Loading…
Enhancing the ifcOWL ontology with an alternative representation for geometric data
Over the past few years, several suggestions have been made of how to convert an EXPRESS schema into an OWL ontology. The conversion from EXPRESS to OWL is of particular use to the architectural design and construction industry, because one of the key data models in this domain, namely the Industry...
Saved in:
Published in: | Automation in construction 2017-08, Vol.80, p.77-94 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f20c49b5c26b17adcbcd78c6c34d41b1c8b43abd714b98f4e2821b0709690b813 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f20c49b5c26b17adcbcd78c6c34d41b1c8b43abd714b98f4e2821b0709690b813 |
container_end_page | 94 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 77 |
container_title | Automation in construction |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | Pauwels, Pieter Krijnen, Thomas Terkaj, Walter Beetz, Jakob |
description | Over the past few years, several suggestions have been made of how to convert an EXPRESS schema into an OWL ontology. The conversion from EXPRESS to OWL is of particular use to the architectural design and construction industry, because one of the key data models in this domain, namely the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC), is represented using the EXPRESS information modelling language. These conversion efforts have by now resulted in a recommended ifcOWL ontology that stays semantically close to the EXPRESS schema. Two major improvements could be made in addition to this ifcOWL basis. First, the ontology could be split into diverse modules, making it easier to use subsets of the entire ontology. Second, geometric aggregated data (e.g. lists of coordinates) could be serialised into alternative, less complex semantic structures. The purpose of both improvements is to make ifcOWL data smaller in size and complexity. In this article, we focus entirely on the second topic, namely the optimization of geometric data in the semantic representation. We outline and discuss the diverse available options in optimizing the data representations used. We quantify the impact of these measures on the ifcOWL ontology and instance model size. We conclude with an explicit recommendation and give an indication of how this recommendation might be implemented in combination with the already available ifcOWL ontology.
•An analysis is made of the size and complexity of ifcOWL building models.•Four alternative representations for ifcOWL geometry are proposed.•A Well-Known Text (WKT) representation is proposed as add-on to the ifcOWL ontology.•The WKT-based representation is evaluated using 42 reference IFC files.•High improvements are achieved in terms of model size and complexity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.03.001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1919588257</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0926580517301826</els_id><sourcerecordid>1919588257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f20c49b5c26b17adcbcd78c6c34d41b1c8b43abd714b98f4e2821b0709690b813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv_wEXA9Yw380w2gpT6gEIXKi5DkrnTZmiTmqSV_ntH6trV5cA5h3M_Qm4Z5AxYcz_kap-Md3kBrM2hzAHYGZkw3hZZywU7JxMQRZPVHOpLchXjAAAtNGJC3uZurZyxbkXTGqntzfJzQb1LfuNXR_pt05oqR9UmYXAq2QPSgLuAEV0apXe094Gu0G8xBWtop5K6Jhe92kS8-btT8vE0f5-9ZIvl8-vscZGZkkPK-gJMJXRtikazVnVGm67lpjFl1VVMM8N1VSrdtazSgvcVFrxgetwtGgGas3JK7k69u-C_9hiTHPx-XLmJkgkmas6Luh1d1cllgo8xYC93wW5VOEoG8hefHOQJn_zFJ6GUI74x9nCK4fjBwWKQ0Vh0Bjsb0CTZeft_wQ9s63ti</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1919588257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing the ifcOWL ontology with an alternative representation for geometric data</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Pauwels, Pieter ; Krijnen, Thomas ; Terkaj, Walter ; Beetz, Jakob</creator><creatorcontrib>Pauwels, Pieter ; Krijnen, Thomas ; Terkaj, Walter ; Beetz, Jakob</creatorcontrib><description>Over the past few years, several suggestions have been made of how to convert an EXPRESS schema into an OWL ontology. The conversion from EXPRESS to OWL is of particular use to the architectural design and construction industry, because one of the key data models in this domain, namely the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC), is represented using the EXPRESS information modelling language. These conversion efforts have by now resulted in a recommended ifcOWL ontology that stays semantically close to the EXPRESS schema. Two major improvements could be made in addition to this ifcOWL basis. First, the ontology could be split into diverse modules, making it easier to use subsets of the entire ontology. Second, geometric aggregated data (e.g. lists of coordinates) could be serialised into alternative, less complex semantic structures. The purpose of both improvements is to make ifcOWL data smaller in size and complexity. In this article, we focus entirely on the second topic, namely the optimization of geometric data in the semantic representation. We outline and discuss the diverse available options in optimizing the data representations used. We quantify the impact of these measures on the ifcOWL ontology and instance model size. We conclude with an explicit recommendation and give an indication of how this recommendation might be implemented in combination with the already available ifcOWL ontology.
•An analysis is made of the size and complexity of ifcOWL building models.•Four alternative representations for ifcOWL geometry are proposed.•A Well-Known Text (WKT) representation is proposed as add-on to the ifcOWL ontology.•The WKT-based representation is evaluated using 42 reference IFC files.•High improvements are achieved in terms of model size and complexity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0926-5805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.03.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>BIM ; Complexity ; Construction industry ; Conversion ; Data exchange ; Geometry ; IFC ; Indication ; Knowledge representation ; Linked data ; Lists ; Modules ; Ontology ; Optimization ; OWL ; Programming languages ; Semantics</subject><ispartof>Automation in construction, 2017-08, Vol.80, p.77-94</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f20c49b5c26b17adcbcd78c6c34d41b1c8b43abd714b98f4e2821b0709690b813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f20c49b5c26b17adcbcd78c6c34d41b1c8b43abd714b98f4e2821b0709690b813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pauwels, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krijnen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terkaj, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beetz, Jakob</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing the ifcOWL ontology with an alternative representation for geometric data</title><title>Automation in construction</title><description>Over the past few years, several suggestions have been made of how to convert an EXPRESS schema into an OWL ontology. The conversion from EXPRESS to OWL is of particular use to the architectural design and construction industry, because one of the key data models in this domain, namely the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC), is represented using the EXPRESS information modelling language. These conversion efforts have by now resulted in a recommended ifcOWL ontology that stays semantically close to the EXPRESS schema. Two major improvements could be made in addition to this ifcOWL basis. First, the ontology could be split into diverse modules, making it easier to use subsets of the entire ontology. Second, geometric aggregated data (e.g. lists of coordinates) could be serialised into alternative, less complex semantic structures. The purpose of both improvements is to make ifcOWL data smaller in size and complexity. In this article, we focus entirely on the second topic, namely the optimization of geometric data in the semantic representation. We outline and discuss the diverse available options in optimizing the data representations used. We quantify the impact of these measures on the ifcOWL ontology and instance model size. We conclude with an explicit recommendation and give an indication of how this recommendation might be implemented in combination with the already available ifcOWL ontology.
•An analysis is made of the size and complexity of ifcOWL building models.•Four alternative representations for ifcOWL geometry are proposed.•A Well-Known Text (WKT) representation is proposed as add-on to the ifcOWL ontology.•The WKT-based representation is evaluated using 42 reference IFC files.•High improvements are achieved in terms of model size and complexity.</description><subject>BIM</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Data exchange</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>IFC</subject><subject>Indication</subject><subject>Knowledge representation</subject><subject>Linked data</subject><subject>Lists</subject><subject>Modules</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>OWL</subject><subject>Programming languages</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><issn>0926-5805</issn><issn>1872-7891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv_wEXA9Yw380w2gpT6gEIXKi5DkrnTZmiTmqSV_ntH6trV5cA5h3M_Qm4Z5AxYcz_kap-Md3kBrM2hzAHYGZkw3hZZywU7JxMQRZPVHOpLchXjAAAtNGJC3uZurZyxbkXTGqntzfJzQb1LfuNXR_pt05oqR9UmYXAq2QPSgLuAEV0apXe094Gu0G8xBWtop5K6Jhe92kS8-btT8vE0f5-9ZIvl8-vscZGZkkPK-gJMJXRtikazVnVGm67lpjFl1VVMM8N1VSrdtazSgvcVFrxgetwtGgGas3JK7k69u-C_9hiTHPx-XLmJkgkmas6Luh1d1cllgo8xYC93wW5VOEoG8hefHOQJn_zFJ6GUI74x9nCK4fjBwWKQ0Vh0Bjsb0CTZeft_wQ9s63ti</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Pauwels, Pieter</creator><creator>Krijnen, Thomas</creator><creator>Terkaj, Walter</creator><creator>Beetz, Jakob</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Enhancing the ifcOWL ontology with an alternative representation for geometric data</title><author>Pauwels, Pieter ; Krijnen, Thomas ; Terkaj, Walter ; Beetz, Jakob</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f20c49b5c26b17adcbcd78c6c34d41b1c8b43abd714b98f4e2821b0709690b813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>BIM</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Data exchange</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>IFC</topic><topic>Indication</topic><topic>Knowledge representation</topic><topic>Linked data</topic><topic>Lists</topic><topic>Modules</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>OWL</topic><topic>Programming languages</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pauwels, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krijnen, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terkaj, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beetz, Jakob</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Automation in construction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pauwels, Pieter</au><au>Krijnen, Thomas</au><au>Terkaj, Walter</au><au>Beetz, Jakob</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing the ifcOWL ontology with an alternative representation for geometric data</atitle><jtitle>Automation in construction</jtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>80</volume><spage>77</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>77-94</pages><issn>0926-5805</issn><eissn>1872-7891</eissn><abstract>Over the past few years, several suggestions have been made of how to convert an EXPRESS schema into an OWL ontology. The conversion from EXPRESS to OWL is of particular use to the architectural design and construction industry, because one of the key data models in this domain, namely the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC), is represented using the EXPRESS information modelling language. These conversion efforts have by now resulted in a recommended ifcOWL ontology that stays semantically close to the EXPRESS schema. Two major improvements could be made in addition to this ifcOWL basis. First, the ontology could be split into diverse modules, making it easier to use subsets of the entire ontology. Second, geometric aggregated data (e.g. lists of coordinates) could be serialised into alternative, less complex semantic structures. The purpose of both improvements is to make ifcOWL data smaller in size and complexity. In this article, we focus entirely on the second topic, namely the optimization of geometric data in the semantic representation. We outline and discuss the diverse available options in optimizing the data representations used. We quantify the impact of these measures on the ifcOWL ontology and instance model size. We conclude with an explicit recommendation and give an indication of how this recommendation might be implemented in combination with the already available ifcOWL ontology.
•An analysis is made of the size and complexity of ifcOWL building models.•Four alternative representations for ifcOWL geometry are proposed.•A Well-Known Text (WKT) representation is proposed as add-on to the ifcOWL ontology.•The WKT-based representation is evaluated using 42 reference IFC files.•High improvements are achieved in terms of model size and complexity.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.autcon.2017.03.001</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0926-5805 |
ispartof | Automation in construction, 2017-08, Vol.80, p.77-94 |
issn | 0926-5805 1872-7891 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1919588257 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | BIM Complexity Construction industry Conversion Data exchange Geometry IFC Indication Knowledge representation Linked data Lists Modules Ontology Optimization OWL Programming languages Semantics |
title | Enhancing the ifcOWL ontology with an alternative representation for geometric data |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T02%3A50%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20the%20ifcOWL%20ontology%20with%20an%20alternative%20representation%20for%20geometric%20data&rft.jtitle=Automation%20in%20construction&rft.au=Pauwels,%20Pieter&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=80&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=77-94&rft.issn=0926-5805&rft.eissn=1872-7891&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.03.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1919588257%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-f20c49b5c26b17adcbcd78c6c34d41b1c8b43abd714b98f4e2821b0709690b813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1919588257&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |