Loading…

Tighter bounds on the probability of failure than those provided by random set theory

•The bounds provided by random set theory are wider than necessary.•The bounds provided by the measurable selections in the random set are narrower.•Condition are given when both methods provide the same bounds on the probability.•Numerical examples illustrate the discussion. Random set theory is a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computers & structures 2017-09, Vol.189, p.101-113
Main Authors: Alvarez, Diego A., Hurtado, Jorge E., Ramírez, Juliana
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1e160f123f21361d59b246a7b6cd7b6f15ad1854fdb7a21a73c918065442e8343
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1e160f123f21361d59b246a7b6cd7b6f15ad1854fdb7a21a73c918065442e8343
container_end_page 113
container_issue
container_start_page 101
container_title Computers & structures
container_volume 189
creator Alvarez, Diego A.
Hurtado, Jorge E.
Ramírez, Juliana
description •The bounds provided by random set theory are wider than necessary.•The bounds provided by the measurable selections in the random set are narrower.•Condition are given when both methods provide the same bounds on the probability.•Numerical examples illustrate the discussion. Random set theory is a generalization of Dempster-Shafer evidence theory, that employs an infinite number of focal elements. It can be used for the estimation of the bounds of the probability of failure of structural systems when there is both aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in the representation of the input variables. Indeed, this framework allows to model basic variables as cumulative distribution functions, distribution-free probability boxes, possibility distributions or families of intervals provided by experts, while representing the dependence of the implied variables by means of copulas. This paper reviews another method, which poses the calculation of the bounds of the probability of failure as a reliability-based-design-optimization problem. It is proved theoretically and by means of numerical experiments, that the latter method provides tighter bounds on the probability of failure than those estimated by random set theory. We also theoretically show some interesting relationships between the random set-based method and the optimization approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.04.006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1938146662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045794917301013</els_id><sourcerecordid>1938146662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1e160f123f21361d59b246a7b6cd7b6f15ad1854fdb7a21a73c918065442e8343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDVhineBxHCdZVhUvCYlNu7YcP6ijNi52Uil_j0MRWzYzi7n3zsxB6B5IDgT4Y5crfzjGIYwqpwSqnLCcEH6BFlBXTUYpKy7RghBWZlXDmmt0E2NHkoIRskDbjfvcDSbg1o-9jtj3eNgZfAy-la3bu2HC3mIr3X4MJo3kPPfxR3Fy2mjcTjjIXvsDjmaYzT5Mt-jKyn00d799ibbPT5v1a_b-8fK2Xr1nqmDFkIEBTizQwlIoOOiyaSnjsmq50qlYKKWGumRWt5WkIKtCNVATXjJGTZ0ilujhnJuu-RpNHETnx9CnlQKaogbGOadJVZ1VKvgYg7HiGNxBhkkAETND0Yk_hmJmKAgTiVByrs5Ok544ORNEVM70ymgXjBqE9u7fjG_E-H77</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1938146662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tighter bounds on the probability of failure than those provided by random set theory</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Alvarez, Diego A. ; Hurtado, Jorge E. ; Ramírez, Juliana</creator><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, Diego A. ; Hurtado, Jorge E. ; Ramírez, Juliana</creatorcontrib><description>•The bounds provided by random set theory are wider than necessary.•The bounds provided by the measurable selections in the random set are narrower.•Condition are given when both methods provide the same bounds on the probability.•Numerical examples illustrate the discussion. Random set theory is a generalization of Dempster-Shafer evidence theory, that employs an infinite number of focal elements. It can be used for the estimation of the bounds of the probability of failure of structural systems when there is both aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in the representation of the input variables. Indeed, this framework allows to model basic variables as cumulative distribution functions, distribution-free probability boxes, possibility distributions or families of intervals provided by experts, while representing the dependence of the implied variables by means of copulas. This paper reviews another method, which poses the calculation of the bounds of the probability of failure as a reliability-based-design-optimization problem. It is proved theoretically and by means of numerical experiments, that the latter method provides tighter bounds on the probability of failure than those estimated by random set theory. We also theoretically show some interesting relationships between the random set-based method and the optimization approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-7949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2243</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.04.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Boxes ; Dempster-Shafer evidence theory ; Design optimization ; Distribution functions ; Failure ; Imprecise probabilities ; Mathematical models ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Multivariate analysis ; Numerical analysis ; Probability distribution ; Probability of failure ; Random sets ; Set theory ; Stochastic subset optimization ; Studies ; Upper and lower probabilities</subject><ispartof>Computers &amp; structures, 2017-09, Vol.189, p.101-113</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Sep 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1e160f123f21361d59b246a7b6cd7b6f15ad1854fdb7a21a73c918065442e8343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1e160f123f21361d59b246a7b6cd7b6f15ad1854fdb7a21a73c918065442e8343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, Diego A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurtado, Jorge E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez, Juliana</creatorcontrib><title>Tighter bounds on the probability of failure than those provided by random set theory</title><title>Computers &amp; structures</title><description>•The bounds provided by random set theory are wider than necessary.•The bounds provided by the measurable selections in the random set are narrower.•Condition are given when both methods provide the same bounds on the probability.•Numerical examples illustrate the discussion. Random set theory is a generalization of Dempster-Shafer evidence theory, that employs an infinite number of focal elements. It can be used for the estimation of the bounds of the probability of failure of structural systems when there is both aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in the representation of the input variables. Indeed, this framework allows to model basic variables as cumulative distribution functions, distribution-free probability boxes, possibility distributions or families of intervals provided by experts, while representing the dependence of the implied variables by means of copulas. This paper reviews another method, which poses the calculation of the bounds of the probability of failure as a reliability-based-design-optimization problem. It is proved theoretically and by means of numerical experiments, that the latter method provides tighter bounds on the probability of failure than those estimated by random set theory. We also theoretically show some interesting relationships between the random set-based method and the optimization approach.</description><subject>Boxes</subject><subject>Dempster-Shafer evidence theory</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Distribution functions</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Imprecise probabilities</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Probability distribution</subject><subject>Probability of failure</subject><subject>Random sets</subject><subject>Set theory</subject><subject>Stochastic subset optimization</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Upper and lower probabilities</subject><issn>0045-7949</issn><issn>1879-2243</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwDVhineBxHCdZVhUvCYlNu7YcP6ijNi52Uil_j0MRWzYzi7n3zsxB6B5IDgT4Y5crfzjGIYwqpwSqnLCcEH6BFlBXTUYpKy7RghBWZlXDmmt0E2NHkoIRskDbjfvcDSbg1o-9jtj3eNgZfAy-la3bu2HC3mIr3X4MJo3kPPfxR3Fy2mjcTjjIXvsDjmaYzT5Mt-jKyn00d799ibbPT5v1a_b-8fK2Xr1nqmDFkIEBTizQwlIoOOiyaSnjsmq50qlYKKWGumRWt5WkIKtCNVATXjJGTZ0ilujhnJuu-RpNHETnx9CnlQKaogbGOadJVZ1VKvgYg7HiGNxBhkkAETND0Yk_hmJmKAgTiVByrs5Ok544ORNEVM70ymgXjBqE9u7fjG_E-H77</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Alvarez, Diego A.</creator><creator>Hurtado, Jorge E.</creator><creator>Ramírez, Juliana</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Tighter bounds on the probability of failure than those provided by random set theory</title><author>Alvarez, Diego A. ; Hurtado, Jorge E. ; Ramírez, Juliana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1e160f123f21361d59b246a7b6cd7b6f15ad1854fdb7a21a73c918065442e8343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Boxes</topic><topic>Dempster-Shafer evidence theory</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Distribution functions</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Imprecise probabilities</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Probability distribution</topic><topic>Probability of failure</topic><topic>Random sets</topic><topic>Set theory</topic><topic>Stochastic subset optimization</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Upper and lower probabilities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, Diego A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurtado, Jorge E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez, Juliana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computers &amp; structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alvarez, Diego A.</au><au>Hurtado, Jorge E.</au><au>Ramírez, Juliana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tighter bounds on the probability of failure than those provided by random set theory</atitle><jtitle>Computers &amp; structures</jtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>189</volume><spage>101</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>101-113</pages><issn>0045-7949</issn><eissn>1879-2243</eissn><abstract>•The bounds provided by random set theory are wider than necessary.•The bounds provided by the measurable selections in the random set are narrower.•Condition are given when both methods provide the same bounds on the probability.•Numerical examples illustrate the discussion. Random set theory is a generalization of Dempster-Shafer evidence theory, that employs an infinite number of focal elements. It can be used for the estimation of the bounds of the probability of failure of structural systems when there is both aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in the representation of the input variables. Indeed, this framework allows to model basic variables as cumulative distribution functions, distribution-free probability boxes, possibility distributions or families of intervals provided by experts, while representing the dependence of the implied variables by means of copulas. This paper reviews another method, which poses the calculation of the bounds of the probability of failure as a reliability-based-design-optimization problem. It is proved theoretically and by means of numerical experiments, that the latter method provides tighter bounds on the probability of failure than those estimated by random set theory. We also theoretically show some interesting relationships between the random set-based method and the optimization approach.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.04.006</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-7949
ispartof Computers & structures, 2017-09, Vol.189, p.101-113
issn 0045-7949
1879-2243
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1938146662
source Elsevier
subjects Boxes
Dempster-Shafer evidence theory
Design optimization
Distribution functions
Failure
Imprecise probabilities
Mathematical models
Monte Carlo simulation
Multivariate analysis
Numerical analysis
Probability distribution
Probability of failure
Random sets
Set theory
Stochastic subset optimization
Studies
Upper and lower probabilities
title Tighter bounds on the probability of failure than those provided by random set theory
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T00%3A09%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tighter%20bounds%20on%20the%20probability%20of%20failure%20than%20those%20provided%20by%20random%20set%20theory&rft.jtitle=Computers%20&%20structures&rft.au=Alvarez,%20Diego%20A.&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=189&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=101-113&rft.issn=0045-7949&rft.eissn=1879-2243&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.04.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1938146662%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-1e160f123f21361d59b246a7b6cd7b6f15ad1854fdb7a21a73c918065442e8343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1938146662&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true