A Defense of Free Will Skepticism: Replies to Commentaries by Victor Tadros, Saul Smilansky, Michael McKenna, and Alfred R. Mele on Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life

This paper features Derk Pereboom’s replies to commentaries by Victor Tadros and Saul Smilansky on his non-retributive, incapacitation-focused proposal for treatment of dangerous criminals; by Michael McKenna on his manipulation argument against compatibilism about basic desert and causal determinat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Criminal law and philosophy 2017-09, Vol.11 (3), p.617-636
Main Author: Pereboom, Derk
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Criminal justice
Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law
Ethics
Free will
Law
Law and Criminology
Legal History
Original Paper
Philosophy of Law
Theories of Law
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper features Derk Pereboom’s replies to commentaries by Victor Tadros and Saul Smilansky on his non-retributive, incapacitation-focused proposal for treatment of dangerous criminals; by Michael McKenna on his manipulation argument against compatibilism about basic desert and causal determination; and by Alfred R. Mele on his disappearing agent argument against event-causal libertarianism.
ISSN:1871-9791
1871-9805
DOI:10.1007/s11572-017-9412-2