Water quality before and after watershed-scale implementation of stormwater wet ponds in the coastal plain

• Published in: Ecological engineering 2017-08, Vol.105, p.240-251
• Main Authors: Gold, A.C., Thompson, S.P., Piehler, M.F.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ammonium; Ammonium compounds; Capacity; Chlorophyll; Chlorophyll a; Coastal development; Coastal environments; Coastal plains; Coastal streams; Coastal waters; Coastal zone; Coasts; Construction; Data; Data processing; Drainage; Dredging; Excavation; Headwaters; Hydrologic data; Mineral nutrients; Nitrates; Nitrites; Nitrogen compounds; Nutrient concentrations; Nutrients; Organic nitrogen; Orthophosphate; Oxides; Pollutant removal; Pollutants; Pond construction; Ponds; Removal; Retrofitting; Rivers; SCM; Sinkholes; Storm sewers; Stormwater; Stormwater management; Suspended particulate matter; Total suspended solids; Water control; Water management; Water pollution; Water quality; Watersheds; Wet ponds
• ISSN: 0925-8574; 1872-6992
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.05.003

Wet ponds have been used extensively for stormwater control throughout the US, including coastal areas. Despite the widespread application of these water control structures, few studies have investigated how watershed-scale implementation of wet ponds affects downstream water quality or how the pollutant removal efficacy of wet ponds changes over time in a coastal setting. This study utilizes a seven year data set of nutrient, total suspended solid, and chlorophyll-a concentration data collected during baseflow and stormflow from two coastal headwater streams draining a developed (28% impervious) and an undeveloped (1.2% impervious) watershed. The seven year record encompasses before, during, and after a large construction project and concurrent implementation of wet ponds in the developed watershed that drain 97% of the watershed area. Additional nutrient, total suspended solid, and chlorophyll-a concentration data were collected from within a wet pond in the developed watershed during baseflow over a single spring and summer. A comparison of stream water quality before and after the construction project and wet pond implementation in the developed watershed showed that mean chlorophyll-a, nitrate-nitrite (NOx−), organic nitrogen, and total suspended solid concentrations significantly increased, the mean orthophosphate (PO43−) concentration significantly decreased, and the mean ammonium (NH4+) concentration did not change. Over a three year time period after construction and pond implementation, developed stream chlorophyll-a, ammonium, and organic nitrogen concentrations decreased, and nitrate-nitrite, orthophosphate, and total suspended solid concentrations increased compared to the reference stream during the same period, indicating changes in pollutant removal capacity. A comparison of baseflow and stormflow samples during the Post period and samples from a wet pond in the developed watershed indicated that ponds were functioning as sources of chlorophyll-a and total suspended solids to the stream and sinks for nitrate-nitrite. Overall, watershed-scale implementation of wet ponds in the developed watershed failed to mitigate many negative water quality impacts caused by increased development. This study suggests that centralized stormwater management may not be optimal for maintaining water quality in coastal environments, and that pond retrofits combined with frequent excavation could improve pollutant removal by wet ponds. Further research on the ef