Loading…

Relocating Disadvantage in Five Australian Cities: Socio-spatial Polarisation under Neo-liberalism

During the mid-1980s, the Australian political discourse shifted decisively towards a neo-liberal political agenda that has remained the dominant policy paradigm ever since. Arguably, a key outcome of this has been an increase in social inequality. However, there has been little acknowledgement of t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Urban policy and research 2017-04, Vol.35 (2), p.103-121
Main Authors: Randolph, Bill, Tice, Andrew
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-5a17bc0a6175d34ca55eefd9b69632819e5fbf078cbf0010f007e90974f67f563
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-5a17bc0a6175d34ca55eefd9b69632819e5fbf078cbf0010f007e90974f67f563
container_end_page 121
container_issue 2
container_start_page 103
container_title Urban policy and research
container_volume 35
creator Randolph, Bill
Tice, Andrew
description During the mid-1980s, the Australian political discourse shifted decisively towards a neo-liberal political agenda that has remained the dominant policy paradigm ever since. Arguably, a key outcome of this has been an increase in social inequality. However, there has been little acknowledgement of this process in Australian urban policy debates. Yet these social outcomes have been accompanied by distinctive impacts on the socio-spatial structure of the Australian city. Using Census data over a 25 year period between 1986 and 2011, this paper analyses the trend towards a marked suburbanisation of the most disadvantaged households in the five major Australian cities. Its conclusions have relevance for current metropolitan planning strategies and their capacity to address what is emerging as Australia's version of the now more widely recognised "urban inversion" of the last quarter of a century.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/08111146.2016.1221337
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1933962744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1933962744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-5a17bc0a6175d34ca55eefd9b69632819e5fbf078cbf0010f007e90974f67f563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKuPIARcT00mmWTiSqlWhaLizzpkMklJmSY1SSt9e2do3XoX392ccy98AFxiNMGoRteoxv1QNikRZhNclpgQfgRGmHJW8JLSYzAamGKATsFZSkuEsMBEjEDzbrqgVXZ-Ae9dUu1W-awWBjoPZ25r4N0m5ag6pzycuuxMuoEfQbtQpHVvqQ6-hU7F3swueLjxrYnwxYSic40ZvLQ6BydWdclcHPYYfM0ePqdPxfz18Xl6Ny80IXUuKoV5o5FimFctoVpVlTG2FQ0TjJQ1FqayjUW81n0ijPrgRiDBqWXcVoyMwdX-7jqG741JWS7DJvr-pcSCEMFKTmlPVXtKx5BSNFauo1upuJMYyaFO-VenHOqUhzp773bvOW9DXKmfELtWZrXrQrRRee2SJP-f-AXr53wm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1933962744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relocating Disadvantage in Five Australian Cities: Socio-spatial Polarisation under Neo-liberalism</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Randolph, Bill ; Tice, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Randolph, Bill ; Tice, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>During the mid-1980s, the Australian political discourse shifted decisively towards a neo-liberal political agenda that has remained the dominant policy paradigm ever since. Arguably, a key outcome of this has been an increase in social inequality. However, there has been little acknowledgement of this process in Australian urban policy debates. Yet these social outcomes have been accompanied by distinctive impacts on the socio-spatial structure of the Australian city. Using Census data over a 25 year period between 1986 and 2011, this paper analyses the trend towards a marked suburbanisation of the most disadvantaged households in the five major Australian cities. Its conclusions have relevance for current metropolitan planning strategies and their capacity to address what is emerging as Australia's version of the now more widely recognised "urban inversion" of the last quarter of a century.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0811-1146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-7244</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08111146.2016.1221337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Australian cities ; Censuses ; Cities ; Disadvantaged ; Households ; Inequality ; Liberalism ; Neoliberalism ; Planning ; Policy making ; Political discourse ; social disadvantage ; Social inequality ; spatial polarisation ; Suburbanisation ; Suburbanization ; Urban policy</subject><ispartof>Urban policy and research, 2017-04, Vol.35 (2), p.103-121</ispartof><rights>2016 Editorial Board, Urban Policy and Research 2016</rights><rights>2016 Editorial Board, Urban Policy and Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-5a17bc0a6175d34ca55eefd9b69632819e5fbf078cbf0010f007e90974f67f563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-5a17bc0a6175d34ca55eefd9b69632819e5fbf078cbf0010f007e90974f67f563</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6815-0935</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Randolph, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tice, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Relocating Disadvantage in Five Australian Cities: Socio-spatial Polarisation under Neo-liberalism</title><title>Urban policy and research</title><description>During the mid-1980s, the Australian political discourse shifted decisively towards a neo-liberal political agenda that has remained the dominant policy paradigm ever since. Arguably, a key outcome of this has been an increase in social inequality. However, there has been little acknowledgement of this process in Australian urban policy debates. Yet these social outcomes have been accompanied by distinctive impacts on the socio-spatial structure of the Australian city. Using Census data over a 25 year period between 1986 and 2011, this paper analyses the trend towards a marked suburbanisation of the most disadvantaged households in the five major Australian cities. Its conclusions have relevance for current metropolitan planning strategies and their capacity to address what is emerging as Australia's version of the now more widely recognised "urban inversion" of the last quarter of a century.</description><subject>Australian cities</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Disadvantaged</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political discourse</subject><subject>social disadvantage</subject><subject>Social inequality</subject><subject>spatial polarisation</subject><subject>Suburbanisation</subject><subject>Suburbanization</subject><subject>Urban policy</subject><issn>0811-1146</issn><issn>1476-7244</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKuPIARcT00mmWTiSqlWhaLizzpkMklJmSY1SSt9e2do3XoX392ccy98AFxiNMGoRteoxv1QNikRZhNclpgQfgRGmHJW8JLSYzAamGKATsFZSkuEsMBEjEDzbrqgVXZ-Ae9dUu1W-awWBjoPZ25r4N0m5ag6pzycuuxMuoEfQbtQpHVvqQ6-hU7F3swueLjxrYnwxYSic40ZvLQ6BydWdclcHPYYfM0ePqdPxfz18Xl6Ny80IXUuKoV5o5FimFctoVpVlTG2FQ0TjJQ1FqayjUW81n0ijPrgRiDBqWXcVoyMwdX-7jqG741JWS7DJvr-pcSCEMFKTmlPVXtKx5BSNFauo1upuJMYyaFO-VenHOqUhzp773bvOW9DXKmfELtWZrXrQrRRee2SJP-f-AXr53wm</recordid><startdate>20170403</startdate><enddate>20170403</enddate><creator>Randolph, Bill</creator><creator>Tice, Andrew</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6815-0935</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170403</creationdate><title>Relocating Disadvantage in Five Australian Cities: Socio-spatial Polarisation under Neo-liberalism</title><author>Randolph, Bill ; Tice, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-5a17bc0a6175d34ca55eefd9b69632819e5fbf078cbf0010f007e90974f67f563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Australian cities</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Disadvantaged</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political discourse</topic><topic>social disadvantage</topic><topic>Social inequality</topic><topic>spatial polarisation</topic><topic>Suburbanisation</topic><topic>Suburbanization</topic><topic>Urban policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Randolph, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tice, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Urban policy and research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Randolph, Bill</au><au>Tice, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relocating Disadvantage in Five Australian Cities: Socio-spatial Polarisation under Neo-liberalism</atitle><jtitle>Urban policy and research</jtitle><date>2017-04-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>103-121</pages><issn>0811-1146</issn><eissn>1476-7244</eissn><abstract>During the mid-1980s, the Australian political discourse shifted decisively towards a neo-liberal political agenda that has remained the dominant policy paradigm ever since. Arguably, a key outcome of this has been an increase in social inequality. However, there has been little acknowledgement of this process in Australian urban policy debates. Yet these social outcomes have been accompanied by distinctive impacts on the socio-spatial structure of the Australian city. Using Census data over a 25 year period between 1986 and 2011, this paper analyses the trend towards a marked suburbanisation of the most disadvantaged households in the five major Australian cities. Its conclusions have relevance for current metropolitan planning strategies and their capacity to address what is emerging as Australia's version of the now more widely recognised "urban inversion" of the last quarter of a century.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/08111146.2016.1221337</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6815-0935</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0811-1146
ispartof Urban policy and research, 2017-04, Vol.35 (2), p.103-121
issn 0811-1146
1476-7244
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1933962744
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PAIS Index; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Australian cities
Censuses
Cities
Disadvantaged
Households
Inequality
Liberalism
Neoliberalism
Planning
Policy making
Political discourse
social disadvantage
Social inequality
spatial polarisation
Suburbanisation
Suburbanization
Urban policy
title Relocating Disadvantage in Five Australian Cities: Socio-spatial Polarisation under Neo-liberalism
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A01%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relocating%20Disadvantage%20in%20Five%20Australian%20Cities:%20Socio-spatial%20Polarisation%20under%20Neo-liberalism&rft.jtitle=Urban%20policy%20and%20research&rft.au=Randolph,%20Bill&rft.date=2017-04-03&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=103-121&rft.issn=0811-1146&rft.eissn=1476-7244&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08111146.2016.1221337&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1933962744%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-5a17bc0a6175d34ca55eefd9b69632819e5fbf078cbf0010f007e90974f67f563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1933962744&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true