VC Contract Design: Development State, Bargaining Power, and the Classification of Early-Cycle Companies

Private equity shareholder agreements are essential to the successful relationship between venture capital (VC) providers and recipients and are structured to balance the interests and objectives of both parties. However, these contracts are complex and contain a broad range of design options. The a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of private equity 2017-09, Vol.20 (4), p.36-46
Main Authors: Sonius, David, Yerkes, Rustin T., Westhues, Katharina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agreements
Bargaining
Business metrics
Capital structure
Collaboration
Debt financing
Decision making
Economic models
Entrepreneurship
Funding
Growth rate
Hypotheses
Organizational structure
Private equity
Product development
Profitability
Questionnaires
Startups
Stockholders
Venture capital
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 46
container_issue 4
container_start_page 36
container_title The journal of private equity
container_volume 20
creator Sonius, David
Yerkes, Rustin T.
Westhues, Katharina
description Private equity shareholder agreements are essential to the successful relationship between venture capital (VC) providers and recipients and are structured to balance the interests and objectives of both parties. However, these contracts are complex and contain a broad range of design options. The authors propose a model to classify early-cycle companies into four groups according to two dimensions: bargaining power and development state. Their survey of VC providers suggests most VC contracts include a core set of standardized investor rights. Additionally, there are varying rights according to the degree of bargaining power and development state, preserving contract flexibility to accommodate a range of investment prospects.
doi_str_mv 10.3905/jpe.2017.20.4.036
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1932898873</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1932898873</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-867100fb3ee5052fdf98668f023ee83e38c72b70d3fccd9718cd413bdc7830aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AbafeJJ1Jxp2O9QEFBR_bkGaSdso0GZNU6b83UjfnwLmHe-BD6JLAlNVQXm8GM6VAeJbpbAqsOkIjSipRiBLEMRoRqKuiLDk9RWcxbgAIBcFGaP3Z4Ma7FJRO-N7EbuVusn-b3g9b4xJ-SyqZCb5TYaU617kVfvU_Jkywci1Oa4ObXsXY2U6r1HmHvcVzFfp90ex1n69-OyjXmXiOTqzqo7n49zH6eJi_N0_F4uXxubldFJrSMhWi4gTALpkxJZTUtrYWVSUs0JwIZpjQnC45tMxq3dacCN3OCFu2mgsGSrExujr8HYL_2pmY5MbvgsuTktSMiloIznKLHFo6-BiDsXII3VaFvSQg_4DKDFT-Ac0iZzIDZb-Pxmly</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1932898873</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>VC Contract Design: Development State, Bargaining Power, and the Classification of Early-Cycle Companies</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Sonius, David ; Yerkes, Rustin T. ; Westhues, Katharina</creator><creatorcontrib>Sonius, David ; Yerkes, Rustin T. ; Westhues, Katharina</creatorcontrib><description>Private equity shareholder agreements are essential to the successful relationship between venture capital (VC) providers and recipients and are structured to balance the interests and objectives of both parties. However, these contracts are complex and contain a broad range of design options. The authors propose a model to classify early-cycle companies into four groups according to two dimensions: bargaining power and development state. Their survey of VC providers suggests most VC contracts include a core set of standardized investor rights. Additionally, there are varying rights according to the degree of bargaining power and development state, preserving contract flexibility to accommodate a range of investment prospects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1096-5572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8508</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3905/jpe.2017.20.4.036</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Pageant Media</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Bargaining ; Business metrics ; Capital structure ; Collaboration ; Debt financing ; Decision making ; Economic models ; Entrepreneurship ; Funding ; Growth rate ; Hypotheses ; Organizational structure ; Private equity ; Product development ; Profitability ; Questionnaires ; Startups ; Stockholders ; Venture capital</subject><ispartof>The journal of private equity, 2017-09, Vol.20 (4), p.36-46</ispartof><rights>Copyright Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC Fall 2017</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1932898873/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1932898873?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,74767</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sonius, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yerkes, Rustin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westhues, Katharina</creatorcontrib><title>VC Contract Design: Development State, Bargaining Power, and the Classification of Early-Cycle Companies</title><title>The journal of private equity</title><description>Private equity shareholder agreements are essential to the successful relationship between venture capital (VC) providers and recipients and are structured to balance the interests and objectives of both parties. However, these contracts are complex and contain a broad range of design options. The authors propose a model to classify early-cycle companies into four groups according to two dimensions: bargaining power and development state. Their survey of VC providers suggests most VC contracts include a core set of standardized investor rights. Additionally, there are varying rights according to the degree of bargaining power and development state, preserving contract flexibility to accommodate a range of investment prospects.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Business metrics</subject><subject>Capital structure</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Debt financing</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Organizational structure</subject><subject>Private equity</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Startups</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Venture capital</subject><issn>1096-5572</issn><issn>2168-8508</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AbafeJJ1Jxp2O9QEFBR_bkGaSdso0GZNU6b83UjfnwLmHe-BD6JLAlNVQXm8GM6VAeJbpbAqsOkIjSipRiBLEMRoRqKuiLDk9RWcxbgAIBcFGaP3Z4Ma7FJRO-N7EbuVusn-b3g9b4xJ-SyqZCb5TYaU617kVfvU_Jkywci1Oa4ObXsXY2U6r1HmHvcVzFfp90ex1n69-OyjXmXiOTqzqo7n49zH6eJi_N0_F4uXxubldFJrSMhWi4gTALpkxJZTUtrYWVSUs0JwIZpjQnC45tMxq3dacCN3OCFu2mgsGSrExujr8HYL_2pmY5MbvgsuTktSMiloIznKLHFo6-BiDsXII3VaFvSQg_4DKDFT-Ac0iZzIDZb-Pxmly</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Sonius, David</creator><creator>Yerkes, Rustin T.</creator><creator>Westhues, Katharina</creator><general>Pageant Media</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>VC Contract Design: Development State, Bargaining Power, and the Classification of Early-Cycle Companies</title><author>Sonius, David ; Yerkes, Rustin T. ; Westhues, Katharina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-867100fb3ee5052fdf98668f023ee83e38c72b70d3fccd9718cd413bdc7830aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Business metrics</topic><topic>Capital structure</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Debt financing</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Organizational structure</topic><topic>Private equity</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Startups</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Venture capital</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sonius, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yerkes, Rustin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westhues, Katharina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>UK &amp; Ireland Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The journal of private equity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sonius, David</au><au>Yerkes, Rustin T.</au><au>Westhues, Katharina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>VC Contract Design: Development State, Bargaining Power, and the Classification of Early-Cycle Companies</atitle><jtitle>The journal of private equity</jtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>36-46</pages><issn>1096-5572</issn><eissn>2168-8508</eissn><abstract>Private equity shareholder agreements are essential to the successful relationship between venture capital (VC) providers and recipients and are structured to balance the interests and objectives of both parties. However, these contracts are complex and contain a broad range of design options. The authors propose a model to classify early-cycle companies into four groups according to two dimensions: bargaining power and development state. Their survey of VC providers suggests most VC contracts include a core set of standardized investor rights. Additionally, there are varying rights according to the degree of bargaining power and development state, preserving contract flexibility to accommodate a range of investment prospects.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Pageant Media</pub><doi>10.3905/jpe.2017.20.4.036</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1096-5572
ispartof The journal of private equity, 2017-09, Vol.20 (4), p.36-46
issn 1096-5572
2168-8508
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1932898873
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; ABI/INFORM Global
subjects Agreements
Bargaining
Business metrics
Capital structure
Collaboration
Debt financing
Decision making
Economic models
Entrepreneurship
Funding
Growth rate
Hypotheses
Organizational structure
Private equity
Product development
Profitability
Questionnaires
Startups
Stockholders
Venture capital
title VC Contract Design: Development State, Bargaining Power, and the Classification of Early-Cycle Companies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A53%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=VC%20Contract%20Design:%20Development%20State,%20Bargaining%20Power,%20and%20the%20Classification%20of%20Early-Cycle%20Companies&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20private%20equity&rft.au=Sonius,%20David&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=36-46&rft.issn=1096-5572&rft.eissn=2168-8508&rft_id=info:doi/10.3905/jpe.2017.20.4.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1932898873%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-867100fb3ee5052fdf98668f023ee83e38c72b70d3fccd9718cd413bdc7830aa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1932898873&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true