Loading…

A ‘striking’ relationship: scorpion defensive behaviour and its relation to morphology and performance

Summary Like many other venomous organisms, scorpions use their venom in defence against predators. Scorpions apply their venomous stinger by extending the caudal part of the body, the metasoma, forward towards the attacker. There are considerable differences in metasoma morphology among scorpion sp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Functional ecology 2017-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1390-1404
Main Authors: Coelho, Pedro, Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni, Rasko, Mykola, van der Meijden, Arie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-9620e477e800e79bed7e78eb7188e4bb8175938600e123a39e55bcde35eab97d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-9620e477e800e79bed7e78eb7188e4bb8175938600e123a39e55bcde35eab97d3
container_end_page 1404
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1390
container_title Functional ecology
container_volume 31
creator Coelho, Pedro
Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni
Rasko, Mykola
van der Meijden, Arie
description Summary Like many other venomous organisms, scorpions use their venom in defence against predators. Scorpions apply their venomous stinger by extending the caudal part of the body, the metasoma, forward towards the attacker. There are considerable differences in metasoma morphology among scorpion species, and these may afford differences in defensive strike performance. We investigated the movement trajectory and kinematics of the defensive strike in seven species of scorpions, and how these variables are related to each other, and to morphology. We recorded defensive strikes using high‐speed video, and reconstructed the trajectory of the telson. From these trajectories, we calculated velocity, acceleration and other kinematic variables. To compare strike trajectory shapes, we used geometric morphometrics. We have shown that the defensive strike differs in trajectory shape, speed, path length and duration between scorpion species. Body size is also an important factor affecting strike characteristics. Relative metasoma length and girth may also influence strike performance, as well as strike trajectory shape. Strikes with different trajectories have different kinematic properties: those with open trajectory shapes attain higher speeds. Our results show that performance differences in defensive behaviour between different scorpion species may be partly mediated by morphology, binding together phenotypic, functional and behavioural diversity. A lay summary is available for this article. Lay Summary
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2435.12855
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1915552800</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48582414</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48582414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-9620e477e800e79bed7e78eb7188e4bb8175938600e123a39e55bcde35eab97d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRMFbPngoFz2n3a7K7x1JaFQpe9LzkY6qJMYm7KdJbf4b-vf4SE6O9OpeBmfeZ4X0JuWZ0yrqaMRFByKWAKeMa4IQEx8kpCSiPTKhlJM7JhfcFpdQA5wEZzyeH_advXf6aV8-H_dfEYRm3eV35l7y5JGebuPR49dtH5Gm1fFzcheuH2_vFfB2mQmkITcQpSqVQU4rKJJgpVBoTxbRGmSSaKTBCR92WcRELgwBJmqEAjBOjMjEiN8PdxtXvW_StLeqtq7qXlhkGALy73Klmgyp1tfcON7Zx-VvsdpZR22dge8e2d2x_MugIGIiPvMTdf3K7Wi7-uPHAFb6t3ZGTGjSXTIpvNYlmnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1915552800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A ‘striking’ relationship: scorpion defensive behaviour and its relation to morphology and performance</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Coelho, Pedro ; Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni ; Rasko, Mykola ; van der Meijden, Arie</creator><contributor>Portugal, Steven</contributor><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Pedro ; Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni ; Rasko, Mykola ; van der Meijden, Arie ; Portugal, Steven</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Like many other venomous organisms, scorpions use their venom in defence against predators. Scorpions apply their venomous stinger by extending the caudal part of the body, the metasoma, forward towards the attacker. There are considerable differences in metasoma morphology among scorpion species, and these may afford differences in defensive strike performance. We investigated the movement trajectory and kinematics of the defensive strike in seven species of scorpions, and how these variables are related to each other, and to morphology. We recorded defensive strikes using high‐speed video, and reconstructed the trajectory of the telson. From these trajectories, we calculated velocity, acceleration and other kinematic variables. To compare strike trajectory shapes, we used geometric morphometrics. We have shown that the defensive strike differs in trajectory shape, speed, path length and duration between scorpion species. Body size is also an important factor affecting strike characteristics. Relative metasoma length and girth may also influence strike performance, as well as strike trajectory shape. Strikes with different trajectories have different kinematic properties: those with open trajectory shapes attain higher speeds. Our results show that performance differences in defensive behaviour between different scorpion species may be partly mediated by morphology, binding together phenotypic, functional and behavioural diversity. A lay summary is available for this article. Lay Summary</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12855</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley</publisher><subject>Acceleration ; Animal physiological ecology ; Behavior ; Body size ; Defensive behavior ; defensive behaviour ; functional morphology ; High speed ; Kinematics ; Mathematical morphology ; Morphology ; Predators ; scorpion ; sting ; strike kinematics ; Strikes ; Trajectories ; trajectory shape ; Velocity ; Venom</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2017-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1390-1404</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. © 2017 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2017 The Authors. Functional Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Functional Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-9620e477e800e79bed7e78eb7188e4bb8175938600e123a39e55bcde35eab97d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-9620e477e800e79bed7e78eb7188e4bb8175938600e123a39e55bcde35eab97d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5889-8579</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48582414$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48582414$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Portugal, Steven</contributor><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasko, Mykola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Meijden, Arie</creatorcontrib><title>A ‘striking’ relationship: scorpion defensive behaviour and its relation to morphology and performance</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>Summary Like many other venomous organisms, scorpions use their venom in defence against predators. Scorpions apply their venomous stinger by extending the caudal part of the body, the metasoma, forward towards the attacker. There are considerable differences in metasoma morphology among scorpion species, and these may afford differences in defensive strike performance. We investigated the movement trajectory and kinematics of the defensive strike in seven species of scorpions, and how these variables are related to each other, and to morphology. We recorded defensive strikes using high‐speed video, and reconstructed the trajectory of the telson. From these trajectories, we calculated velocity, acceleration and other kinematic variables. To compare strike trajectory shapes, we used geometric morphometrics. We have shown that the defensive strike differs in trajectory shape, speed, path length and duration between scorpion species. Body size is also an important factor affecting strike characteristics. Relative metasoma length and girth may also influence strike performance, as well as strike trajectory shape. Strikes with different trajectories have different kinematic properties: those with open trajectory shapes attain higher speeds. Our results show that performance differences in defensive behaviour between different scorpion species may be partly mediated by morphology, binding together phenotypic, functional and behavioural diversity. A lay summary is available for this article. Lay Summary</description><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>Animal physiological ecology</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Defensive behavior</subject><subject>defensive behaviour</subject><subject>functional morphology</subject><subject>High speed</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Mathematical morphology</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>scorpion</subject><subject>sting</subject><subject>strike kinematics</subject><subject>Strikes</subject><subject>Trajectories</subject><subject>trajectory shape</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Venom</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRMFbPngoFz2n3a7K7x1JaFQpe9LzkY6qJMYm7KdJbf4b-vf4SE6O9OpeBmfeZ4X0JuWZ0yrqaMRFByKWAKeMa4IQEx8kpCSiPTKhlJM7JhfcFpdQA5wEZzyeH_advXf6aV8-H_dfEYRm3eV35l7y5JGebuPR49dtH5Gm1fFzcheuH2_vFfB2mQmkITcQpSqVQU4rKJJgpVBoTxbRGmSSaKTBCR92WcRELgwBJmqEAjBOjMjEiN8PdxtXvW_StLeqtq7qXlhkGALy73Klmgyp1tfcON7Zx-VvsdpZR22dge8e2d2x_MugIGIiPvMTdf3K7Wi7-uPHAFb6t3ZGTGjSXTIpvNYlmnw</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Coelho, Pedro</creator><creator>Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni</creator><creator>Rasko, Mykola</creator><creator>van der Meijden, Arie</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5889-8579</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>A ‘striking’ relationship</title><author>Coelho, Pedro ; Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni ; Rasko, Mykola ; van der Meijden, Arie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-9620e477e800e79bed7e78eb7188e4bb8175938600e123a39e55bcde35eab97d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>Animal physiological ecology</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Defensive behavior</topic><topic>defensive behaviour</topic><topic>functional morphology</topic><topic>High speed</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Mathematical morphology</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>scorpion</topic><topic>sting</topic><topic>strike kinematics</topic><topic>Strikes</topic><topic>Trajectories</topic><topic>trajectory shape</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Venom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasko, Mykola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Meijden, Arie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coelho, Pedro</au><au>Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni</au><au>Rasko, Mykola</au><au>van der Meijden, Arie</au><au>Portugal, Steven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A ‘striking’ relationship: scorpion defensive behaviour and its relation to morphology and performance</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1390</spage><epage>1404</epage><pages>1390-1404</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>Summary Like many other venomous organisms, scorpions use their venom in defence against predators. Scorpions apply their venomous stinger by extending the caudal part of the body, the metasoma, forward towards the attacker. There are considerable differences in metasoma morphology among scorpion species, and these may afford differences in defensive strike performance. We investigated the movement trajectory and kinematics of the defensive strike in seven species of scorpions, and how these variables are related to each other, and to morphology. We recorded defensive strikes using high‐speed video, and reconstructed the trajectory of the telson. From these trajectories, we calculated velocity, acceleration and other kinematic variables. To compare strike trajectory shapes, we used geometric morphometrics. We have shown that the defensive strike differs in trajectory shape, speed, path length and duration between scorpion species. Body size is also an important factor affecting strike characteristics. Relative metasoma length and girth may also influence strike performance, as well as strike trajectory shape. Strikes with different trajectories have different kinematic properties: those with open trajectory shapes attain higher speeds. Our results show that performance differences in defensive behaviour between different scorpion species may be partly mediated by morphology, binding together phenotypic, functional and behavioural diversity. A lay summary is available for this article. Lay Summary</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.12855</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5889-8579</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-8463
ispartof Functional ecology, 2017-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1390-1404
issn 0269-8463
1365-2435
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1915552800
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Acceleration
Animal physiological ecology
Behavior
Body size
Defensive behavior
defensive behaviour
functional morphology
High speed
Kinematics
Mathematical morphology
Morphology
Predators
scorpion
sting
strike kinematics
Strikes
Trajectories
trajectory shape
Velocity
Venom
title A ‘striking’ relationship: scorpion defensive behaviour and its relation to morphology and performance
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A18%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20%E2%80%98striking%E2%80%99%20relationship:%20scorpion%20defensive%20behaviour%20and%20its%20relation%20to%20morphology%20and%20performance&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Coelho,%20Pedro&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1390&rft.epage=1404&rft.pages=1390-1404&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.12855&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48582414%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-9620e477e800e79bed7e78eb7188e4bb8175938600e123a39e55bcde35eab97d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1915552800&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48582414&rfr_iscdi=true