Investing in Development: Six High-Performing, High-Poverty Schools Implement the Massachusetts Teacher Evaluation Policy

We studied how six high-performing, high-poverty schools in one large Massachusetts city implemented the states new teacher evaluation policy. The sample includes traditional, turnaround, restart, and charter schools, each of which had received the state s highest accountability rating. We sought to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Educational evaluation and policy analysis 2017-09, Vol.39 (3), p.383-406
Main Authors: Reinhorn, Stefanie K., Johnson, Susan Moore, Simon, Nicole S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accountability
Administrative Policy
Administrative Principles
Administrators
Charter Schools
Comparative Analysis
Content Analysis
Disadvantaged Schools
Educational Practices
Elementary Secondary Education
High Achievement
Observation
Poverty
Poverty Areas
Principals
Program Implementation
Qualitative Research
Ratings & rankings
School Effectiveness
School Turnaround
Semi Structured Interviews
State Policy
Teacher Attitudes
Teacher Evaluation
Teacher evaluations
Teachers
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We studied how six high-performing, high-poverty schools in one large Massachusetts city implemented the states new teacher evaluation policy. The sample includes traditional, turnaround, restart, and charter schools, each of which had received the state s highest accountability rating. We sought to learn how these successful schools approached teacher evaluation, including classroom observations, feedback, andsummative ratings. We interviewed 142 teachers and administrators and analyzed data using sensemaking theory, which considers how individuals ' knowledge and beliefs, the context in which they work, and the policy stimuli they encounter affect implementation. All schools prioritized the goal of developing their teachers over holding them accountable. The spillover effects of additional policies affected how these schools approached implementation.
ISSN:0162-3737
1935-1062
DOI:10.3102/0162373717690605