Loading…

MULTICRITERIA METHODOLOGIES IN DECISION MAKING PROCESS IN FINANCE

Nowadays the decision making process in different areas considering multiple influent factors has become a priority. The financial institutions have been facing multiple risks during the recent years, usually interacting risks which makes necessary an efficient decision making, in order to optimize...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Researchers world - journal of arts science and commerce 2017-04, Vol.VIII (2), p.105-114
Main Author: Madhi, Doris
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 114
container_issue 2
container_start_page 105
container_title Researchers world - journal of arts science and commerce
container_volume VIII
creator Madhi, Doris
description Nowadays the decision making process in different areas considering multiple influent factors has become a priority. The financial institutions have been facing multiple risks during the recent years, usually interacting risks which makes necessary an efficient decision making, in order to optimize the capital allocation and increase profitability. Different authors have given a great contribution at the purpose, considering different variables which mainly lead to the same conclusion. Thus, decision makers always run the risk of being influenced by their own experience and preferences and a unique and optimal solution can t be reached if multiple criteria are not considered. The existing theories of Multi Criteria Decision Aid suggest the consideration of multiple criteria quantitative and qualitative in order to select the most influential ones and to create a ranking from the best to the worst. The merit of these methods (ELECTRE, PROMETHEE and MURAME) consists in the complex structuring allowance and the consideration of the interacting variables. These methods follow the exploiting phase, which allows the creation of an outranking performance matrix of variables based not only on the manager's preferences, but also on objective evaluation criteria. The main merit associated to these methods is related to their versatility and broader use in different areas of decision making.
doi_str_mv 10.18843/rwjasc/v8i2/11
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1918332285</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1918332285</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1091-b430211d01902240ac3d71da59afd2c2f3b82180c6f2d69e29ba8d8c9552c863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkFFLwzAUhYMoOOaefS34XJt703bJY-myLbi10tbnkKUtbKibiVP27-0278u5cA7nwEfII9Bn4DxmkfvdGW-jH77FCOCGjBBRhHHK09vzzyCMYYr3ZOL9jg6XQIwgRiRbv60alVeqkZXKgrVsluWsXJULJetAFcFM5qpWZRGssxdVLILXqsxlfbHmqsiKXD6Qu968-27yr2PSzGWTL8NzSZ6tQgtUQLiJGUWAloKgiDE1lrVTaE0iTN-ixZ5tOAKnNu2xTUWHYmN4y61IErQ8ZWPydK09uP3XsfPferc_us9hUYMAzhgiT4ZUdE1Zt_fedb0-uO2HcScNVF9I6SspfSalAdgfqeNWVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1918332285</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MULTICRITERIA METHODOLOGIES IN DECISION MAKING PROCESS IN FINANCE</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Madhi, Doris</creator><creatorcontrib>Madhi, Doris ; PhD.Candidate, University “Aleksandёr Xhuvani” Faculty of Economics, Rruga Kozma Naska Elbasan, Albania</creatorcontrib><description>Nowadays the decision making process in different areas considering multiple influent factors has become a priority. The financial institutions have been facing multiple risks during the recent years, usually interacting risks which makes necessary an efficient decision making, in order to optimize the capital allocation and increase profitability. Different authors have given a great contribution at the purpose, considering different variables which mainly lead to the same conclusion. Thus, decision makers always run the risk of being influenced by their own experience and preferences and a unique and optimal solution can t be reached if multiple criteria are not considered. The existing theories of Multi Criteria Decision Aid suggest the consideration of multiple criteria quantitative and qualitative in order to select the most influential ones and to create a ranking from the best to the worst. The merit of these methods (ELECTRE, PROMETHEE and MURAME) consists in the complex structuring allowance and the consideration of the interacting variables. These methods follow the exploiting phase, which allows the creation of an outranking performance matrix of variables based not only on the manager's preferences, but also on objective evaluation criteria. The main merit associated to these methods is related to their versatility and broader use in different areas of decision making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2231-4172</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2229-4686</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2229-4686</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18843/rwjasc/v8i2/11</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malegaon: Educational Research Multimedia &amp; Publications</publisher><subject>Capital ; Decision makers ; Decision making ; Decision theory ; Economics ; Finance ; Financial institutions ; Institutions ; Profitability ; Ranking ; Ratings &amp; rankings ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Researchers world - journal of arts science and commerce, 2017-04, Vol.VIII (2), p.105-114</ispartof><rights>Copyright Educational Research Multimedia &amp; Publications Apr 2017</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1918332285/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1918332285?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12847,21394,27924,27925,33223,33611,43733,74221</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Madhi, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PhD.Candidate, University “Aleksandёr Xhuvani” Faculty of Economics, Rruga Kozma Naska Elbasan, Albania</creatorcontrib><title>MULTICRITERIA METHODOLOGIES IN DECISION MAKING PROCESS IN FINANCE</title><title>Researchers world - journal of arts science and commerce</title><description>Nowadays the decision making process in different areas considering multiple influent factors has become a priority. The financial institutions have been facing multiple risks during the recent years, usually interacting risks which makes necessary an efficient decision making, in order to optimize the capital allocation and increase profitability. Different authors have given a great contribution at the purpose, considering different variables which mainly lead to the same conclusion. Thus, decision makers always run the risk of being influenced by their own experience and preferences and a unique and optimal solution can t be reached if multiple criteria are not considered. The existing theories of Multi Criteria Decision Aid suggest the consideration of multiple criteria quantitative and qualitative in order to select the most influential ones and to create a ranking from the best to the worst. The merit of these methods (ELECTRE, PROMETHEE and MURAME) consists in the complex structuring allowance and the consideration of the interacting variables. These methods follow the exploiting phase, which allows the creation of an outranking performance matrix of variables based not only on the manager's preferences, but also on objective evaluation criteria. The main merit associated to these methods is related to their versatility and broader use in different areas of decision making.</description><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Decision makers</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision theory</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Financial institutions</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Ranking</subject><subject>Ratings &amp; rankings</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>2231-4172</issn><issn>2229-4686</issn><issn>2229-4686</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNotkFFLwzAUhYMoOOaefS34XJt703bJY-myLbi10tbnkKUtbKibiVP27-0278u5cA7nwEfII9Bn4DxmkfvdGW-jH77FCOCGjBBRhHHK09vzzyCMYYr3ZOL9jg6XQIwgRiRbv60alVeqkZXKgrVsluWsXJULJetAFcFM5qpWZRGssxdVLILXqsxlfbHmqsiKXD6Qu968-27yr2PSzGWTL8NzSZ6tQgtUQLiJGUWAloKgiDE1lrVTaE0iTN-ixZ5tOAKnNu2xTUWHYmN4y61IErQ8ZWPydK09uP3XsfPferc_us9hUYMAzhgiT4ZUdE1Zt_fedb0-uO2HcScNVF9I6SspfSalAdgfqeNWVg</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Madhi, Doris</creator><general>Educational Research Multimedia &amp; Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>MULTICRITERIA METHODOLOGIES IN DECISION MAKING PROCESS IN FINANCE</title><author>Madhi, Doris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1091-b430211d01902240ac3d71da59afd2c2f3b82180c6f2d69e29ba8d8c9552c863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Decision makers</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision theory</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Financial institutions</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Ranking</topic><topic>Ratings &amp; rankings</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Madhi, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PhD.Candidate, University “Aleksandёr Xhuvani” Faculty of Economics, Rruga Kozma Naska Elbasan, Albania</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Researchers world - journal of arts science and commerce</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Madhi, Doris</au><aucorp>PhD.Candidate, University “Aleksandёr Xhuvani” Faculty of Economics, Rruga Kozma Naska Elbasan, Albania</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MULTICRITERIA METHODOLOGIES IN DECISION MAKING PROCESS IN FINANCE</atitle><jtitle>Researchers world - journal of arts science and commerce</jtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>VIII</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>105-114</pages><issn>2231-4172</issn><issn>2229-4686</issn><eissn>2229-4686</eissn><abstract>Nowadays the decision making process in different areas considering multiple influent factors has become a priority. The financial institutions have been facing multiple risks during the recent years, usually interacting risks which makes necessary an efficient decision making, in order to optimize the capital allocation and increase profitability. Different authors have given a great contribution at the purpose, considering different variables which mainly lead to the same conclusion. Thus, decision makers always run the risk of being influenced by their own experience and preferences and a unique and optimal solution can t be reached if multiple criteria are not considered. The existing theories of Multi Criteria Decision Aid suggest the consideration of multiple criteria quantitative and qualitative in order to select the most influential ones and to create a ranking from the best to the worst. The merit of these methods (ELECTRE, PROMETHEE and MURAME) consists in the complex structuring allowance and the consideration of the interacting variables. These methods follow the exploiting phase, which allows the creation of an outranking performance matrix of variables based not only on the manager's preferences, but also on objective evaluation criteria. The main merit associated to these methods is related to their versatility and broader use in different areas of decision making.</abstract><cop>Malegaon</cop><pub>Educational Research Multimedia &amp; Publications</pub><doi>10.18843/rwjasc/v8i2/11</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2231-4172
ispartof Researchers world - journal of arts science and commerce, 2017-04, Vol.VIII (2), p.105-114
issn 2231-4172
2229-4686
2229-4686
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1918332285
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection
subjects Capital
Decision makers
Decision making
Decision theory
Economics
Finance
Financial institutions
Institutions
Profitability
Ranking
Ratings & rankings
Variables
title MULTICRITERIA METHODOLOGIES IN DECISION MAKING PROCESS IN FINANCE
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A57%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MULTICRITERIA%20METHODOLOGIES%20IN%20DECISION%20MAKING%20PROCESS%20IN%20FINANCE&rft.jtitle=Researchers%20world%20-%20journal%20of%20arts%20science%20and%20commerce&rft.au=Madhi,%20Doris&rft.aucorp=PhD.Candidate,%20University%20%E2%80%9CAleksand%D1%91r%20Xhuvani%E2%80%9D%20Faculty%20of%20Economics,%20Rruga%20Kozma%20Naska%20Elbasan,%20Albania&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=VIII&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=105-114&rft.issn=2231-4172&rft.eissn=2229-4686&rft_id=info:doi/10.18843/rwjasc/v8i2/11&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1918332285%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1091-b430211d01902240ac3d71da59afd2c2f3b82180c6f2d69e29ba8d8c9552c863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1918332285&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true