Loading…

The contribution of epiphyton to the primary production of tropical floodplain wetlands

Tropical floodplains are one of the most productive ecosystems on earth. Studies on floodplain productivity have primarily focused on trees and macrophytes, rather than algae, due to their greater biomass. However, epiphyton—algae and bacteria attached to the submerged portion of aquatic macrophytes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biotropica 2017-07, Vol.49 (4), p.461-471
Main Authors: Adame, Maria F., Pettit, Neil E., Valdez, Dominic, Ward, Doug, Burford, Michele A., Bunn, Stuart E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3545-24c5a7336c146521e811243bc1f48c6eeddb46a47b4fd55dc9a54f82071a39153
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3545-24c5a7336c146521e811243bc1f48c6eeddb46a47b4fd55dc9a54f82071a39153
container_end_page 471
container_issue 4
container_start_page 461
container_title Biotropica
container_volume 49
creator Adame, Maria F.
Pettit, Neil E.
Valdez, Dominic
Ward, Doug
Burford, Michele A.
Bunn, Stuart E.
description Tropical floodplains are one of the most productive ecosystems on earth. Studies on floodplain productivity have primarily focused on trees and macrophytes, rather than algae, due to their greater biomass. However, epiphyton—algae and bacteria attached to the submerged portion of aquatic macrophytes—is a major source of energy in many tropical floodplains. Epiphyton productivity rates are unknown for most tropical floodplain wetlands, and spatial variability is not well understood. In this study, we measured primary productivity of epiphyton in Kakadu National Park in northern Australia. We estimated the relative contribution of epiphyton to aquatic production (epiphyton, + phytoplankton + macrophytes). We sampled sites dominated by different macrophyte structural types: vertical emerging grasses, horizontal emerging grasses, submerged macrophytes, and macrophytes with floating leaves. Epiphyton productivity was highly influenced by the structural type of the macrophyte. Highest potential productivity per weight was measured from epiphyton growing on macrophytes with floating leaves and horizontal grasses (1.52 ± 0.53 and 1.82 0.61 mgC/dw g epiphyton/h, respectively) and lowest in submerged macrophytes and vertical grasses (0.57 ± 0.26 and 0.66 ± 0.47 mgC/dw g epiphyton/h, respectively). When considering the areal biomass of the macrophyte and the amount of epiphyton attached, epiphyton on horizontal grasses and submerged macrophytes had productivity values approximately ten times higher (45–219 mgC/m²/d) compared to those on vertical grasses and macrophytes with floating leaves (2–18 mgC/m²/d). Epiphyton contributed between 2 to 13 percent to the aquatic production of these tropical floodplain wetlands.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/btp.12445
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1915237704</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48576451</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48576451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3545-24c5a7336c146521e811243bc1f48c6eeddb46a47b4fd55dc9a54f82071a39153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8AOQIjExpLXjs52MUJUPqRIMRYyW4zhqqhAH21HVf48hLRu3nE73vPfxInRN8IzEmJehn5EMgJ2gCREAqYCsOEUTjDFPKcf8HF14v41lwTBM0Md6YxJtu-CacgiN7RJbJ6Zv-s0-xCLYJESgd82ncvuYbTXoIxac7Rut2qRura36VjVdsjOhVV3lL9FZrVpvrg55it4fl-vFc7p6fXpZ3K9STRmwNAPNlKCUawKcZcTkJF5PS01qyDU3pqpK4ApECXXFWKULxaDOMyyIogVhdIpux7nxtK_B-CC3dnBdXClJ7GdUCAyRuhsp7az3ztTy8JEkWP74JqNv8te3yM5Hdte0Zv8_KB_Wb0fFzajY-mDdnwJyJjgwQr8BEPx5CQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1915237704</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The contribution of epiphyton to the primary production of tropical floodplain wetlands</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Adame, Maria F. ; Pettit, Neil E. ; Valdez, Dominic ; Ward, Doug ; Burford, Michele A. ; Bunn, Stuart E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adame, Maria F. ; Pettit, Neil E. ; Valdez, Dominic ; Ward, Doug ; Burford, Michele A. ; Bunn, Stuart E.</creatorcontrib><description>Tropical floodplains are one of the most productive ecosystems on earth. Studies on floodplain productivity have primarily focused on trees and macrophytes, rather than algae, due to their greater biomass. However, epiphyton—algae and bacteria attached to the submerged portion of aquatic macrophytes—is a major source of energy in many tropical floodplains. Epiphyton productivity rates are unknown for most tropical floodplain wetlands, and spatial variability is not well understood. In this study, we measured primary productivity of epiphyton in Kakadu National Park in northern Australia. We estimated the relative contribution of epiphyton to aquatic production (epiphyton, + phytoplankton + macrophytes). We sampled sites dominated by different macrophyte structural types: vertical emerging grasses, horizontal emerging grasses, submerged macrophytes, and macrophytes with floating leaves. Epiphyton productivity was highly influenced by the structural type of the macrophyte. Highest potential productivity per weight was measured from epiphyton growing on macrophytes with floating leaves and horizontal grasses (1.52 ± 0.53 and 1.82 0.61 mgC/dw g epiphyton/h, respectively) and lowest in submerged macrophytes and vertical grasses (0.57 ± 0.26 and 0.66 ± 0.47 mgC/dw g epiphyton/h, respectively). When considering the areal biomass of the macrophyte and the amount of epiphyton attached, epiphyton on horizontal grasses and submerged macrophytes had productivity values approximately ten times higher (45–219 mgC/m²/d) compared to those on vertical grasses and macrophytes with floating leaves (2–18 mgC/m²/d). Epiphyton contributed between 2 to 13 percent to the aquatic production of these tropical floodplain wetlands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-7429</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/btp.12445</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley</publisher><subject>Algae ; Aquatic plants ; Australia ; Bacteria ; Biomass ; Earth ; Ecosystems ; epiphyton ; Floating structures ; Floodplains ; Grasses ; Kakadu ; Leaves ; macrophyte ; Macrophytes ; National parks ; paragrass ; Phytoplankton ; Primary production ; Productivity ; Spatial variations ; Tropical climate ; wetland ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Biotropica, 2017-07, Vol.49 (4), p.461-471</ispartof><rights>2017 The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3545-24c5a7336c146521e811243bc1f48c6eeddb46a47b4fd55dc9a54f82071a39153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3545-24c5a7336c146521e811243bc1f48c6eeddb46a47b4fd55dc9a54f82071a39153</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9620-9252</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48576451$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48576451$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adame, Maria F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettit, Neil E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdez, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Doug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burford, Michele A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunn, Stuart E.</creatorcontrib><title>The contribution of epiphyton to the primary production of tropical floodplain wetlands</title><title>Biotropica</title><description>Tropical floodplains are one of the most productive ecosystems on earth. Studies on floodplain productivity have primarily focused on trees and macrophytes, rather than algae, due to their greater biomass. However, epiphyton—algae and bacteria attached to the submerged portion of aquatic macrophytes—is a major source of energy in many tropical floodplains. Epiphyton productivity rates are unknown for most tropical floodplain wetlands, and spatial variability is not well understood. In this study, we measured primary productivity of epiphyton in Kakadu National Park in northern Australia. We estimated the relative contribution of epiphyton to aquatic production (epiphyton, + phytoplankton + macrophytes). We sampled sites dominated by different macrophyte structural types: vertical emerging grasses, horizontal emerging grasses, submerged macrophytes, and macrophytes with floating leaves. Epiphyton productivity was highly influenced by the structural type of the macrophyte. Highest potential productivity per weight was measured from epiphyton growing on macrophytes with floating leaves and horizontal grasses (1.52 ± 0.53 and 1.82 0.61 mgC/dw g epiphyton/h, respectively) and lowest in submerged macrophytes and vertical grasses (0.57 ± 0.26 and 0.66 ± 0.47 mgC/dw g epiphyton/h, respectively). When considering the areal biomass of the macrophyte and the amount of epiphyton attached, epiphyton on horizontal grasses and submerged macrophytes had productivity values approximately ten times higher (45–219 mgC/m²/d) compared to those on vertical grasses and macrophytes with floating leaves (2–18 mgC/m²/d). Epiphyton contributed between 2 to 13 percent to the aquatic production of these tropical floodplain wetlands.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>epiphyton</subject><subject>Floating structures</subject><subject>Floodplains</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Kakadu</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>macrophyte</subject><subject>Macrophytes</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>paragrass</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>wetland</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0006-3606</issn><issn>1744-7429</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8AOQIjExpLXjs52MUJUPqRIMRYyW4zhqqhAH21HVf48hLRu3nE73vPfxInRN8IzEmJehn5EMgJ2gCREAqYCsOEUTjDFPKcf8HF14v41lwTBM0Md6YxJtu-CacgiN7RJbJ6Zv-s0-xCLYJESgd82ncvuYbTXoIxac7Rut2qRura36VjVdsjOhVV3lL9FZrVpvrg55it4fl-vFc7p6fXpZ3K9STRmwNAPNlKCUawKcZcTkJF5PS01qyDU3pqpK4ApECXXFWKULxaDOMyyIogVhdIpux7nxtK_B-CC3dnBdXClJ7GdUCAyRuhsp7az3ztTy8JEkWP74JqNv8te3yM5Hdte0Zv8_KB_Wb0fFzajY-mDdnwJyJjgwQr8BEPx5CQ</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Adame, Maria F.</creator><creator>Pettit, Neil E.</creator><creator>Valdez, Dominic</creator><creator>Ward, Doug</creator><creator>Burford, Michele A.</creator><creator>Bunn, Stuart E.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9620-9252</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>The contribution of epiphyton to the primary production of tropical floodplain wetlands</title><author>Adame, Maria F. ; Pettit, Neil E. ; Valdez, Dominic ; Ward, Doug ; Burford, Michele A. ; Bunn, Stuart E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3545-24c5a7336c146521e811243bc1f48c6eeddb46a47b4fd55dc9a54f82071a39153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>epiphyton</topic><topic>Floating structures</topic><topic>Floodplains</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Kakadu</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>macrophyte</topic><topic>Macrophytes</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>paragrass</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>wetland</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adame, Maria F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettit, Neil E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valdez, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Doug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burford, Michele A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunn, Stuart E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biotropica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adame, Maria F.</au><au>Pettit, Neil E.</au><au>Valdez, Dominic</au><au>Ward, Doug</au><au>Burford, Michele A.</au><au>Bunn, Stuart E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The contribution of epiphyton to the primary production of tropical floodplain wetlands</atitle><jtitle>Biotropica</jtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>461</spage><epage>471</epage><pages>461-471</pages><issn>0006-3606</issn><eissn>1744-7429</eissn><abstract>Tropical floodplains are one of the most productive ecosystems on earth. Studies on floodplain productivity have primarily focused on trees and macrophytes, rather than algae, due to their greater biomass. However, epiphyton—algae and bacteria attached to the submerged portion of aquatic macrophytes—is a major source of energy in many tropical floodplains. Epiphyton productivity rates are unknown for most tropical floodplain wetlands, and spatial variability is not well understood. In this study, we measured primary productivity of epiphyton in Kakadu National Park in northern Australia. We estimated the relative contribution of epiphyton to aquatic production (epiphyton, + phytoplankton + macrophytes). We sampled sites dominated by different macrophyte structural types: vertical emerging grasses, horizontal emerging grasses, submerged macrophytes, and macrophytes with floating leaves. Epiphyton productivity was highly influenced by the structural type of the macrophyte. Highest potential productivity per weight was measured from epiphyton growing on macrophytes with floating leaves and horizontal grasses (1.52 ± 0.53 and 1.82 0.61 mgC/dw g epiphyton/h, respectively) and lowest in submerged macrophytes and vertical grasses (0.57 ± 0.26 and 0.66 ± 0.47 mgC/dw g epiphyton/h, respectively). When considering the areal biomass of the macrophyte and the amount of epiphyton attached, epiphyton on horizontal grasses and submerged macrophytes had productivity values approximately ten times higher (45–219 mgC/m²/d) compared to those on vertical grasses and macrophytes with floating leaves (2–18 mgC/m²/d). Epiphyton contributed between 2 to 13 percent to the aquatic production of these tropical floodplain wetlands.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/btp.12445</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9620-9252</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3606
ispartof Biotropica, 2017-07, Vol.49 (4), p.461-471
issn 0006-3606
1744-7429
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1915237704
source Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Algae
Aquatic plants
Australia
Bacteria
Biomass
Earth
Ecosystems
epiphyton
Floating structures
Floodplains
Grasses
Kakadu
Leaves
macrophyte
Macrophytes
National parks
paragrass
Phytoplankton
Primary production
Productivity
Spatial variations
Tropical climate
wetland
Wetlands
title The contribution of epiphyton to the primary production of tropical floodplain wetlands
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T03%3A32%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20contribution%20of%20epiphyton%20to%20the%20primary%20production%20of%20tropical%20floodplain%20wetlands&rft.jtitle=Biotropica&rft.au=Adame,%20Maria%20F.&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=461&rft.epage=471&rft.pages=461-471&rft.issn=0006-3606&rft.eissn=1744-7429&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/btp.12445&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48576451%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3545-24c5a7336c146521e811243bc1f48c6eeddb46a47b4fd55dc9a54f82071a39153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1915237704&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48576451&rfr_iscdi=true