Loading…
Relocating Disadvantage in Five Australian Cities: Socio-spatial Polarisation under Neo-liberalism
During the mid-1980s, the Australian political discourse shifted decisively towards a neo-liberal political agenda that has remained the dominant policy paradigm ever since. Arguably, a key outcome of this has been an increase in social inequality. However, there has been little acknowledgement of t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Urban policy and research 2017-04, Vol.35 (2), p.103-121 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-5a17bc0a6175d34ca55eefd9b69632819e5fbf078cbf0010f007e90974f67f563 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-5a17bc0a6175d34ca55eefd9b69632819e5fbf078cbf0010f007e90974f67f563 |
container_end_page | 121 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 103 |
container_title | Urban policy and research |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Randolph, Bill Tice, Andrew |
description | During the mid-1980s, the Australian political discourse shifted decisively towards a neo-liberal political agenda that has remained the dominant policy paradigm ever since. Arguably, a key outcome of this has been an increase in social inequality. However, there has been little acknowledgement of this process in Australian urban policy debates. Yet these social outcomes have been accompanied by distinctive impacts on the socio-spatial structure of the Australian city. Using Census data over a 25 year period between 1986 and 2011, this paper analyses the trend towards a marked suburbanisation of the most disadvantaged households in the five major Australian cities. Its conclusions have relevance for current metropolitan planning strategies and their capacity to address what is emerging as Australia's version of the now more widely recognised "urban inversion" of the last quarter of a century. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/08111146.2016.1221337 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1933962744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1933962744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-5a17bc0a6175d34ca55eefd9b69632819e5fbf078cbf0010f007e90974f67f563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKuPIARcT00mmWTiSqlWhaLizzpkMklJmSY1SSt9e2do3XoX392ccy98AFxiNMGoRteoxv1QNikRZhNclpgQfgRGmHJW8JLSYzAamGKATsFZSkuEsMBEjEDzbrqgVXZ-Ae9dUu1W-awWBjoPZ25r4N0m5ag6pzycuuxMuoEfQbtQpHVvqQ6-hU7F3swueLjxrYnwxYSic40ZvLQ6BydWdclcHPYYfM0ePqdPxfz18Xl6Ny80IXUuKoV5o5FimFctoVpVlTG2FQ0TjJQ1FqayjUW81n0ijPrgRiDBqWXcVoyMwdX-7jqG741JWS7DJvr-pcSCEMFKTmlPVXtKx5BSNFauo1upuJMYyaFO-VenHOqUhzp773bvOW9DXKmfELtWZrXrQrRRee2SJP-f-AXr53wm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1933962744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relocating Disadvantage in Five Australian Cities: Socio-spatial Polarisation under Neo-liberalism</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Randolph, Bill ; Tice, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Randolph, Bill ; Tice, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>During the mid-1980s, the Australian political discourse shifted decisively towards a neo-liberal political agenda that has remained the dominant policy paradigm ever since. Arguably, a key outcome of this has been an increase in social inequality. However, there has been little acknowledgement of this process in Australian urban policy debates. Yet these social outcomes have been accompanied by distinctive impacts on the socio-spatial structure of the Australian city. Using Census data over a 25 year period between 1986 and 2011, this paper analyses the trend towards a marked suburbanisation of the most disadvantaged households in the five major Australian cities. Its conclusions have relevance for current metropolitan planning strategies and their capacity to address what is emerging as Australia's version of the now more widely recognised "urban inversion" of the last quarter of a century.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0811-1146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-7244</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08111146.2016.1221337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Australian cities ; Censuses ; Cities ; Disadvantaged ; Households ; Inequality ; Liberalism ; Neoliberalism ; Planning ; Policy making ; Political discourse ; social disadvantage ; Social inequality ; spatial polarisation ; Suburbanisation ; Suburbanization ; Urban policy</subject><ispartof>Urban policy and research, 2017-04, Vol.35 (2), p.103-121</ispartof><rights>2016 Editorial Board, Urban Policy and Research 2016</rights><rights>2016 Editorial Board, Urban Policy and Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-5a17bc0a6175d34ca55eefd9b69632819e5fbf078cbf0010f007e90974f67f563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-5a17bc0a6175d34ca55eefd9b69632819e5fbf078cbf0010f007e90974f67f563</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6815-0935</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Randolph, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tice, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Relocating Disadvantage in Five Australian Cities: Socio-spatial Polarisation under Neo-liberalism</title><title>Urban policy and research</title><description>During the mid-1980s, the Australian political discourse shifted decisively towards a neo-liberal political agenda that has remained the dominant policy paradigm ever since. Arguably, a key outcome of this has been an increase in social inequality. However, there has been little acknowledgement of this process in Australian urban policy debates. Yet these social outcomes have been accompanied by distinctive impacts on the socio-spatial structure of the Australian city. Using Census data over a 25 year period between 1986 and 2011, this paper analyses the trend towards a marked suburbanisation of the most disadvantaged households in the five major Australian cities. Its conclusions have relevance for current metropolitan planning strategies and their capacity to address what is emerging as Australia's version of the now more widely recognised "urban inversion" of the last quarter of a century.</description><subject>Australian cities</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Disadvantaged</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political discourse</subject><subject>social disadvantage</subject><subject>Social inequality</subject><subject>spatial polarisation</subject><subject>Suburbanisation</subject><subject>Suburbanization</subject><subject>Urban policy</subject><issn>0811-1146</issn><issn>1476-7244</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKuPIARcT00mmWTiSqlWhaLizzpkMklJmSY1SSt9e2do3XoX392ccy98AFxiNMGoRteoxv1QNikRZhNclpgQfgRGmHJW8JLSYzAamGKATsFZSkuEsMBEjEDzbrqgVXZ-Ae9dUu1W-awWBjoPZ25r4N0m5ag6pzycuuxMuoEfQbtQpHVvqQ6-hU7F3swueLjxrYnwxYSic40ZvLQ6BydWdclcHPYYfM0ePqdPxfz18Xl6Ny80IXUuKoV5o5FimFctoVpVlTG2FQ0TjJQ1FqayjUW81n0ijPrgRiDBqWXcVoyMwdX-7jqG741JWS7DJvr-pcSCEMFKTmlPVXtKx5BSNFauo1upuJMYyaFO-VenHOqUhzp773bvOW9DXKmfELtWZrXrQrRRee2SJP-f-AXr53wm</recordid><startdate>20170403</startdate><enddate>20170403</enddate><creator>Randolph, Bill</creator><creator>Tice, Andrew</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6815-0935</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170403</creationdate><title>Relocating Disadvantage in Five Australian Cities: Socio-spatial Polarisation under Neo-liberalism</title><author>Randolph, Bill ; Tice, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-5a17bc0a6175d34ca55eefd9b69632819e5fbf078cbf0010f007e90974f67f563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Australian cities</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Disadvantaged</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political discourse</topic><topic>social disadvantage</topic><topic>Social inequality</topic><topic>spatial polarisation</topic><topic>Suburbanisation</topic><topic>Suburbanization</topic><topic>Urban policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Randolph, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tice, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Urban policy and research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Randolph, Bill</au><au>Tice, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relocating Disadvantage in Five Australian Cities: Socio-spatial Polarisation under Neo-liberalism</atitle><jtitle>Urban policy and research</jtitle><date>2017-04-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>103-121</pages><issn>0811-1146</issn><eissn>1476-7244</eissn><abstract>During the mid-1980s, the Australian political discourse shifted decisively towards a neo-liberal political agenda that has remained the dominant policy paradigm ever since. Arguably, a key outcome of this has been an increase in social inequality. However, there has been little acknowledgement of this process in Australian urban policy debates. Yet these social outcomes have been accompanied by distinctive impacts on the socio-spatial structure of the Australian city. Using Census data over a 25 year period between 1986 and 2011, this paper analyses the trend towards a marked suburbanisation of the most disadvantaged households in the five major Australian cities. Its conclusions have relevance for current metropolitan planning strategies and their capacity to address what is emerging as Australia's version of the now more widely recognised "urban inversion" of the last quarter of a century.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/08111146.2016.1221337</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6815-0935</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0811-1146 |
ispartof | Urban policy and research, 2017-04, Vol.35 (2), p.103-121 |
issn | 0811-1146 1476-7244 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1933962744 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PAIS Index; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Australian cities Censuses Cities Disadvantaged Households Inequality Liberalism Neoliberalism Planning Policy making Political discourse social disadvantage Social inequality spatial polarisation Suburbanisation Suburbanization Urban policy |
title | Relocating Disadvantage in Five Australian Cities: Socio-spatial Polarisation under Neo-liberalism |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A01%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relocating%20Disadvantage%20in%20Five%20Australian%20Cities:%20Socio-spatial%20Polarisation%20under%20Neo-liberalism&rft.jtitle=Urban%20policy%20and%20research&rft.au=Randolph,%20Bill&rft.date=2017-04-03&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=103-121&rft.issn=0811-1146&rft.eissn=1476-7244&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08111146.2016.1221337&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1933962744%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-5a17bc0a6175d34ca55eefd9b69632819e5fbf078cbf0010f007e90974f67f563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1933962744&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |