Loading…

Fire behaviour on engineered landforms stabilised with high biomass buffel grass

•Rehabilitation method has a significant impact on fire behaviour in semi-arid Australia.•Grass dominates replaced topsoil; trees and shrubs dominate unamended mine spoil.•Total fuel loads on topsoil are 43% greater than those on spoil.•Fireline intensities in grassland on topsoil are double those f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological engineering 2017-04, Vol.101, p.237-246
Main Authors: McKenna, Phill, Glenn, Vanessa, Erskine, Peter D., Doley, David, Sturgess, Andrew
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-12cc35b9b4ca8215c6f30b5f01375c2896b92ff570c2235c3e4594894fce6bb63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-12cc35b9b4ca8215c6f30b5f01375c2896b92ff570c2235c3e4594894fce6bb63
container_end_page 246
container_issue
container_start_page 237
container_title Ecological engineering
container_volume 101
creator McKenna, Phill
Glenn, Vanessa
Erskine, Peter D.
Doley, David
Sturgess, Andrew
description •Rehabilitation method has a significant impact on fire behaviour in semi-arid Australia.•Grass dominates replaced topsoil; trees and shrubs dominate unamended mine spoil.•Total fuel loads on topsoil are 43% greater than those on spoil.•Fireline intensities in grassland on topsoil are double those for woodland on spoil. Rehabilitated lands created by open-cut coal mines are generally protected by land managers from fire and grazing disturbances. This practice is employed to reduce negative impacts, such as erosion, on the developing ecosystems. However, fire exclusion over long periods inadvertently contributes to increased fire risk on rehabilitated landforms, particularly when high biomass, mono-dominant grasses form a major component of these new ecosystems. In May 2015, an experimental fire burnt 117ha of rehabilitation at a coal mine site in the Bowen Basin, Australia. Standing grass fuel loads, dominated by buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.), were up to 9.3t/ha in grassland areas and 5.3t/ha in areas of open woodland. Average litter fuel loads were 2.4 and 3.6t/ha for grassland and open woodland, respectively. Calculated fire intensity was higher in grassland (4612±502kWm−1) than open woodland areas (1977±804kWm−1) indicating that rehabilitated landforms dominated by buffel grass may represent a higher fire risk to mine sites and regional areas in the Bowen Basin when compared to the original vegetation. Fire behaviour reflected the varying underlying terrain, fuel loads and surface soil or overburden conditions. Further research is recommended to investigate fire behaviour in buffel grasslands across a range of fuel load and curing conditions, with the aim to develop an invasive grass fire spread model that can be used inform both landscape reconstruction prescriptions for ecological engineers and more broadly in managing the fire risk across landscapes dominated by these vegetation types.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.01.038
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1931723880</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925857417300472</els_id><sourcerecordid>1931723880</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-12cc35b9b4ca8215c6f30b5f01375c2896b92ff570c2235c3e4594894fce6bb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh43jUfm01yEil-QUEPeg6b7KSbst2tybbivzelvXsaZnjfd2YehG4pKSmh9f26BDf2MKxKRqgsCS0JV2doRpVkRa01O0czopkolJDVJbpKaU0IkUzoGfp4DhGwha7Zh3EX8TjgHBQGgAgt7puh9WPcJJymxoY-pDz8CVOHu7DqsA3jpkkJ25330ONVzM01uvBNn-DmVOfo6_npc_FaLN9f3haPy8JxqaaCMue4sNpWrlGMCld7TqzwhHIpHFO6tpp5LyRxjHHhOFRCV0pX3kFtbc3n6O6Yu43j9w7SZNb5_iGvNFRzKhlXimSVOKpcHFOK4M02hk0Tfw0l5gDPrM0JnjnAM4SaDC_7Ho4-yC_sA0STXIDBQZtxucm0Y_gn4Q_k3HrW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1931723880</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fire behaviour on engineered landforms stabilised with high biomass buffel grass</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>McKenna, Phill ; Glenn, Vanessa ; Erskine, Peter D. ; Doley, David ; Sturgess, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>McKenna, Phill ; Glenn, Vanessa ; Erskine, Peter D. ; Doley, David ; Sturgess, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>•Rehabilitation method has a significant impact on fire behaviour in semi-arid Australia.•Grass dominates replaced topsoil; trees and shrubs dominate unamended mine spoil.•Total fuel loads on topsoil are 43% greater than those on spoil.•Fireline intensities in grassland on topsoil are double those for woodland on spoil. Rehabilitated lands created by open-cut coal mines are generally protected by land managers from fire and grazing disturbances. This practice is employed to reduce negative impacts, such as erosion, on the developing ecosystems. However, fire exclusion over long periods inadvertently contributes to increased fire risk on rehabilitated landforms, particularly when high biomass, mono-dominant grasses form a major component of these new ecosystems. In May 2015, an experimental fire burnt 117ha of rehabilitation at a coal mine site in the Bowen Basin, Australia. Standing grass fuel loads, dominated by buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.), were up to 9.3t/ha in grassland areas and 5.3t/ha in areas of open woodland. Average litter fuel loads were 2.4 and 3.6t/ha for grassland and open woodland, respectively. Calculated fire intensity was higher in grassland (4612±502kWm−1) than open woodland areas (1977±804kWm−1) indicating that rehabilitated landforms dominated by buffel grass may represent a higher fire risk to mine sites and regional areas in the Bowen Basin when compared to the original vegetation. Fire behaviour reflected the varying underlying terrain, fuel loads and surface soil or overburden conditions. Further research is recommended to investigate fire behaviour in buffel grasslands across a range of fuel load and curing conditions, with the aim to develop an invasive grass fire spread model that can be used inform both landscape reconstruction prescriptions for ecological engineers and more broadly in managing the fire risk across landscapes dominated by these vegetation types.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-8574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.01.038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Australia ; Biomass ; Central Queensland ; Coal mines ; Coal mining ; Curing ; Ecosystems ; Erosion ; Fire exclusion ; Fires ; Flammability ; Fuels ; Grasses ; Grasslands ; Grazing ; Land management ; Land reclamation ; Landforms ; Landscape ; Loads (forces) ; Overburden ; Pasture ; Pastures ; Reclamation ; Rehabilitation ; Risk management ; Soil ; Soil conditions ; Soil investigations ; Soil surfaces ; Terrain ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Ecological engineering, 2017-04, Vol.101, p.237-246</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Apr 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-12cc35b9b4ca8215c6f30b5f01375c2896b92ff570c2235c3e4594894fce6bb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-12cc35b9b4ca8215c6f30b5f01375c2896b92ff570c2235c3e4594894fce6bb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKenna, Phill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenn, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erskine, Peter D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doley, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturgess, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Fire behaviour on engineered landforms stabilised with high biomass buffel grass</title><title>Ecological engineering</title><description>•Rehabilitation method has a significant impact on fire behaviour in semi-arid Australia.•Grass dominates replaced topsoil; trees and shrubs dominate unamended mine spoil.•Total fuel loads on topsoil are 43% greater than those on spoil.•Fireline intensities in grassland on topsoil are double those for woodland on spoil. Rehabilitated lands created by open-cut coal mines are generally protected by land managers from fire and grazing disturbances. This practice is employed to reduce negative impacts, such as erosion, on the developing ecosystems. However, fire exclusion over long periods inadvertently contributes to increased fire risk on rehabilitated landforms, particularly when high biomass, mono-dominant grasses form a major component of these new ecosystems. In May 2015, an experimental fire burnt 117ha of rehabilitation at a coal mine site in the Bowen Basin, Australia. Standing grass fuel loads, dominated by buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.), were up to 9.3t/ha in grassland areas and 5.3t/ha in areas of open woodland. Average litter fuel loads were 2.4 and 3.6t/ha for grassland and open woodland, respectively. Calculated fire intensity was higher in grassland (4612±502kWm−1) than open woodland areas (1977±804kWm−1) indicating that rehabilitated landforms dominated by buffel grass may represent a higher fire risk to mine sites and regional areas in the Bowen Basin when compared to the original vegetation. Fire behaviour reflected the varying underlying terrain, fuel loads and surface soil or overburden conditions. Further research is recommended to investigate fire behaviour in buffel grasslands across a range of fuel load and curing conditions, with the aim to develop an invasive grass fire spread model that can be used inform both landscape reconstruction prescriptions for ecological engineers and more broadly in managing the fire risk across landscapes dominated by these vegetation types.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Central Queensland</subject><subject>Coal mines</subject><subject>Coal mining</subject><subject>Curing</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Erosion</subject><subject>Fire exclusion</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Flammability</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Land reclamation</subject><subject>Landforms</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Loads (forces)</subject><subject>Overburden</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Pastures</subject><subject>Reclamation</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil conditions</subject><subject>Soil investigations</subject><subject>Soil surfaces</subject><subject>Terrain</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0925-8574</issn><issn>1872-6992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh43jUfm01yEil-QUEPeg6b7KSbst2tybbivzelvXsaZnjfd2YehG4pKSmh9f26BDf2MKxKRqgsCS0JV2doRpVkRa01O0czopkolJDVJbpKaU0IkUzoGfp4DhGwha7Zh3EX8TjgHBQGgAgt7puh9WPcJJymxoY-pDz8CVOHu7DqsA3jpkkJ25330ONVzM01uvBNn-DmVOfo6_npc_FaLN9f3haPy8JxqaaCMue4sNpWrlGMCld7TqzwhHIpHFO6tpp5LyRxjHHhOFRCV0pX3kFtbc3n6O6Yu43j9w7SZNb5_iGvNFRzKhlXimSVOKpcHFOK4M02hk0Tfw0l5gDPrM0JnjnAM4SaDC_7Ho4-yC_sA0STXIDBQZtxucm0Y_gn4Q_k3HrW</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>McKenna, Phill</creator><creator>Glenn, Vanessa</creator><creator>Erskine, Peter D.</creator><creator>Doley, David</creator><creator>Sturgess, Andrew</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Fire behaviour on engineered landforms stabilised with high biomass buffel grass</title><author>McKenna, Phill ; Glenn, Vanessa ; Erskine, Peter D. ; Doley, David ; Sturgess, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-12cc35b9b4ca8215c6f30b5f01375c2896b92ff570c2235c3e4594894fce6bb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Central Queensland</topic><topic>Coal mines</topic><topic>Coal mining</topic><topic>Curing</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Erosion</topic><topic>Fire exclusion</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Flammability</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Land reclamation</topic><topic>Landforms</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Loads (forces)</topic><topic>Overburden</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Pastures</topic><topic>Reclamation</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil conditions</topic><topic>Soil investigations</topic><topic>Soil surfaces</topic><topic>Terrain</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKenna, Phill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenn, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erskine, Peter D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doley, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturgess, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKenna, Phill</au><au>Glenn, Vanessa</au><au>Erskine, Peter D.</au><au>Doley, David</au><au>Sturgess, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fire behaviour on engineered landforms stabilised with high biomass buffel grass</atitle><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>101</volume><spage>237</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>237-246</pages><issn>0925-8574</issn><eissn>1872-6992</eissn><abstract>•Rehabilitation method has a significant impact on fire behaviour in semi-arid Australia.•Grass dominates replaced topsoil; trees and shrubs dominate unamended mine spoil.•Total fuel loads on topsoil are 43% greater than those on spoil.•Fireline intensities in grassland on topsoil are double those for woodland on spoil. Rehabilitated lands created by open-cut coal mines are generally protected by land managers from fire and grazing disturbances. This practice is employed to reduce negative impacts, such as erosion, on the developing ecosystems. However, fire exclusion over long periods inadvertently contributes to increased fire risk on rehabilitated landforms, particularly when high biomass, mono-dominant grasses form a major component of these new ecosystems. In May 2015, an experimental fire burnt 117ha of rehabilitation at a coal mine site in the Bowen Basin, Australia. Standing grass fuel loads, dominated by buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.), were up to 9.3t/ha in grassland areas and 5.3t/ha in areas of open woodland. Average litter fuel loads were 2.4 and 3.6t/ha for grassland and open woodland, respectively. Calculated fire intensity was higher in grassland (4612±502kWm−1) than open woodland areas (1977±804kWm−1) indicating that rehabilitated landforms dominated by buffel grass may represent a higher fire risk to mine sites and regional areas in the Bowen Basin when compared to the original vegetation. Fire behaviour reflected the varying underlying terrain, fuel loads and surface soil or overburden conditions. Further research is recommended to investigate fire behaviour in buffel grasslands across a range of fuel load and curing conditions, with the aim to develop an invasive grass fire spread model that can be used inform both landscape reconstruction prescriptions for ecological engineers and more broadly in managing the fire risk across landscapes dominated by these vegetation types.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.01.038</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-8574
ispartof Ecological engineering, 2017-04, Vol.101, p.237-246
issn 0925-8574
1872-6992
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1931723880
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Australia
Biomass
Central Queensland
Coal mines
Coal mining
Curing
Ecosystems
Erosion
Fire exclusion
Fires
Flammability
Fuels
Grasses
Grasslands
Grazing
Land management
Land reclamation
Landforms
Landscape
Loads (forces)
Overburden
Pasture
Pastures
Reclamation
Rehabilitation
Risk management
Soil
Soil conditions
Soil investigations
Soil surfaces
Terrain
Vegetation
title Fire behaviour on engineered landforms stabilised with high biomass buffel grass
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A32%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fire%20behaviour%20on%20engineered%20landforms%20stabilised%20with%20high%20biomass%20buffel%20grass&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20engineering&rft.au=McKenna,%20Phill&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=101&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=237-246&rft.issn=0925-8574&rft.eissn=1872-6992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.01.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1931723880%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-12cc35b9b4ca8215c6f30b5f01375c2896b92ff570c2235c3e4594894fce6bb63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1931723880&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true