>Bourdieu, Pierre (1930-2002)</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Credentials</subject><subject>Cultural capital</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Habitus</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Hiring</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Market positioning</subject><subject>Prestige</subject><subject>Professional recruitment</subject><subject>Professions</subject><subject>Public interest</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Social mobility</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Upward mobility</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0951-3574</issn><issn>1758-4205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNplUD1PwzAUtBBIhMIPYLPEbHgvtmtnjCraApUYoHP06jjCVRKXfAz996SUjeXdcHfvTsfYPcIjItinPM9fBYJIAVOBKOUFS9BoK1QK-pIlkGkUUht1zW76fg8Ak8smbPURXaCaN3EX6jAcObUlX1LoeO6c73s-RD58eU7OxbEdqHVHfuhiNVEhtjy0v-z27ZZdVVT3_u4PZ2y7fP5crMXmffWyyDfC4Ryk0DZVBOCdQ6Ws2yljPJSQWVPZ1Ch0tsx85b1SxmszP12prQYiJA1zkjP2cP47lfgefT8U-zh27RRZYIbSYjolTCo4q3zjO6rL4tCFhrpjgVCc5ir-zSV_AJeoWnI</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Duff, Angus</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession in the UK</title><author>Duff, Angus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1603-5824a00ecc1448cb477e0d0987f82741c8d9efee447e57647e535850aa1a506a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Access</topic><topic>Accountancy</topic><topic>Accountants</topic><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Accounting firms</topic><topic>Agenda</topic><topic>Bourdieu, Pierre (1930-2002)</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Credentials</topic><topic>Cultural capital</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Habitus</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Hiring</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Market positioning</topic><topic>Prestige</topic><topic>Professional recruitment</topic><topic>Professions</topic><topic>Public interest</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Social mobility</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Upward mobility</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duff, Angus</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Accounting, auditing & accountability journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duff, Angus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession in the UK</atitle><jtitle>Accounting, auditing & accountability journal</jtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1082</spage><epage>1110</epage><pages>1082-1110</pages><issn>0951-3574</issn><eissn>1758-4205</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to consider how Big Four and mid-tier accountancy firms in the UK are responding to political concerns about social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession.
Design/methodology/approach
Interviews were undertaken with 18 public accountancy firms, ranked in the Top 30 by fee income, operating in the UK to identify how they are recruiting staff in the light of the Fair Access to the Professions’ agenda. Bourdieusian sociology is used to inform the findings.
Findings
The Big Four firms employ a discourse of hiring “the brightest and the best” to satisfy perceived client demand, where symbolic capital is instantiated by reputational capital, reflecting prestige and specialisation, supported by a workforce with elite credentials. For mid-tier firms, reputational capital is interpreted as the need for individuals to service a diverse client portfolio. In general, most interviewees demonstrated relatively limited awareness of the issues surrounding the Fair Access agenda.
Research limitations/implications
The interviews with accountancy firms are both exploratory and cross-sectional. Furthermore, the study was undertaken at an embryonic point (2010) in the emerging Fair Access discourse. Future work considering the accountancy profession could usefully examine if, and how, matters have progressed.
Social implications
The investigation finds that accountancy firms remain relatively socially exclusive, largely due to the requirement for high educational entry standards, and interviewees’ responses generally indicate only limited attempts at engagement with political agendas of promoting Fair Access to the profession.
Originality/value
This paper is the first to empirically evaluate how the accountancy profession is responding to the Fair Access agenda; documents changing patterns of recruitment in accountancy employment, including the hiring of non-graduates to undertake professional work; and augments the literature considering social class and accounting.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/AAAJ-10-2012-1133</doi><tpages>29</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0951-3574 |
ispartof | Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 2017-07, Vol.30 (5), p.1082-1110 |
issn | 0951-3574 1758-4205 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1913812824 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list) |
subjects | Academic achievement Access Accountancy Accountants Accounting Accounting firms Agenda Bourdieu, Pierre (1930-2002) Colleges & universities Companies Credentials Cultural capital Discourse Employment Habitus Higher education Hiring Income distribution Interviews Market positioning Prestige Professional recruitment Professions Public interest Recruitment Social classes Social mobility Students Success Upward mobility Workforce |
title | Social mobility and Fair Access to the accountancy profession in the UK |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A56%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20mobility%20and%20Fair%20Access%20to%20the%20accountancy%20profession%20in%20the%20UK&rft.jtitle=Accounting,%20auditing%20&%20accountability%20journal&rft.au=Duff,%20Angus&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1082&rft.epage=1110&rft.pages=1082-1110&rft.issn=0951-3574&rft.eissn=1758-4205&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2012-1133&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E1913812824%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1603-5824a00ecc1448cb477e0d0987f82741c8d9efee447e57647e535850aa1a506a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1913812824&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |