Loading…
International comparison of total-factor energy productivity growth: A parametric Malmquist index approach
This paper constructs a Malmquist energy productivity index based on the Shephard energy distance function to measure total-factor energy productivity change. In order to account for individual heterogeneities as well as statistical noises, we use a newly developed fixed-effects SFA model for estima...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energy (Oxford) 2017-01, Vol.118, p.481-488 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4dc5b80e49eed17bd127fe6c33b3f8a1044e2cfb7bb8112f4c9fea40115b0aab3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4dc5b80e49eed17bd127fe6c33b3f8a1044e2cfb7bb8112f4c9fea40115b0aab3 |
container_end_page | 488 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 481 |
container_title | Energy (Oxford) |
container_volume | 118 |
creator | Du, Kerui Lin, Boqiang |
description | This paper constructs a Malmquist energy productivity index based on the Shephard energy distance function to measure total-factor energy productivity change. In order to account for individual heterogeneities as well as statistical noises, we use a newly developed fixed-effects SFA model for estimation. Then it is applied to compare energy productivity growth across the world's 123 economies. The main findings are as follows. First, on average the world witnessed a 34.6% growth of energy productivity between 1990 and 2010 which was mainly driven by technological progress. Second, the developed countries achieved higher growth in energy productivity than the developing countries. Third, the developed countries took lead in technological progress while the developing countries performed better in efficiency improvement. Fourth, there are no evidences supporting σ-convergence among countries' energy productivity growth.
•The energy productivity averagely increased by 34.6% from 1990 to 2010.•The energy productivity growth was mainly driven by technological progress.•There are no evidences for σ-convergence of energy productivity growth in the world. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.052 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1932184025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360544216314864</els_id><sourcerecordid>1932184025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4dc5b80e49eed17bd127fe6c33b3f8a1044e2cfb7bb8112f4c9fea40115b0aab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKxDAUDaLgOPoHLgKuW5M2fbkQhsEXjLjRdUjTm5mUtukk6ej8vRnq2tXlHs6DcxC6pSSmhOb3bQwD2O0xTsIXoJhkyRla0LJIo7wos3O0IGlOooyx5BJdOdcSQrKyqhaofRs82EF4bQbRYWn6UVjtzICNwt540UVKSG8sniPwaE0zSa8P2h_x1ppvv3vAKxxUogdvtcTvouv3k3Ye66GBHyzGoBFyd40ulOgc3PzdJfp6fvpcv0abj5e39WoTScZKH7FGZnVJgFUADS3qhiaFglymaZ2qUlDCGCRS1UVdl5QmislKgWCE0qwmQtTpEt3NviF2P4HzvDVTqNg5Tqs0oSUjSRZYbGZJa5yzoPhodS_skVPCT6vyls-V-WnVExpWDbLHWQahwUGD5U5qGCQ02oL0vDH6f4NfYBCFpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1932184025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>International comparison of total-factor energy productivity growth: A parametric Malmquist index approach</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Du, Kerui ; Lin, Boqiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Du, Kerui ; Lin, Boqiang</creatorcontrib><description>This paper constructs a Malmquist energy productivity index based on the Shephard energy distance function to measure total-factor energy productivity change. In order to account for individual heterogeneities as well as statistical noises, we use a newly developed fixed-effects SFA model for estimation. Then it is applied to compare energy productivity growth across the world's 123 economies. The main findings are as follows. First, on average the world witnessed a 34.6% growth of energy productivity between 1990 and 2010 which was mainly driven by technological progress. Second, the developed countries achieved higher growth in energy productivity than the developing countries. Third, the developed countries took lead in technological progress while the developing countries performed better in efficiency improvement. Fourth, there are no evidences supporting σ-convergence among countries' energy productivity growth.
•The energy productivity averagely increased by 34.6% from 1990 to 2010.•The energy productivity growth was mainly driven by technological progress.•There are no evidences for σ-convergence of energy productivity growth in the world.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.052</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Developed countries ; Developing countries ; Energy ; Energy consumption ; Energy conversion efficiency ; Energy efficiency ; Energy measurement ; Energy productivity ; Fixed-effects ; Indexes ; Industrial Revolution ; LDCs ; Productivity ; SFA</subject><ispartof>Energy (Oxford), 2017-01, Vol.118, p.481-488</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 1, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4dc5b80e49eed17bd127fe6c33b3f8a1044e2cfb7bb8112f4c9fea40115b0aab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4dc5b80e49eed17bd127fe6c33b3f8a1044e2cfb7bb8112f4c9fea40115b0aab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Du, Kerui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Boqiang</creatorcontrib><title>International comparison of total-factor energy productivity growth: A parametric Malmquist index approach</title><title>Energy (Oxford)</title><description>This paper constructs a Malmquist energy productivity index based on the Shephard energy distance function to measure total-factor energy productivity change. In order to account for individual heterogeneities as well as statistical noises, we use a newly developed fixed-effects SFA model for estimation. Then it is applied to compare energy productivity growth across the world's 123 economies. The main findings are as follows. First, on average the world witnessed a 34.6% growth of energy productivity between 1990 and 2010 which was mainly driven by technological progress. Second, the developed countries achieved higher growth in energy productivity than the developing countries. Third, the developed countries took lead in technological progress while the developing countries performed better in efficiency improvement. Fourth, there are no evidences supporting σ-convergence among countries' energy productivity growth.
•The energy productivity averagely increased by 34.6% from 1990 to 2010.•The energy productivity growth was mainly driven by technological progress.•There are no evidences for σ-convergence of energy productivity growth in the world.</description><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy conversion efficiency</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy measurement</subject><subject>Energy productivity</subject><subject>Fixed-effects</subject><subject>Indexes</subject><subject>Industrial Revolution</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>SFA</subject><issn>0360-5442</issn><issn>1873-6785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtKxDAUDaLgOPoHLgKuW5M2fbkQhsEXjLjRdUjTm5mUtukk6ej8vRnq2tXlHs6DcxC6pSSmhOb3bQwD2O0xTsIXoJhkyRla0LJIo7wos3O0IGlOooyx5BJdOdcSQrKyqhaofRs82EF4bQbRYWn6UVjtzICNwt540UVKSG8sniPwaE0zSa8P2h_x1ppvv3vAKxxUogdvtcTvouv3k3Ye66GBHyzGoBFyd40ulOgc3PzdJfp6fvpcv0abj5e39WoTScZKH7FGZnVJgFUADS3qhiaFglymaZ2qUlDCGCRS1UVdl5QmislKgWCE0qwmQtTpEt3NviF2P4HzvDVTqNg5Tqs0oSUjSRZYbGZJa5yzoPhodS_skVPCT6vyls-V-WnVExpWDbLHWQahwUGD5U5qGCQ02oL0vDH6f4NfYBCFpA</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Du, Kerui</creator><creator>Lin, Boqiang</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>International comparison of total-factor energy productivity growth: A parametric Malmquist index approach</title><author>Du, Kerui ; Lin, Boqiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4dc5b80e49eed17bd127fe6c33b3f8a1044e2cfb7bb8112f4c9fea40115b0aab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy conversion efficiency</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy measurement</topic><topic>Energy productivity</topic><topic>Fixed-effects</topic><topic>Indexes</topic><topic>Industrial Revolution</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>SFA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Du, Kerui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Boqiang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Du, Kerui</au><au>Lin, Boqiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>International comparison of total-factor energy productivity growth: A parametric Malmquist index approach</atitle><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>118</volume><spage>481</spage><epage>488</epage><pages>481-488</pages><issn>0360-5442</issn><eissn>1873-6785</eissn><abstract>This paper constructs a Malmquist energy productivity index based on the Shephard energy distance function to measure total-factor energy productivity change. In order to account for individual heterogeneities as well as statistical noises, we use a newly developed fixed-effects SFA model for estimation. Then it is applied to compare energy productivity growth across the world's 123 economies. The main findings are as follows. First, on average the world witnessed a 34.6% growth of energy productivity between 1990 and 2010 which was mainly driven by technological progress. Second, the developed countries achieved higher growth in energy productivity than the developing countries. Third, the developed countries took lead in technological progress while the developing countries performed better in efficiency improvement. Fourth, there are no evidences supporting σ-convergence among countries' energy productivity growth.
•The energy productivity averagely increased by 34.6% from 1990 to 2010.•The energy productivity growth was mainly driven by technological progress.•There are no evidences for σ-convergence of energy productivity growth in the world.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.052</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-5442 |
ispartof | Energy (Oxford), 2017-01, Vol.118, p.481-488 |
issn | 0360-5442 1873-6785 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1932184025 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Developed countries Developing countries Energy Energy consumption Energy conversion efficiency Energy efficiency Energy measurement Energy productivity Fixed-effects Indexes Industrial Revolution LDCs Productivity SFA |
title | International comparison of total-factor energy productivity growth: A parametric Malmquist index approach |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A47%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=International%20comparison%20of%20total-factor%20energy%20productivity%20growth:%20A%20parametric%20Malmquist%20index%20approach&rft.jtitle=Energy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Du,%20Kerui&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=118&rft.spage=481&rft.epage=488&rft.pages=481-488&rft.issn=0360-5442&rft.eissn=1873-6785&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1932184025%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4dc5b80e49eed17bd127fe6c33b3f8a1044e2cfb7bb8112f4c9fea40115b0aab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1932184025&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |