Loading…

New Saharan wind observations reveal substantial biases in analysed dust‐generating winds

The Sahara is the largest source of airborne mineral dust on Earth. New data from the Fennec field campaign from remote Sahara allow evaluation of ECMWF ERA‐Interim analysed winds. High winds and diurnal variation are under‐represented in analyses, which perform less well during the summer monsoon (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric science letters 2017-09, Vol.18 (9), p.366-372
Main Authors: Roberts, Alexander J., Marsham, John H., Knippertz, Peter, Parker, Douglas J., Bart, Mark, Garcia‐Carreras, Luis, Hobby, Matthew, McQuaid, James B., Rosenberg, Philip D., Walker, Daniel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3235-650dc5490594b44f882d81012a77a40e71572e4ae36bfc91f3381d041cf16c183
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3235-650dc5490594b44f882d81012a77a40e71572e4ae36bfc91f3381d041cf16c183
container_end_page 372
container_issue 9
container_start_page 366
container_title Atmospheric science letters
container_volume 18
creator Roberts, Alexander J.
Marsham, John H.
Knippertz, Peter
Parker, Douglas J.
Bart, Mark
Garcia‐Carreras, Luis
Hobby, Matthew
McQuaid, James B.
Rosenberg, Philip D.
Walker, Daniel
description The Sahara is the largest source of airborne mineral dust on Earth. New data from the Fennec field campaign from remote Sahara allow evaluation of ECMWF ERA‐Interim analysed winds. High winds and diurnal variation are under‐represented in analyses, which perform less well during the summer monsoon (even in the isolated central Sahara). Analyses do not capture the seasonal cycle, missing the summertime maximum in winds in the central Sahara summer time dust hotspot. For the remote Sahara, the Earth's largest dust source, there has always been a near‐absence of data for evaluating models. Here, new observations from the Fennec project are used along with Sahelian data from the African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis (AMMA) to give an unprecedented evaluation of dust‐generating winds in the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts ERA‐Interim reanalysis (ERA‐I). Consistent with past studies, near‐surface, high‐speed winds are lacking in ERA‐I and the diurnal variability is under‐represented. During the summer monsoon season, correlations of ERA‐I with observed wind‐speed are low (∼0.35 in Sahel and 0.25–0.4 in the Sahara). Fennec data show for the first time that: (1) correlations are reduced even in the Sahara, not directly influenced by the monsoon, (2) the systematic underestimation of observed winds by ERA‐I in the summertime Sahel extends into the central Sahara: potentially explaining the failure of global models to capture the observed global dust maximum that occurs over the summertime Sahara (such as CMIP5), and demonstrates that modelled winds must be improved if they are to capture this key feature of the climatology.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/asl.765
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1937292073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1937292073</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3235-650dc5490594b44f882d81012a77a40e71572e4ae36bfc91f3381d041cf16c183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFbxFQZcuDF17vxkkmUp_kHRRRUEF8MkmdSUOKlzk5bufASf0ScxtS7cuLpn8Z3D5SPkFNgIGOOXFuuRjtUeGYASLOIxPO__yYfkCHHBGICM9YC83Ls1ndlXG6yn68oXtMnQhZVtq8YjDW7lbE2xy7C1vq36nFUWHdLKU-ttvUFX0KLD9uvjc-68C33Rz3-W8JgclLZGd_J7h-Tp-upxchtNH27uJuNplAsuVBQrVuRKpkylMpOyTBJeJMCAW62tZE6D0txJ60SclXkKpRAJFExCXkKcQyKG5Gy3uwzNe-ewNYumC_1zaCAVmqecadFT5zsqDw1icKVZhurNho0BZrbmTG_O9OZ68mJHrqvabf7DzHg25Vv8G3bRb_8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1937292073</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Saharan wind observations reveal substantial biases in analysed dust‐generating winds</title><source>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Roberts, Alexander J. ; Marsham, John H. ; Knippertz, Peter ; Parker, Douglas J. ; Bart, Mark ; Garcia‐Carreras, Luis ; Hobby, Matthew ; McQuaid, James B. ; Rosenberg, Philip D. ; Walker, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Alexander J. ; Marsham, John H. ; Knippertz, Peter ; Parker, Douglas J. ; Bart, Mark ; Garcia‐Carreras, Luis ; Hobby, Matthew ; McQuaid, James B. ; Rosenberg, Philip D. ; Walker, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>The Sahara is the largest source of airborne mineral dust on Earth. New data from the Fennec field campaign from remote Sahara allow evaluation of ECMWF ERA‐Interim analysed winds. High winds and diurnal variation are under‐represented in analyses, which perform less well during the summer monsoon (even in the isolated central Sahara). Analyses do not capture the seasonal cycle, missing the summertime maximum in winds in the central Sahara summer time dust hotspot. For the remote Sahara, the Earth's largest dust source, there has always been a near‐absence of data for evaluating models. Here, new observations from the Fennec project are used along with Sahelian data from the African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis (AMMA) to give an unprecedented evaluation of dust‐generating winds in the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts ERA‐Interim reanalysis (ERA‐I). Consistent with past studies, near‐surface, high‐speed winds are lacking in ERA‐I and the diurnal variability is under‐represented. During the summer monsoon season, correlations of ERA‐I with observed wind‐speed are low (∼0.35 in Sahel and 0.25–0.4 in the Sahara). Fennec data show for the first time that: (1) correlations are reduced even in the Sahara, not directly influenced by the monsoon, (2) the systematic underestimation of observed winds by ERA‐I in the summertime Sahel extends into the central Sahara: potentially explaining the failure of global models to capture the observed global dust maximum that occurs over the summertime Sahara (such as CMIP5), and demonstrates that modelled winds must be improved if they are to capture this key feature of the climatology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-261X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-261X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/asl.765</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>African monsoon ; AMMA ; Atmospheric particulates ; Atmospheric sciences ; Climate models ; Climatology ; Correlation ; Data ; Dust ; Dust storms ; Earth ; Evaluation ; fennec ; monsoon ; Monsoons ; reanalysis ; Sahara ; Summer monsoon ; Weather forecasting ; Wind ; Wind observation ; Wind speed ; Winds</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric science letters, 2017-09, Vol.18 (9), p.366-372</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of the Royal Meteorological Society.</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3235-650dc5490594b44f882d81012a77a40e71572e4ae36bfc91f3381d041cf16c183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3235-650dc5490594b44f882d81012a77a40e71572e4ae36bfc91f3381d041cf16c183</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4970-9032</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1937292073/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1937292073?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,46052,46476,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsham, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knippertz, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bart, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia‐Carreras, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobby, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McQuaid, James B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, Philip D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>New Saharan wind observations reveal substantial biases in analysed dust‐generating winds</title><title>Atmospheric science letters</title><description>The Sahara is the largest source of airborne mineral dust on Earth. New data from the Fennec field campaign from remote Sahara allow evaluation of ECMWF ERA‐Interim analysed winds. High winds and diurnal variation are under‐represented in analyses, which perform less well during the summer monsoon (even in the isolated central Sahara). Analyses do not capture the seasonal cycle, missing the summertime maximum in winds in the central Sahara summer time dust hotspot. For the remote Sahara, the Earth's largest dust source, there has always been a near‐absence of data for evaluating models. Here, new observations from the Fennec project are used along with Sahelian data from the African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis (AMMA) to give an unprecedented evaluation of dust‐generating winds in the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts ERA‐Interim reanalysis (ERA‐I). Consistent with past studies, near‐surface, high‐speed winds are lacking in ERA‐I and the diurnal variability is under‐represented. During the summer monsoon season, correlations of ERA‐I with observed wind‐speed are low (∼0.35 in Sahel and 0.25–0.4 in the Sahara). Fennec data show for the first time that: (1) correlations are reduced even in the Sahara, not directly influenced by the monsoon, (2) the systematic underestimation of observed winds by ERA‐I in the summertime Sahel extends into the central Sahara: potentially explaining the failure of global models to capture the observed global dust maximum that occurs over the summertime Sahara (such as CMIP5), and demonstrates that modelled winds must be improved if they are to capture this key feature of the climatology.</description><subject>African monsoon</subject><subject>AMMA</subject><subject>Atmospheric particulates</subject><subject>Atmospheric sciences</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Climatology</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Dust</subject><subject>Dust storms</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>fennec</subject><subject>monsoon</subject><subject>Monsoons</subject><subject>reanalysis</subject><subject>Sahara</subject><subject>Summer monsoon</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Wind observation</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><subject>Winds</subject><issn>1530-261X</issn><issn>1530-261X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFbxFQZcuDF17vxkkmUp_kHRRRUEF8MkmdSUOKlzk5bufASf0ScxtS7cuLpn8Z3D5SPkFNgIGOOXFuuRjtUeGYASLOIxPO__yYfkCHHBGICM9YC83Ls1ndlXG6yn68oXtMnQhZVtq8YjDW7lbE2xy7C1vq36nFUWHdLKU-ttvUFX0KLD9uvjc-68C33Rz3-W8JgclLZGd_J7h-Tp-upxchtNH27uJuNplAsuVBQrVuRKpkylMpOyTBJeJMCAW62tZE6D0txJ60SclXkKpRAJFExCXkKcQyKG5Gy3uwzNe-ewNYumC_1zaCAVmqecadFT5zsqDw1icKVZhurNho0BZrbmTG_O9OZ68mJHrqvabf7DzHg25Vv8G3bRb_8</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Roberts, Alexander J.</creator><creator>Marsham, John H.</creator><creator>Knippertz, Peter</creator><creator>Parker, Douglas J.</creator><creator>Bart, Mark</creator><creator>Garcia‐Carreras, Luis</creator><creator>Hobby, Matthew</creator><creator>McQuaid, James B.</creator><creator>Rosenberg, Philip D.</creator><creator>Walker, Daniel</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4970-9032</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>New Saharan wind observations reveal substantial biases in analysed dust‐generating winds</title><author>Roberts, Alexander J. ; Marsham, John H. ; Knippertz, Peter ; Parker, Douglas J. ; Bart, Mark ; Garcia‐Carreras, Luis ; Hobby, Matthew ; McQuaid, James B. ; Rosenberg, Philip D. ; Walker, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3235-650dc5490594b44f882d81012a77a40e71572e4ae36bfc91f3381d041cf16c183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>African monsoon</topic><topic>AMMA</topic><topic>Atmospheric particulates</topic><topic>Atmospheric sciences</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Climatology</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Dust</topic><topic>Dust storms</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>fennec</topic><topic>monsoon</topic><topic>Monsoons</topic><topic>reanalysis</topic><topic>Sahara</topic><topic>Summer monsoon</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Wind observation</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><topic>Winds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Alexander J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsham, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knippertz, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bart, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia‐Carreras, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobby, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McQuaid, James B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, Philip D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric science letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roberts, Alexander J.</au><au>Marsham, John H.</au><au>Knippertz, Peter</au><au>Parker, Douglas J.</au><au>Bart, Mark</au><au>Garcia‐Carreras, Luis</au><au>Hobby, Matthew</au><au>McQuaid, James B.</au><au>Rosenberg, Philip D.</au><au>Walker, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Saharan wind observations reveal substantial biases in analysed dust‐generating winds</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric science letters</jtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>366</spage><epage>372</epage><pages>366-372</pages><issn>1530-261X</issn><eissn>1530-261X</eissn><abstract>The Sahara is the largest source of airborne mineral dust on Earth. New data from the Fennec field campaign from remote Sahara allow evaluation of ECMWF ERA‐Interim analysed winds. High winds and diurnal variation are under‐represented in analyses, which perform less well during the summer monsoon (even in the isolated central Sahara). Analyses do not capture the seasonal cycle, missing the summertime maximum in winds in the central Sahara summer time dust hotspot. For the remote Sahara, the Earth's largest dust source, there has always been a near‐absence of data for evaluating models. Here, new observations from the Fennec project are used along with Sahelian data from the African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis (AMMA) to give an unprecedented evaluation of dust‐generating winds in the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts ERA‐Interim reanalysis (ERA‐I). Consistent with past studies, near‐surface, high‐speed winds are lacking in ERA‐I and the diurnal variability is under‐represented. During the summer monsoon season, correlations of ERA‐I with observed wind‐speed are low (∼0.35 in Sahel and 0.25–0.4 in the Sahara). Fennec data show for the first time that: (1) correlations are reduced even in the Sahara, not directly influenced by the monsoon, (2) the systematic underestimation of observed winds by ERA‐I in the summertime Sahel extends into the central Sahara: potentially explaining the failure of global models to capture the observed global dust maximum that occurs over the summertime Sahara (such as CMIP5), and demonstrates that modelled winds must be improved if they are to capture this key feature of the climatology.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/asl.765</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4970-9032</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1530-261X
ispartof Atmospheric science letters, 2017-09, Vol.18 (9), p.366-372
issn 1530-261X
1530-261X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1937292073
source Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects African monsoon
AMMA
Atmospheric particulates
Atmospheric sciences
Climate models
Climatology
Correlation
Data
Dust
Dust storms
Earth
Evaluation
fennec
monsoon
Monsoons
reanalysis
Sahara
Summer monsoon
Weather forecasting
Wind
Wind observation
Wind speed
Winds
title New Saharan wind observations reveal substantial biases in analysed dust‐generating winds
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A10%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Saharan%20wind%20observations%20reveal%20substantial%20biases%20in%20analysed%20dust%E2%80%90generating%20winds&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20science%20letters&rft.au=Roberts,%20Alexander%20J.&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=366&rft.epage=372&rft.pages=366-372&rft.issn=1530-261X&rft.eissn=1530-261X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/asl.765&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1937292073%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3235-650dc5490594b44f882d81012a77a40e71572e4ae36bfc91f3381d041cf16c183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1937292073&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true