Qualitative Research on Work–Family in the Management Field: A Review

Despite a proliferation of work–family literature over the past three decades, studies employing quantitative methodologies significantly outweigh those adopting qualitative approaches. In this paper, we intend to explore the state of qualitative work–family research in the management field and prov...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied psychology 2017-07, Vol.66 (3), p.382-433
Main Authors: Beigi, Mina, Shirmohammadi, Melika
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Coping strategies
Cultural differences
Families & family life
Family studies
Gender differences
Management science
Parents & parenting
Qualitative research
Research methodology
Terminology
Work
Work life balance
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Despite a proliferation of work–family literature over the past three decades, studies employing quantitative methodologies significantly outweigh those adopting qualitative approaches. In this paper, we intend to explore the state of qualitative work–family research in the management field and provide a comprehensive profile of the 152 studies included in this review. We synthesise the findings of qualitative work–family studies and provide six themes including parenthood, gender differences, cultural differences, family‐friendly policies and non‐traditional work arrangements, coping strategies, and under‐studied populations. We also describe how findings of qualitative work–family studies compare to those of quantitative studies. The review highlights seven conclusions in the current qualitative literature: a limited number of qualitative endeavours, findings worth further attention, convergent foci, the loose use of work–family terminology, the neglect of a variety of qualitative research approaches, quantitative attitudes towards qualitative research, and insufficient reporting of research methods. In addition, implications for future researchers are discussed.
ISSN:0269-994X
1464-0597
DOI:10.1111/apps.12093