Loading…

Distribution, Density, and Size of Migratory and Fluvial Sculpins in Relation to Barriers in Puget Sound Lowland Streams

We examined the effects of potential barriers on populations of migratory sculpins (Coastrange Sculpin Cottus aleuticus and Prickly Sculpin C. asper) and fluvial sculpins (Riffle Sculpin C. gulosus, Shorthead Sculpin C. confusus, and Torrent Sculpin C. rhotheus). Barriers can alter sculpin distribut...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:North American journal of fisheries management 2017-08, Vol.37 (4), p.729-742
Main Authors: Tabor, Roger A., Waterstrat, Frithiof T., Lantz, Daniel W., Berge, Hans B., Liermann, Martin C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We examined the effects of potential barriers on populations of migratory sculpins (Coastrange Sculpin Cottus aleuticus and Prickly Sculpin C. asper) and fluvial sculpins (Riffle Sculpin C. gulosus, Shorthead Sculpin C. confusus, and Torrent Sculpin C. rhotheus). Barriers can alter sculpin distribution because migratory sculpins have pelagic larvae that drift downstream to calm waters and juveniles and adults migrate upstream. We compared sculpin populations upstream and downstream of a barrier in 19 lowland streams in the Puget Sound region, Washington. Within each stream, we examined the farthest downstream barrier that would be most likely to impact the upstream movements of migratory sculpins. All study streams had populations of migratory sculpins in stream reaches downstream of the barrier. In 8 of the 19 streams with a barrier, at least one species of fluvial sculpin was also present. We also documented the relative distribution of migratory sculpins and fluvial sculpins in one reference stream without a barrier. In all streams examined, the density of migratory sculpins upstream of the barrier was lower than that downstream of the barrier and the differences were statistically significant. In 12 of the 19 streams, migratory sculpins were not present upstream of the barrier. In streams with fluvial sculpin populations, fluvial sculpins were usually rare downstream of barriers and were statistically less abundant than upstream of the barrier. The migratory sculpins collected upstream of barriers were statistically larger than those collected downstream of barriers. In the reference stream, migratory sculpin species dominated the lower stream reaches and were gradually replaced by fluvial sculpin species in more upstream reaches. Overall, barriers appear to have an important effect on the distribution of both migratory sculpins and fluvial sculpins, which should be taken into account when assessing habitat modifications and fish communities in Puget Sound lowland streams. Received November 4, 2016; accepted March 25, 2017 Published online June 12, 2017
ISSN:0275-5947
1548-8675
DOI:10.1080/02755947.2017.1313795