Loading…

Validation of Ankle Strength Measurements by Means of a Hand-Held Dynamometer in Adult Healthy Subjects

Uniaxial Hand-Held Dynamometer (HHD) is a low-cost device widely adopted in clinical practice to measure muscle force. HHD measurements depend on operator’s ability and joint movements. The aim of the work is to validate the use of a commercial HHD in both dorsiflexion and plantarflexion ankle stren...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of sensors 2017-01, Vol.2017 (2017), p.1-8
Main Authors: Ancillao, Andrea, Rossi, Stefano, Palermo, Eduardo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-d38346b4b1ee6fcd0901a250e0004c9935658580ae122990b7bc6c4b20fd525e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-d38346b4b1ee6fcd0901a250e0004c9935658580ae122990b7bc6c4b20fd525e3
container_end_page 8
container_issue 2017
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of sensors
container_volume 2017
creator Ancillao, Andrea
Rossi, Stefano
Palermo, Eduardo
description Uniaxial Hand-Held Dynamometer (HHD) is a low-cost device widely adopted in clinical practice to measure muscle force. HHD measurements depend on operator’s ability and joint movements. The aim of the work is to validate the use of a commercial HHD in both dorsiflexion and plantarflexion ankle strength measurements quantifying the effects of HHD misplacements and unwanted foot’s movements on the measurements. We used an optoelectronic system and a multicomponent load cell to quantify the sources of error in the manual assessment of the ankle strength due to both the operator’s ability to hold still the HHD and the transversal components of the exerted force that are usually neglected in clinical routine. Results showed that foot’s movements and angular misplacements of HHD on sagittal and horizontal planes were relevant sources of inaccuracy on the strength assessment. Moreover, ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion force measurements presented an inaccuracy less than 2% and higher than 10%, respectively. In conclusion, the manual use of a uniaxial HHD is not recommended for the assessment of ankle plantarflexion strength; on the contrary, it can be allowed asking the operator to pay strong attention to the HHD positioning in ankle dorsiflexion strength measurements.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2017/5426031
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1926424985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1926424985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-d38346b4b1ee6fcd0901a250e0004c9935658580ae122990b7bc6c4b20fd525e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1Lw0AQBuAgCtbqzbMseNTY2d3sJjmW-hFB8VAVb2GTTNrUdFN3N0j-vQkpevQ0M_DwDryed07hhlIhZgxoOBMBk8DpgTehMgr9kMno8HcXH8feibUbAMlDzife6l3VVaFc1WjSlGSuP2skS2dQr9yaPKOyrcEtamdJ1g23toNTJFG68BOsC3LbabVttujQkEqTedHWjiSoarfuyLLNNpg7e-odlaq2eLafU-_t_u51kfhPLw-Pi_mTnwcROL_gEQ9kFmQUUZZ5ATFQxQQgAAR5HHMhRSQiUEgZi2PIwiyXeZAxKAvBBPKpdznm7kzz1aJ16aZpje5fpjRmMmBBHIleXY8qN421Bst0Z6qtMl1KIR2qTIcq032VPb8a-brShfqu_tMXo8beYKn-NI1CiBn_AdHqe_4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1926424985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of Ankle Strength Measurements by Means of a Hand-Held Dynamometer in Adult Healthy Subjects</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Titles (Open access)</source><creator>Ancillao, Andrea ; Rossi, Stefano ; Palermo, Eduardo</creator><contributor>Tian, Guiyun</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ancillao, Andrea ; Rossi, Stefano ; Palermo, Eduardo ; Tian, Guiyun</creatorcontrib><description>Uniaxial Hand-Held Dynamometer (HHD) is a low-cost device widely adopted in clinical practice to measure muscle force. HHD measurements depend on operator’s ability and joint movements. The aim of the work is to validate the use of a commercial HHD in both dorsiflexion and plantarflexion ankle strength measurements quantifying the effects of HHD misplacements and unwanted foot’s movements on the measurements. We used an optoelectronic system and a multicomponent load cell to quantify the sources of error in the manual assessment of the ankle strength due to both the operator’s ability to hold still the HHD and the transversal components of the exerted force that are usually neglected in clinical routine. Results showed that foot’s movements and angular misplacements of HHD on sagittal and horizontal planes were relevant sources of inaccuracy on the strength assessment. Moreover, ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion force measurements presented an inaccuracy less than 2% and higher than 10%, respectively. In conclusion, the manual use of a uniaxial HHD is not recommended for the assessment of ankle plantarflexion strength; on the contrary, it can be allowed asking the operator to pay strong attention to the HHD positioning in ankle dorsiflexion strength measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1687-725X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1687-7268</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2017/5426031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Ankle ; Archives &amp; records ; Developmental disabilities ; Down syndrome ; Methods ; Optoelectronics ; Permissible error ; Planes ; Posture ; Rehabilitation ; Research methodology ; Strength ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of sensors, 2017-01, Vol.2017 (2017), p.1-8</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Andrea Ancillao et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Andrea Ancillao et al.; This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-d38346b4b1ee6fcd0901a250e0004c9935658580ae122990b7bc6c4b20fd525e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-d38346b4b1ee6fcd0901a250e0004c9935658580ae122990b7bc6c4b20fd525e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0006-7013 ; 0000-0002-3213-8261</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1926424985/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1926424985?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,75097</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Tian, Guiyun</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ancillao, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palermo, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of Ankle Strength Measurements by Means of a Hand-Held Dynamometer in Adult Healthy Subjects</title><title>Journal of sensors</title><description>Uniaxial Hand-Held Dynamometer (HHD) is a low-cost device widely adopted in clinical practice to measure muscle force. HHD measurements depend on operator’s ability and joint movements. The aim of the work is to validate the use of a commercial HHD in both dorsiflexion and plantarflexion ankle strength measurements quantifying the effects of HHD misplacements and unwanted foot’s movements on the measurements. We used an optoelectronic system and a multicomponent load cell to quantify the sources of error in the manual assessment of the ankle strength due to both the operator’s ability to hold still the HHD and the transversal components of the exerted force that are usually neglected in clinical routine. Results showed that foot’s movements and angular misplacements of HHD on sagittal and horizontal planes were relevant sources of inaccuracy on the strength assessment. Moreover, ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion force measurements presented an inaccuracy less than 2% and higher than 10%, respectively. In conclusion, the manual use of a uniaxial HHD is not recommended for the assessment of ankle plantarflexion strength; on the contrary, it can be allowed asking the operator to pay strong attention to the HHD positioning in ankle dorsiflexion strength measurements.</description><subject>Ankle</subject><subject>Archives &amp; records</subject><subject>Developmental disabilities</subject><subject>Down syndrome</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Optoelectronics</subject><subject>Permissible error</subject><subject>Planes</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1687-725X</issn><issn>1687-7268</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1Lw0AQBuAgCtbqzbMseNTY2d3sJjmW-hFB8VAVb2GTTNrUdFN3N0j-vQkpevQ0M_DwDryed07hhlIhZgxoOBMBk8DpgTehMgr9kMno8HcXH8feibUbAMlDzife6l3VVaFc1WjSlGSuP2skS2dQr9yaPKOyrcEtamdJ1g23toNTJFG68BOsC3LbabVttujQkEqTedHWjiSoarfuyLLNNpg7e-odlaq2eLafU-_t_u51kfhPLw-Pi_mTnwcROL_gEQ9kFmQUUZZ5ATFQxQQgAAR5HHMhRSQiUEgZi2PIwiyXeZAxKAvBBPKpdznm7kzz1aJ16aZpje5fpjRmMmBBHIleXY8qN421Bst0Z6qtMl1KIR2qTIcq032VPb8a-brShfqu_tMXo8beYKn-NI1CiBn_AdHqe_4</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Ancillao, Andrea</creator><creator>Rossi, Stefano</creator><creator>Palermo, Eduardo</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0006-7013</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3213-8261</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Validation of Ankle Strength Measurements by Means of a Hand-Held Dynamometer in Adult Healthy Subjects</title><author>Ancillao, Andrea ; Rossi, Stefano ; Palermo, Eduardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-d38346b4b1ee6fcd0901a250e0004c9935658580ae122990b7bc6c4b20fd525e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Ankle</topic><topic>Archives &amp; records</topic><topic>Developmental disabilities</topic><topic>Down syndrome</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Optoelectronics</topic><topic>Permissible error</topic><topic>Planes</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ancillao, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palermo, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of sensors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ancillao, Andrea</au><au>Rossi, Stefano</au><au>Palermo, Eduardo</au><au>Tian, Guiyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of Ankle Strength Measurements by Means of a Hand-Held Dynamometer in Adult Healthy Subjects</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sensors</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>2017</volume><issue>2017</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>1687-725X</issn><eissn>1687-7268</eissn><abstract>Uniaxial Hand-Held Dynamometer (HHD) is a low-cost device widely adopted in clinical practice to measure muscle force. HHD measurements depend on operator’s ability and joint movements. The aim of the work is to validate the use of a commercial HHD in both dorsiflexion and plantarflexion ankle strength measurements quantifying the effects of HHD misplacements and unwanted foot’s movements on the measurements. We used an optoelectronic system and a multicomponent load cell to quantify the sources of error in the manual assessment of the ankle strength due to both the operator’s ability to hold still the HHD and the transversal components of the exerted force that are usually neglected in clinical routine. Results showed that foot’s movements and angular misplacements of HHD on sagittal and horizontal planes were relevant sources of inaccuracy on the strength assessment. Moreover, ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion force measurements presented an inaccuracy less than 2% and higher than 10%, respectively. In conclusion, the manual use of a uniaxial HHD is not recommended for the assessment of ankle plantarflexion strength; on the contrary, it can be allowed asking the operator to pay strong attention to the HHD positioning in ankle dorsiflexion strength measurements.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><doi>10.1155/2017/5426031</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0006-7013</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3213-8261</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1687-725X
ispartof Journal of sensors, 2017-01, Vol.2017 (2017), p.1-8
issn 1687-725X
1687-7268
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1926424985
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Wiley-Blackwell Titles (Open access)
subjects Ankle
Archives & records
Developmental disabilities
Down syndrome
Methods
Optoelectronics
Permissible error
Planes
Posture
Rehabilitation
Research methodology
Strength
Studies
title Validation of Ankle Strength Measurements by Means of a Hand-Held Dynamometer in Adult Healthy Subjects
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T06%3A15%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20Ankle%20Strength%20Measurements%20by%20Means%20of%20a%20Hand-Held%20Dynamometer%20in%20Adult%20Healthy%20Subjects&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sensors&rft.au=Ancillao,%20Andrea&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=2017&rft.issue=2017&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=1687-725X&rft.eissn=1687-7268&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2017/5426031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1926424985%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-d38346b4b1ee6fcd0901a250e0004c9935658580ae122990b7bc6c4b20fd525e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1926424985&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true