Loading…
Fire behaviour on engineered landforms stabilised with high biomass buffel grass
•Rehabilitation method has a significant impact on fire behaviour in semi-arid Australia.•Grass dominates replaced topsoil; trees and shrubs dominate unamended mine spoil.•Total fuel loads on topsoil are 43% greater than those on spoil.•Fireline intensities in grassland on topsoil are double those f...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecological engineering 2017-04, Vol.101, p.237-246 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-12cc35b9b4ca8215c6f30b5f01375c2896b92ff570c2235c3e4594894fce6bb63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-12cc35b9b4ca8215c6f30b5f01375c2896b92ff570c2235c3e4594894fce6bb63 |
container_end_page | 246 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 237 |
container_title | Ecological engineering |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | McKenna, Phill Glenn, Vanessa Erskine, Peter D. Doley, David Sturgess, Andrew |
description | •Rehabilitation method has a significant impact on fire behaviour in semi-arid Australia.•Grass dominates replaced topsoil; trees and shrubs dominate unamended mine spoil.•Total fuel loads on topsoil are 43% greater than those on spoil.•Fireline intensities in grassland on topsoil are double those for woodland on spoil.
Rehabilitated lands created by open-cut coal mines are generally protected by land managers from fire and grazing disturbances. This practice is employed to reduce negative impacts, such as erosion, on the developing ecosystems. However, fire exclusion over long periods inadvertently contributes to increased fire risk on rehabilitated landforms, particularly when high biomass, mono-dominant grasses form a major component of these new ecosystems. In May 2015, an experimental fire burnt 117ha of rehabilitation at a coal mine site in the Bowen Basin, Australia. Standing grass fuel loads, dominated by buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.), were up to 9.3t/ha in grassland areas and 5.3t/ha in areas of open woodland. Average litter fuel loads were 2.4 and 3.6t/ha for grassland and open woodland, respectively. Calculated fire intensity was higher in grassland (4612±502kWm−1) than open woodland areas (1977±804kWm−1) indicating that rehabilitated landforms dominated by buffel grass may represent a higher fire risk to mine sites and regional areas in the Bowen Basin when compared to the original vegetation. Fire behaviour reflected the varying underlying terrain, fuel loads and surface soil or overburden conditions. Further research is recommended to investigate fire behaviour in buffel grasslands across a range of fuel load and curing conditions, with the aim to develop an invasive grass fire spread model that can be used inform both landscape reconstruction prescriptions for ecological engineers and more broadly in managing the fire risk across landscapes dominated by these vegetation types. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.01.038 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1931723880</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925857417300472</els_id><sourcerecordid>1931723880</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-12cc35b9b4ca8215c6f30b5f01375c2896b92ff570c2235c3e4594894fce6bb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh43jUfm01yEil-QUEPeg6b7KSbst2tybbivzelvXsaZnjfd2YehG4pKSmh9f26BDf2MKxKRqgsCS0JV2doRpVkRa01O0czopkolJDVJbpKaU0IkUzoGfp4DhGwha7Zh3EX8TjgHBQGgAgt7puh9WPcJJymxoY-pDz8CVOHu7DqsA3jpkkJ25330ONVzM01uvBNn-DmVOfo6_npc_FaLN9f3haPy8JxqaaCMue4sNpWrlGMCld7TqzwhHIpHFO6tpp5LyRxjHHhOFRCV0pX3kFtbc3n6O6Yu43j9w7SZNb5_iGvNFRzKhlXimSVOKpcHFOK4M02hk0Tfw0l5gDPrM0JnjnAM4SaDC_7Ho4-yC_sA0STXIDBQZtxucm0Y_gn4Q_k3HrW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1931723880</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fire behaviour on engineered landforms stabilised with high biomass buffel grass</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>McKenna, Phill ; Glenn, Vanessa ; Erskine, Peter D. ; Doley, David ; Sturgess, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>McKenna, Phill ; Glenn, Vanessa ; Erskine, Peter D. ; Doley, David ; Sturgess, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>•Rehabilitation method has a significant impact on fire behaviour in semi-arid Australia.•Grass dominates replaced topsoil; trees and shrubs dominate unamended mine spoil.•Total fuel loads on topsoil are 43% greater than those on spoil.•Fireline intensities in grassland on topsoil are double those for woodland on spoil.
Rehabilitated lands created by open-cut coal mines are generally protected by land managers from fire and grazing disturbances. This practice is employed to reduce negative impacts, such as erosion, on the developing ecosystems. However, fire exclusion over long periods inadvertently contributes to increased fire risk on rehabilitated landforms, particularly when high biomass, mono-dominant grasses form a major component of these new ecosystems. In May 2015, an experimental fire burnt 117ha of rehabilitation at a coal mine site in the Bowen Basin, Australia. Standing grass fuel loads, dominated by buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.), were up to 9.3t/ha in grassland areas and 5.3t/ha in areas of open woodland. Average litter fuel loads were 2.4 and 3.6t/ha for grassland and open woodland, respectively. Calculated fire intensity was higher in grassland (4612±502kWm−1) than open woodland areas (1977±804kWm−1) indicating that rehabilitated landforms dominated by buffel grass may represent a higher fire risk to mine sites and regional areas in the Bowen Basin when compared to the original vegetation. Fire behaviour reflected the varying underlying terrain, fuel loads and surface soil or overburden conditions. Further research is recommended to investigate fire behaviour in buffel grasslands across a range of fuel load and curing conditions, with the aim to develop an invasive grass fire spread model that can be used inform both landscape reconstruction prescriptions for ecological engineers and more broadly in managing the fire risk across landscapes dominated by these vegetation types.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-8574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.01.038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Australia ; Biomass ; Central Queensland ; Coal mines ; Coal mining ; Curing ; Ecosystems ; Erosion ; Fire exclusion ; Fires ; Flammability ; Fuels ; Grasses ; Grasslands ; Grazing ; Land management ; Land reclamation ; Landforms ; Landscape ; Loads (forces) ; Overburden ; Pasture ; Pastures ; Reclamation ; Rehabilitation ; Risk management ; Soil ; Soil conditions ; Soil investigations ; Soil surfaces ; Terrain ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Ecological engineering, 2017-04, Vol.101, p.237-246</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Apr 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-12cc35b9b4ca8215c6f30b5f01375c2896b92ff570c2235c3e4594894fce6bb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-12cc35b9b4ca8215c6f30b5f01375c2896b92ff570c2235c3e4594894fce6bb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKenna, Phill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenn, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erskine, Peter D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doley, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturgess, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Fire behaviour on engineered landforms stabilised with high biomass buffel grass</title><title>Ecological engineering</title><description>•Rehabilitation method has a significant impact on fire behaviour in semi-arid Australia.•Grass dominates replaced topsoil; trees and shrubs dominate unamended mine spoil.•Total fuel loads on topsoil are 43% greater than those on spoil.•Fireline intensities in grassland on topsoil are double those for woodland on spoil.
Rehabilitated lands created by open-cut coal mines are generally protected by land managers from fire and grazing disturbances. This practice is employed to reduce negative impacts, such as erosion, on the developing ecosystems. However, fire exclusion over long periods inadvertently contributes to increased fire risk on rehabilitated landforms, particularly when high biomass, mono-dominant grasses form a major component of these new ecosystems. In May 2015, an experimental fire burnt 117ha of rehabilitation at a coal mine site in the Bowen Basin, Australia. Standing grass fuel loads, dominated by buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.), were up to 9.3t/ha in grassland areas and 5.3t/ha in areas of open woodland. Average litter fuel loads were 2.4 and 3.6t/ha for grassland and open woodland, respectively. Calculated fire intensity was higher in grassland (4612±502kWm−1) than open woodland areas (1977±804kWm−1) indicating that rehabilitated landforms dominated by buffel grass may represent a higher fire risk to mine sites and regional areas in the Bowen Basin when compared to the original vegetation. Fire behaviour reflected the varying underlying terrain, fuel loads and surface soil or overburden conditions. Further research is recommended to investigate fire behaviour in buffel grasslands across a range of fuel load and curing conditions, with the aim to develop an invasive grass fire spread model that can be used inform both landscape reconstruction prescriptions for ecological engineers and more broadly in managing the fire risk across landscapes dominated by these vegetation types.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Central Queensland</subject><subject>Coal mines</subject><subject>Coal mining</subject><subject>Curing</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Erosion</subject><subject>Fire exclusion</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Flammability</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Land reclamation</subject><subject>Landforms</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Loads (forces)</subject><subject>Overburden</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Pastures</subject><subject>Reclamation</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil conditions</subject><subject>Soil investigations</subject><subject>Soil surfaces</subject><subject>Terrain</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0925-8574</issn><issn>1872-6992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh43jUfm01yEil-QUEPeg6b7KSbst2tybbivzelvXsaZnjfd2YehG4pKSmh9f26BDf2MKxKRqgsCS0JV2doRpVkRa01O0czopkolJDVJbpKaU0IkUzoGfp4DhGwha7Zh3EX8TjgHBQGgAgt7puh9WPcJJymxoY-pDz8CVOHu7DqsA3jpkkJ25330ONVzM01uvBNn-DmVOfo6_npc_FaLN9f3haPy8JxqaaCMue4sNpWrlGMCld7TqzwhHIpHFO6tpp5LyRxjHHhOFRCV0pX3kFtbc3n6O6Yu43j9w7SZNb5_iGvNFRzKhlXimSVOKpcHFOK4M02hk0Tfw0l5gDPrM0JnjnAM4SaDC_7Ho4-yC_sA0STXIDBQZtxucm0Y_gn4Q_k3HrW</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>McKenna, Phill</creator><creator>Glenn, Vanessa</creator><creator>Erskine, Peter D.</creator><creator>Doley, David</creator><creator>Sturgess, Andrew</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Fire behaviour on engineered landforms stabilised with high biomass buffel grass</title><author>McKenna, Phill ; Glenn, Vanessa ; Erskine, Peter D. ; Doley, David ; Sturgess, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-12cc35b9b4ca8215c6f30b5f01375c2896b92ff570c2235c3e4594894fce6bb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Central Queensland</topic><topic>Coal mines</topic><topic>Coal mining</topic><topic>Curing</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Erosion</topic><topic>Fire exclusion</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Flammability</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Land reclamation</topic><topic>Landforms</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Loads (forces)</topic><topic>Overburden</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Pastures</topic><topic>Reclamation</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil conditions</topic><topic>Soil investigations</topic><topic>Soil surfaces</topic><topic>Terrain</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKenna, Phill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glenn, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erskine, Peter D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doley, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturgess, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKenna, Phill</au><au>Glenn, Vanessa</au><au>Erskine, Peter D.</au><au>Doley, David</au><au>Sturgess, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fire behaviour on engineered landforms stabilised with high biomass buffel grass</atitle><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>101</volume><spage>237</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>237-246</pages><issn>0925-8574</issn><eissn>1872-6992</eissn><abstract>•Rehabilitation method has a significant impact on fire behaviour in semi-arid Australia.•Grass dominates replaced topsoil; trees and shrubs dominate unamended mine spoil.•Total fuel loads on topsoil are 43% greater than those on spoil.•Fireline intensities in grassland on topsoil are double those for woodland on spoil.
Rehabilitated lands created by open-cut coal mines are generally protected by land managers from fire and grazing disturbances. This practice is employed to reduce negative impacts, such as erosion, on the developing ecosystems. However, fire exclusion over long periods inadvertently contributes to increased fire risk on rehabilitated landforms, particularly when high biomass, mono-dominant grasses form a major component of these new ecosystems. In May 2015, an experimental fire burnt 117ha of rehabilitation at a coal mine site in the Bowen Basin, Australia. Standing grass fuel loads, dominated by buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.), were up to 9.3t/ha in grassland areas and 5.3t/ha in areas of open woodland. Average litter fuel loads were 2.4 and 3.6t/ha for grassland and open woodland, respectively. Calculated fire intensity was higher in grassland (4612±502kWm−1) than open woodland areas (1977±804kWm−1) indicating that rehabilitated landforms dominated by buffel grass may represent a higher fire risk to mine sites and regional areas in the Bowen Basin when compared to the original vegetation. Fire behaviour reflected the varying underlying terrain, fuel loads and surface soil or overburden conditions. Further research is recommended to investigate fire behaviour in buffel grasslands across a range of fuel load and curing conditions, with the aim to develop an invasive grass fire spread model that can be used inform both landscape reconstruction prescriptions for ecological engineers and more broadly in managing the fire risk across landscapes dominated by these vegetation types.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.01.038</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0925-8574 |
ispartof | Ecological engineering, 2017-04, Vol.101, p.237-246 |
issn | 0925-8574 1872-6992 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1931723880 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Australia Biomass Central Queensland Coal mines Coal mining Curing Ecosystems Erosion Fire exclusion Fires Flammability Fuels Grasses Grasslands Grazing Land management Land reclamation Landforms Landscape Loads (forces) Overburden Pasture Pastures Reclamation Rehabilitation Risk management Soil Soil conditions Soil investigations Soil surfaces Terrain Vegetation |
title | Fire behaviour on engineered landforms stabilised with high biomass buffel grass |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A32%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fire%20behaviour%20on%20engineered%20landforms%20stabilised%20with%20high%20biomass%20buffel%20grass&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20engineering&rft.au=McKenna,%20Phill&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=101&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=237-246&rft.issn=0925-8574&rft.eissn=1872-6992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.01.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1931723880%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-12cc35b9b4ca8215c6f30b5f01375c2896b92ff570c2235c3e4594894fce6bb63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1931723880&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |