The effects of hierarchy, centralization and formalization on municipal fiscal health: An empirical test of the bureaucratic ideal

This research examines the effects of three defining features of bureaucratic organizations – hierarchy, centralization of decision‐making, and the formalization of administrative procedures and rules – on the fiscal health of city governments in the US. It utilizes data from a national survey of to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public administration (London) 2017-09, Vol.95 (3), p.791-806
Main Author: Jimenez, Benedict S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Administrative procedure
Bias
Bureaucracy
Centralization
Cities
Decision making
Dummy
Economic models
Factor analysis
Financial statements
Heterogeneity
Hierarchies
Local government
Municipal finance
Polls & surveys
Public finance
Regression analysis
Rules
Solvency
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This research examines the effects of three defining features of bureaucratic organizations – hierarchy, centralization of decision‐making, and the formalization of administrative procedures and rules – on the fiscal health of city governments in the US. It utilizes data from a national survey of top appointed city officials in the US to measure the bureaucratic features of city governments, and assesses budgetary solvency using actual financial data from audited financial reports. Using factor analysis to develop a composite bureaucracy index, and addressing unobserved heterogeneity and possible simultaneity bias through least squares dummy variable regression and instrumental variable regression, the empirical analysis shows that excessive bureaucracy leads to poorer fiscal health. Analysing the effects of the individual components of the index, the results indicate that centralization and formalization exert a statistically significant and negative effect on city budgetary solvency.
ISSN:0033-3298
1467-9299
DOI:10.1111/padm.12327