Loading…

American Bar Association Section of Taxation Comments on Proposed Regulations Under Section 751(b)

The American Bar Association Section of Taxation (the "Section") released comments (the "Comments") on proposed regulations issued by the Treasury and the Service concerning section 751(b), which was included in Subchapter K when first enacted in 1954, and has been amended slight...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Tax lawyer 2017-04, Vol.70 (3), p.661-710
Main Author: American Bar Association Section of Taxation
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 710
container_issue 3
container_start_page 661
container_title The Tax lawyer
container_volume 70
creator American Bar Association Section of Taxation
description The American Bar Association Section of Taxation (the "Section") released comments (the "Comments") on proposed regulations issued by the Treasury and the Service concerning section 751(b), which was included in Subchapter K when first enacted in 1954, and has been amended slightly since then. Section 751(b) applies to a distribution of property from a partnership to a partner if the effect of the distribution is to effect an exchange of the distributee's share of unrealized receivables and substantially appreciated inventory "in exchange for" an increased share of other assets, or vice versa. Thus, section 751(b) is directed at distributions that have the effect of shirting ordinary income among partners. Regulations under section 751(b) were promulgated in 1956 and were focused on distributions that shift partners' shares of the value of a partnership's ordinary income assets. The regulations have not been amended since their original promulgation. The examples in those regulations determine a partner's interest in section 751 property by reference to the partner's share of the gross value of the partnership's assets (the "gross value" approach), not by reference to the partner's share of the unrealized gain or loss in the property. If a distribution results in a shift between the partner's interest in the partnership's section 751 property and the partnership's other property, those regulations require a deemed asset exchange of both section 751 property and other property between the partner and the partnership to determine the tax consequences of the distribution (the "asset exchange" approach). With their focus on value, the 1956 regulations were found to yield results that were both internally inconsistent and inconsistent with the goals of the statute. In response to this well-recognized problem, the government issued Notice 2006-14, proposing a new approach to implementing section 751(b). In the Notice, the government asked for comments on (1) replacing the gross asset value approach with a "hypothetical sale" approach for purposes of determining a partner's interest in the partnership's section 751 property and (2) replacing the asset exchange approach with a "hot asset sale" approach to determine the tax consequences when it is determined that section 751(b) applies. The proposed 751(b) regulations adopt many of the principles described in Notice 2006-14. The proposed regulations (1) provide rules for determining partners' interests in section 7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1918884069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44650010</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44650010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j509-a429205bb52096a71e1da18ec232b87a46a55a3a9a9c31094717f17e2035bd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMFKxDAQDaJgXf0EIeBFD4VJk7TJsRZdhQXFXcFbmbSptGybmnRB_96yFU_vMfNm3ps5IVHCEx2noPQpiQAExADy45xchNABcGCgI2Ly3vq2woHeo6d5CK5qcWrdQLe2OqJr6A6_l1rh-t4OU6Azf_VudMHW9M1-HvbHfqDvQ239_2gm2a25uyRnDe6DvfrDFdk-PuyKp3jzsn4u8k3cSdAxikQnII2RCegUM2ZZjUzZar7CqAxFilIiR4264nN0kbGsYZlNgEtTA1-Rm2Xr6N3XwYap7NzBD7NhyTRTSglI9ay6XlRdmJwvR9_26H9KIVIJ80P4L9rNWZ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1918884069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>American Bar Association Section of Taxation Comments on Proposed Regulations Under Section 751(b)</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>EBSCOHost: Business Source Ultimate</source><creator>American Bar Association Section of Taxation</creator><creatorcontrib>American Bar Association Section of Taxation</creatorcontrib><description>The American Bar Association Section of Taxation (the "Section") released comments (the "Comments") on proposed regulations issued by the Treasury and the Service concerning section 751(b), which was included in Subchapter K when first enacted in 1954, and has been amended slightly since then. Section 751(b) applies to a distribution of property from a partnership to a partner if the effect of the distribution is to effect an exchange of the distributee's share of unrealized receivables and substantially appreciated inventory "in exchange for" an increased share of other assets, or vice versa. Thus, section 751(b) is directed at distributions that have the effect of shirting ordinary income among partners. Regulations under section 751(b) were promulgated in 1956 and were focused on distributions that shift partners' shares of the value of a partnership's ordinary income assets. The regulations have not been amended since their original promulgation. The examples in those regulations determine a partner's interest in section 751 property by reference to the partner's share of the gross value of the partnership's assets (the "gross value" approach), not by reference to the partner's share of the unrealized gain or loss in the property. If a distribution results in a shift between the partner's interest in the partnership's section 751 property and the partnership's other property, those regulations require a deemed asset exchange of both section 751 property and other property between the partner and the partnership to determine the tax consequences of the distribution (the "asset exchange" approach). With their focus on value, the 1956 regulations were found to yield results that were both internally inconsistent and inconsistent with the goals of the statute. In response to this well-recognized problem, the government issued Notice 2006-14, proposing a new approach to implementing section 751(b). In the Notice, the government asked for comments on (1) replacing the gross asset value approach with a "hypothetical sale" approach for purposes of determining a partner's interest in the partnership's section 751 property and (2) replacing the asset exchange approach with a "hot asset sale" approach to determine the tax consequences when it is determined that section 751(b) applies. The proposed 751(b) regulations adopt many of the principles described in Notice 2006-14. The proposed regulations (1) provide rules for determining partners' interests in section 751 property, (2) set forth the test to determine whether section 751 (b) applies to a partnership distribution, including anti-abuse principles that may apply in certain situations in which the test would not otherwise be satisfied, (3) explain the tax consequences of a section 751(b) distribution, and (4) describe certain ancillary issues. The proposed regulations withdraw the asset exchange approach of the current regulations, but do not require the use of a particular approach for determining the tax consequences of a section 751(b) distribution. Rather, the partnership must use a reasonable approach that is consistent with the purpose of section 751(b). The drafters of the proposed regulations signal that the "hot asset sale" approach and a "deemed gain" approach are reasonable in many or most situations. In the Comments, the Section stated that it strongly supports the general approach adopted in the proposed regulations as compared with the approach taken in the 1956 regulation. Additionally, while supporting the general approach of the proposed regulations, the Section recommended numerous changes and additions, notably with respect to: (1) determining substantial appreciation in inventory; (2) permitting certain special allocations (i.e., synthetic revaluations) to obtain the same results as a revaluation; (3) addressing the overlap of section 751(b) with section 704(b) substantiality; (4) revising certain aspects of the capital gain recognition provisions in the proposed regulation; (5) providing for information reporting by lower tier partnerships to upper tier partnerships; (6) coordinating the interaction of section 751(b) with section 1245; (7) allocating section 734(b) adjustments; (8) illustrating the interaction of section 751(b) and section 1254; (9) clarifying that if the deemed gain approach is adopted, the resulting deemed sale will not be given effect for any other purpose as a partnership-level sale of assets; (10) resolving the interaction of section 751(b) and section 1248; and (11) addressing certain aspects of the anti-abuse rules in the proposed regulations. The comments provide detailed explanations, often with numerical examples, in each of these areas. These comments ("Comments") are submitted on behalf of the American Bar Association Section of Taxation (the "Section") and have not been approved by the House of Delegates or Board of Governors of the American Bar Association. Accordingly, they should not be construed as representing the position of the American Bar Association. Principal responsibility for preparing these Comments was exercised by Howard E. Abrams and Erich P. Hahn. Substantive contributions were made by Deanna W. Harris, Victoria Louie, and Julie Marion. The Comments were reviewed by Thomas E. Yearout, Chair of the Partnerships and LLCs Committee (the "Committee"), and Jeanne M. Sullivan, former Chair of the Committee. The Comments were further reviewed by William H. Caudill for the Sections Committee on Government Submissions, Roberta Mann, Council Director for the Committee, and Peter H. Blessing, the Section's Vice Chair (Government Relations). Although the members of the Section of Taxation who participated in preparing these Comments have clients who might be affected by the federal income tax principles addressed by these Comments, no such member (or the firm or organization to which such member belongs) has been engaged by a client to make a government submission with respect to, or otherwise to influence the development or outcome of, the specific subject matter of these Comments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-005X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2329-6089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Bar Association Section of Taxation</publisher><subject>Bar associations ; Capital gains ; Committees ; Controlled foreign corporations ; Distribution of partnership interests ; Foreign partnerships ; Foreign tax credits ; Internal Revenue Code ; Partnership interest ; Profits ; Proposals ; Regulation ; Simplification ; Studies ; Tax regulations ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>The Tax lawyer, 2017-04, Vol.70 (3), p.661-710</ispartof><rights>2017 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Spring 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44650010$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1918884069?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,36037,44339,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>American Bar Association Section of Taxation</creatorcontrib><title>American Bar Association Section of Taxation Comments on Proposed Regulations Under Section 751(b)</title><title>The Tax lawyer</title><description>The American Bar Association Section of Taxation (the "Section") released comments (the "Comments") on proposed regulations issued by the Treasury and the Service concerning section 751(b), which was included in Subchapter K when first enacted in 1954, and has been amended slightly since then. Section 751(b) applies to a distribution of property from a partnership to a partner if the effect of the distribution is to effect an exchange of the distributee's share of unrealized receivables and substantially appreciated inventory "in exchange for" an increased share of other assets, or vice versa. Thus, section 751(b) is directed at distributions that have the effect of shirting ordinary income among partners. Regulations under section 751(b) were promulgated in 1956 and were focused on distributions that shift partners' shares of the value of a partnership's ordinary income assets. The regulations have not been amended since their original promulgation. The examples in those regulations determine a partner's interest in section 751 property by reference to the partner's share of the gross value of the partnership's assets (the "gross value" approach), not by reference to the partner's share of the unrealized gain or loss in the property. If a distribution results in a shift between the partner's interest in the partnership's section 751 property and the partnership's other property, those regulations require a deemed asset exchange of both section 751 property and other property between the partner and the partnership to determine the tax consequences of the distribution (the "asset exchange" approach). With their focus on value, the 1956 regulations were found to yield results that were both internally inconsistent and inconsistent with the goals of the statute. In response to this well-recognized problem, the government issued Notice 2006-14, proposing a new approach to implementing section 751(b). In the Notice, the government asked for comments on (1) replacing the gross asset value approach with a "hypothetical sale" approach for purposes of determining a partner's interest in the partnership's section 751 property and (2) replacing the asset exchange approach with a "hot asset sale" approach to determine the tax consequences when it is determined that section 751(b) applies. The proposed 751(b) regulations adopt many of the principles described in Notice 2006-14. The proposed regulations (1) provide rules for determining partners' interests in section 751 property, (2) set forth the test to determine whether section 751 (b) applies to a partnership distribution, including anti-abuse principles that may apply in certain situations in which the test would not otherwise be satisfied, (3) explain the tax consequences of a section 751(b) distribution, and (4) describe certain ancillary issues. The proposed regulations withdraw the asset exchange approach of the current regulations, but do not require the use of a particular approach for determining the tax consequences of a section 751(b) distribution. Rather, the partnership must use a reasonable approach that is consistent with the purpose of section 751(b). The drafters of the proposed regulations signal that the "hot asset sale" approach and a "deemed gain" approach are reasonable in many or most situations. In the Comments, the Section stated that it strongly supports the general approach adopted in the proposed regulations as compared with the approach taken in the 1956 regulation. Additionally, while supporting the general approach of the proposed regulations, the Section recommended numerous changes and additions, notably with respect to: (1) determining substantial appreciation in inventory; (2) permitting certain special allocations (i.e., synthetic revaluations) to obtain the same results as a revaluation; (3) addressing the overlap of section 751(b) with section 704(b) substantiality; (4) revising certain aspects of the capital gain recognition provisions in the proposed regulation; (5) providing for information reporting by lower tier partnerships to upper tier partnerships; (6) coordinating the interaction of section 751(b) with section 1245; (7) allocating section 734(b) adjustments; (8) illustrating the interaction of section 751(b) and section 1254; (9) clarifying that if the deemed gain approach is adopted, the resulting deemed sale will not be given effect for any other purpose as a partnership-level sale of assets; (10) resolving the interaction of section 751(b) and section 1248; and (11) addressing certain aspects of the anti-abuse rules in the proposed regulations. The comments provide detailed explanations, often with numerical examples, in each of these areas. These comments ("Comments") are submitted on behalf of the American Bar Association Section of Taxation (the "Section") and have not been approved by the House of Delegates or Board of Governors of the American Bar Association. Accordingly, they should not be construed as representing the position of the American Bar Association. Principal responsibility for preparing these Comments was exercised by Howard E. Abrams and Erich P. Hahn. Substantive contributions were made by Deanna W. Harris, Victoria Louie, and Julie Marion. The Comments were reviewed by Thomas E. Yearout, Chair of the Partnerships and LLCs Committee (the "Committee"), and Jeanne M. Sullivan, former Chair of the Committee. The Comments were further reviewed by William H. Caudill for the Sections Committee on Government Submissions, Roberta Mann, Council Director for the Committee, and Peter H. Blessing, the Section's Vice Chair (Government Relations). Although the members of the Section of Taxation who participated in preparing these Comments have clients who might be affected by the federal income tax principles addressed by these Comments, no such member (or the firm or organization to which such member belongs) has been engaged by a client to make a government submission with respect to, or otherwise to influence the development or outcome of, the specific subject matter of these Comments.</description><subject>Bar associations</subject><subject>Capital gains</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Controlled foreign corporations</subject><subject>Distribution of partnership interests</subject><subject>Foreign partnerships</subject><subject>Foreign tax credits</subject><subject>Internal Revenue Code</subject><subject>Partnership interest</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Proposals</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Simplification</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tax regulations</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>0040-005X</issn><issn>2329-6089</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UMFKxDAQDaJgXf0EIeBFD4VJk7TJsRZdhQXFXcFbmbSptGybmnRB_96yFU_vMfNm3ps5IVHCEx2noPQpiQAExADy45xchNABcGCgI2Ly3vq2woHeo6d5CK5qcWrdQLe2OqJr6A6_l1rh-t4OU6Azf_VudMHW9M1-HvbHfqDvQ239_2gm2a25uyRnDe6DvfrDFdk-PuyKp3jzsn4u8k3cSdAxikQnII2RCegUM2ZZjUzZar7CqAxFilIiR4264nN0kbGsYZlNgEtTA1-Rm2Xr6N3XwYap7NzBD7NhyTRTSglI9ay6XlRdmJwvR9_26H9KIVIJ80P4L9rNWZ8</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>American Bar Association Section of Taxation</creator><general>American Bar Association Section of Taxation</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>American Bar Association Section of Taxation Comments on Proposed Regulations Under Section 751(b)</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j509-a429205bb52096a71e1da18ec232b87a46a55a3a9a9c31094717f17e2035bd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Bar associations</topic><topic>Capital gains</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Controlled foreign corporations</topic><topic>Distribution of partnership interests</topic><topic>Foreign partnerships</topic><topic>Foreign tax credits</topic><topic>Internal Revenue Code</topic><topic>Partnership interest</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Proposals</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Simplification</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tax regulations</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>American Bar Association Section of Taxation</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Tax lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><aucorp>American Bar Association Section of Taxation</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>American Bar Association Section of Taxation Comments on Proposed Regulations Under Section 751(b)</atitle><jtitle>The Tax lawyer</jtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>661</spage><epage>710</epage><pages>661-710</pages><issn>0040-005X</issn><eissn>2329-6089</eissn><abstract>The American Bar Association Section of Taxation (the "Section") released comments (the "Comments") on proposed regulations issued by the Treasury and the Service concerning section 751(b), which was included in Subchapter K when first enacted in 1954, and has been amended slightly since then. Section 751(b) applies to a distribution of property from a partnership to a partner if the effect of the distribution is to effect an exchange of the distributee's share of unrealized receivables and substantially appreciated inventory "in exchange for" an increased share of other assets, or vice versa. Thus, section 751(b) is directed at distributions that have the effect of shirting ordinary income among partners. Regulations under section 751(b) were promulgated in 1956 and were focused on distributions that shift partners' shares of the value of a partnership's ordinary income assets. The regulations have not been amended since their original promulgation. The examples in those regulations determine a partner's interest in section 751 property by reference to the partner's share of the gross value of the partnership's assets (the "gross value" approach), not by reference to the partner's share of the unrealized gain or loss in the property. If a distribution results in a shift between the partner's interest in the partnership's section 751 property and the partnership's other property, those regulations require a deemed asset exchange of both section 751 property and other property between the partner and the partnership to determine the tax consequences of the distribution (the "asset exchange" approach). With their focus on value, the 1956 regulations were found to yield results that were both internally inconsistent and inconsistent with the goals of the statute. In response to this well-recognized problem, the government issued Notice 2006-14, proposing a new approach to implementing section 751(b). In the Notice, the government asked for comments on (1) replacing the gross asset value approach with a "hypothetical sale" approach for purposes of determining a partner's interest in the partnership's section 751 property and (2) replacing the asset exchange approach with a "hot asset sale" approach to determine the tax consequences when it is determined that section 751(b) applies. The proposed 751(b) regulations adopt many of the principles described in Notice 2006-14. The proposed regulations (1) provide rules for determining partners' interests in section 751 property, (2) set forth the test to determine whether section 751 (b) applies to a partnership distribution, including anti-abuse principles that may apply in certain situations in which the test would not otherwise be satisfied, (3) explain the tax consequences of a section 751(b) distribution, and (4) describe certain ancillary issues. The proposed regulations withdraw the asset exchange approach of the current regulations, but do not require the use of a particular approach for determining the tax consequences of a section 751(b) distribution. Rather, the partnership must use a reasonable approach that is consistent with the purpose of section 751(b). The drafters of the proposed regulations signal that the "hot asset sale" approach and a "deemed gain" approach are reasonable in many or most situations. In the Comments, the Section stated that it strongly supports the general approach adopted in the proposed regulations as compared with the approach taken in the 1956 regulation. Additionally, while supporting the general approach of the proposed regulations, the Section recommended numerous changes and additions, notably with respect to: (1) determining substantial appreciation in inventory; (2) permitting certain special allocations (i.e., synthetic revaluations) to obtain the same results as a revaluation; (3) addressing the overlap of section 751(b) with section 704(b) substantiality; (4) revising certain aspects of the capital gain recognition provisions in the proposed regulation; (5) providing for information reporting by lower tier partnerships to upper tier partnerships; (6) coordinating the interaction of section 751(b) with section 1245; (7) allocating section 734(b) adjustments; (8) illustrating the interaction of section 751(b) and section 1254; (9) clarifying that if the deemed gain approach is adopted, the resulting deemed sale will not be given effect for any other purpose as a partnership-level sale of assets; (10) resolving the interaction of section 751(b) and section 1248; and (11) addressing certain aspects of the anti-abuse rules in the proposed regulations. The comments provide detailed explanations, often with numerical examples, in each of these areas. These comments ("Comments") are submitted on behalf of the American Bar Association Section of Taxation (the "Section") and have not been approved by the House of Delegates or Board of Governors of the American Bar Association. Accordingly, they should not be construed as representing the position of the American Bar Association. Principal responsibility for preparing these Comments was exercised by Howard E. Abrams and Erich P. Hahn. Substantive contributions were made by Deanna W. Harris, Victoria Louie, and Julie Marion. The Comments were reviewed by Thomas E. Yearout, Chair of the Partnerships and LLCs Committee (the "Committee"), and Jeanne M. Sullivan, former Chair of the Committee. The Comments were further reviewed by William H. Caudill for the Sections Committee on Government Submissions, Roberta Mann, Council Director for the Committee, and Peter H. Blessing, the Section's Vice Chair (Government Relations). Although the members of the Section of Taxation who participated in preparing these Comments have clients who might be affected by the federal income tax principles addressed by these Comments, no such member (or the firm or organization to which such member belongs) has been engaged by a client to make a government submission with respect to, or otherwise to influence the development or outcome of, the specific subject matter of these Comments.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Bar Association Section of Taxation</pub><tpages>50</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-005X
ispartof The Tax lawyer, 2017-04, Vol.70 (3), p.661-710
issn 0040-005X
2329-6089
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1918884069
source ABI/INFORM global; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; EBSCOHost: Business Source Ultimate
subjects Bar associations
Capital gains
Committees
Controlled foreign corporations
Distribution of partnership interests
Foreign partnerships
Foreign tax credits
Internal Revenue Code
Partnership interest
Profits
Proposals
Regulation
Simplification
Studies
Tax regulations
Taxation
title American Bar Association Section of Taxation Comments on Proposed Regulations Under Section 751(b)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T17%3A50%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=American%20Bar%20Association%20Section%20of%20Taxation%20Comments%20on%20Proposed%20Regulations%20Under%20Section%20751(b)&rft.jtitle=The%20Tax%20lawyer&rft.aucorp=American%20Bar%20Association%20Section%20of%20Taxation&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=661&rft.epage=710&rft.pages=661-710&rft.issn=0040-005X&rft.eissn=2329-6089&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44650010%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j509-a429205bb52096a71e1da18ec232b87a46a55a3a9a9c31094717f17e2035bd03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1918884069&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44650010&rfr_iscdi=true