Loading…
MULTICRITERIA METHODOLOGIES IN DECISION MAKING PROCESS IN FINANCE
Nowadays the decision making process in different areas considering multiple influent factors has become a priority. The financial institutions have been facing multiple risks during the recent years, usually interacting risks which makes necessary an efficient decision making, in order to optimize...
Saved in:
Published in: | Researchers world - journal of arts science and commerce 2017-04, Vol.VIII (2), p.105-114 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 114 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 105 |
container_title | Researchers world - journal of arts science and commerce |
container_volume | VIII |
creator | Madhi, Doris |
description | Nowadays the decision making process in different areas considering multiple influent factors has become a priority. The financial institutions have been facing multiple risks during the recent years, usually interacting risks which makes necessary an efficient decision making, in order to optimize the capital allocation and increase profitability. Different authors have given a great contribution at the purpose, considering different variables which mainly lead to the same conclusion. Thus, decision makers always run the risk of being influenced by their own experience and preferences and a unique and optimal solution can t be reached if multiple criteria are not considered. The existing theories of Multi Criteria Decision Aid suggest the consideration of multiple criteria quantitative and qualitative in order to select the most influential ones and to create a ranking from the best to the worst. The merit of these methods (ELECTRE, PROMETHEE and MURAME) consists in the complex structuring allowance and the consideration of the interacting variables. These methods follow the exploiting phase, which allows the creation of an outranking performance matrix of variables based not only on the manager's preferences, but also on objective evaluation criteria. The main merit associated to these methods is related to their versatility and broader use in different areas of decision making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.18843/rwjasc/v8i2/11 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1918332285</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1918332285</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1091-b430211d01902240ac3d71da59afd2c2f3b82180c6f2d69e29ba8d8c9552c863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkFFLwzAUhYMoOOaefS34XJt703bJY-myLbi10tbnkKUtbKibiVP27-0278u5cA7nwEfII9Bn4DxmkfvdGW-jH77FCOCGjBBRhHHK09vzzyCMYYr3ZOL9jg6XQIwgRiRbv60alVeqkZXKgrVsluWsXJULJetAFcFM5qpWZRGssxdVLILXqsxlfbHmqsiKXD6Qu968-27yr2PSzGWTL8NzSZ6tQgtUQLiJGUWAloKgiDE1lrVTaE0iTN-ixZ5tOAKnNu2xTUWHYmN4y61IErQ8ZWPydK09uP3XsfPferc_us9hUYMAzhgiT4ZUdE1Zt_fedb0-uO2HcScNVF9I6SspfSalAdgfqeNWVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1918332285</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MULTICRITERIA METHODOLOGIES IN DECISION MAKING PROCESS IN FINANCE</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Madhi, Doris</creator><creatorcontrib>Madhi, Doris ; PhD.Candidate, University “Aleksandёr Xhuvani” Faculty of Economics, Rruga Kozma Naska Elbasan, Albania</creatorcontrib><description>Nowadays the decision making process in different areas considering multiple influent factors has become a priority. The financial institutions have been facing multiple risks during the recent years, usually interacting risks which makes necessary an efficient decision making, in order to optimize the capital allocation and increase profitability. Different authors have given a great contribution at the purpose, considering different variables which mainly lead to the same conclusion. Thus, decision makers always run the risk of being influenced by their own experience and preferences and a unique and optimal solution can t be reached if multiple criteria are not considered. The existing theories of Multi Criteria Decision Aid suggest the consideration of multiple criteria quantitative and qualitative in order to select the most influential ones and to create a ranking from the best to the worst. The merit of these methods (ELECTRE, PROMETHEE and MURAME) consists in the complex structuring allowance and the consideration of the interacting variables. These methods follow the exploiting phase, which allows the creation of an outranking performance matrix of variables based not only on the manager's preferences, but also on objective evaluation criteria. The main merit associated to these methods is related to their versatility and broader use in different areas of decision making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2231-4172</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2229-4686</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2229-4686</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18843/rwjasc/v8i2/11</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malegaon: Educational Research Multimedia & Publications</publisher><subject>Capital ; Decision makers ; Decision making ; Decision theory ; Economics ; Finance ; Financial institutions ; Institutions ; Profitability ; Ranking ; Ratings & rankings ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Researchers world - journal of arts science and commerce, 2017-04, Vol.VIII (2), p.105-114</ispartof><rights>Copyright Educational Research Multimedia & Publications Apr 2017</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1918332285/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1918332285?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12847,21394,27924,27925,33223,33611,43733,74221</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Madhi, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PhD.Candidate, University “Aleksandёr Xhuvani” Faculty of Economics, Rruga Kozma Naska Elbasan, Albania</creatorcontrib><title>MULTICRITERIA METHODOLOGIES IN DECISION MAKING PROCESS IN FINANCE</title><title>Researchers world - journal of arts science and commerce</title><description>Nowadays the decision making process in different areas considering multiple influent factors has become a priority. The financial institutions have been facing multiple risks during the recent years, usually interacting risks which makes necessary an efficient decision making, in order to optimize the capital allocation and increase profitability. Different authors have given a great contribution at the purpose, considering different variables which mainly lead to the same conclusion. Thus, decision makers always run the risk of being influenced by their own experience and preferences and a unique and optimal solution can t be reached if multiple criteria are not considered. The existing theories of Multi Criteria Decision Aid suggest the consideration of multiple criteria quantitative and qualitative in order to select the most influential ones and to create a ranking from the best to the worst. The merit of these methods (ELECTRE, PROMETHEE and MURAME) consists in the complex structuring allowance and the consideration of the interacting variables. These methods follow the exploiting phase, which allows the creation of an outranking performance matrix of variables based not only on the manager's preferences, but also on objective evaluation criteria. The main merit associated to these methods is related to their versatility and broader use in different areas of decision making.</description><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Decision makers</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision theory</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Financial institutions</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Ranking</subject><subject>Ratings & rankings</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>2231-4172</issn><issn>2229-4686</issn><issn>2229-4686</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNotkFFLwzAUhYMoOOaefS34XJt703bJY-myLbi10tbnkKUtbKibiVP27-0278u5cA7nwEfII9Bn4DxmkfvdGW-jH77FCOCGjBBRhHHK09vzzyCMYYr3ZOL9jg6XQIwgRiRbv60alVeqkZXKgrVsluWsXJULJetAFcFM5qpWZRGssxdVLILXqsxlfbHmqsiKXD6Qu968-27yr2PSzGWTL8NzSZ6tQgtUQLiJGUWAloKgiDE1lrVTaE0iTN-ixZ5tOAKnNu2xTUWHYmN4y61IErQ8ZWPydK09uP3XsfPferc_us9hUYMAzhgiT4ZUdE1Zt_fedb0-uO2HcScNVF9I6SspfSalAdgfqeNWVg</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Madhi, Doris</creator><general>Educational Research Multimedia & Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>MULTICRITERIA METHODOLOGIES IN DECISION MAKING PROCESS IN FINANCE</title><author>Madhi, Doris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1091-b430211d01902240ac3d71da59afd2c2f3b82180c6f2d69e29ba8d8c9552c863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Decision makers</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision theory</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Financial institutions</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Ranking</topic><topic>Ratings & rankings</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Madhi, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PhD.Candidate, University “Aleksandёr Xhuvani” Faculty of Economics, Rruga Kozma Naska Elbasan, Albania</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Researchers world - journal of arts science and commerce</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Madhi, Doris</au><aucorp>PhD.Candidate, University “Aleksandёr Xhuvani” Faculty of Economics, Rruga Kozma Naska Elbasan, Albania</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MULTICRITERIA METHODOLOGIES IN DECISION MAKING PROCESS IN FINANCE</atitle><jtitle>Researchers world - journal of arts science and commerce</jtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>VIII</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>105-114</pages><issn>2231-4172</issn><issn>2229-4686</issn><eissn>2229-4686</eissn><abstract>Nowadays the decision making process in different areas considering multiple influent factors has become a priority. The financial institutions have been facing multiple risks during the recent years, usually interacting risks which makes necessary an efficient decision making, in order to optimize the capital allocation and increase profitability. Different authors have given a great contribution at the purpose, considering different variables which mainly lead to the same conclusion. Thus, decision makers always run the risk of being influenced by their own experience and preferences and a unique and optimal solution can t be reached if multiple criteria are not considered. The existing theories of Multi Criteria Decision Aid suggest the consideration of multiple criteria quantitative and qualitative in order to select the most influential ones and to create a ranking from the best to the worst. The merit of these methods (ELECTRE, PROMETHEE and MURAME) consists in the complex structuring allowance and the consideration of the interacting variables. These methods follow the exploiting phase, which allows the creation of an outranking performance matrix of variables based not only on the manager's preferences, but also on objective evaluation criteria. The main merit associated to these methods is related to their versatility and broader use in different areas of decision making.</abstract><cop>Malegaon</cop><pub>Educational Research Multimedia & Publications</pub><doi>10.18843/rwjasc/v8i2/11</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2231-4172 |
ispartof | Researchers world - journal of arts science and commerce, 2017-04, Vol.VIII (2), p.105-114 |
issn | 2231-4172 2229-4686 2229-4686 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1918332285 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection |
subjects | Capital Decision makers Decision making Decision theory Economics Finance Financial institutions Institutions Profitability Ranking Ratings & rankings Variables |
title | MULTICRITERIA METHODOLOGIES IN DECISION MAKING PROCESS IN FINANCE |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A57%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MULTICRITERIA%20METHODOLOGIES%20IN%20DECISION%20MAKING%20PROCESS%20IN%20FINANCE&rft.jtitle=Researchers%20world%20-%20journal%20of%20arts%20science%20and%20commerce&rft.au=Madhi,%20Doris&rft.aucorp=PhD.Candidate,%20University%20%E2%80%9CAleksand%D1%91r%20Xhuvani%E2%80%9D%20Faculty%20of%20Economics,%20Rruga%20Kozma%20Naska%20Elbasan,%20Albania&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=VIII&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=105-114&rft.issn=2231-4172&rft.eissn=2229-4686&rft_id=info:doi/10.18843/rwjasc/v8i2/11&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1918332285%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1091-b430211d01902240ac3d71da59afd2c2f3b82180c6f2d69e29ba8d8c9552c863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1918332285&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |