Loading…
A ‘striking’ relationship: scorpion defensive behaviour and its relation to morphology and performance
Summary Like many other venomous organisms, scorpions use their venom in defence against predators. Scorpions apply their venomous stinger by extending the caudal part of the body, the metasoma, forward towards the attacker. There are considerable differences in metasoma morphology among scorpion sp...
Saved in:
Published in: | Functional ecology 2017-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1390-1404 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-9620e477e800e79bed7e78eb7188e4bb8175938600e123a39e55bcde35eab97d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-9620e477e800e79bed7e78eb7188e4bb8175938600e123a39e55bcde35eab97d3 |
container_end_page | 1404 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1390 |
container_title | Functional ecology |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Coelho, Pedro Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni Rasko, Mykola van der Meijden, Arie |
description | Summary
Like many other venomous organisms, scorpions use their venom in defence against predators. Scorpions apply their venomous stinger by extending the caudal part of the body, the metasoma, forward towards the attacker. There are considerable differences in metasoma morphology among scorpion species, and these may afford differences in defensive strike performance.
We investigated the movement trajectory and kinematics of the defensive strike in seven species of scorpions, and how these variables are related to each other, and to morphology.
We recorded defensive strikes using high‐speed video, and reconstructed the trajectory of the telson. From these trajectories, we calculated velocity, acceleration and other kinematic variables. To compare strike trajectory shapes, we used geometric morphometrics.
We have shown that the defensive strike differs in trajectory shape, speed, path length and duration between scorpion species. Body size is also an important factor affecting strike characteristics. Relative metasoma length and girth may also influence strike performance, as well as strike trajectory shape. Strikes with different trajectories have different kinematic properties: those with open trajectory shapes attain higher speeds.
Our results show that performance differences in defensive behaviour between different scorpion species may be partly mediated by morphology, binding together phenotypic, functional and behavioural diversity.
A lay summary is available for this article.
Lay Summary |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2435.12855 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1915552800</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48582414</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48582414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-9620e477e800e79bed7e78eb7188e4bb8175938600e123a39e55bcde35eab97d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRMFbPngoFz2n3a7K7x1JaFQpe9LzkY6qJMYm7KdJbf4b-vf4SE6O9OpeBmfeZ4X0JuWZ0yrqaMRFByKWAKeMa4IQEx8kpCSiPTKhlJM7JhfcFpdQA5wEZzyeH_advXf6aV8-H_dfEYRm3eV35l7y5JGebuPR49dtH5Gm1fFzcheuH2_vFfB2mQmkITcQpSqVQU4rKJJgpVBoTxbRGmSSaKTBCR92WcRELgwBJmqEAjBOjMjEiN8PdxtXvW_StLeqtq7qXlhkGALy73Klmgyp1tfcON7Zx-VvsdpZR22dge8e2d2x_MugIGIiPvMTdf3K7Wi7-uPHAFb6t3ZGTGjSXTIpvNYlmnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1915552800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A ‘striking’ relationship: scorpion defensive behaviour and its relation to morphology and performance</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Coelho, Pedro ; Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni ; Rasko, Mykola ; van der Meijden, Arie</creator><contributor>Portugal, Steven</contributor><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Pedro ; Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni ; Rasko, Mykola ; van der Meijden, Arie ; Portugal, Steven</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Like many other venomous organisms, scorpions use their venom in defence against predators. Scorpions apply their venomous stinger by extending the caudal part of the body, the metasoma, forward towards the attacker. There are considerable differences in metasoma morphology among scorpion species, and these may afford differences in defensive strike performance.
We investigated the movement trajectory and kinematics of the defensive strike in seven species of scorpions, and how these variables are related to each other, and to morphology.
We recorded defensive strikes using high‐speed video, and reconstructed the trajectory of the telson. From these trajectories, we calculated velocity, acceleration and other kinematic variables. To compare strike trajectory shapes, we used geometric morphometrics.
We have shown that the defensive strike differs in trajectory shape, speed, path length and duration between scorpion species. Body size is also an important factor affecting strike characteristics. Relative metasoma length and girth may also influence strike performance, as well as strike trajectory shape. Strikes with different trajectories have different kinematic properties: those with open trajectory shapes attain higher speeds.
Our results show that performance differences in defensive behaviour between different scorpion species may be partly mediated by morphology, binding together phenotypic, functional and behavioural diversity.
A lay summary is available for this article.
Lay Summary</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12855</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley</publisher><subject>Acceleration ; Animal physiological ecology ; Behavior ; Body size ; Defensive behavior ; defensive behaviour ; functional morphology ; High speed ; Kinematics ; Mathematical morphology ; Morphology ; Predators ; scorpion ; sting ; strike kinematics ; Strikes ; Trajectories ; trajectory shape ; Velocity ; Venom</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2017-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1390-1404</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. © 2017 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2017 The Authors. Functional Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Functional Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-9620e477e800e79bed7e78eb7188e4bb8175938600e123a39e55bcde35eab97d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-9620e477e800e79bed7e78eb7188e4bb8175938600e123a39e55bcde35eab97d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5889-8579</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48582414$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48582414$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Portugal, Steven</contributor><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasko, Mykola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Meijden, Arie</creatorcontrib><title>A ‘striking’ relationship: scorpion defensive behaviour and its relation to morphology and performance</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>Summary
Like many other venomous organisms, scorpions use their venom in defence against predators. Scorpions apply their venomous stinger by extending the caudal part of the body, the metasoma, forward towards the attacker. There are considerable differences in metasoma morphology among scorpion species, and these may afford differences in defensive strike performance.
We investigated the movement trajectory and kinematics of the defensive strike in seven species of scorpions, and how these variables are related to each other, and to morphology.
We recorded defensive strikes using high‐speed video, and reconstructed the trajectory of the telson. From these trajectories, we calculated velocity, acceleration and other kinematic variables. To compare strike trajectory shapes, we used geometric morphometrics.
We have shown that the defensive strike differs in trajectory shape, speed, path length and duration between scorpion species. Body size is also an important factor affecting strike characteristics. Relative metasoma length and girth may also influence strike performance, as well as strike trajectory shape. Strikes with different trajectories have different kinematic properties: those with open trajectory shapes attain higher speeds.
Our results show that performance differences in defensive behaviour between different scorpion species may be partly mediated by morphology, binding together phenotypic, functional and behavioural diversity.
A lay summary is available for this article.
Lay Summary</description><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>Animal physiological ecology</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Defensive behavior</subject><subject>defensive behaviour</subject><subject>functional morphology</subject><subject>High speed</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Mathematical morphology</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>scorpion</subject><subject>sting</subject><subject>strike kinematics</subject><subject>Strikes</subject><subject>Trajectories</subject><subject>trajectory shape</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Venom</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRMFbPngoFz2n3a7K7x1JaFQpe9LzkY6qJMYm7KdJbf4b-vf4SE6O9OpeBmfeZ4X0JuWZ0yrqaMRFByKWAKeMa4IQEx8kpCSiPTKhlJM7JhfcFpdQA5wEZzyeH_advXf6aV8-H_dfEYRm3eV35l7y5JGebuPR49dtH5Gm1fFzcheuH2_vFfB2mQmkITcQpSqVQU4rKJJgpVBoTxbRGmSSaKTBCR92WcRELgwBJmqEAjBOjMjEiN8PdxtXvW_StLeqtq7qXlhkGALy73Klmgyp1tfcON7Zx-VvsdpZR22dge8e2d2x_MugIGIiPvMTdf3K7Wi7-uPHAFb6t3ZGTGjSXTIpvNYlmnw</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Coelho, Pedro</creator><creator>Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni</creator><creator>Rasko, Mykola</creator><creator>van der Meijden, Arie</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5889-8579</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>A ‘striking’ relationship</title><author>Coelho, Pedro ; Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni ; Rasko, Mykola ; van der Meijden, Arie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-9620e477e800e79bed7e78eb7188e4bb8175938600e123a39e55bcde35eab97d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>Animal physiological ecology</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Defensive behavior</topic><topic>defensive behaviour</topic><topic>functional morphology</topic><topic>High speed</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Mathematical morphology</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>scorpion</topic><topic>sting</topic><topic>strike kinematics</topic><topic>Strikes</topic><topic>Trajectories</topic><topic>trajectory shape</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Venom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasko, Mykola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Meijden, Arie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coelho, Pedro</au><au>Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni</au><au>Rasko, Mykola</au><au>van der Meijden, Arie</au><au>Portugal, Steven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A ‘striking’ relationship: scorpion defensive behaviour and its relation to morphology and performance</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1390</spage><epage>1404</epage><pages>1390-1404</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>Summary
Like many other venomous organisms, scorpions use their venom in defence against predators. Scorpions apply their venomous stinger by extending the caudal part of the body, the metasoma, forward towards the attacker. There are considerable differences in metasoma morphology among scorpion species, and these may afford differences in defensive strike performance.
We investigated the movement trajectory and kinematics of the defensive strike in seven species of scorpions, and how these variables are related to each other, and to morphology.
We recorded defensive strikes using high‐speed video, and reconstructed the trajectory of the telson. From these trajectories, we calculated velocity, acceleration and other kinematic variables. To compare strike trajectory shapes, we used geometric morphometrics.
We have shown that the defensive strike differs in trajectory shape, speed, path length and duration between scorpion species. Body size is also an important factor affecting strike characteristics. Relative metasoma length and girth may also influence strike performance, as well as strike trajectory shape. Strikes with different trajectories have different kinematic properties: those with open trajectory shapes attain higher speeds.
Our results show that performance differences in defensive behaviour between different scorpion species may be partly mediated by morphology, binding together phenotypic, functional and behavioural diversity.
A lay summary is available for this article.
Lay Summary</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.12855</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5889-8579</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-8463 |
ispartof | Functional ecology, 2017-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1390-1404 |
issn | 0269-8463 1365-2435 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1915552800 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Acceleration Animal physiological ecology Behavior Body size Defensive behavior defensive behaviour functional morphology High speed Kinematics Mathematical morphology Morphology Predators scorpion sting strike kinematics Strikes Trajectories trajectory shape Velocity Venom |
title | A ‘striking’ relationship: scorpion defensive behaviour and its relation to morphology and performance |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A18%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20%E2%80%98striking%E2%80%99%20relationship:%20scorpion%20defensive%20behaviour%20and%20its%20relation%20to%20morphology%20and%20performance&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Coelho,%20Pedro&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1390&rft.epage=1404&rft.pages=1390-1404&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.12855&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48582414%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3785-9620e477e800e79bed7e78eb7188e4bb8175938600e123a39e55bcde35eab97d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1915552800&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48582414&rfr_iscdi=true |