Loading…

Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment

The use of leaderboards is a common approach to the gamification of employee performance, but little is known about the specific mechanisms and mediating processes by which leaderboards actually affect employee behavior. Given the lack of research in this domain, this study proposes goal-setting the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computers in human behavior 2017-06, Vol.71, p.508-515
Main Authors: Landers, Richard N., Bauer, Kristina N., Callan, Rachel C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-16d4d01365c73d073658896337932471ea6e0cf1a3e8848fc90034a16056d84b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-16d4d01365c73d073658896337932471ea6e0cf1a3e8848fc90034a16056d84b3
container_end_page 515
container_issue
container_start_page 508
container_title Computers in human behavior
container_volume 71
creator Landers, Richard N.
Bauer, Kristina N.
Callan, Rachel C.
description The use of leaderboards is a common approach to the gamification of employee performance, but little is known about the specific mechanisms and mediating processes by which leaderboards actually affect employee behavior. Given the lack of research in this domain, this study proposes goal-setting theory, one of the most well-established motivational theories in psychology, as a framework by which to understand these effects. In this study, a classic brainstorming task is gamified with a leaderboard in order to explore this. Participants were randomly assigned to four classic levels of goal-setting (do-your-best, easy, difficult and impossible goals) plus a leaderboard populated with initials and scores representing identical goal-setting conditions. The presence of a leaderboard was successful in motivating participants to performance levels similar to that of difficult and impossible goal-setting, suggesting participants implicitly set goals at or near the top of the leaderboard without any prompting to do so. Goal commitment, a common individual difference moderator in goal-setting theory, was also assessed and behaved similarly in the presence of the leaderboard as when traditional goals were provided. From these results, we conclude that goal-setting theory is valuable to understand the success of leaderboards, and we recommend further exploration of existing psychological theories, including goal-setting, to better explain the effects of gamification. •Goal-setting theory was offered as an explanatory framework for leaderboards.•An experiment found addition of a leaderboard on a task increased performance.•Leaderboards performed similarly to traditional difficult and impossible goals.•Individual goal commitment moderated the success of leaderboards as with goals.•Goal-setting and other psychological theories should be explored in gamification.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1932132809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0747563215300868</els_id><sourcerecordid>1932132809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-16d4d01365c73d073658896337932471ea6e0cf1a3e8848fc90034a16056d84b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscU5Yx4ntwKmqoCCBuMDZcp1N69LGxXb5eXtclTOnncPM7Ogj5JJByYCJ61Vpl_OyAtaUoEoAdURGTEleSNFWx2QEspZFI3h1Ss5iXAFA04AYkeeZ2bjeWZOcH6jvaTLxnW4x9D5szGCRfrm0pGs0HYa5N6GLN3RCF96sacSU3LCg-J39boNDOicnvVlHvPi7Y_J2f_c6fSieXmaP08lTYXnVpIKJru6AcdFYyTuQWSjVCs5ly6taMjQCwfbMcFSqVr1tAXhtmIBGdKqe8zG5OvRug__YYUx65XdhyC81yxWMVwra7GIHlw0-xoC93uaZJvxoBnpPTa90pqb31DQonanlzO0hg3n-p8Ogo3WYOXQuoE268-6f9C-Lq3NG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1932132809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Landers, Richard N. ; Bauer, Kristina N. ; Callan, Rachel C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Landers, Richard N. ; Bauer, Kristina N. ; Callan, Rachel C.</creatorcontrib><description>The use of leaderboards is a common approach to the gamification of employee performance, but little is known about the specific mechanisms and mediating processes by which leaderboards actually affect employee behavior. Given the lack of research in this domain, this study proposes goal-setting theory, one of the most well-established motivational theories in psychology, as a framework by which to understand these effects. In this study, a classic brainstorming task is gamified with a leaderboard in order to explore this. Participants were randomly assigned to four classic levels of goal-setting (do-your-best, easy, difficult and impossible goals) plus a leaderboard populated with initials and scores representing identical goal-setting conditions. The presence of a leaderboard was successful in motivating participants to performance levels similar to that of difficult and impossible goal-setting, suggesting participants implicitly set goals at or near the top of the leaderboard without any prompting to do so. Goal commitment, a common individual difference moderator in goal-setting theory, was also assessed and behaved similarly in the presence of the leaderboard as when traditional goals were provided. From these results, we conclude that goal-setting theory is valuable to understand the success of leaderboards, and we recommend further exploration of existing psychological theories, including goal-setting, to better explain the effects of gamification. •Goal-setting theory was offered as an explanatory framework for leaderboards.•An experiment found addition of a leaderboard on a task increased performance.•Leaderboards performed similarly to traditional difficult and impossible goals.•Individual goal commitment moderated the success of leaderboards as with goals.•Goal-setting and other psychological theories should be explored in gamification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0747-5632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elmsford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Brainstorming ; Employees ; Experiment ; Gamification ; Goal setting ; Goal-setting theory ; Goals ; Group dynamics ; Leaderboard ; Leadership ; Performance measurement ; Psychology ; Quantitative ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Computers in human behavior, 2017-06, Vol.71, p.508-515</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-16d4d01365c73d073658896337932471ea6e0cf1a3e8848fc90034a16056d84b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-16d4d01365c73d073658896337932471ea6e0cf1a3e8848fc90034a16056d84b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5611-2923</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Landers, Richard N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Kristina N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callan, Rachel C.</creatorcontrib><title>Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment</title><title>Computers in human behavior</title><description>The use of leaderboards is a common approach to the gamification of employee performance, but little is known about the specific mechanisms and mediating processes by which leaderboards actually affect employee behavior. Given the lack of research in this domain, this study proposes goal-setting theory, one of the most well-established motivational theories in psychology, as a framework by which to understand these effects. In this study, a classic brainstorming task is gamified with a leaderboard in order to explore this. Participants were randomly assigned to four classic levels of goal-setting (do-your-best, easy, difficult and impossible goals) plus a leaderboard populated with initials and scores representing identical goal-setting conditions. The presence of a leaderboard was successful in motivating participants to performance levels similar to that of difficult and impossible goal-setting, suggesting participants implicitly set goals at or near the top of the leaderboard without any prompting to do so. Goal commitment, a common individual difference moderator in goal-setting theory, was also assessed and behaved similarly in the presence of the leaderboard as when traditional goals were provided. From these results, we conclude that goal-setting theory is valuable to understand the success of leaderboards, and we recommend further exploration of existing psychological theories, including goal-setting, to better explain the effects of gamification. •Goal-setting theory was offered as an explanatory framework for leaderboards.•An experiment found addition of a leaderboard on a task increased performance.•Leaderboards performed similarly to traditional difficult and impossible goals.•Individual goal commitment moderated the success of leaderboards as with goals.•Goal-setting and other psychological theories should be explored in gamification.</description><subject>Brainstorming</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Experiment</subject><subject>Gamification</subject><subject>Goal setting</subject><subject>Goal-setting theory</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Group dynamics</subject><subject>Leaderboard</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Performance measurement</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Quantitative</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0747-5632</issn><issn>1873-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscU5Yx4ntwKmqoCCBuMDZcp1N69LGxXb5eXtclTOnncPM7Ogj5JJByYCJ61Vpl_OyAtaUoEoAdURGTEleSNFWx2QEspZFI3h1Ss5iXAFA04AYkeeZ2bjeWZOcH6jvaTLxnW4x9D5szGCRfrm0pGs0HYa5N6GLN3RCF96sacSU3LCg-J39boNDOicnvVlHvPi7Y_J2f_c6fSieXmaP08lTYXnVpIKJru6AcdFYyTuQWSjVCs5ly6taMjQCwfbMcFSqVr1tAXhtmIBGdKqe8zG5OvRug__YYUx65XdhyC81yxWMVwra7GIHlw0-xoC93uaZJvxoBnpPTa90pqb31DQonanlzO0hg3n-p8Ogo3WYOXQuoE268-6f9C-Lq3NG</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Landers, Richard N.</creator><creator>Bauer, Kristina N.</creator><creator>Callan, Rachel C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5611-2923</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment</title><author>Landers, Richard N. ; Bauer, Kristina N. ; Callan, Rachel C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-16d4d01365c73d073658896337932471ea6e0cf1a3e8848fc90034a16056d84b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Brainstorming</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Experiment</topic><topic>Gamification</topic><topic>Goal setting</topic><topic>Goal-setting theory</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Group dynamics</topic><topic>Leaderboard</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Performance measurement</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Quantitative</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Landers, Richard N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Kristina N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callan, Rachel C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computers in human behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Landers, Richard N.</au><au>Bauer, Kristina N.</au><au>Callan, Rachel C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment</atitle><jtitle>Computers in human behavior</jtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>71</volume><spage>508</spage><epage>515</epage><pages>508-515</pages><issn>0747-5632</issn><eissn>1873-7692</eissn><abstract>The use of leaderboards is a common approach to the gamification of employee performance, but little is known about the specific mechanisms and mediating processes by which leaderboards actually affect employee behavior. Given the lack of research in this domain, this study proposes goal-setting theory, one of the most well-established motivational theories in psychology, as a framework by which to understand these effects. In this study, a classic brainstorming task is gamified with a leaderboard in order to explore this. Participants were randomly assigned to four classic levels of goal-setting (do-your-best, easy, difficult and impossible goals) plus a leaderboard populated with initials and scores representing identical goal-setting conditions. The presence of a leaderboard was successful in motivating participants to performance levels similar to that of difficult and impossible goal-setting, suggesting participants implicitly set goals at or near the top of the leaderboard without any prompting to do so. Goal commitment, a common individual difference moderator in goal-setting theory, was also assessed and behaved similarly in the presence of the leaderboard as when traditional goals were provided. From these results, we conclude that goal-setting theory is valuable to understand the success of leaderboards, and we recommend further exploration of existing psychological theories, including goal-setting, to better explain the effects of gamification. •Goal-setting theory was offered as an explanatory framework for leaderboards.•An experiment found addition of a leaderboard on a task increased performance.•Leaderboards performed similarly to traditional difficult and impossible goals.•Individual goal commitment moderated the success of leaderboards as with goals.•Goal-setting and other psychological theories should be explored in gamification.</abstract><cop>Elmsford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.008</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5611-2923</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0747-5632
ispartof Computers in human behavior, 2017-06, Vol.71, p.508-515
issn 0747-5632
1873-7692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1932132809
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Brainstorming
Employees
Experiment
Gamification
Goal setting
Goal-setting theory
Goals
Group dynamics
Leaderboard
Leadership
Performance measurement
Psychology
Quantitative
Studies
title Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A00%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gamification%20of%20task%20performance%20with%20leaderboards:%20A%20goal%20setting%20experiment&rft.jtitle=Computers%20in%20human%20behavior&rft.au=Landers,%20Richard%20N.&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=71&rft.spage=508&rft.epage=515&rft.pages=508-515&rft.issn=0747-5632&rft.eissn=1873-7692&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1932132809%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-16d4d01365c73d073658896337932471ea6e0cf1a3e8848fc90034a16056d84b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1932132809&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true