Loading…

International comparison of total-factor energy productivity growth: A parametric Malmquist index approach

This paper constructs a Malmquist energy productivity index based on the Shephard energy distance function to measure total-factor energy productivity change. In order to account for individual heterogeneities as well as statistical noises, we use a newly developed fixed-effects SFA model for estima...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy (Oxford) 2017-01, Vol.118, p.481-488
Main Authors: Du, Kerui, Lin, Boqiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4dc5b80e49eed17bd127fe6c33b3f8a1044e2cfb7bb8112f4c9fea40115b0aab3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4dc5b80e49eed17bd127fe6c33b3f8a1044e2cfb7bb8112f4c9fea40115b0aab3
container_end_page 488
container_issue
container_start_page 481
container_title Energy (Oxford)
container_volume 118
creator Du, Kerui
Lin, Boqiang
description This paper constructs a Malmquist energy productivity index based on the Shephard energy distance function to measure total-factor energy productivity change. In order to account for individual heterogeneities as well as statistical noises, we use a newly developed fixed-effects SFA model for estimation. Then it is applied to compare energy productivity growth across the world's 123 economies. The main findings are as follows. First, on average the world witnessed a 34.6% growth of energy productivity between 1990 and 2010 which was mainly driven by technological progress. Second, the developed countries achieved higher growth in energy productivity than the developing countries. Third, the developed countries took lead in technological progress while the developing countries performed better in efficiency improvement. Fourth, there are no evidences supporting σ-convergence among countries' energy productivity growth. •The energy productivity averagely increased by 34.6% from 1990 to 2010.•The energy productivity growth was mainly driven by technological progress.•There are no evidences for σ-convergence of energy productivity growth in the world.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.052
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1932184025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360544216314864</els_id><sourcerecordid>1932184025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4dc5b80e49eed17bd127fe6c33b3f8a1044e2cfb7bb8112f4c9fea40115b0aab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKxDAUDaLgOPoHLgKuW5M2fbkQhsEXjLjRdUjTm5mUtukk6ej8vRnq2tXlHs6DcxC6pSSmhOb3bQwD2O0xTsIXoJhkyRla0LJIo7wos3O0IGlOooyx5BJdOdcSQrKyqhaofRs82EF4bQbRYWn6UVjtzICNwt540UVKSG8sniPwaE0zSa8P2h_x1ppvv3vAKxxUogdvtcTvouv3k3Ye66GBHyzGoBFyd40ulOgc3PzdJfp6fvpcv0abj5e39WoTScZKH7FGZnVJgFUADS3qhiaFglymaZ2qUlDCGCRS1UVdl5QmislKgWCE0qwmQtTpEt3NviF2P4HzvDVTqNg5Tqs0oSUjSRZYbGZJa5yzoPhodS_skVPCT6vyls-V-WnVExpWDbLHWQahwUGD5U5qGCQ02oL0vDH6f4NfYBCFpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1932184025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>International comparison of total-factor energy productivity growth: A parametric Malmquist index approach</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Du, Kerui ; Lin, Boqiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Du, Kerui ; Lin, Boqiang</creatorcontrib><description>This paper constructs a Malmquist energy productivity index based on the Shephard energy distance function to measure total-factor energy productivity change. In order to account for individual heterogeneities as well as statistical noises, we use a newly developed fixed-effects SFA model for estimation. Then it is applied to compare energy productivity growth across the world's 123 economies. The main findings are as follows. First, on average the world witnessed a 34.6% growth of energy productivity between 1990 and 2010 which was mainly driven by technological progress. Second, the developed countries achieved higher growth in energy productivity than the developing countries. Third, the developed countries took lead in technological progress while the developing countries performed better in efficiency improvement. Fourth, there are no evidences supporting σ-convergence among countries' energy productivity growth. •The energy productivity averagely increased by 34.6% from 1990 to 2010.•The energy productivity growth was mainly driven by technological progress.•There are no evidences for σ-convergence of energy productivity growth in the world.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.052</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Developed countries ; Developing countries ; Energy ; Energy consumption ; Energy conversion efficiency ; Energy efficiency ; Energy measurement ; Energy productivity ; Fixed-effects ; Indexes ; Industrial Revolution ; LDCs ; Productivity ; SFA</subject><ispartof>Energy (Oxford), 2017-01, Vol.118, p.481-488</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 1, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4dc5b80e49eed17bd127fe6c33b3f8a1044e2cfb7bb8112f4c9fea40115b0aab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4dc5b80e49eed17bd127fe6c33b3f8a1044e2cfb7bb8112f4c9fea40115b0aab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Du, Kerui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Boqiang</creatorcontrib><title>International comparison of total-factor energy productivity growth: A parametric Malmquist index approach</title><title>Energy (Oxford)</title><description>This paper constructs a Malmquist energy productivity index based on the Shephard energy distance function to measure total-factor energy productivity change. In order to account for individual heterogeneities as well as statistical noises, we use a newly developed fixed-effects SFA model for estimation. Then it is applied to compare energy productivity growth across the world's 123 economies. The main findings are as follows. First, on average the world witnessed a 34.6% growth of energy productivity between 1990 and 2010 which was mainly driven by technological progress. Second, the developed countries achieved higher growth in energy productivity than the developing countries. Third, the developed countries took lead in technological progress while the developing countries performed better in efficiency improvement. Fourth, there are no evidences supporting σ-convergence among countries' energy productivity growth. •The energy productivity averagely increased by 34.6% from 1990 to 2010.•The energy productivity growth was mainly driven by technological progress.•There are no evidences for σ-convergence of energy productivity growth in the world.</description><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy conversion efficiency</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy measurement</subject><subject>Energy productivity</subject><subject>Fixed-effects</subject><subject>Indexes</subject><subject>Industrial Revolution</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>SFA</subject><issn>0360-5442</issn><issn>1873-6785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtKxDAUDaLgOPoHLgKuW5M2fbkQhsEXjLjRdUjTm5mUtukk6ej8vRnq2tXlHs6DcxC6pSSmhOb3bQwD2O0xTsIXoJhkyRla0LJIo7wos3O0IGlOooyx5BJdOdcSQrKyqhaofRs82EF4bQbRYWn6UVjtzICNwt540UVKSG8sniPwaE0zSa8P2h_x1ppvv3vAKxxUogdvtcTvouv3k3Ye66GBHyzGoBFyd40ulOgc3PzdJfp6fvpcv0abj5e39WoTScZKH7FGZnVJgFUADS3qhiaFglymaZ2qUlDCGCRS1UVdl5QmislKgWCE0qwmQtTpEt3NviF2P4HzvDVTqNg5Tqs0oSUjSRZYbGZJa5yzoPhodS_skVPCT6vyls-V-WnVExpWDbLHWQahwUGD5U5qGCQ02oL0vDH6f4NfYBCFpA</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Du, Kerui</creator><creator>Lin, Boqiang</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>International comparison of total-factor energy productivity growth: A parametric Malmquist index approach</title><author>Du, Kerui ; Lin, Boqiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4dc5b80e49eed17bd127fe6c33b3f8a1044e2cfb7bb8112f4c9fea40115b0aab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy conversion efficiency</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy measurement</topic><topic>Energy productivity</topic><topic>Fixed-effects</topic><topic>Indexes</topic><topic>Industrial Revolution</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>SFA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Du, Kerui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Boqiang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Du, Kerui</au><au>Lin, Boqiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>International comparison of total-factor energy productivity growth: A parametric Malmquist index approach</atitle><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>118</volume><spage>481</spage><epage>488</epage><pages>481-488</pages><issn>0360-5442</issn><eissn>1873-6785</eissn><abstract>This paper constructs a Malmquist energy productivity index based on the Shephard energy distance function to measure total-factor energy productivity change. In order to account for individual heterogeneities as well as statistical noises, we use a newly developed fixed-effects SFA model for estimation. Then it is applied to compare energy productivity growth across the world's 123 economies. The main findings are as follows. First, on average the world witnessed a 34.6% growth of energy productivity between 1990 and 2010 which was mainly driven by technological progress. Second, the developed countries achieved higher growth in energy productivity than the developing countries. Third, the developed countries took lead in technological progress while the developing countries performed better in efficiency improvement. Fourth, there are no evidences supporting σ-convergence among countries' energy productivity growth. •The energy productivity averagely increased by 34.6% from 1990 to 2010.•The energy productivity growth was mainly driven by technological progress.•There are no evidences for σ-convergence of energy productivity growth in the world.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.052</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-5442
ispartof Energy (Oxford), 2017-01, Vol.118, p.481-488
issn 0360-5442
1873-6785
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1932184025
source Elsevier
subjects Developed countries
Developing countries
Energy
Energy consumption
Energy conversion efficiency
Energy efficiency
Energy measurement
Energy productivity
Fixed-effects
Indexes
Industrial Revolution
LDCs
Productivity
SFA
title International comparison of total-factor energy productivity growth: A parametric Malmquist index approach
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A47%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=International%20comparison%20of%20total-factor%20energy%20productivity%20growth:%20A%20parametric%20Malmquist%20index%20approach&rft.jtitle=Energy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Du,%20Kerui&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=118&rft.spage=481&rft.epage=488&rft.pages=481-488&rft.issn=0360-5442&rft.eissn=1873-6785&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1932184025%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4dc5b80e49eed17bd127fe6c33b3f8a1044e2cfb7bb8112f4c9fea40115b0aab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1932184025&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true